Microsoft Gestapo

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:


"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* conversation?


--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.

--
Alias

Alias wrote:
AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.

I agree that the censorship is *dramatic*!

From what I've read, one should only have *ONE* Outlook.com account.

The Moderator of Annexcafe User2User - an MVP - claims he has 11
(eleven) accounts with Outlook.com. To me, that smacks of some form of
abuse.

Never fear ........ The truth *will* out! :-)

Steve Hayes wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:


"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* conversation?

See here, Steve:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/o...1-be014e8a8810

Perhaps you'd like to question why no 'public' answer has been
forthcoming. If you did, I suspect YOU would be banned too! ;-)

The Other Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:30:07 +0200, Steve Hayes
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:


"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* conversation?

WHICH 'forum'???

Ain't no f*ing moderators HERE, are there?

Nope! :-)

G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?


Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!



--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 25.0
Thunderbird 24.3.0
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:


*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!


The part that is hard to believe, is Mr. Brooks has been
doing this for at least the last seven or eight *years*.

He deserves an award for "Asperger-like persistence"
(repetitive patterns of behavior and interests).

Paul

~BD~ wrote:
Alias wrote:
AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.

I agree that the censorship is *dramatic*!

I don't go there so I don't give a **** what they do. I'm glad MS left
Usenet.


From what I've read, one should only have *ONE* Outlook.com account.

You heard wrong. I have four.


The Moderator of Annexcafe User2User - an MVP - claims he has 11
(eleven) accounts with Outlook.com. To me, that smacks of some form of
abuse.

Of what?


Never fear ........ The truth *will* out! :-)


What "truth"?

--
Alias

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

Yeah, right. Like anyone can moderate here in Usenet which is to where
you posted, not some web-based flattened forum hosted by Microsoft.

So they don't like forgery or nymshifting. We don't like it here,
either.

Alias wrote:

~BD~ wrote:
[snip]
From what I've read, one should only have *ONE* Outlook.com account.

You heard wrong. I have four.

I used to have something like 6 or 8 Hotmail accounts. Since the relatively-
recent (past several years) makeover that made Hotmail not work quite right
in Opera, I've only made the effort to keep one open.

The Moderator of Annexcafe User2User

There's only one mod?

an MVP - claims he has 11 (eleven) accounts with Outlook.com. To me, that
smacks of some form of abuse.

Of what?

BD's idea of what's "proper", perhaps.

--
There might be room at the top but there is seldom enough time.

On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:58:46 +0100, AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

*WHICH* moderator?!!

--
s|b

On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Perhaps you'd like to question why no 'public' answer has been
forthcoming. If you did, I suspect YOU would be banned too! ;-)

Nobody cares about your petty vendettas.

Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself. Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand, Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/
--
"Man will occasionally stumble over the truth ..." Sir Winston Churchill