Adult factual proof Dan Purgert posts are the product of a child's brain

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:12:07 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

There were a couple of glaring errors in the posting, figured they ought
to be fixed ... HTH, HAND

FOR THE PERMANENT USENET RECORD:
o Interestingly, _every_ post by Dan Purgert below, is that of a child.

Adult proof Dan Purgert's posts are clearly the output of a child is below.
o Pointing only to Dan Purgert's own posts, in response to tech questions.

First, I'll point to just one of my threads, as an example of added value:
o Do we have (yet) an actionable list of all free Windows
& Linux web browsers (and their main purpose)?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/jn0gJGRAOMA

Can anyone find even a _single_ thread from Dan Purgert that added value?
o ?
o ?

FACT:
Let's just state that I've been long on record proving that Dan Purgert
owns the mind of a child - which - he just proved - again - so that's not
even an ad hominem attack - it's simply a proven fact Dan proves for us.

Ignoring this copycat thread (which, no doubt, Dan thinks he's a genius for
figuring out), let's look at the facts of the same thread where Rene
Lamontagne proved his inability to post anything of on-topic technical
value, shall we?

o Does anyone have libmtp freeware currently working on Linux or
Windows who can show us how to COPY files to/from unrooted Android
over USB using libmtp?

Notice that's an _adult_ topic, highly technical, which only technically
competent adults could possibly add any value to the answer of.

So _what_ is Dan Purgert's first attempt at adding adult technical value?
o https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.os.linux/rN0tMFWPwHo/wtO0DLW-CAAJ

"Didn't Arlen have a huge "tutorial(tm)" on "Sliding Files" between
Android and any other OS effortlessly, and significantly faster
than MTP? Maybe that's the answer to the problem."

Here is Dan Purgert's _second_ attempt at adding adult on-topic tech value:
o https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.os.linux/rN0tMFWPwHo/ZKNnjxwWAQAJ
... in response to a childish post by Rene Lamontagne ...
"That was a good one. I think I saved it around here somewhere."

Here is Dan Purgert's _third_ attempt at adding adult on-topic tech value:
o https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.os.linux/rN0tMFWPwHo/E-uz-TQWAQAJ
... in response to his own childish post - as if to prove he's a child...
"Don't forget that we're only here to have a conversation,
and bring nothing to the "potluck" (or has he changed his metaphor
since I sent him to the bitbucket)."

That, is Dan Purgert's entire _possible_ added value to the question?
o *I posit that is the output of a person with the brain of a child*.

All of which are completely unprovoked since I don't respond to Dan Purgert
because, as always, Dan Purgert is incapable of adding value to the topic.

FACT:
o *Every post in that thread, from Dan Purgert, is that of a child*.
--
Adults will note I ignored Dan Purgert's childish posts in that thread.

On 03/09/2020 03:43 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:

o Pointing only to Dan Purgert's own posts, in response to tech
questions.

First, I'll point to just one of my threads, as an example of added
value:


Fascinates the hell out of me. You should be a Twilight Zone episode.

Remember the character who was going to make all of the evil people 3
feet tall?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Sea wrote:
On 03/09/2020 03:43 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:

o Pointing only to Dan Purgert's own posts, in response to tech
questions.

First, I'll point to just one of my threads, as an example of added
value:


Fascinates the hell out of me. You should be a Twilight Zone episode.

Maybe "Arlen Holder(tm)" is actually a Turing Test?

It's about the sanest explanation I can come up with.

Remember the character who was going to make all of the evil people 3
feet tall?

I don't remember that one off hand. I gravitated more towards The Outer
Limits than Twilight Zone.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5nd4 8ACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooHF+QgAmJgWrO+2PG+XbpH1WPOgfIQNVMNew/IEFuuJWqvi90HFmX59NEGhJ+5s
Aa5qO7Xs0c4bBdpVsaIG4Lje6u4enNi0bErNISzQ0txOY2HU7P BAFJzh2leddlCP
udoNXFhYBTZcGBGKamngXlrjVM6RF7ID7GEvHzNKtNM8iKUXDp eks1hKpe4oiTPX
+foZNLnxY9aRBTk91IZ2R6T/oXgFi5qjdzqhy3Zt2zNKIuJDAcnJoxD4xWD3mANV
HTWD0LNrX9UHmOK44FPCoNiR0K1lsGEXkEqBC0UKnj3EdC9/XygBIEA/Zk5I1ZiZ
qAV3BJOV0GOAGtHyjuMSjegqSrR/RA==
=NgcW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 20:42:01 -0700, Sea wrote:

Fascinates the hell out of me.

