Microsoft Gestapo

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:50:58 +0100, the lying, slimy, cowardly, *STUPID*
**** wrote:

Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:59:58 +0000 (UTC), ~BD~
wrote:

On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:56:19 -0300, Shadow wrote:

No, quite honestly, I don't think you answered a single
question I made you.
1) What do you want to know ?
2) When did it (whatever it was) happen ? Yesterday ? Last
week maybe ?
3) What operating system do you use (I would assume Microsoft,
from the links, but please answer)
4)Why did you think whatever the problem was, it was so
important you crossposted over 100 times ? Is anyone here in imminent
danger ? Of what ? A backdoor in Bitlocker maybe ? Something worse ?

I don't need links to anything. In your own words, please.

Devil worship!

Thank you, BD, you finally came out with an honest answer. I
suppose it covers all 4 questions.
Out of professional interest, how long has this "Devil" been
"stalking" you ?
TIA []'s

(cross-posted to alt.2600, where mental problems are somewhat
on-topic, and here, as the "Devil" appears to use Windows 7 to manifest
itself, according to BD's OP)

Since 2005 - when I had £245.00 fraudulently taken from my bank account!

SNIP POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS LINK

HTH

You're whining again about something you do yourself, hypocrite- about
someone taking ownership rights over the property of another without
permission. If you think it's so ****ing wrong, then why the **** do you
do it?



--
None are so hopelessly enslaved, as those who falsely believe they
are free. The truth has been kept from the depth of their minds by
masters who rule them with lies.
-Johann von Goethe

It’s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different. It could be that they use different email accounts to login and post questions and use another account to answer that question and award themselves points. These things go on all the time and you will see the same name cropping up every where because they have made a life doing this. They are retired or unemployable or they are simply jobless because of their lack of social skills when dealing with people. All they know is how to login on their computer and start posting something on forums and newsgroups to keep themselves busy.

Don’t do it again what ever you did in the first place and change your identity and create a new account if you are so desperate to go to their forums or newsgroups.

"AnyMouse" wrote in message ...


"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

Hi, ~BD,

Sorry for the late reply, work days leave me no time for newsgroup
replies, generally.

On 6/21/14 7:12 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 3:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted
by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and
not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting
Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself.
Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing you
can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand,
Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ



Support your position, answer the question.

Which bit of THIS did you not understand, laddie?

"I've been attending the Alpha Course this winter (see:
http://alpha.org/default.asp) and am now absolutely certain that I'm
being
tasked by God to pursue matters relentlessly until good defeats evil
here on
the web. It has been extremely lonely at times and I'd welcome help from
anyone who is willing and able to help me achieve His aim."

Besides the link being broken, you still have not answered the question.

I sincerely apologize for the broken link. Things do change with time!

You may learn more he- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_course

Thanks for the repaired link. Looks interesting, but I have an innate
distrust of any group that claims to know precisely what God wants.
That kind of thinking led to the Crusades, and we are still reaping the
results of that.

Besides, it isn't germane to your original question of why winston has
11 email accounts. Which certainly has nothing to do with the topic of
the original post for this thread.

So, don't try turning this into a good vs. evil religious discussion.
That is certainly disrespectful of every one here, especially the
original poster.

You just have generalizations of what you believe. That proves
nothing. Tell my why *you* believe it's your business, not God's or
someone else.

As a relative newbie here, *please tell me WHY you wish to know*.

My question is why you think it's your business that winston has 11
email accounts. I could care less about your Alpha Course. :-)

It may help you to know that it was immediately after I made that post
(a little tongue-in-cheek) that I was banned from posting on the
Annexcafe groups. Hey Ho! ;-)

Besides, if you're intelligent, you'd ask Winston, which you may have
done. If he hasn't answered, that may be some indication of his opinion
of you.

I'm sufficiently intelligent to have bought an Apple iMac! (but it's at
home, not on my boat!) Please explain why YOU are not using Mavericks.
Does your machine not meet the required 'specs'?
https://www.apple.com/uk/osx/specs/

iMac here too. Haven't upgraded to Mavericks because I've seen nothing
in the latest version of OS that gives me something I don't already have
or can do with Mountain Lion. There is greater integration between
Apple products, but I own only this Apple product, and I'm not a cloud
devotee. No Facebook/Twitter accounts, etc. No data storage for
backups, etc. The only online storage I have is a Dropbox account that
I use for large attachments rather than try to attach them to an email.

As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

I can understand that! :-)

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/

Oh! Yes! He's a nasty *piece of work* (as Peter Foldes liked to say!)

