If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/25/2018 6:34 PM, Paul wrote:
cameo wrote: I wish I knew a way to post screen images of relevant settings here that would let you see what I see here. I used to know one of those free web sites that anonymously accepted image uploads and returned an URL of those images for viewing by anybody. Last time I checked that site was full with suspicious ads and I want to stay away from those. This one is still suspicious. It has a 1024x768 limit and will reduce the resolution of larger images, to fit in that space. All sites need to show you some sort of advertising, unless you're paying a monthly rental. https://postimage.org/index.php?um=flash When the upload is finished, it will return a table of URLs. Look to the "Hotlink for forums:" row, third from the bottom. Extract the URL from there. It will look similar to this. ** https://s14.postimg.org/582whzo75/some.gif***** # this is not a real URL Using a second browser, copy the URL into the browser and verify the image is at full scale. I've made mistakes before and used the thumbnail link instead, and that ends up being an unreadably-small image. Testing with a second browser, is to verify everything is OK. That site receives so many uploads per month, their provider presented them with a bill for $40,000 for the bandwidth used. That's the bill for one month. ******* The site you might have been thinking of, is "tinypic", which used to be pretty bad in terms of the advertising content. It would almost freeze the PC with the junk loaded in the browser. When I visit that site now (someone posts a picture via the site), I use a Linux VM :-) ** Paul Thanks, Paul. You're right it was the tinypic site and I like this one you just gave me a lot better. Here are several links showing images of the Device Driver Page and from the network diagnostics. Let me know if you need more. https://s9.postimg.org/m0plwvaqn/Plugable1.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/t3xhchnvz/Plugable2.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/csxdg6yjj/Plugable3.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/qmlq58yun/Plugable4.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/5cy3ueq9r/Plugable5.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/i4ca0wcwf/Plugable6.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/6f8acxe7z/Plugable7.jpg I've gotta' run now. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
"cameo" wrote in message news
On 2/25/2018 12:22 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , cameo writes: On 2/23/2018 11:45 PM, Mike S wrote: [] I didn't try that but the fact that the router port yo which I connected it would not light up suggested to me hardware problem. This was not a big surprise to me because this particular Pavilion model's system board had some problem before wher I had to reflow the solder on its graphics chip a couple times. Eventually I had to replace the system board with a new one with a more recent version of GPU. [] I contacted HP's customer support which was surprisingly accommodating despite the out-of-warranty situation but even they could not help. At that point I decided I had enough of trying to make thet RJ45 port working again and try the USB3 method. [] Since you've had the system board out already, you'll know: is the ethernet socket directly connected to the main board, or - as in a lot of laptops - is it (maybe along with a couple of USB ports) on a small board, that is connected to the main board by a cable? If the latter, it might be worth replacing the small board - and/or checking the connections of the cable connecting the two boards. Luckily I still have pictures of the noteboook disassembly at various stages, so I don't have to rely on my memory. Unfortunately the RJ45 socket is soldered right to the motherboard, no a separate small board. This is the HP Pavilion tx1000 model, more specifically tx1410us. It's a real small notebook but I can run a full 1920 pix HD external monitor from it while the notebook cover is closed and tucked away. Except the obvious quality control issues, it's a really good design where you can access not just the battery but the hard drive and memory slot really easily for any upgrade. I wish I could say the same thing about my newer Lenovo laptop. Just to add my two cents worth. I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers. If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear. If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. -- Bob S. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
cameo wrote:
On 2/25/2018 6:34 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: I wish I knew a way to post screen images of relevant settings here that would let you see what I see here. I used to know one of those free web sites that anonymously accepted image uploads and returned an URL of those images for viewing by anybody. Last time I checked that site was full with suspicious ads and I want to stay away from those. This one is still suspicious. It has a 1024x768 limit and will reduce the resolution of larger images, to fit in that space. All sites need to show you some sort of advertising, unless you're paying a monthly rental. https://postimage.org/index.php?um=flash When the upload is finished, it will return a table of URLs. Look to the "Hotlink for forums:" row, third from the bottom. Extract the URL from there. It will look similar to this. https://s14.postimg.org/582whzo75/some.gif # this is not a real URL Using a second browser, copy the URL into the browser and verify the image is at full scale. I've made mistakes before and used the thumbnail link instead, and that ends up being an unreadably-small image. Testing with a second browser, is to verify everything is OK. That site receives so many uploads per month, their provider presented them with a bill for $40,000 for the bandwidth used. That's the bill for one month. ******* The site you might have been thinking of, is "tinypic", which used to be pretty bad in terms of the advertising content. It would almost freeze the PC with the junk loaded in the browser. When I visit that site now (someone posts a picture via the site), I use a Linux VM :-) Paul Thanks, Paul. You're right it was the tinypic site and I like this one you just gave me a lot better. Here are several links showing images of the Device Driver Page and from the network diagnostics. Let me know if you need more. https://s9.postimg.org/m0plwvaqn/Plugable1.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/t3xhchnvz/Plugable2.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/csxdg6yjj/Plugable3.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/qmlq58yun/Plugable4.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/5cy3ueq9r/Plugable5.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/i4ca0wcwf/Plugable6.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/6f8acxe7z/Plugable7.jpg I've gotta' run now. From Command Prompt ipconfig can tell you about whether an address has been acquired. If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address 169.254.X.X You can assign a static address, instead of leaving a NIC on full auto. Adapters can be assigned priority, but that's not your problem. This just shows it's possible to "bias" the adapters and carry more traffic on one than another. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows And you can see some of those items, in the Properties of the network connection as well. Since you just set up the ASIX, these should not be damaged. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...roperties.html Someone here identified several services. What I was hoping to find, was a complete list of things that affect a network connection. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...o-network.html network list service network location awareness service windows firewall If there was a services issue of some sort, the problem could occur for both NICs. It would be an issue common to both NICs. Maybe a GPEDIT policy or GPO could affect the wired network. I'm not a networking guy, so I don't have a "nice flow chart" with an orderly checklist of things to look at. You also usually have a "Network Troubleshooter" in the Control Panels : Troubleshooters area. It will issue a couple of network commands to reset things. But since your Wifi works, I doubt that troubleshooter will make a bit of difference. Your new NIC is GbE, and as a consequence has MDI/MDIX and it won't matter what kind of Ethernet cable is used. If one end uses GbE (eight wire, four pairs), it can find as few as two working pairs and switch to 10/100BT operation. It can also cross the transmit and receive so their wired properly, without user assistance. So that's probably not the problem on the ASIX. The router could have the wired interface turned off on purpose, but you report the LEDs on either end are operating properly. Paul |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/25/2018 9:02 PM, Paul wrote:
cameo wrote: On 2/25/2018 6:34 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: I wish I knew a way to post screen images of relevant settings here that would let you see what I see here. I used to know one of those free web sites that anonymously accepted image uploads and returned an URL of those images for viewing by anybody. Last time I checked that site was full with suspicious ads and I want to stay away from those. This one is still suspicious. It has a 1024x768 limit and will reduce the resolution of larger images, to fit in that space. All sites need to show you some sort of advertising, unless you're paying a monthly rental. https://postimage.org/index.php?um=flash When the upload is finished, it will return a table of URLs. Look to the "Hotlink for forums:" row, third from the bottom. Extract the URL from there. It will look similar to this. *** https://s14.postimg.org/582whzo75/some.gif***** # this is not a real URL Using a second browser, copy the URL into the browser and verify the image is at full scale. I've made mistakes before and used the thumbnail link instead, and that ends up being an unreadably-small image. Testing with a second browser, is to verify everything is OK. That site receives so many uploads per month, their provider presented them with a bill for $40,000 for the bandwidth used. That's the bill for one month. ******* The site you might have been thinking of, is "tinypic", which used to be pretty bad in terms of the advertising content. It would almost freeze the PC with the junk loaded in the browser. When I visit that site now (someone posts a picture via the site), I use a Linux VM :-) *** Paul Thanks, Paul. You're right it was the tinypic site and I like this one you just gave me a lot better. Here are several links showing images of the Device Driver Page and from the network diagnostics. Let me know if you need more. https://s9.postimg.org/m0plwvaqn/Plugable1.