*FACT*
It's interesting you're fascinated by someone who posts FACTS to Usenet.
o You're fascinated by someone who bases his statements on proven cites?

*FACT*
Why is it so fascinating to you that _adults_ are on this newsgroup?
o Adults, IMHO, base assessments on actual facts - which is what I did.

*FACT*
That fact fascinates you?
o You're fascinated that adults base their opinions on actual cited facts?

*FACT*
o I pointed to _exactly_ what Dan Purgert wrote as my factual basis.
https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com/3L8iBjqf/has-rene-lamontagne-ever-added-any-technical-value-to-any-thread-on-this-newsgroup-in-his-entire#post14

*FACT*
In that thread, Dan Purgert posted _zero_ helpful on-topic technical facts.
o Every post by Dan Purgert is easily shown to be worthless in value, IMHO.

*FACT*
Out of a thread containing 14 posts, Dan Purgert posted x times
o Not one of which was an _adult_ post of on-topic technical value, IMHO.

ASSESSMENT:
o Those are the facts upon which _adults_ should base their statements,
IMHO.

ASSESSMENT:
There are two kinds of posters on Usenet, IMHO:
a. Worthless posters such as Dan Purgert yet again proved to be, and,
b. Those who provide value.

QUESTION:
Can (not will, but can) Dan Purgert ever post not as a child would post?
--
Usenet is so much more valuable, and pleasant, when people act like adults.

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:18:40 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

I don't remember that one off hand. I gravitated more towards The Outer
Limits than Twilight Zone.

*FACT*
*Each post from Dan Purgert is _more_ evidence of his child-like brain*.
https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com/jBmxPlFH/adult-factual-proof-dan-purgert-posts-are-the-product-of-a-child-s-brain

*FACT*
This factual cite is of Dan Purgert childishly posting his copycat taunt:
(Dan Purgert can't post _anything_ without proving his brain is that of a
small child who can only post a childishly simply copycat taunt to facts!)
https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com/3L8iBjqf/has-rene-lamontagne-ever-added-any-technical-value-to-any-thread-on-this-newsgroup-in-his-entire#post14

*STRATEGY*
Bear in mind, this thread is placed on the permanent Usenet record for a
strategic and tactical purpose, since Dan Purgert will likely continue to
post his child-like taunts well into the future, and hence, this thread
will simply reflect the actual _negative_ value of Dan Purgert posts.

*FACT*
This is the thread of on-topic technical value where Dan Purgert posted his
absolutely worthless child-like taunts, and to which I'm responding:
https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com/E7WFpU4K/does-anyone-have-libmtp-freeware-currently-working-on-linux-or-windows-who-can-show-us-how-to-copy

*FACT*
Here is the sum total of Dan Purgert's incessantly childish worthless
"negative value" to that difficult technical topic for Windows users who
wish to copy the hosts file to an unrooted Android filessytem over USB
(using libMTP):
"Didn't Arlen have a huge "tutorial(tm)" on "Sliding Files"
between Android and any other OS effortlessly, and significantly
faster than MTP? Maybe that's the answer to the problem.
(tongue firmly in cheek)"

Adults on this newsgroup will note I only cite the facts.
o Every post I'm citing from Dan Purgert is evidence of a child-like brain.
--
This is proof Dan Purgert is just not capable of ever posting adult value.

On 03/10/2020 07:43 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:18:40 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

I don't remember that one off hand. I gravitated more towards The Outer
Limits than Twilight Zone.

One Step Beyond was also fun. Only one I remember now is "Reunion",
found it on Youtube.

o Every post I'm citing from Dan Purgert is evidence of a child-like brain.

Yes, I think so. Maybe you should stop doing it.

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:50:18 -0700, Sea wrote:

One Step Beyond was also fun

Is it even possible, Sea, for you to stick to the topic of this thread?

Can you or can you not find even a _single_ thread authored by Dan Purgert
in this newsgroup, that contains any _adult_ on-topic technical value?

