A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 7 » Windows 7 Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Win32 or Win64



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old May 13th 10, 10:15 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Jackie[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default Win32 or Win64

On 5/13/2010 22:35, johnbee wrote:

Just for information: I do not do much word processing, but my wife
does. This is the first PC I have had with Office on it, and I am not
much impressed, neither is Pat, and we would far rather install our old
Lotus Wordpro. Trouble is, it won't work under Windows 7. No doubt the
Microsoft screw everybody else's software it is our Operating System
policy. They have cut some fonts as well, though they don't cost a lot
each.


Have you tried to install and/or run it with Windows Vista or XP
compatibility mode? You can do it like this:
Right-click on it, choose Properties-Compatibility and there you have
the option.

If you have Windows 7 Professional, Ultimate or Enterprise, you can
download and install "Windows XP Mode". This allows you to run older
applications that does not run on Windows 7, via Virtual PC, but right
on your desktop.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/w...indows-xp-mode
Ads
  #62  
Old May 13th 10, 10:54 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Bill[_38_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Win32 or Win64


"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news
Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB systems!
: )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2


I had to cheat. I never used CP/M. : )

Bill


  #63  
Old May 13th 10, 11:05 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Seth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Win32 or Win64

"Bill" wrote in message
...

"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news
Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting
reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB systems!
: )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2


I had to cheat. I never used CP/M. : )



IIRC, "pip" was essentially the copy command in CP/M. So in following the
above command, it would appear it would concatenate 2 files in a 3rd new
file (new file is both old files combined).

The part I can't remember is the a: and b:. Was that used back then to
identify floppy drives? Or am I mixing up a DOS convention that wasn't the
same?

If I'm right about that part, then amend my understanding of the command
line to this... Combine the 2 files that are on the a: drive to a new file
on the b: drive.


  #64  
Old May 13th 10, 11:56 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
Chris Sidener[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Win32 or Win64


"Seth" wrote in message
...
"Bill" wrote in message
...

"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news
Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting
reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB
systems! : )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2


I had to cheat. I never used CP/M. : )



IIRC, "pip" was essentially the copy command in CP/M. So in following the
above command, it would appear it would concatenate 2 files in a 3rd new
file (new file is both old files combined).

The part I can't remember is the a: and b:. Was that used back then to
identify floppy drives? Or am I mixing up a DOS convention that wasn't the
same?

If I'm right about that part, then amend my understanding of the command
line to this... Combine the 2 files that are on the a: drive to a new file
on the b: drive.



Yep. And I was using 8" single sided floppies...

Chris

  #65  
Old May 14th 10, 12:21 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Bill[_38_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Win32 or Win64


"Bill" wrote in message
...

"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news
Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting
reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB systems!
: )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2



What percentage of Windows users do you suppose have
never run ANY command from the command line?

I admit when Windows first came out, I was a ney-sayer--"surely
it wouldn't support the complex manipulations I needed to perform
fromt the command line"...once in a while, I miss some of my xedit
editing commands, but not too often!

Bill


  #67  
Old May 14th 10, 01:04 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Joe Morris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 289
Default Win32 or Win64

"Bill" wrote:

What percentage of Windows users do you suppose have
never run ANY command from the command line?


Perhaps the question could be asking how many users know that you *can* run
nontrivial commands from the command line? Or that there are some things
you can only do from the command line?

I've automated most of the Windows 7 build process at my POE using numerous
command-line scripts, plus a few PowerShell scripts and C# applications
where the CMD shell doesn't offer the needed function. I take some
(good-natured) ribbing for using the old tools, but my response is the same
as it's been for years: it does everything we need it to do.

M$ designed the "Server 2008 Core" configuration to operate exclusively from
the command line: there is no GUI support. One interesting statistic about
this is the number of security bulletins that list Server 2008 as an
affected system...but then note that Server Core is NOT affected.

I admit when Windows first came out, I was a ney-sayer--"surely
it wouldn't support the complex manipulations I needed to perform
fromt the command line"...once in a while, I miss some of my xedit
editing commands, but not too often!


If you miss the power of the XEDIT commands, buy a copy of Kevin Kearney's
KEDIT application that essentially ports the XEDIT interface to the PC
world, using REXX as its macro language. (If you're interested, buy it now.
Kevin has stated that he plans to market it only through the end of this
year, and support it for another year. I suspect that his potential
customer base - i.e., the old VM community - is either already a customer or
never will be.) The current version (1.6) runs on both 32-bit and 64-bit
Windows 7. www.kedit.com

I routinely use the old character-mode KEDIT for DOS program for quick text
edits. Like Quicken for DOS (which I still use to keep track of bank and
credit card accounts) it does what I want with a minimum of fuss.