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/t3xhchnvz/Plugable2.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/csxdg6yjj/Plugable3.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/qmlq58yun/Plugable4.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/5cy3ueq9r/Plugable5.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/i4ca0wcwf/Plugable6.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/6f8acxe7z/Plugable7.jpg I've gotta' run now. From Command Prompt ** ipconfig can tell you about whether an address has been acquired. Here it is with the WiFi turned on. As you see, the WiFi connection at the bottom does have the Gateway IP, but the new USB adapter Local Area Connection 3 does not. https://s26.postimg.org/h51jw0z7t/Plugable8.jpg If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address ** 169.254.X.X You can assign a static address, instead of leaving a NIC on full auto. Adapters can be assigned priority, but that's not your problem. This just shows it's possible to "bias" the adapters and carry more traffic on one than another. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows And you can see some of those items, in the Properties of the network connection as well. Since you just set up the ASIX, these should not be damaged. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...roperties.html Someone here identified several services. What I was hoping to find, was a complete list of things that affect a network connection. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...o-network.html ** network list service ** network location awareness service ** windows firewall If there was a services issue of some sort, the problem could occur for both NICs. It would be an issue common to both NICs. Maybe a GPEDIT policy or GPO could affect the wired network. I'm not a networking guy, so I don't have a "nice flow chart" with an orderly checklist of things to look at. You also usually have a "Network Troubleshooter" in the Control Panels : Troubleshooters area. It will issue a couple of network commands to reset things. But since your Wifi works, I doubt that troubleshooter will make a bit of difference. Your new NIC is GbE, and as a consequence has MDI/MDIX and it won't matter what kind of Ethernet cable is used. If one end uses GbE (eight wire, four pairs), it can find as few as two working pairs and switch to 10/100BT operation. It can also cross the transmit and receive so their wired properly, without user assistance. So that's probably not the problem on the ASIX. I haven't seen any reference to GbE (whatever that means) with this adapter but it was referred to at the previous one that was using Realtek chip. I retuened that one already. I'm wondering if maybe the USB3 driver of my ExpressCard/34 is too old and this new Plugable adapter expects a newer one and they are incompatible. I wish I could find a more recent driver for it. https://www.amazon.com/ExpressCard-3...scard+34+USB+3 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
cameo wrote:
On 2/25/2018 9:02 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: On 2/25/2018 6:34 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: I wish I knew a way to post screen images of relevant settings here that would let you see what I see here. I used to know one of those free web sites that anonymously accepted image uploads and returned an URL of those images for viewing by anybody. Last time I checked that site was full with suspicious ads and I want to stay away from those. This one is still suspicious. It has a 1024x768 limit and will reduce the resolution of larger images, to fit in that space. All sites need to show you some sort of advertising, unless you're paying a monthly rental. https://postimage.org/index.php?um=flash When the upload is finished, it will return a table of URLs. Look to the "Hotlink for forums:" row, third from the bottom. Extract the URL from there. It will look similar to this. https://s14.postimg.org/582whzo75/some.gif # this is not a real URL Using a second browser, copy the URL into the browser and verify the image is at full scale. I've made mistakes before and used the thumbnail link instead, and that ends up being an unreadably-small image. Testing with a second browser, is to verify everything is OK. That site receives so many uploads per month, their provider presented them with a bill for $40,000 for the bandwidth used. That's the bill for one month. ******* The site you might have been thinking of, is "tinypic", which used to be pretty bad in terms of the advertising content. It would almost freeze the PC with the junk loaded in the browser. When I visit that site now (someone posts a picture via the site), I use a Linux VM :-) Paul Thanks, Paul. You're right it was the tinypic site and I like this one you just gave me a lot better. Here are several links showing images of the Device Driver Page and from the network diagnostics. Let me know if you need more. https://s9.postimg.org/m0plwvaqn/Plugable1.