That is, in the entire history of Usenet, can you find even a _single_
thread of on-topic adult value from this Dan Purgert ... or not?

If not, then you're simply proving the key point of this thread.
--
Usenet is so much more valuable, and pleasant, when people act like adults.

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:39:59 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

Something else to look into.
Maybe it'll help debase me of my "child-like brain(tm)(r)(c)"

I just saw this, yet another extremely childish post from Dan Purgert.
o Dan Purgert proves he doesn't own adult cognitive skills necessary to add value.

For the permanent Usenet record...
Notice that in this _one_ thread I just posted moments ago, I've added
_more_ value than Dan Purgert has _ever_ added in his entire life!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/lBbHJdKgBaM

The point is that this utterly worthless ill-educated manchild Dan Purgert
is constantly and incessantly proving he literally is completely incapable
of ever adding any semblance of _adult_ value to _any_ Usenet newsgroup.

FACT:
o Every post by Dan Purgert proves that statement completely correct.
--
Only 2 kinds of people are on Usenet: Those adding value & those who can't.

On 03/10/2020 04:19 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:50:18 -0700, Sea wrote:

One Step Beyond was also fun

Is it even possible, Sea, for you to stick to the topic of this
thread?

Can you or can you not find even a _single_ thread authored by Dan
Purgert in this newsgroup, that contains any _adult_ on-topic
technical value?

That is, in the entire history of Usenet, can you find even a
_single_ thread of on-topic adult value from this Dan Purgert ... or
not?

If not, then you're simply proving the key point of this thread.

OK. He once called me that "cow character" and I was so ****ed (like you
are) that I vowed to administer payback. Spent a few days pondering, and
I had the evil plan.
But by then I had realized that, hey, Dan Purgert was right. I posted
something stupid. Dan's smarter than I, so I'll let him live, read his
posts, and I might learn a few things.

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:29:40 -0700, Sea wrote:

But by then I had realized that, hey, Dan Purgert was right.

For the permanent Usenet record ...
o It's a fair _adult_ question, Sea.

*Name just one thread, by Dan Purgert, to this group, of any adult value*
o *Name just one*

I'm still waiting for someone, anyone, who claims that Dan Purgert is _not_
a worthless child-like ill-educated poster who has never once in his entire
life ever authored even a _single_ thread of redeeming value to this ng, to
back up their claim with a _single_ cite to that thread of reputed value.

I already pointed to Dan Purgert's childish posts proving his posts not
only lack any semblence of adult value, but they're of _negative_ value.

All I ask of you is the adult question that you do the same adult task.

It's trivial to prove people own imaginary belief systems since their
belief systems are based on exactly zero (0) facts.

To that end, I ask you to prove your claim are _not_ wholly imaginary.

In the entire history of Usenet ... can your (or _anyone_) find even a
_single_ thread authored by Dan Purgert to this newsgroup that has _any_
adult on-topic technical value whatsoever?

*Name just one thread, by Dan Purgert, to this group, of any adult value*
o *Name just one*
--
Only 2 kinds of people are on Usenet: Those adding value & those who can't.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Sea wrote:
On 03/10/2020 04:19 PM, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:50:18 -0700, Sea wrote:

One Step Beyond was also fun

Is it even possible, Sea, for you to stick to the topic of this
thread?

Can you or can you not find even a _single_ thread authored by Dan
Purgert in this newsgroup, that contains any _adult_ on-topic
technical value?

That is, in the entire history of Usenet, can you find even a
_single_ thread of on-topic adult value from this Dan Purgert ... or
not?

If not, then you're simply proving the key point of this thread.

OK. He once called me that "cow character" and I was so ****ed (like you

I did? Were you perhaps using a different nym at the time involving
'cow' in the name?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5otJ EACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooEVjAgAjWB0mvqCN0Qcs1oTu2WFf3/l3jyQY8ZZPBFt4ndBooOqZtq2bpchFcdh
otiOnbB7iIuPST59v/tjoXuNwUgv80aTpWv7rIzqs1BvnL/s1hgcu+L48r71/RuI
06b8LdSE4luhTt/MbMq9Z6cVl0S2zUxYrOLLsfqsMv8VSvR5qWJmrprJM2bBxuuw
tc71qmBD4R30CrltY36yWQKuyY7SSF0DOADZKY/SQPTXTBHo5VKaOMwW8v7hWXPC
MVCQIlBa42hBupTjmA437P2liHdULe/44DjVv7ryEGouU9IoWGjYYRf2Km0sgTm9
VN63UteKZHeKpR2HCsZPrFadKI1Iqg==
=1S8n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:51:13 -0000 (UTC), Dan Purgert wrote:

I did? Were you perhaps using a different nym at the time involving
'cow' in the name?

