Microsoft Gestapo

Shadow wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:54:37 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

The forums at www.aumha.net have been closed
down and www.aumha.org has been abandoned

You forgot to cross post to alt.comp.win98 and
alt.comp.satanism.
You are slipping, BD. Must be all those voices.
[]'s

PS Both sites have minimal visits. They are probably all you.


Good football this evening! :-)

Mike Easter wrote:
~BD~ wrote:
Mike Easter wrote:

You might try the wikipedia entries on thelema, and associated links
from there including other wikipedia articles and external thelema 101
and 'Thelema (the Will) and its positive & negative implications'.

I believe I've read all such entries, over a number of years.

I don't believe you read them with an open mind ready for a wide range
of comprehension. If you only believe Thelema = Crowley = Satanism or
something evil or that the current (and past) thelema mantra is 'do
whatever you want to do, unfettered by any kind of conventional
religious morality', then you are missing a broader understanding which
discussion also doesn't belong in this newsgroup.

Where *do* you suggest we discuss same, Mike?

Perhaps you can tell me - do the security folk at Microsoft ever
check the advice given and the malware 'fixes' provided by sites such
as these?

MS support is a very broad spectrum of generally informal with a touch
of 'formality' or vetting or reputation building such as MVP and
numerous other later structures in the MS support hierarchy. That is
another subject which you could research with an open mind.

You confirmed yourself that Peter Foldes (an ex-MVP) is a liar. Robear
Dyer is a liar, too.

Aumha is not a member of same.

As you've been told numerous times, my interest in such old sites as
aumha is zero.

That's fine with me. Tell me though, Mike - why might someone pay to
keep ANY old/redundant site on-line and not keep it updated?

On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:31:02 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

That's fine with me. Tell me though, Mike - why might someone pay to
keep ANY old/redundant site on-line and not keep it updated?

Maybe you should ask the tens of thousands of people that do ?
Not here. Nothing to do with Win 7.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

"Shadow" wrote in message ...


Maybe you should ask the tens of thousands of people that do ?
Not here. Nothing to do with Win 7.


But it might be something to do with you because you know a lot more than the OP so he was just asking you. So wise man reply to him if you know the answer.

--
This post might contain rich text (HTML) or just plain text. either way, if you don't like it then you can kill-filter the poster so that you don't see his posts ever again.

~BD~ wrote:
Where *do* you suggest we discuss same, Mike?

You used to show up in scorched-earth.

However, if I get bored with the conversation, I may drop out without
'warning'.

BTW, I don't know if you found the wiki deleted page archives debating
the removal of the Eshelman article/entry. You might want to track that
down.

I agree with the POV that it/he doesn't deserve an article; 'he' fits OK
into a part of a par on Phyllis Seckel, which gives him all the
'historical' credit deserved about his Thelema-related contributions.


--
Mike Easter

On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:52:58 +0100, "Good Guy"
wrote:

"Shadow" wrote in message ...


Maybe you should ask the tens of thousands of people that do ?
Not here. Nothing to do with Win 7.


But it might be something to do with you because you know a
lot more than the OP so he was just asking you. So wise man
reply to him if you know the answer.

He just asked me on alt.comp.freeware why I did something
illegal like download my email using torrents. Something I did not
know was possible or illegal. He probably got that from the police,
who he constantly snitches to.
He obviously knows a lot more than I do. He's the "tech guy",
not me.
As to the sites, I have a couple of paid accounts I can't be
bothered to shut down. 5 dollars a month, it's just not worth the
trouble, and I might need them again in the future.
But he knows that. Like I said, he's the "tech-guy".
ROFL
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Shadow posts a blatant *LIE*!!!

On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 17:52:58 +0100, "Good Guy"
wrote:

"Shadow" wrote in message ...


Maybe you should ask the tens of thousands of people that do ?
Not here. Nothing to do with Win 7.


But it might be something to do with you because you know a
lot more than the OP so he was just asking you. So wise man
reply to him if you know the answer.

He just asked me on alt.comp.freeware why I did something
illegal like download my email using torrents. Something I did not
know was possible or illegal. He probably got that from the police,
who he constantly snitches to.
He obviously knows a lot more than I do. He's the "tech guy",
not me.
As to the sites, I have a couple of paid accounts I can't be
bothered to shut down. 5 dollars a month, it's just not worth the
trouble, and I might need them again in the future.
But he knows that. Like I said, he's the "tech-guy".
ROFL
[]'s


Now ALL readers here will *know* you LIED, Shadow. A foolish post, IMO!

What I *actually* said was .......

