Microsoft Gestapo

VanguardLH wrote:
AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

Yeah, right. Like anyone can moderate here in Usenet which is to where
you posted, not some web-based flattened forum hosted by Microsoft.

So they don't like forgery or nymshifting. We don't like it here,
either.

You are a straight guy, VanguardLH

I challenge you to post a reply to this question ....

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/o...lc=1033&auth=1

Ask WHICH moderator felt that the question was ... inappropriate!

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:17:59 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:20:31 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow claimed

He's the reg

I do not understand what that means. :-(

As you pointed out, you are a newbie, he's a REGular poster,
here. He asked you first.
Be polite.
Tell him EXACTLY what you want to know, cite dates (they are
very important), operating system you use and of course, why it was so
important you needed to crosspost 100 times about it.
Then we can finally solve your problem (even if that might
involve recommending a shrink)
HTH
[]'s

Might THIS help?

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.
TIA
[]'s


Subject: Can Microsoft Answers be abused?
From: PhillipJones
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:48:47 -0400
Message-ID:
References:
Bytes: 3257
Lines: 76
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.75.60.83
Path: pegasus.annex.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: annexcafe.general.user2user,annexcafe.uk.general.u ser2user
X-Authenticated-User: pjonesCET
X-Trace: pegasus.annex.net 1401814131 75.75.60.83 (3 Jun 2014 11:48:51
-0500)
Reply-to:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: pegasus.annex.net annexcafe.general.user2user:312129
annexcafe.uk.general.user2user:7842

Tony Smith wrote:
...winston said in Usenet Message-ID:

"My Outlook.com account on the other hand has been in use publicly much
longer (initially in 1995) until 2007 on Usenet, continued instant
messaging on 6 contintents, blog contact address 7 yrs until 2013 on a
public site with over 1.6 million visits, Skype, Twitter and Facebook.
- similar results to Gmail for the Hotmail Junk Folder, but nothing to
the Inbox.

A few years ago I would agree that Gmail's were better, today I don't
see a difference (and I've 11 Outlook.com accounts). Now, if I include
a Yahoo Plus account, no comparison, Yahoo is the worst by a long
shot..it misses more than all my other web based email accounts
combined."

John Doe responded with: Message-ID:

(and I've 11 Outlook.com accounts)

I've noticed that http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us requires folk to
'sign in' in order to make a post. It appears that the sign in page

hxxps://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=12&ct=1401699036&


rver=6.1.6206.0&wp=LBI&wreply=https:%2F%2Fanswers .microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsite%2Fcompletesignin%3Fsilent%3DFalse&id=273 572


http://goo.gl/GrvyWA

... is much the same as that used when signing in to use Outlook.com

hxxps://login.live.com/login.srf?wa=wsignin1.0&rpsnv=12&ct=1401699247&


rver=6.4.6456.0&wp=MBI&wreply=http:%2F%2Fmail.liv e.com%2Fdefault.aspx&lc=1033&id=64855&mkt=en-us&cbcxt=mai&snsc=1


http://goo.gl/K6OwpC

If you have 11 accounts, how do you know which one to use when using
Microsoft Answers?

(long links broken deliberately)

So ...........

If one can 'sign in' to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us with *ANY*
Outlook.com account/identity one chooses there is, surely, an
opportunity for the facility to be abused.

Think about it!

To sign answers I went Ms LiveID site and got a LiveId address.
I use that live.com address to sign in to answers and when I set it up I
had all email to go to my regular ISP address.
I frequently answer questions for Mac Office (Word, Excel) and am a MCC
(Microsoft Content creator (create excellent content answer many
questions,etc). And currently am a CM ( Community Moderator - crack the
whip when needed grin. Merge duplicate questions. Edit content when
need. Report when people use Private Info they should, report Spam and
report user profiles that spam to Moderator with more power than I. )
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

~BD~ wrote:
VanguardLH wrote:
AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

Yeah, right. Like anyone can moderate here in Usenet which is to where
you posted, not some web-based flattened forum hosted by Microsoft.

So they don't like forgery or nymshifting. We don't like it here,
either.

You are a straight guy, VanguardLH

I challenge you to post a reply to this question ....

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/o...lc=1033&auth=1


Ask WHICH moderator felt that the question was ... inappropriate!


Nobody here has your fixation.

The topic of discussion here, is general issues with the
Windows 7 OS you just installed on your computer, or got
with a new computer you purchased.

Not what happened to *you* at band camp.

Moderators moderate. They examine the purpose of the forum,
whether a poster is asking an on-topic post, or an answerer
is staying on topic. If the only purpose of a post is
sporgery, flooding, or other nastiness, they do what is
necessary so that innocent users will not have to see it.

In any of the threads you've presented, I don't think I've
ever seen an on-topic conversation. Are you capable of it ?
Does your posting to a Microsoft forum, have to do with
fixing or repairing some Microsoft product you're using ?

I thought you owned a Macintosh computer.