Note that anything in a post relating to religion or our computer OSes
will go unanswered.



--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 25.0
Thunderbird 24.6.0
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

WLM-Tester wrote:

It¢s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different. It could be that they use different email accounts to login and post questions and use another account to answer that question and award themselves points. These things go on all the time and you will see the same name cropping up every where because they have made a life doing this. They are retired or unemployable or they are simply jobless because of their lack of social skills when dealing with people. All they know is how to login on their computer and start posting something on forums and newsgroups to keep themselves busy.

Don¢t do it again what ever you did in the first place and change your identity and create a new account if you are so desperate to go to their forums or newsgroups.

"AnyMouse" wrote in message ...

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!

When locked out of a forum, creating a new account doesn't always work
to get back in. For example, and because many users have always-on
connections (cable or DSL), and because the IP binding remains valid
while it is assigned even after it has expired, the exiled can be traced
by their IP address. Even if you unbind and rebind, you may still get
assigned your previous IP address. The ISP has an IP pool they can
assign to their customers and the ISP may reassign you the same IP
address if you did an unbind following by a bind performed within some
period of time (that depends on how large is the ISP's IP pool). I
believe there is a means of differentiating IP address that are from a
modem pool to determine if it is a dial-up users that likely gets a
different IP address from their ISP's pool.

So then the exiled try to get tricky by using anonymous proxies through
which they direct their traffic to connect to the forum so their IP
address is different. Well, these proxies the users' find are also the
same ones the forum admin can find. In fact, there are blacklists
already compiled to assist sites in blocking connections from the
publicly accessible (sometimes anonymizing) proxies. A connection to
the forum gets rejected when coming from one of these proxies.

The Referer header can help fingerprint your return as well as cookies,
DOM storage in your web browser, window titles (assigned in code, not
what you see, if a reconnect is attempted within the same browser
instance), and other methods are available to identify a returning user.
If you are required to register for an account, the information you
enter can be included in a fingerprint. When creating a new account,
the user may duplicate some of the old account's information because the
user is the same person as before. They may want to, for example, reuse
some of their old information so they know what to use if they have to
use the "Forgot Password" scheme to get back into their account.

So the ejected OP may not be able to simply create a new account to
pretend his is someone different than who he was before. His "style"
alone may be sufficient to re-identify him. Since he was forging the
identities of others, and since those others are unlikely to be hiding
who they are in the registration details of their accounts, it's pretty
easy to see when someone is posting as "winston" who is not using
winston's account there. Of course, AnyMouse cites someone else's
statement that doesn't provide enough context to know what AnyMouse is
asking about.

Ken Springer wrote:
Hi, ~BD,

Sorry for the late reply, work days leave me no time for newsgroup
replies, generally.

Hello Ken! :-)

No worries - I've been busy boating!

On 6/21/14 7:12 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 3:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

"The conversation was flagged as inappropriate and was deleted
by a
moderator, on the grounds that it was inappropriate content and
not
relevant to that forum. The moderator felt that expecting
Phillip to
speak on behalf of Winston [about why he has those accounts] was
inappropriate. Others agreed."

*WHICH* others?!!


When you post in an MS forum, you need to behave yourself.
Otherwise,
you will be censored. It's their forum and there isn't a thing
you
can
do about it and whining about it here is useless.



It's another "Boater Dave" a.k.a. "David Brooks" sock.

That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

Think about it! ;-)

*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

I'm just curious... Why is it any of your business?

Perhaps your review of THIS thread will help you better understand,
Ken!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!or...o/QSgppAHWFcAJ




Support your position, answer the question.

Which bit of THIS did you not understand, laddie?

"I've been attending the Alpha Course this winter (see:
http://alpha.org/default.asp) and am now absolutely certain that I'm
being
tasked by God to pursue matters relentlessly until good defeats evil
here on
the web. It has been extremely lonely at times and I'd welcome help
from
anyone who is willing and able to help me achieve His aim."

Besides the link being broken, you still have not answered the question.

I sincerely apologize for the broken link. Things do change with time!

You may learn more he- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_course

Thanks for the repaired link. Looks interesting, but I have an innate
distrust of any group that claims to know precisely what God wants. That
kind of thinking led to the Crusades, and we are still reaping the
results of that.

Besides, it isn't germane to your original question of why winston has
11 email accounts. Which certainly has nothing to do with the topic of
the original post for this thread.

You misunderstood! I don't give a hoot how many email accounts
'...winston' may or may not have.

So, don't try turning this into a good vs. evil religious discussion.
That is certainly disrespectful of every one here, especially the
original poster.

