If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On 30.06.20 6:00, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On 30 Jun 2020, Sjouke Burry wrote
(in ) : On 30.06.20 6:00, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote: You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. I just filter out all HTML |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:29:08 -0700, John C. wrote:
To the people in the other groups (alt.comp.os.windows-10 and rec.photo.digital) my apologies. I had my crosspost filter turned off temporarily and forgot to turn it back on. For the permanent Usenet record to preserve... the facts. o My strategy to combat worthless pieces of **** like Corliss clearly is, is simply to publicly point to _exactly_ what people like Corliss write. If Corliss isn't at all embarrassed by what he wrote, then he should be. When these well-known worthless pieces of **** like John Corliss troll _other_ threads, I follow the rule to completely ignore them and not feed them, as they have never in their entire lives added _any_ value to any thread on Usenet in this newsgroup. However, when these worthless pieces of **** like John Corliss infest a thread where we're trying to accomplish something useful, and in this case, using brand new freeware tools, then I'm simply going to point out that John Corliss (and his many socks, e.g., his "Corvid" sock) write. Fact is, there is no good way to deal with trolls like John Corliss o Corliss will likely continue to prove he's a worthless piece of ****. It's what worthless pieces of **** like John Corless clearly is... do. When he does, on a thread where we're trying to accomplish something... o Then I'm simply going to point to EXACTLY what John Corliss writes... I do this so that these worthless pieces of **** infest other threads. o So we can get back to getting something done on _this_ thread. -- The worthless pieces of **** like Corliss always prove what they are. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 10:47:55, Wolffan wrote:
On 30 Jun 2020, Sjouke Burry wrote (in ) : On 30.06.20 6:00, 0 You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. I just filter out all HTML But you still post something that my old newsreader says is "text with undisplayable characters: utf-8", where there's no need for them (-: -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "We're plumbing shallows we didn't know existed here" - Jeremy Paxman (as quizmaster of "University Challenge"), 1998 (when losing team suddenly put on a spurt by showing knowledge of things like the Eurovision Song Contest ...) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Recuva
Arlen Holder wrote in
: Let us not forget Recuva https://www.portablefreeware.com/index.php?id=1139 Recuva helps recover files that have been accidentally deleted from your computer. This includes files emptied from the Recycle bin as well as images and other files that have been deleted by user error from digital camera memory cards or MP3 players. The program has a friendly "wizard"-style set up for finding documents by type (pictures, documents etc.) or an advanced mode to search manually through all deleted files. On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 07:30:31 +1000, Peter Jason wrote: Does this have to be downloaded? I tried but I got repeated shopping screens & nothing has appeared in the Download folder. How is this to be downloaded? Hi Peter Jason, This is breaking news, so we'll be learning more soon, I'm sure. o Where this article says it's hard to find, but they show how to find it: o *Microsoft adds WINFR file undeletion tool to the Microsoft Store* https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020...infr-file-unde letion-tool-to-the-microsoft-store/ "Although it isn't yet built into Windows, Microsoft has finally released its own file undelete tool - it's called Windows File Recovery, and it works with the newest builds of Windows (variously known as 20H1, 2004, and 19041)." Specifically, they mention how difficult it is to find by normal methods: "the tool certainly could be easier to find. When we looked for Windows File Recovery by name on Bing, in a freshly installed Windows 10 2004 VM, we got buried under pages of ads for other things. Moving onto the Microsoft Store, the experience was no better - when searching for its exact name, we couldn't find the Windows File Recovery tool until we'd filtered our results first to Apps only, then to Tools & Utilities only. Once we'd finally found the tool and verified that we met the system requirements, installation was a click away." Given the huge Windows market share, this brand new capability could be a big deal to anyone who ever lost a photo (which is pretty much almost everyone) who then had to use freeware on Windows, or on a USB drive, or a flash card, etc. to recover lost videos, photos, screenshots, etc. In fact, almost the _entire_ article cited above discusses how to recover lost digital image files, which all of us (almost) have needed in the past. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 10:47:55, Wolffan wrote: On 30 Jun 2020, Sjouke Burry wrote (in ) : On 30.06.20 6:00, 0 You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. I just filter out all HTML But you still post something that my old newsreader says is "text with undisplayable characters: utf-8", where there's no need for them (-: That's probably because Good Guy posts his crap in utf-8, so Sjouke and Wolffan just inherit it. N.B. Your newsreader stripped the 'Good Guy wrote:' part from the attribution line, probably also because of utf-8. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On 30 Jun 2020, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote
(in article ): On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 10:47:55, wrote: On 30 Jun 2020, Sjouke Burry wrote (in ) : On 30.06.20 6:00, 0 You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. I just filter out all HTML But you still post something that my old newsreader says is "text with undisplayable characters: utf-8", where there's no need for them (-: I use UTF-8 because I quite often _do_ need to display characters not in the basic ASCII character set. I also quite often read posts containing such characters. My newsreader was able to read/write UTF-8 from at least version 2; it is currently at 5.24. One of the reasons I selected it back when it was at v2 was that it could read/write UTF-8 (and that it did threading properly), and, yes, I post using a format I deliberately went looking for and paid for, as the Hog is _not_ a free newsreader. I don’t do HTML in places not required, such as email and USENET. I do do UTF-8 where non-ASCII can be encountered, which includes email and USENET. For one thing, many non-English names are properly spelled with accents, umlauts, and what-not, and in reaction to my known poor spelling and typo-proneness I make an effort to at least get people’s names right. ASCII can’t do that. UTF-8 can. Those who dislike UTF-8, for whatever reason, can simply filter it out, the way that I filter out HTML in email and USENET. Or not. I don’t care either way. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 13:59:22, Wolffan wrote:
On 30 Jun 2020, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote (in article ): On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 10:47:55, wrote: On 30 Jun 2020, Sjouke Burry wrote (in ) : On 30.06.20 6:00, 0 You are not authorised to read my posts in plain text. cut You are not authorised to terrorise the internet. I just filter out all HTML But you still post something that my old newsreader says is "text with undisplayable characters: utf-8", where there's no need for them (-: I use UTF-8 because I quite often _do_ need to display characters not in the basic ASCII character set. I also quite often read posts containing such characters. My newsreader was able to read/write UTF-8 from at least version 2; it is currently at 5.24. One of the reasons I selected it back when it was at v2 was that it could read/write UTF-8 (and that it did threading properly), and, yes, I post using a format I deliberately went looking for and paid for, as the Hog is _not_ a free newsreader. I don’t do HTML in places not required, such as email and USENET. I do do UTF-8 where non-ASCII can be encountered, which includes email and USENET. For one thing, many non-English names are properly spelled with accents, umlauts, and what-not, and in reaction to my known poor spelling and typo-proneness I make an effort to at least get people’s names right. ASCII can’t do that. UTF-8 can. Those who dislike UTF-8, for whatever reason, can simply filter it out, the way that I filter out HTML in email and USENET. Or not. I don’t care either way. It wasn't that I dislike it, it was that you (via your software) declared UTF-8 a post that contained no UTF-8. But no matter (-: -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf She didn't strike me as much of a reader. It's never a good sign if someone has a leaflet with a bookmark in it. - Sarah Millican in Rdio Times, 17-23 November 2012 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft's new free Windows File Recovery command-line tool retrieves deleted files
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 05:00:27, =?UTF-8?B?8J+YiSBHb29kIEd1eSDwn5iJ?=
wrote: [] I suggest it's better to try first before rejecting a product just because it's from Microsoft. Some of you hate Microsoft and without knowing anything about the product, you all jump into giving opinions about it. It's, in my opinion, very stupid thing to do. There are "It's from Microsoft so can't be good." Agreed, not bright. [] With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows. "It's the latest thing from Microsoft, so must be wonderful." Also not very bright. "People love it." Not true: (most) people have no choice. (And I think 1.2 billion might be more than there are people on the planet with regular access to electricity, let alone able to afford anything that runs any version of Windows.) HTML Enabled NewsReader Required html { box-sizing: border-box; } *, *:before, *:after { box-sizing: inherit; } a { /* text-decoration: none; */ color: inherit; color: blue; } p { text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-word; } body { margin: 0; padding: 0; background-color: #183016; font-family: 'Open Sans', 'sans-serif'; display: grid; align-items: center; justify-items: center; } .container-grid { width: 60vw; display: grid; grid-template-columns: 1fr 4fr; grid-template-rows: minmax(100px, auto) 1fr minmax(100px, auto); grid-gap: 10px; min-height: 100vh; box-sizing: border-box; } .container-grid* { background-color: #f3dec8; color: #b63100; padding: 20px; font-size: 125%; border-radius: 5px; } .header { grid-column: 1 / -1; grid-row: 1; /* background-image: url('https://i.imgur.com/hgVHWAN.png'); */ background-image: url('https://i.imgur.com/A6uUHFt.png'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 60vw; } .content { grid-column: 1 / -1; grid-row: 2; } .sidebar { grid-column: 1; grid-row: 2; } .footer { grid-column: 1 / -1; grid-row: 3; font-size: 90%; background-color: blue; color: yellow; font-weight: bolder; background-image: url('https://i.imgur.com/t0D3LZV.png'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-size: 60vw; } .header, .footer { display: grid; align-items: center; justify-items: center; border-radius: 5px; } Garbage left in place (-: -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf She didn't strike me as much of a reader. It's never a good sign if someone has a leaflet with a bookmark in it. - Sarah Millican in Rdio Times, 17-23 November 2012 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|