I bet if you socked up, asked a question about some
problem you had with the Registry, you would not be
TOSsed. And, during the entire thread, did not
return to your favorite fixation with MVPs. If
you didn't ask questions about MVPs, where they worked,
or other questions of a personal nature, I bet the
MODs wouldn't even know who you are.

Paul

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:08:23 -0700, Charles Lindbergh
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?


If you stop feeding him, he might go away.............

Dream on. BD's been doing this for years. He hijacks threads,
changes the topic to something called aumha (his fixation) and then
multi-crossposts them so the gullible are killfiled.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:10:26 -0300, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:08:23 -0700, Charles Lindbergh
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?


If you stop feeding him, he might go away.............

Dream on. BD's been doing this for years. He hijacks threads,
changes the topic to something called aumha (his fixation) and then
multi-crossposts them so the gullible are killfiled.
[]'s

In a bizarre way, I want to thank him. I've now change my kill file
from one newsgroup to global, and from "mark read" to "ignore
[sub]thread".

Hopefully, I'll never see Boater Dave mentioned again.

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:10:26 -0300, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:08:23 -0700, Charles Lindbergh
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?


If you stop feeding him, he might go away.............

Dream on. BD's been doing this for years. He hijacks threads,
changes the topic to something called aumha (his fixation) and then
multi-crossposts them so the gullible are killfiled.
[]'s

As for aumha, IIRC, it was (or referred to) a website run by a MS MVP,
back when there were MS newsgroups on various Windows topics.

And again, IIRC, it was full of information collected by that MVP and
posted on the site. It was useful.

It's been a long time and I have forgotten the MVP's name, sorry.

Well, not sorry, just a bit slow. Google to the rescue:

Here's the URL: http://www.aumha.org/

And the man's name is James A. Eshelman, AKA Jim Eshelman (easily seen
on the site).

Since he put acute accents on *both* e's in the word resume in a link on
his site, he's obviously not all bad :-)

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

~BD~ wrote:
"Gene E. Bloch" wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:10:26 -0300, Shadow wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:08:23 -0700, Charles Lindbergh
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?


If you stop feeding him, he might go away.............

Dream on. BD's been doing this for years. He hijacks threads,
changes the topic to something called aumha (his fixation) and then
multi-crossposts them so the gullible are killfiled.
[]'s

As for aumha, IIRC, it was (or referred to) a website run by a MS MVP,
back when there were MS newsgroups on various Windows topics.

And again, IIRC, it was full of information collected by that MVP and
posted on the site. It was useful.

It's been a long time and I have forgotten the MVP's name, sorry.

Well, not sorry, just a bit slow. Google to the rescue:

Here's the URL: http://www.aumha.org/

And the man's name is James A. Eshelman, AKA Jim Eshelman (easily seen
on the site).

Since he put acute accents on *both* e's in the word resume in a link on
his site, he's obviously not all bad :-)

He *IS*!!! He follows the teachings of Aleister Crowley - Devil worship!

Doubtful?

Follow him he https://www.facebook.com/jamesaeshelman

Take care though! ;-)

G. Morgan wrote:
~BD~ wrote:

Doubtful?

Follow him he https://www.facebook.com/jamesaeshelman

Take care though! ;-)

He's not smart enough to block people other than "friends"?

When one is in league with the devil, one hardly needs to care! ;-)

Or so I'm told!

Paul wrote:
~BD~ wrote:
VanguardLH wrote:
AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

Yeah, right. Like anyone can moderate here in Usenet which is to where
you posted, not some web-based flattened forum hosted by Microsoft.

So they don't like forgery or nymshifting. We don't like it here,
either.

You are a straight guy, VanguardLH

I challenge you to post a reply to this question ....

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/o...lc=1033&auth=1


Ask WHICH moderator felt that the question was ... inappropriate!


Nobody here has your fixation.

I can but hope that SOMEONE will wonder why BD has made SUCH a fuss
about PABear - an entity who has lied, even though an MVP!

The topic of discussion here, is general issues with the
Windows 7 OS you just installed on your computer, or got
with a new computer you purchased.

I've had this machine for around two years. I bought it because I left
the power supply cord for my Acer XP machine at home by mistake and felt
a bit lost without a working computer on board my narrowboat!

Not what happened to *you* at band camp.

I don't know what "band camp" is.

Moderators moderate. They examine the purpose of the forum,
whether a poster is asking an on-topic post, or an answerer
is staying on topic. If the only purpose of a post is
sporgery, flooding, or other nastiness, they do what is
necessary so that innocent users will not have to see it.

In any of the threads you've presented, I don't think I've
ever seen an on-topic conversation. Are you capable of it ?
Does your posting to a Microsoft forum, have to do with
fixing or repairing some Microsoft product you're using ?

No. I've always managed WITHOUT the need to ask on Microsoft Answers.

In fact, YOU, have helped me, Paul - for which I have and DO thank you

I thought you owned a Macintosh computer.