"So that readers may judge your own credibility, did you not once claim
that you, personally, use Torrents to download illegal copies of music
and films?"

You avoided giving an answer. EOD.

Proof? He Message-ID:

aside

Some folk may find this article of interest:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19474829

BitTorrent study finds most file-sharers are monitored

Illegal downloaders are likely to be monitored "within hours"

A Birmingham University study indicates that an illegal file-sharer
downloading popular content would be logged by a monitoring firm within
three hours.

The team said it was "surprised" by the scale of the monitoring.

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:42:55 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Now ALL readers here will *know* you LIED, Shadow. A foolish post, IMO!

What I *actually* said was .......

"So that readers may judge your own credibility, did you not once claim
that you, personally, use Torrents to download illegal copies of music
and films?"

You avoided giving an answer. EOD.

You were asking about how I emailed malware to the
researchers, and started going on about films and music. I just
ignored the off-topic part. I don't live in England. Scratch illegal.
See proof below.
I was interested, though, in the concept of using torrents to
send email. Something you seem to master, since you posted about
torrents, in an "emailing malware" thread.
You also said you contributed malware to Virustotal and
Uploadmalware, using a lot of false email accounts. Neither site
requires emails. IOW, you have never helped anyone, unless you
consider snitching to the police "helping".
Again, proof below.

From the messages you cited:
//
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:29:15 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

FYI, Dustin - I HAVE submitted examples to Virus Total and also to this
site: http://www.uploadmalware.com/ I have some concern, though, as as
I have no idea who these folk are. Do YOU know?

Usual scam about "Devil's sites". Virustotal belongs to
Glugle. Hey, maybe you are right for once. Glugle IS eViL, though
probably not 25.8069758011.
Uploadmalware is as trustworthy as the sites it passes the
samples to. OBCESS and email the AV sites, they will confirm it. Use
one of your many fake accounts. They might killfile your real one.

I'm sure you must be aware that I don't always use the posting name of
BD or derivatives, so there's no possible way you'd ever know that *I*
had submitted any samples to anywhere at all! ;-)

OK, so you've got dozens of fake email accounts. Who cares ?
So do a lot of other people. Neither site requires an email to submit
malware.
//

My post about malware and free AV for windows:
//
The malware that gets emailed to me, it's usually in my spam
folder. Mostly banker trojans. I pass them on to a researcher so they
can make the latest AV database. Why, don't you ?
[]'s

Your reply:

No - I don't use Torrents to download illegal copies of music and films.

Torrents ? Really ?
Obfuscation to get away from the on-topic windows freeware
discussion of malware and AVs, and how to be a useful citizen ?
ROFL
[]'s



--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Mike Easter wrote:
~BD~ wrote:
Where *do* you suggest we discuss same, Mike?

You used to show up in scorched-earth.

I do still monitor messages there ........... when I get the time!

However, if I get bored with the conversation, I may drop out without
'warning'.

That's the beauty of Usenet! :-)

BTW, I don't know if you found the wiki deleted page archives debating
the removal of the Eshelman article/entry. You might want to track that
down.

I did do that some years ago. Perhaps I should revisit - if/when time
allows. It's not so easy when out on the canals, often with a poor or
even NO internet connection!

I agree with the POV that it/he doesn't deserve an article; 'he' fits OK
into a part of a par on Phyllis Seckel, which gives him all the
'historical' credit deserved about his Thelema-related contributions.

Have you actually read the short thread I started here, Mike?

http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/w...7-0dec115243dd

Shadow wriggled!!!

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:42:55 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Now ALL readers here will *know* you LIED, Shadow. A foolish post, IMO!

What I *actually* said was .......

"So that readers may judge your own credibility, did you not once claim
that you, personally, use Torrents to download illegal copies of music
and films?"

You avoided giving an answer. EOD.
[....]

Shadow - *YOU LIED*.

Accept you exposure as a liar like a man! ;-)

You made your views known he Message-ID:

Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:09:24 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Shadow wriggled!!!

On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:42:55 +0100, ~BD~
wrote:

Now ALL readers here will *know* you LIED, Shadow. A foolish post, IMO!

What I *actually* said was .......

"So that readers may judge your own credibility, did you not once claim
that you, personally, use Torrents to download illegal copies of music
and films?"

You avoided giving an answer. EOD.
[....]

Shadow - *YOU LIED*.

Accept you exposure as a liar like a man! ;-)

You made your views known he Message-ID:



And I stand by them. What part bothered you, this question ?

On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:07:31 -0200, Shadow wrote:

Why the interest in profiling me ?