OK! :-)

You just have generalizations of what you believe. That proves
nothing. Tell my why *you* believe it's your business, not God's or
someone else.

As a relative newbie here, *please tell me WHY you wish to know*.

My question is why you think it's your business that winston has 11
email accounts. I could care less about your Alpha Course. :-)

Winston blanked my friend Tony Smith on the Annexcafe User2User forum.

He wasn't straight-forward and honest.

It may help you to know that it was immediately after I made that post
(a little tongue-in-cheek) that I was banned from posting on the
Annexcafe groups. Hey Ho! ;-)

Besides, if you're intelligent, you'd ask Winston, which you may have
done. If he hasn't answered, that may be some indication of his opinion
of you.

I'm sufficiently intelligent to have bought an Apple iMac! (but it's at
home, not on my boat!) Please explain why YOU are not using Mavericks.
Does your machine not meet the required 'specs'?
https://www.apple.com/uk/osx/specs/

iMac here too. Haven't upgraded to Mavericks because I've seen nothing
in the latest version of OS that gives me something I don't already have
or can do with Mountain Lion. There is greater integration between
Apple products, but I own only this Apple product, and I'm not a cloud
devotee. No Facebook/Twitter accounts, etc. No data storage for
backups, etc. The only online storage I have is a Dropbox account that
I use for large attachments rather than try to attach them to an email.

IMO you SHOULD update to Mavericks. I use Dropbox too - great facility!

As for the thread, I feel like I've been swimming in a septic tank.

I can understand that! :-)

HTH

Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!

As an aside, the most malevolent poster on the www.dogagent.com
server
was CoyoteV - until not too long ago. That's the guy who USED to run
Scorched-Earth on the Annexcafe groups!

This is his personal web site: http://mindzon.com/

Oh! Yes! He's a nasty *piece of work* (as Peter Foldes liked to say!)

Note that anything in a post relating to religion or our computer OSes
will go unanswered.

I suspect you know NOTHING of Peter Foldes! ;-)

On 6/25/14 1:15 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
Hi, ~BD,

Sorry for the late reply, work days leave me no time for newsgroup
replies, generally.

Hello Ken! :-)

No worries - I've been busy boating!

On 6/21/14 7:12 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 3:36 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 1:58 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
On 6/20/14 7:51 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
G. Morgan wrote:
Alias wrote:

AnyMouse wrote:

snip

You misunderstood! I don't give a hoot how many email accounts
'...winston' may or may not have.

You are so full of human feces, it's unbelievable. You asked why he had
so many accounts, so you do give a sh1t.



I'll even quote what you wrote:

"That in no way changes the fact that there *is* something untoward
happening at Microsoft Answers!

"Think about it!

"*WHY* has Winston got 11 (eleven) Outlook.COM accounts?

"Ask him on Annexcafe User2User - he won't answer here!"

snip

Now, go away and don't darken my doorstep ever again.


--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.8.5
Firefox 25.0
Thunderbird 24.6.0
"My brain is like lightning, a quick flash
and it's gone!"

Nil wrote:
On 20 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

WTF??? Petty?

This is all about *GOOD* v. *EVIL*!

It is *IMPORTANT*!

It's only important to an attention whore like yourself. To those of us
who have a firmer grip on reality, it's irrelevant bull****.

Tell me, what is not "reality" in THIS thread?

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/p...8-6715053dea0d

D.

On 26 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Tell me, what is not "reality" in THIS thread?

If you think you can draw me into your bottomless pit of paranoid
delusions, you're even stupider than you appear.

Nil wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Tell me, what is not "reality" in THIS thread?

If you think you can draw me into your bottomless pit of paranoid
delusions, you're even stupider than you appear.

What, exactly, is paranoid about protecting oneself from malware?

Just cite YOUR opinion.

Mike Easter wrote:

There is much misunderstanding of the thelemite 'do as thou wilt'
concept; it is not hedonistic, but quite the contrary.

Just what makes you believe this to be so, Mike?

I'm intrigued.

On 26 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Nil wrote:
On 26 Jun 2014, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general:

Tell me, what is not "reality" in THIS thread?

If you think you can draw me into your bottomless pit of paranoid
delusions, you're even stupider than you appear.

What, exactly, is paranoid about protecting oneself from malware?

Just cite YOUR opinion.

Thank you for proving that you are, indeed, stupider than you appear.

~BD~ wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:

There is much misunderstanding of the thelemite 'do as thou wilt'
concept; it is not hedonistic, but quite the contrary.

Just what makes you believe this to be so, Mike?

I'm intrigued.