I do! :-) A 24 inch iMac - but it's too big to bring on my boat. I do,
though, also have an iPad which can (usually!) connect to the 3G network
for Internet access. I can then connect this Toshiba laptop wirelessly
to the iPad and get Internet access in that manner.

I bet if you socked up, asked a question about some
problem you had with the Registry, you would not be
TOSsed. And, during the entire thread, did not
return to your favorite fixation with MVPs. If
you didn't ask questions about MVPs, where they worked,
or other questions of a personal nature, I bet the
MODs wouldn't even know who you are.

You are absolutely right! BTDT! :-)

Here's a couple of threads you may like to explo-

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/w...7-0dec115243dd

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/w...b-443e7782cbc4

I sincerely apologize for the delay in my response. We are in a very
rural area and we had NO signal yesterday and for much of today! It can
be (IS!) very frustrating!

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC), ~BD~
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.

Devil worship!

Thank you, BD, you finally came out with an honest answer. I
suppose it covers all 4 questions.
Out of professional interest, how long has this "Devil" been
"stalking" you ?
TIA
[]'s

(cross-posted to alt.2600, where mental problems are somewhat
on-topic, and here, as the "Devil" appears to use Windows 7 to
manifest itself, according to BD's OP)
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC), ~BD~
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.

Devil worship!

Thank you, BD, you finally came out with an honest answer. I
suppose it covers all 4 questions.
Out of professional interest, how long has this "Devil" been
"stalking" you ?
TIA
[]'s

(cross-posted to alt.2600, where mental problems are somewhat
on-topic, and here, as the "Devil" appears to use Windows 7 to
manifest itself, according to BD's OP)

Since 2005 - when I had £245.00 fraudulently taken from my bank account!

http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=49908

HTH :-)

Dustin wrote:
~BD~ wrote in :

Since 2005 - when I had £245.00 fraudulently taken from my bank account!

You probably deserved it.

I didn't.

Who were you stalking/harassing when this happened
to you?

Nobody! I was exploring England's waterways on my narrowboat!

Did you ever see the bad persons who did this to you brought to
justice?

No. :-(

Have you caused even one person to be brought to justice?

Yes! :-)

How do you excuse the bad acts you commit on a daily basis? Why do you take
peoples photographs knowing you don't have permission and post them
elsewhere? Why do you stalk people and encourage others to acquire
information on people for you to abuse? Why do you do those things and claim you're a good guy?

Training, Dustin. :-)

Please answer my questions if you can David.

I'm saddened that you haven't listened, Dustin. I've tried *so* hard to
help you see the light. :-(

~BD~ wrote:
When one is in league with the devil,

Thelema is a religion; your religion is some kind of Christianity.

Many Christians believe that the/their 'devil' is some kind of enemy of
their God and humankind.

Saying that any/some non-Christian religion is 'in league with the
devil' is no more correct than (either) Christians or Muslims calling
each other infidels because they don't have the same belief system.

If we would lump all of such Abrahamic religions into a pile, Thelema
wouldn't be in that pile; being kinda polytheistic rooted in Egyptian
religions which preceded the monotheistic Abrahamics and kinda
philosophical.

There is much misunderstanding of the thelemite 'do as thou wilt'
concept; it is not hedonistic, but quite the contrary.


--
Mike Easter

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:50:58 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC), ~BD~
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.

Devil worship!

Thank you, BD, you finally came out with an honest answer. I
suppose it covers all 4 questions.
Out of professional interest, how long has this "Devil" been
"stalking" you ?
TIA
[]'s

(cross-posted to alt.2600, where mental problems are somewhat
on-topic, and here, as the "Devil" appears to use Windows 7 to
manifest itself, according to BD's OP)

Since 2005 - when I had £245.00 fraudulently taken from my bank account!

http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=49908

HTH :-)

It did. Did the "Devil" in Kaspersky ever give your real
identity back, or are you still using the eViL one it gave you OVER
NINE YEARS AGO ?
BTW, that's roughly 20 cents an OT post. You've had your
money's worth.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:50:58 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC), ~BD~
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.

Devil worship!

Thank you, BD, you finally came out with an honest answer. I
suppose it covers all 4 questions.
Out of professional interest, how long has this "Devil" been
"stalking" you ?
TIA
[]'s

(cross-posted to alt.2600, where mental problems are somewhat
on-topic, and here, as the "Devil" appears to use Windows 7 to
manifest itself, according to BD's OP)

Since 2005 - when I had £245.00 fraudulently taken from my bank account!

http://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?showtopic=49908

HTH :-)

It did. Did the "Devil" in Kaspersky ever give your real
identity back, or are you still using the eViL one it gave you OVER
NINE YEARS AGO ?

I'm a descendant of KING David! You'll have to guess, Shadow! :-)

BTW, that's roughly 20 cents an OT post. You've had your
money's worth.

OK. Bye .........
[]'s