If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On 16/01/2016 22:53, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:43:05 -0000, edevils wrote: On 16/01/2016 20:39, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:31:43 -0000, edevils wrote: On 16/01/2016 18:14, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:06:39 -0000, Paul wrote: Fritz Wuehler wrote: So, free Windows is just like Linux now. A lot of code and promising crap that never gets fixed or developed further. Most of the time, we end up not understanding why they're changing things. If the objective was to in an obvious way, "make Win10 better and better", I might have a more positive attitude to the rolling release idea and what they're actually doing to it. For example, the desktop version uses Windows Update. The latest builds added Update Orchestrator, which sits above Windows Update, a piece of software used on the Enterprise edition. Do consumers need Update Orchestrator ? No. Did the policies in the OS change, because of the presence of Update Orchestrator ? Yes. Is the overall change an improvement for consumers ? No. The desktop version is being used as a testbed, and for ideas that may have no positive impact on the consumer version itself. And that's not really the intention of the rolling release idea. It's an abuse of rolling release. Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. It works for me too, but the fact that it is being used as a testbed, like Paul put it, combined with the nearly "unstoppable" automatic updates, makes me a bit unconfortable. I mean, a new feature update could break it any time, could it not? I don't feel like I'm using a Beta version. It's more reliable than previous models. I am not having problems either. But we don't know what issues a new feature may or may not cause in the future. The difference between Windows 10 and previous windows versions is that Windows 10 automatically updates itself with new features. And with previous versions, most of us did this anyway. There is a huge difference though. You didn't upgrade to a new Windows version in the middle of a working day. You knew that something *might* sometimes go wrong. So, you took the jump to the new features only if and when you wanted to. And we didn't know about problems until AFTER the update. Exactly my point. Now, for you and me, Windows 10 works like a charm, but we'll find out about problems (or, hopefully, not) AFTER the updates. Oh, except there weren't any problems. So what is it you're worrying about again? Most times there weren't any problems, but sometimes there were, and you had to find a fix. That was OK, anyhow, because you did *not* try and upgrade Windows while you were working at your computer. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:17:39 -0000, edevils wrote:
On 16/01/2016 22:53, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 21:43:05 -0000, edevils wrote: On 16/01/2016 20:39, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:31:43 -0000, edevils wrote: On 16/01/2016 18:14, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:06:39 -0000, Paul wrote: Fritz Wuehler wrote: So, free Windows is just like Linux now. A lot of code and promising crap that never gets fixed or developed further. Most of the time, we end up not understanding why they're changing things. If the objective was to in an obvious way, "make Win10 better and better", I might have a more positive attitude to the rolling release idea and what they're actually doing to it. For example, the desktop version uses Windows Update. The latest builds added Update Orchestrator, which sits above Windows Update, a piece of software used on the Enterprise edition. Do consumers need Update Orchestrator ? No. Did the policies in the OS change, because of the presence of Update Orchestrator ? Yes. Is the overall change an improvement for consumers ? No. The desktop version is being used as a testbed, and for ideas that may have no positive impact on the consumer version itself. And that's not really the intention of the rolling release idea. It's an abuse of rolling release. Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. It works for me too, but the fact that it is being used as a testbed, like Paul put it, combined with the nearly "unstoppable" automatic updates, makes me a bit unconfortable. I mean, a new feature update could break it any time, could it not? I don't feel like I'm using a Beta version. It's more reliable than previous models. I am not having problems either. But we don't know what issues a new feature may or may not cause in the future. The difference between Windows 10 and previous windows versions is that Windows 10 automatically updates itself with new features. And with previous versions, most of us did this anyway. There is a huge difference though. You didn't upgrade to a new Windows version in the middle of a working day. You knew that something *might* sometimes go wrong. So, you took the jump to the new features only if and when you wanted to. Er.... I still do that now. I don't even know updates are available until I press start to engage sleep, and notice "install updates and restart" as an option. And we didn't know about problems until AFTER the update. Exactly my point. Now, for you and me, Windows 10 works like a charm, but we'll find out about problems (or, hopefully, not) AFTER the updates. And that's exactly what happened to us with previous Windows, so what's the change? Oh, except there weren't any problems. So what is it you're worrying about again? Most times there weren't any problems, but sometimes there were, and you had to find a fix. What times? I've NEVER had a problem with an update. That was OK, anyhow, because you did *not* try and upgrade Windows while you were working at your computer. And I still don't. Why are you doing so? -- People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On 16/01/2016 22:47, Jake wrote:
"edevils" wrote in message ... On 16/01/2016 18:14, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:06:39 -0000, Paul wrote: Fritz Wuehler wrote: So, free Windows is just like Linux now. A lot of code and promising crap that never gets fixed or developed further. Most of the time, we end up not understanding why they're changing things. If the objective was to in an obvious way, "make Win10 better and better", I might have a more positive attitude to the rolling release idea and what they're actually doing to it. For example, the desktop version uses Windows Update. The latest builds added Update Orchestrator, which sits above Windows Update, a piece of software used on the Enterprise edition. Do consumers need Update Orchestrator ? No. Did the policies in the OS change, because of the presence of Update Orchestrator ? Yes. Is the overall change an improvement for consumers ? No. The desktop version is being used as a testbed, and for ideas that may have no positive impact on the consumer version itself. And that's not really the intention of the rolling release idea. It's an abuse of rolling release. Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. It works for me too, but the fact that it is being used as a testbed, like Paul put it, combined with the nearly "unstoppable" automatic updates, makes me a bit unconfortable. I mean, a new feature update could break it any time, could it not? I've allowed MS to update my machines automatically for years without an issue. Same here. But automatic updates did not include new features, usually, in previous Windows versions. However, a Win 10 update a few weeks ago did change some of my settings. But no problems since then. But since we have no choice, lets see how it plays out. However, Windows 10 *Professional* allows you to defer risky feature upgrades, while still receiving security patches as soon as they are released. That's why I deem Pro safer than Home. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:25:12 -0000, edevils wrote:
On 16/01/2016 22:47, Jake wrote: "edevils" wrote in message ... On 16/01/2016 18:14, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:06:39 -0000, Paul wrote: Fritz Wuehler wrote: So, free Windows is just like Linux now. A lot of code and promising crap that never gets fixed or developed further. Most of the time, we end up not understanding why they're changing things. If the objective was to in an obvious way, "make Win10 better and better", I might have a more positive attitude to the rolling release idea and what they're actually doing to it. For example, the desktop version uses Windows Update. The latest builds added Update Orchestrator, which sits above Windows Update, a piece of software used on the Enterprise edition. Do consumers need Update Orchestrator ? No. Did the policies in the OS change, because of the presence of Update Orchestrator ? Yes. Is the overall change an improvement for consumers ? No. The desktop version is being used as a testbed, and for ideas that may have no positive impact on the consumer version itself. And that's not really the intention of the rolling release idea. It's an abuse of rolling release. Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. It works for me too, but the fact that it is being used as a testbed, like Paul put it, combined with the nearly "unstoppable" automatic updates, makes me a bit unconfortable. I mean, a new feature update could break it any time, could it not? I've allowed MS to update my machines automatically for years without an issue. Same here. But automatic updates did not include new features, usually, in previous Windows versions. Why would that increase the chances of a monumental ****up? However, a Win 10 update a few weeks ago did change some of my settings. But no problems since then. But since we have no choice, lets see how it plays out. However, Windows 10 *Professional* allows you to defer risky feature upgrades, while still receiving security patches as soon as they are released. That's why I deem Pro safer than Home. Why would anyone have less than the full version? -- I dialled one of those 900 numbers to get some financial advice. They advised me not to dial 900 numbers. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. -- Caver1 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:13:10 -0000, Caver1 wrote:
On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. So, you're driving a Lada about, and I give you a free Ferrari and take your Lada away. Would you complain? And look at it from their point of view. Why should they expend more effort and expense looking after more than one OS just for the luddites? -- In 1272, the Arabic Muslims invented the condom, using a goat's lower intestine. In 1873, the British refined the idea by taking the intestine out of the goat first. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day
"Mr Macaw" wrote in news
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:13:10 -0000, Caver1 wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. So, you're driving a Lada about, and I give you a free Ferrari LOL |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day
edevils wrote:
There is a huge difference though. You didn't upgrade to a new Windows version in the middle of a working day. You knew that something *might* sometimes go wrong. So, you took the jump to the new features only if and when you wanted to. If it isn't broke, don't fix it. There have been only rare times when I actually needed to update Windows, at least since Windows XP |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day
"Mr Macaw" wrote:
edevils wrote: Most times there weren't any problems, but sometimes there were, and you had to find a fix. What times? I've NEVER had a problem with an update. That's because you are clueless twit who hardly uses a computer. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:10 -0500
Caver1 wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. I'm sure Microsoft has a reason for that attitude. I think Microsoft is giving it away free for two reasons, and both are money. One is money from the users, because Windows will become a service that you have to pay for just like your phone bill, and the other is money from the government for the information it collects about its customers. Windows 10 convinced me to stop using any Microsoft products, and I have removed Windows from all my computers. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:52:44 -0000, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:10 -0500 Caver1 wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. I'm sure Microsoft has a reason for that attitude. I think Microsoft is giving it away free for two reasons, and both are money. One is money from the users, because Windows will become a service that you have to pay for just like your phone bill, and the other is money from the government for the information it collects about its customers. Windows 10 convinced me to stop using any Microsoft products, and I have removed Windows from all my computers. What a ridiculous overreaction. I continue to use Windows because: It's what I'm used to. It's got a better interface than other OSs. It's what most people use, which means more programs available and it's the assumed default when anything needs fixing etc. Oh and it's now free! -- Dancing cheektocheek is really a form of floor play. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day
If Windows 10 were in fact "free" Microsoft wouldn't be trying to force
it on everyone. This regular troll is too clueless to know that software claiming to be "free" is in fact not free if it is a waste of time, especially when the beta version is being forced on users. -- "Mr Macaw" no spam.com wrote in newsp.ybcv8dzd86ebyl red.lan: Path: eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!xmission!news.alt.net From: "Mr Macaw" no spam.com Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.privacy.anon-server Subject: 'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:13:15 -0000 Organization: . Lines: 59 Message-ID: op.ybcv8dzd86ebyl red.lan References: d688a41c55708cf719bd3857f7edab73 remailer.org.uk c9cb51b04769047aa120e415e4490172 hoi-polloi.org n7c7ts$tdn$1 dont-email.me n7cdoc$ako$1 dont-email.me 6159e4740342775ebe8364dc5f56554d msgid.frell.theremailer.net n7dt5q$rkk$1 dont-email.me op.ybcct0lt86ebyl red.lan n7dv1l$3k4$1 dont-email.me op.ybcer3cc86ebyl red.lan n7e54v$s4q$1 dont-email.me op.ybcjizpi86ebyl red.lan n7eil1$jab$1 dont-email.me 20160116175244.70acb8b9 johnnyspc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) Xref: mx02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.freewa258205 alt.comp.os.windows-10:14379 alt.privacy.anon-server:47546 On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:52:44 -0000, Johnny johnny invalid.net wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:10 -0500 Caver1 caver1 inthemud.org wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip me privacy.net wrote: "Mr Macaw" no spam.com wrote in message newsp.ybcer3cc86ebyl red.lan... On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul nospam needed.com wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. I'm sure Microsoft has a reason for that attitude. I think Microsoft is giving it away free for two reasons, and both are money. One is money from the users, because Windows will become a service that you have to pay for just like your phone bill, and the other is money from the government for the information it collects about its customers. Windows 10 convinced me to stop using any Microsoft products, and I have removed Windows from all my computers. What a ridiculous overreaction. I continue to use Windows because: It's what I'm used to. It's got a better interface than other OSs. It's what most people use, which means more programs available and it's the assumed default when anything needs fixing etc. Oh and it's now free! -- Dancing cheektocheek is really a form of floor play. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On 2016-01-16 6:52 PM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:10 -0500 Caver1 wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. I'm sure Microsoft has a reason for that attitude. I think Microsoft is giving it away free for two reasons, and both are money. One is money from the users, because Windows will become a service that you have to pay for just like your phone bill, and the other is money from the government for the information it collects about its customers. Windows 10 convinced me to stop using any Microsoft products, and I have removed Windows from all my computers. I don't believe that Windows 10 will be a service that you pay for. Everyone is assuming that will happen but so far, not one soul has any evidence of that happening anytime soon. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter "Everything seems to work fine, except that occasionally everything freezes." - Another one of GNU/Linux's many victims |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 Users Twice a Day
"Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:25:12 -0000, edevils wrote: On 16/01/2016 22:47, Jake wrote: "edevils" wrote in message ... On 16/01/2016 18:14, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:06:39 -0000, Paul wrote: Fritz Wuehler wrote: So, free Windows is just like Linux now. A lot of code and promising crap that never gets fixed or developed further. Most of the time, we end up not understanding why they're changing things. If the objective was to in an obvious way, "make Win10 better and better", I might have a more positive attitude to the rolling release idea and what they're actually doing to it. For example, the desktop version uses Windows Update. The latest builds added Update Orchestrator, which sits above Windows Update, a piece of software used on the Enterprise edition. Do consumers need Update Orchestrator ? No. Did the policies in the OS change, because of the presence of Update Orchestrator ? Yes. Is the overall change an improvement for consumers ? No. The desktop version is being used as a testbed, and for ideas that may have no positive impact on the consumer version itself. And that's not really the intention of the rolling release idea. It's an abuse of rolling release. Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. It works for me too, but the fact that it is being used as a testbed, like Paul put it, combined with the nearly "unstoppable" automatic updates, makes me a bit unconfortable. I mean, a new feature update could break it any time, could it not? I've allowed MS to update my machines automatically for years without an issue. Same here. But automatic updates did not include new features, usually, in previous Windows versions. Why would that increase the chances of a monumental ****up? However, a Win 10 update a few weeks ago did change some of my settings. But no problems since then. But since we have no choice, lets see how it plays out. However, Windows 10 *Professional* allows you to defer risky feature upgrades, while still receiving security patches as soon as they are released. That's why I deem Pro safer than Home. Why would anyone have less than the full version? Now that is an interesting question. I've got what the machine came with. Since it's "free", I'm wondering if I can upgrade free? I'm going to sniff around. I'll keep you posted. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
'Get Windows 10' Turns Itself On and Nags Win 7 and 8.1 UsersTwice a Day
On 2016-01-16 7:13 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 23:52:44 -0000, Johnny wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 18:13:10 -0500 Caver1 wrote: On 01/16/2016 02:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote: On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 19:23:03 -0000, Thip wrote: "Mr Macaw" wrote in message news On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 17:38:35 -0000, Paul wrote: Mr Macaw wrote: Yawn..... it works for me, it's the nicest OS I've ever used. And it's not gone wrong once. Yes, I can see your carefully reasoned argument. It's my experience. Windows doesn't annoy me at all. The only thing M$ ever did that irritated me was Metro in Windows 8, which made me use classic shell. Apart from that, M$ have done nothing but improve Windows. What irritates me is that MS is trying to ram 10 down my throat. That's my decision, not theirs. You don't need to have the decision to use the second best Windows. And for ****'s sake it's FREE! It's unbelievable that Microsoft are for once GIVING STUFF AWAY then people STILL bloody complain about it. For crying out loud, get a life! It's not that it's being given free it's because they are trying to force everyone to upgrade when there is no reason for this attitude. I'm sure Microsoft has a reason for that attitude. I think Microsoft is giving it away free for two reasons, and both are money. One is money from the users, because Windows will become a service that you have to pay for just like your phone bill, and the other is money from the government for the information it collects about its customers. Windows 10 convinced me to stop using any Microsoft products, and I have removed Windows from all my computers. What a ridiculous overreaction. I continue to use Windows because: It's what I'm used to. It's got a better interface than other OSs. It's what most people use, which means more programs available and it's the assumed default when anything needs fixing etc. Oh and it's now free! Everyone is expecting the absolute worst from Windows 10 going forward and people seem to be forgetting that Microsoft is AWARE that many people buy computers and can't/won't afford to pay a monthly fee to use the operating system. It is incredibly unlikely that they'll turn the OS into a service and charge for it, especially since they already seem to be making money from it through the (anonymous) data they acquire from the users. It's what Google has done and it works for them so there's no reason to believe that Microsoft won't do the same thing. Everyone points to Office 365 but it's inconsequential as that suite is not monitored (anonymously) in the same manner that Windows is. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter "Everything seems to work fine, except that occasionally everything freezes." - Another one of GNU/Linux's many victims |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|