You might try the wikipedia entries on thelema, and associated links
from there including other wikipedia articles and external thelema 101
and 'Thelema (the Will) and its positive & negative implications'.

wiki: 'This statement indicates that adherents, who are known as
Thelemites, should seek out and follow their own true path in life,
known as their True Will[6] rather than their egotistic desires.[7]'

pos/neg: 'Why is "Do what thou wilt" different from "Do what you want?"
and is it similar in some respects? On this point, we may examine the
positive and negative aspects of Thelema/Will insofar as positive means
affirming and negative means denying.'
http://iao131.livejournal.com/26165.html

Also realize that Aleister Crowley Thelema and writings was a very long
time ago and that 'contemporary' thelema is a very very broad spectrum
of beliefs and philosophies barely resembling each other.

For your buddy Eshelman's name appearance in the wikipedia, you should
read up on Phyllis Seckler, who besides her own wiki article, also
appears as in the main Thelema article in the 'contemporary writers'
section.


--
Mike Easter

Mike Easter wrote:
~BD~ wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:

There is much misunderstanding of the thelemite 'do as thou wilt'
concept; it is not hedonistic, but quite the contrary.

Just what makes you believe this to be so, Mike?

I'm intrigued.

Thank you for your comments, Mike.

You might try the wikipedia entries on thelema, and associated links
from there including other wikipedia articles and external thelema 101
and 'Thelema (the Will) and its positive & negative implications'.

I believe I've read all such entries, over a number of years.

wiki: 'This statement indicates that adherents, who are known as
Thelemites, should seek out and follow their own true path in life,
known as their True Will[6] rather than their egotistic desires.[7]'

pos/neg: 'Why is "Do what thou wilt" different from "Do what you want?"
and is it similar in some respects? On this point, we may examine the
positive and negative aspects of Thelema/Will insofar as positive means
affirming and negative means denying.'
http://iao131.livejournal.com/26165.html

Also realize that Aleister Crowley Thelema and writings was a very long
time ago and that 'contemporary' thelema is a very very broad spectrum
of beliefs and philosophies barely resembling each other.

For your buddy Eshelman's name appearance in the wikipedia, you should
read up on Phyllis Seckler, who besides her own wiki article, also
appears as in the main Thelema article in the 'contemporary writers'
section.

May I draw your attention to this quote?

=
FYI - there used to be, until recently, a Wikipedia entry for Mr
Eshelman but it has now been removed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Eshelman

Interestingly, there was no mention of the tremendous work Jim had done
to create the 'Windows Support Center' - no mention of his computer
skills at all! I found that strange.

You probably noticed, though, that the 'forums' section of the site is
still quite active, but managed by yet another venerable MVP, PABear
(aka Robear Dyer). The forums may be found he http://aumha.net/

Perhaps you can tell me - do the security folk at Microsoft ever check
the advice given and the malware 'fixes' provided by sites such as these?

There are many, of course - some listed he- Alliance of Security
Analysis Professionals™ http://asap.maddoktor2.com/ but you will note
that Aumha is not a member of same.
=

That is shown as an 'Answer' he

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/w...7-0dec115243dd

It is *NOT* an answer - it's yet another example of how posts are
manipulated on the Microsoft groups!

As some readers will know, the forums at www.aumha.net have been closed
down and www.aumha.org has been abandoned (or has it?!!!)

D.

On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:54:37 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

The forums at www.aumha.net have been closed
down and www.aumha.org has been abandoned

You forgot to cross post to alt.comp.win98 and
alt.comp.satanism.
You are slipping, BD. Must be all those voices.
[]'s

PS Both sites have minimal visits. They are probably all you.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

~BD~ wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:

You might try the wikipedia entries on thelema, and associated links
from there including other wikipedia articles and external thelema 101
and 'Thelema (the Will) and its positive & negative implications'.

I believe I've read all such entries, over a number of years.

I don't believe you read them with an open mind ready for a wide range
of comprehension. If you only believe Thelema = Crowley = Satanism or
something evil or that the current (and past) thelema mantra is 'do
whatever you want to do, unfettered by any kind of conventional
religious morality', then you are missing a broader understanding which
discussion also doesn't belong in this newsgroup.

Perhaps you can tell me - do the security folk at Microsoft ever
check the advice given and the malware 'fixes' provided by sites such
as these?

MS support is a very broad spectrum of generally informal with a touch
of 'formality' or vetting or reputabtion building such as MVP and
numerous other later structures in the MS support hierarchy. That is
another subject which you could research with an open mind.

Aumha is not a member of same.

As you've been told numerous times, my interest in such old sites as
aumha is zero.



--
Mike Easter