For the permanent Usenet record... (which this thread is all about)...
o People like Dan Purgert prove to own the brain of a child on every post.

Since I'm all about facts which are easily verified and since this thread
is intended as a permanent Usenet record, it is instructive to compare the
utterly worthless childish posts by Dan Purgert to a polite informative
adult technical conversation that has been going on in the rec.autos.tech
newsgroup for the same time period as this thread has been going on.

This thread where Dan Purgert proves to add _negative_ value with each post:
https://alt.comp.os.windows-10.narkive.com/jBmxPlFH/adult-factual-proof-dan-purgert-posts-are-the-product-of-a-child-s-brain#post8

This thread, where adults politely & intelligently discuss technical topics:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.autos.tech/mMP4n31pve4/mUER5onWAgAJ

Notice these facts are evident in _all_ threads Dan Purgert posts to:
a. Dan Purgert _always_ posts proving he owns the mind of a small child
b. No possible on-topic technical added-value conversation is possible
c. All Dan Purgert _can_ do is post worthless idle chit chat

Worse, most of the time, Dan Purgert is hurling childish insults whenever
someone _does_ try to post a topic of technical value to this newsgroup.

Even worse is the result, for the permanent Usenet record to record, that
Dan Purgert has _never_ in the entire history of Usenet _ever_ added even a
_single_ thread of on-topic technical value to this newsgroup.

Not even one.

The proof shown is obvious, consistent, and clear that Dan Purgert proves,
in every post, to not be capable of adding _adult_ value to any technical
thread topic on this newsgroup.

Just watch.
--
People like Dan Purgert prove to own the brain of a child on every post.

On 03/11/2020 02:51 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Sea wrote:

OK. He once called me that "cow character" and I was so ****ed (like you

I did? Were you perhaps using a different nym at the time involving
'cow' in the name?

May have been. Cows are Nice. Perhaps.

Reunion, anyway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpBSmXMWijo

On 03/11/2020 07:49 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
Even worse is the result, for the permanent Usenet record to record, that
Dan Purgert has_never_ in the entire history of Usenet_ever_ added even a
_single_ thread of on-topic technical value to this newsgroup.

Not even one.

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cslrnr191ua.221.dan%40djph.net %3E

There are many more, as you know. Anyone can find them.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Sea wrote:
On 03/11/2020 07:49 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
Even worse is the result, for the permanent Usenet record to record, that
Dan Purgert has_never_ in the entire history of Usenet_ever_ added even a
_single_ thread of on-topic technical value to this newsgroup.

Not even one.

http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3Cslrnr191ua.221.dan%40djph.net %3E

There are many more, as you know. Anyone can find them.


I quite like this one (or the others in that thread)
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=ms...0djph.net %3E


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAl5pe3 YACgkQjhHd8xJ5
ooENDwgAr9gpax3uiQLUxU5vkP7ux7M8IxOxwU9Ex8PMvbLlf2 B9PxYlfCIXHB4N
qKuc2YkJZYa/wq2+R8icq0QLmv8smbhw/y5nlOtCFTD8GZ9zc0ZHfuApc3cWFi05
TgW0oUrs5Fa8BLPV9BRvm91N7PEcWm/7shUTg6XoTBNSb01DpjfN/wOVzPnget5K
2+9XY0rrhV+i60OzuKkZX3fWJu5ztx0CP469BaQ6lOQ2pvlDpA ZZsjSz602PIpOW
D9UclVspwe+GPvzz2jRfRjIKH6n9q4oJUKEH3YdJYI3Joqdj2h ZxYegIdID8Vr4K
ekUxJyH9p49bak6Tyf9aWBbQJCkPAQ==
=0f5z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281