Should I have said "stalking" ? That would label you a
criminal in England. Not against the law here.
[]'s

PS Off topic cross-posting removed once again, unless stalking
can only be done on Windows 7, in which case, restore the headers.


OK - *I'll accept that as an apology*! :-)

I have no wish to fight with you, Shadow.

Truly.

On 24/06/2014 18:28, WLM-Tester wrote:
It’s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know
nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various
reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different. It
could be that they use different email accounts to login and post
questions and use another account to answer that question and award
themselves points. These things go on all the time and you will see the
same name cropping up every where because they have made a life doing
this. They are retired or unemployable or they are simply jobless
because of their lack of social skills when dealing with people. All
they know is how to login on their computer and start posting something
on forums and newsgroups to keep themselves busy.
Don’t do it again what ever you did in the first place and change your
identity and create a new account if you are so desperate to go to their
forums or newsgroups.

You are absolutely right - one DOES need to know that folk are *real*.

Here's a name, as a for instance:- G. Winston Natoli

Is this a real person ..... or a fictitious nom de plume?

How on earth can one tell from Internet information?

--
"Do something wonderful, people may imitate it." (Albert Schweitzer)

David B. wrote:
On 24/06/2014 18:28, WLM-Tester wrote:
It’s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know
nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various
reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different. It
could be that they use different email accounts to login and post
questions and use another account to answer that question and award
themselves points. These things go on all the time and you will see
the same name cropping up every where because they have made a life
doing this. They are retired or unemployable or they are simply
jobless because of their lack of social skills when dealing with
people. All they know is how to login on their computer and start
posting something on forums and newsgroups to keep themselves busy.
Don’t do it again what ever you did in the first place and change your
identity and create a new account if you are so desperate to go to
their forums or newsgroups.

You are absolutely right - one DOES need to know that folk are *real*.

Here's a name, as a for instance:- G. Winston Natoli

Is this a real person ..... or a fictitious nom de plume?

How on earth can one tell from Internet information?


Well, get out your magnifying glass, and go over the 500 million
LinkedIn membership list once again. He's in there somewhere.

He's probably registered, as many times as he has email accounts.

Did you know if you chained 15 email accounts together, you
can make 15-factor authentication ?

Paul

On Tue, 2 May 2017 10:50:19 +0100
"David B." wrote:

On 24/06/2014 18:28, WLM-Tester wrote:
It’s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know
nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various
reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different.
It could be that they use different email accounts to login and
post questions and use another account to answer that question and
award themselves points. These things go on all the time and you
will see the same name cropping up every where because they have
made a life doing this. They are retired or unemployable or they
are simply jobless because of their lack of social skills when
dealing with people. All they know is how to login on their
computer and start posting something on forums and newsgroups to
keep themselves busy. Don’t do it again what ever you did in the
first place and change your identity and create a new account if
you are so desperate to go to their forums or newsgroups.

You are absolutely right - one DOES need to know that folk are *real*.

Here's a name, as a for instance:- G. Winston Natoli

Is this a real person ..... or a fictitious nom de plume?

How on earth can one tell from Internet information?

On 02/05/2017 11:45, Paul wrote:
David B. wrote:
On 24/06/2014 18:28, WLM-Tester wrote:
It’s not a good idea to call somebody Gestapo or Nazi when you know
nothing about them. People have many email accounts for various
reasons. For an MVP to have many email accounts is no different. It
could be that they use different email accounts to login and post
questions and use another account to answer that question and award
themselves points. These things go on all the time and you will see
the same name cropping up every where because they have made a life
doing this. They are retired or unemployable or they are simply
jobless because of their lack of social skills when dealing with
people. All they know is how to login on their computer and start
posting something on forums and newsgroups to keep themselves busy.
Don’t do it again what ever you did in the first place and change
your identity and create a new account if you are so desperate to go
to their forums or newsgroups.

You are absolutely right - one DOES need to know that folk are *real*.

Here's a name, as a for instance:- G. Winston Natoli

Is this a real person ..... or a fictitious nom de plume?

How on earth can one tell from Internet information?


Well, get out your magnifying glass, and go over the 500 million
LinkedIn membership list once again. He's in there somewhere.

As you may well have imagined, I did that LONG ago.

Can YOU, Paul, locate him on LinkedIn?

He's probably registered, as many times as he has email accounts.

I've asked a real life friend to look.

Did you know if you chained 15 email accounts together, you
can make 15-factor authentication ?

No. Email addresses and Microsoft Accounts are NOT the same thing.

I thought a chap like you would KNOW that! I'm shocked.

--
"The important thing is not to stop questioning."
- Albert Einstein