Joe Morris


  #68  
Old May 14th 10, 01:07 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Seth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Win32 or Win64

"Dennis Pack" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"Bill" wrote in message
...

"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting
reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB
systems!
: )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2


I had to cheat. I never used CP/M. : )



IIRC, "pip" was essentially the copy command in CP/M. So in following
the
above command, it would appear it would concatenate 2 files in a 3rd new
file (new file is both old files combined).

The part I can't remember is the a: and b:. Was that used back then to
identify floppy drives? Or am I mixing up a DOS convention that wasn't
the
same?

If I'm right about that part, then amend my understanding of the command
line to this... Combine the 2 files that are on the a: drive to a new
file
on the b: drive.


Seth:
If my memory is correct the a drive was for the 3.5" floppy and
the b drive was for the 5.25" floppy. Have a great day.



CP/M pre-dates the 3.5". Heck, it pre-dates MS-DOS. My first "PC
compatible" machine was the first "PC Clone", the EaglePC and it was so
early the machine came with both MS-DOS and CP/M cause they didn't know
which OS was going to win the home/entry-level market.

When I installed a 3.5" into my Epson Equity I+ a few years later they had
only recently come out and everybody was like "you're wasting your money,
those things will never catch on".

"a" for 5.25 and "b" for 3.5 was only a "convention" that many people used
early on as the 5.25 was the standard storage medium and 3.5 was the new
drive they were migrating to.


  #69  
Old May 14th 10, 01:08 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Seth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Win32 or Win64

"Chris Sidener" wrote in message
...

"Seth" wrote in message
...
"Bill" wrote in message
...

"Kerry Brown" *a*m wrote in message
news Thank you for your help! Your post made for interesting
reading/thinking!
I don't run a "junked-up" computer either. Who needs these 1 TB
systems! : )
I was computing before there were "windows"!


So was I. Do you know what this does? pip b:new=ald1,ald2


I had to cheat. I never used CP/M. : )



IIRC, "pip" was essentially the copy command in CP/M. So in following
the above command, it would appear it would concatenate 2 files in a 3rd
new file (new file is both old files combined).

The part I can't remember is the a: and b:. Was that used back then to
identify floppy drives? Or am I mixing up a DOS convention that wasn't
the same?

If I'm right about that part, then amend my understanding of the command
line to this... Combine the 2 files that are on the a: drive to a new
file on the b: drive.


Yep. And I was using 8" single sided floppies...



Yeah, I ditched 8" when I got rid of my Altos multi-user CPU (Altos
processing box with 2 Hazelton dumb terminals).

  #71  
Old May 14th 10, 03:37 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Kerry Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 851
Default Win32 or Win64


What percentage of Windows users do you suppose have
never run ANY command from the command line?


The command line is making a big come back in Powershell. Probably not for
the casual user but definitely power users will want to be familiar with
Powershell. If you manage MS Server OS's it is now required.

--
Kerry Brown


  #72  
Old May 14th 10, 04:21 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
LouB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 227
Default Win32 or Win64

Kerry Brown wrote:

What percentage of Windows users do you suppose have
never run ANY command from the command line?


The command line is making a big come back in Powershell. Probably not
for the casual user but definitely power users will want to be familiar
with Powershell. If you manage MS Server OS's it is now required.

PowerShell = ??

http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&so...8&q=powershell
  #73  
Old May 14th 10, 04:31 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Ken Blake[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Win32 or Win64

On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:39:17 -0400, Dennis Pack
wrote:


If my memory is correct the a drive was for the 3.5" floppy and
the b drive was for the 5.25" floppy. Have a great day.




No.

A: and B: have always been for floppies, regardless of size. In their
earliest days, PCs only had 5.25" floppy drives and both A: and B:
were used for them.

After the 3.5" floppy drives became common, you could still have one
floppy drive or two floppy drives. If you had one floppy drive, it
would be A: and could be either 5.25" or 3.5". If you had two floppy
drives, they could both be either 3.5" or 5.25". Or there could be one
of each, with either the 5.25" or 3.5" using A: and the other size
using B:
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
  #74  
Old May 14th 10, 04:46 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Seth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Win32 or Win64

"LouB" wrote in message
...
Kerry Brown wrote:

What percentage of Windows users do you suppose have
never run ANY command from the command line?


The command line is making a big come back in Powershell. Probably not
for the casual user but definitely power users will want to be familiar
with Powershell. If you manage MS Server OS's it is now required.

PowerShell = ??

http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&so...8&q=powershell



He's talking about this one...
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/s...owershell.aspx

  #75  
Old May 14th 10, 06:11 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
Kerry Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 851
Default Win32 or Win64


PowerShell = ??


All Programs = Accessories = Windows PowerShell

--
Kerry Brown

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.