How many idiots in here are going to vote for Biden?

In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" wrote:


In article
default wrote:

On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:35:30 -0600, Ken Springer
wrote:

On 3/14/20 4:01 PM, default wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:48:35 -0000 (UTC),
(Kenny McCormack) wrote:

In article ,
heron stone wrote:


none are gonna vote for biden

all the idiots are gonna vote for frump

Idiots vote for Biden.

Subhuman, primordial slime votes for Drumpf.

Really no good alternative, but clear which is the worst.

I agree. I have never voted for anyone, but always find myself voting
against the greater evil.

I think politics attracts the worst people. The greediest, the power
hungry, the least competent to lead, the dishonest, the people who got
where they are by kissing ass, and manipulating others.... The
absolute dregs of society.

The people who might make the best leaders, couldn't be dragged into
office kicking and screaming. They have too much integrity to abase
themselves playing that game.

What frustrates me, is just about everyone votes against someone, rather
than for someone. You don't have to vote D or R, but if too few people
never vote for another possibility, things will never change.

So if you are one that votes against someone rather than for someone
that is closer to you, and you don't get what you want, STFU. You
created the situation!

In a perfect world...

The only dildo heads that make it to the primaries are the ones who
are career politicians. They sold their souls long ago.

It would be more effective if people studied the issues and attempted
to vote from a position of understanding, rather than pick the bozo
they recognize (due to a lot of expensive and skillful manipulation)
but that isn't how it is done.

Term limits is a good idea, but no one who thinks politics is a career
is going to do more than pay lip-service to that idea.

Accountability would be another good idea. Have strict standards and
enforce them. We have plenty of politicians that seem to think rules
don't apply to them.

Corporate CEOs' ditto - hold them accountable, they get the big bucks
yet seem to conjure up excuses when things go awry... or they get
caught. The idea that the head of a company can just skate by saying
they don't understand the accounting their firm uses to cook the books
should never be allowed as a defense. What are those bozos getting
the bucks for, only the instantaneous price of the stock?

I like the US navy's model - ultimately the commander is held
accountable. A raw recruit can be directly responsible - but
ultimately the commander was in charge of his qualifications,
training, and trust placed in him. If he can't do the job, he
shouldn't be in the job.

I like how the Marines handle incompetence. Frag in a bag.
BOOM! Problem solved.

Nomen Nescio wrote on 3/7/2020 3:24 PM:
In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
wrote:


In article
Ken Springer wrote:

What the **** does any of this have to do with privacy?

This is a private thread. Butt out.


But this is posted in a PUBLIC newsgroup....



--
Sent from Postbox https://www.postbox-inc.com