How many idiots in here are going to vote for Biden?

In article
Tim Streater wrote:

In article , sms
wrote:

On 3/3/2020 4:34 PM, Dementia-Remailer wrote:
In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
wrote:


You know voting for Biden means you're stupid, right?

Did you know you could vote for Biden using your iPhone?


None of the idiots in here are going to vote for Biden. All of the
idiots in here are voting for Trump.

Only the smart people in here are voting for Biden.

Biden is certainly not even the first choice of many of the people
voting for him, but all the polling shows that he has the best chance of
defeating the real idiot. Personally my favorite Democratic candidate
was Klobuchar.

I'm given to understand that Biden is seriously senile. Mind you,
everyone left in your "race" seems to be a doddering old fossil.

--
There's no obfuscated Perl contest because it's pointless.

- Jeff Polk

In article
Christopher Heng wrote:

On 07/03/2020 14:27, Mayayana wrote:

But what about the people in Asain factories?
He's only building iPhones over there because he can
cheat people out of a fair wage.

tl;dr

However, Chinese are better workers than Americans, Europeans, Africans,
Hispanics or Indians. Out of nowhere they are the second largest
economy in the world and soon they will be first. They will then start
employing people like you who are good at talking rubbish on these
newsgroups.

They aren't better. They have no choice but to perform as
slaves in order to survive.

That is not work. That is a sentence.

In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
wrote:


In article
Ken Springer wrote:

What the **** does any of this have to do with privacy?

This is a private thread. Butt out.

On 2020-03-07 3:13 p.m., troll #0870987E-0073 wrote:
In article
=?UTF-8?B?8J+YiSBHb29kIEd1eSDwn5iJ?=
wrote:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/03/2020 15:30, Christopher Heng wrote:
crap deleted



Groups restored, follow-up defeated.

I know you are a new kid on the block but take your crap some where else
where it belongs. This is Windows 10 newsgroup where we discuss
solutions to Windows 10 problems (if any) or exchange ideas how to do
things in a better way.

Like vote for Trump!

You replied to a post by a known troll in these newsgroups who has been
kill-filed by almost every body here.

Trolls are very intelligent beings. Well, some are anyways.
You would be wise to occasionally seek their counsel.


Naw, there not that intelligent, They can't even build houses, most of
them live under bridges. :-)

Rene

In article , Snit
wrote:

I've always thought the idea of going to someone different each time was
stupid. (Wish I had a different word at the moment than stupid, but
coming up empty.) Would you do that with your doctor? How would a
growing problem be recognized without a history with whatever?

by examining the patient's medical records.

what happens when your doctor retires, or moves to another location, or
various other things that would result in getting a new doctor?

To some extent, sure. But it is also good to have a professional who
knows your specific situation, knows how you handle things, knows what
you are more or less open to, etc.

they see far too many patients to remember specific details of each one
without reviewing medical records, which is why the notes are very
detailed.

On 3/7/20 3:06 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

I've always thought the idea of going to someone different each time was
stupid. (Wish I had a different word at the moment than stupid, but
coming up empty.) Would you do that with your doctor? How would a
growing problem be recognized without a history with whatever?

by examining the patient's medical records.

what happens when your doctor retires, or moves to another location, or
various other things that would result in getting a new doctor?

To some extent, sure. But it is also good to have a professional who
knows your specific situation, knows how you handle things, knows what
you are more or less open to, etc.

they see far too many patients to remember specific details of each one
without reviewing medical records, which is why the notes are very
detailed.

The notes ARE very important... but I know my doctor knows me and it is
a benefit. It is far more than just notes.

There is a human touch that matters.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Naw, there not that intelligent

It's they're not there, moron. So much for *your* intelligence.

In article
Nomen Nescio wrote:

In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
wrote:


In article
Ken Springer wrote:

What the **** does any of this have to do with privacy?

This is a private thread. Butt out.

#DumpTrump2020

In article
Snit wrote:

On 3/7/20 3:06 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Snit
wrote:

I've always thought the idea of going to someone different each time was
stupid. (Wish I had a different word at the moment than stupid, but
coming up empty.) Would you do that with your doctor? How would a
growing problem be recognized without a history with whatever?

by examining the patient's medical records.

what happens when your doctor retires, or moves to another location, or
various other things that would result in getting a new doctor?

To some extent, sure. But it is also good to have a professional who
knows your specific situation, knows how you handle things, knows what
you are more or less open to, etc.

they see far too many patients to remember specific details of each one
without reviewing medical records, which is why the notes are very
detailed.

The notes ARE very important... but I know my doctor knows me and it is
a benefit. It is far more than just notes.

There is a human touch that matters.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2020-03-07 5:23 p.m., Anonymous wrote:
In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Naw, there not that intelligent

It's they're not there, moron. So much for *your* intelligence.



Oh My, A spelling cop.

In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

On 2020-03-07 5:23 p.m., Anonymous wrote:
In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Naw, there not that intelligent

It's they're not there, moron. So much for *your* intelligence.



Oh My, A spelling cop.

Nice try, but that's hardly a spelling error, or even a typo.
LOL

In article
"troll #0870987E-0073" wrote:

#DumpTrump2020

Anonymous wrote:
In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Naw, there not that intelligent

It's they're not there, moron. So much for *your* intelligence.




Oh the irony!

--

Regards,
Savageduck

On 3/7/20 4:24 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
In article .at
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
wrote:


In article
Ken Springer wrote:

What the **** does any of this have to do with privacy?

This is a private thread. Butt out.


LOL, there is nothing like a private thread on UseNet. What a jackwad.

On 2020-03-07 6:10 p.m., Rene Lamontagne wrote:
On 2020-03-07 5:23 p.m., Anonymous wrote:
In article
Rene Lamontagne wrote:

Naw, there not that intelligent

It's they're not there, moron. So much for *your* intelligence.



Oh My, A spelling cop.




If they're not *there* then where are they?