If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about character generation using ALT+numpad keys
I've read the Microsoft site's Glossary page:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964658.aspx It describe three ways of entering character codes: Quote:
the raw character byte code, which is identical to the code stored in memory/disk. The second method's character code refers to the ANSI character-set code. And the third method's character code refers to the Unicode character-set code. Both character codes of the second and third methods may not be identical to the raw character data stored in memory/disk. However, it seems that the third method never work. I've tested this on Notepad - trying to generate the "Æ’" which is U+0192 (decimal 402); Western-ANSI=0x83 (decimal 159); OEM=0x9F (decimal 131). Method #1 (OEM) works: ALT+159. Method #2 (ANSI) works: ALT+0131. But method #3 (Unicode) doesn't work: ALT+++402. Did I use method #3 incorrectly? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about character generation using ALT+numpad keys
JJ on Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:38:44 +0700 typed in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general the following: I've read the Microsoft site's Glossary page: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964658.aspx It describe three ways of entering character codes: Quote:
What I can conclude is that on first method, the character code refers to the raw character byte code, which is identical to the code stored in memory/disk. The second method's character code refers to the ANSI character-set code. And the third method's character code refers to the Unicode character-set code. Both character codes of the second and third methods may not be identical to the raw character data stored in memory/disk. However, it seems that the third method never work. I've tested this on Notepad - trying to generate the "ƒ" which is U+0192 (decimal 402); Western-ANSI=0x83 (decimal 159); OEM=0x9F (decimal 131). Method #1 (OEM) works: ALT+159. Method #2 (ANSI) works: ALT+0131. But method #3 (Unicode) doesn't work: ALT+++402. Did I use method #3 incorrectly? Æ ƒ Hmmm - it may be that your software doesn't do allow it. Ive a list of "alt+" special characters which do not work in WordPerfect. -- pyotr filipivich Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about character generation using ALT+numpad keys
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:24:17 -0800, pyotr filipivich wrote:
Hmmm - it may be that your software doesn't do allow it. I've already tested it on Notepad. FYI, Notepad's multi-line edit control is the least custom keyboard shortcuts polluted than Wordpad. The edit controls on Notepad's Find/Replace dialogs are the clean ones since pressing F5 won't generate the current date & time, and even in those edit controls method #3 doesn't work. Ive a list of "alt+" special characters which do not work in WordPerfect. I do notice that although I'm not sure we're referring to the same collection of characters. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about character generation using ALT+numpad keys
JJ on Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:40:21 +0700 typed in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general the following: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:24:17 -0800, pyotr filipivich wrote: Hmmm - it may be that your software doesn't do allow it. I've already tested it on Notepad. FYI, Notepad's multi-line edit control is the least custom keyboard shortcuts polluted than Wordpad. The edit controls on Notepad's Find/Replace dialogs are the clean ones since pressing F5 won't generate the current date & time, and even in those edit controls method #3 doesn't work. Ive a list of "alt+" special characters which do not work in WordPerfect. I do notice that although I'm not sure we're referring to the same collection of characters. Who knows? I suspect it is a software issue, and I wasn't inclined to go dig it out and look. (WP has its own means to insert Special Characters, which can be a blast in its own right.) To use an old expression "I don't have a wombat in this zoo" so it doesn't matter, to me. -- pyotr filipivich Next month's Panel: Graft - Boon or blessing? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about character generation using ALT+numpad keys
[]
JJ on Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:38:44 +0700 typed in microsoft.public.windowsxp.general the following: I've read the Microsoft site's Glossary page: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964658.aspx It describe three ways of entering character codes: [quote] Alt+Numpad: A method of entering characters by typing in the character’s decimal code with the Numeric Pad keys (Num Lock turned on). In Windows: [] Prompted into it by having a netbook whose keyboard doesn't _have_ a numeric keypad (like most such, you can get one using the 7890uiopjkl;m/ - or similar - keys, but using the Alt+ method of entering characters that way is one way to madness), I've looked for alternatives. The best one I've found so far is allchars - http://allchars.zwolnet.com/; unlike many other prog.s, it doesn't involve _simultaneous_ keypresses, which means it's _unlikely_ to interfere with the shortcuts used by other software. You tap _and release_ the Ctrl key, followed by a couple of keys relating to the character you want. Although I prided myself (sad) on knowing the Alt+numeric codes for various characters I use a lot (such as ±, ×, μ, degrees, ...), I've actually found the AllChars sequences easier to remember for more characters, so tend to use them more (they're actually fewer keypresses anyway): they've designed them well, IMO - for example: ctrl then + then - generates ± ctrl then x then x generates × ctrl then ' then e generates é ctrl then " then o generates ö and many others. (If those don't display OK as you're reading this post, I think you can guess what they generate.) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "The people here are more educated and intelligent. Even stupid people in Britain are smarter than Americans." Madonna, in RT 30 June-6July 2001 (page 32) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|