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/t3xhchnvz/Plugable2.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/csxdg6yjj/Plugable3.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/qmlq58yun/Plugable4.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/5cy3ueq9r/Plugable5.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/i4ca0wcwf/Plugable6.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/6f8acxe7z/Plugable7.jpg I've gotta' run now. From Command Prompt ipconfig can tell you about whether an address has been acquired. Here it is with the WiFi turned on. As you see, the WiFi connection at the bottom does have the Gateway IP, but the new USB adapter Local Area Connection 3 does not. https://s26.postimg.org/h51jw0z7t/Plugable8.jpg If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address 169.254.X.X You can assign a static address, instead of leaving a NIC on full auto. Adapters can be assigned priority, but that's not your problem. This just shows it's possible to "bias" the adapters and carry more traffic on one than another. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows And you can see some of those items, in the Properties of the network connection as well. Since you just set up the ASIX, these should not be damaged. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...roperties.html Someone here identified several services. What I was hoping to find, was a complete list of things that affect a network connection. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...o-network.html network list service network location awareness service windows firewall If there was a services issue of some sort, the problem could occur for both NICs. It would be an issue common to both NICs. Maybe a GPEDIT policy or GPO could affect the wired network. I'm not a networking guy, so I don't have a "nice flow chart" with an orderly checklist of things to look at. You also usually have a "Network Troubleshooter" in the Control Panels : Troubleshooters area. It will issue a couple of network commands to reset things. But since your Wifi works, I doubt that troubleshooter will make a bit of difference. Your new NIC is GbE, and as a consequence has MDI/MDIX and it won't matter what kind of Ethernet cable is used. If one end uses GbE (eight wire, four pairs), it can find as few as two working pairs and switch to 10/100BT operation. It can also cross the transmit and receive so their wired properly, without user assistance. So that's probably not the problem on the ASIX. I haven't seen any reference to GbE (whatever that means) with this adapter but it was referred to at the previous one that was using Realtek chip. I retuened that one already. I'm wondering if maybe the USB3 driver of my ExpressCard/34 is too old and this new Plugable adapter expects a newer one and they are incompatible. I wish I could find a more recent driver for it. https://www.amazon.com/ExpressCard-3...scard+34+USB+3 GbE stands for Gigabit Ethernet, a.k.a. 10/100/1000BT chip. It is the fastest of commodity consumer NIC types and supports MDI/MDIX automatic cable type detection. ******* My motherboard has an ASM104x USB3 chip on it. Set the OS selector here to Windows 7 and there should be a ~5MB download. But the driver is from the year 2013 and is version V1.16.12.0. https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/P9...Desk_Download/ Certainly other driver sources claim to be more modern than that, but the commenters claim their USB3 won't connect. I would be pretty happy myself, if the port actually worked. http://www.station-drivers.com/index...d=2724&lang=en ******* You seem to have an IP address. That's a good sign. Now, can you "ping" from one wired machine to another wired machine. from 192.168.1.1 , I could do ping 192.168.1.2 and from 192.168.1.2 , I could do ping 192.168.1.1 You can test from either of the two machines, towards the other, and see if there is a response. And you can also go to Command Prompt and run the ipconfig command on the ASIX machine and get the rest of the details. See if there is a gateway and so on. C:\WINDOWS\system32ipconfig Windows IP Configuration Ethernet adapter Ethernet: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.102 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.1 If your DNS wasn't working, you should still be able to open a web browser and enter http://156.151.59.35 and it should be the same as doing http://www.sun.com # The Sun/Oracle web site Paul |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/26/2018 1:35 AM, Paul wrote:
cameo wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:02 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: On 2/25/2018 6:34 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: I wish I knew a way to post screen images of relevant settings here that would let you see what I see here. I used to know one of those free web sites that anonymously accepted image uploads and returned an URL of those images for viewing by anybody. Last time I checked that site was full with suspicious ads and I want to stay away from those. This one is still suspicious. It has a 1024x768 limit and will reduce the resolution of larger images, to fit in that space. All sites need to show you some sort of advertising, unless you're paying a monthly rental. https://postimage.org/index.php?um=flash When the upload is finished, it will return a table of URLs. Look to the "Hotlink for forums:" row, third from the bottom. Extract the URL from there. It will look similar to this. *** https://s14.postimg.org/582whzo75/some.gif***** # this is not a real URL Using a second browser, copy the URL into the browser and verify the image is at full scale. I've made mistakes before and used the thumbnail link instead, and that ends up being an unreadably-small image. Testing with a second browser, is to verify everything is OK. That site receives so many uploads per month, their provider presented them with a bill for $40,000 for the bandwidth used. That's the bill for one month. ******* The site you might have been thinking of, is "tinypic", which used to be pretty bad in terms of the advertising content. It would almost freeze the PC with the junk loaded in the browser. When I visit that site now (someone posts a picture via the site), I use a Linux VM :-) *** Paul Thanks, Paul. You're right it was the tinypic site and I like this one you just gave me a lot better. Here are several links showing images of the Device Driver Page and from the network diagnostics. Let me know if you need more. https://s9.postimg.org/m0plwvaqn/Plugable1.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/t3xhchnvz/Plugable2.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/csxdg6yjj/Plugable3.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/qmlq58yun/Plugable4.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/5cy3ueq9r/Plugable5.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/i4ca0wcwf/Plugable6.jpg https://s9.postimg.org/6f8acxe7z/Plugable7.jpg I've gotta' run now. *From Command Prompt *** ipconfig can tell you about whether an address has been acquired. Here it is with the WiFi turned on. As you see, the WiFi connection at the bottom does have the Gateway IP, but the new USB adapter Local Area Connection 3 does not. https://s26.postimg.org/h51jw0z7t/Plugable8.jpg * If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making * contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for * some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny * an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg If the adapter returns the APIPA address, then it isn't making contact with the DHCP server on the wired router. Or maybe for some reason the DHCP server is using MAC filtering to deny an address to the NIC ? I doubt it if you look at this page of my router. It has two Notebook7 entries with different IPs. The 192.168.1.191 is the new USB3 adapter and the 192.168.1.188 is the WiFi. https://s26.postimg.org/8zjhxv395/Plugable9.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address *** 169.254.X.X You can assign a static address, instead of leaving a NIC on full auto. Adapters can be assigned priority, but that's not your problem. This just shows it's possible to "bias" the adapters and carry more traffic on one than another. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows And you can see some of those items, in the Properties of the network connection as well. Since you just set up the ASIX, these should not be damaged. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...roperties.html Someone here identified several services. What I was hoping to find, was a complete list of things that affect a network connection. https://www.sevenforums.com/network-...o-network.html *** network list service *** network location awareness service *** windows firewall If there was a services issue of some sort, the problem could occur for both NICs. It would be an issue common to both NICs. Maybe a GPEDIT policy or GPO could affect the wired network. I'm not a networking guy, so I don't have a "nice flow chart" with an orderly checklist of things to look at. You also usually have a "Network Troubleshooter" in the Control Panels : Troubleshooters area. It will issue a couple of network commands to reset things. But since your Wifi works, I doubt that troubleshooter will make a bit of difference. Your new NIC is GbE, and as a consequence has MDI/MDIX and it won't matter what kind of Ethernet cable is used. If one end uses GbE (eight wire, four pairs), it can find as few as two working pairs and switch to 10/100BT operation. It can also cross the transmit and receive so their wired properly, without user assistance. So that's probably not the problem on the ASIX. I haven't seen any reference to GbE (whatever that means) with this adapter but it was referred to at the previous one that was using Realtek chip. I retuened that one already. I'm wondering if maybe the USB3 driver of my ExpressCard/34 is too old and this new Plugable adapter expects a newer one and they are incompatible. I wish I could find a more recent driver for it. https://www.amazon.com/ExpressCard-3...scard+34+USB+3 GbE stands for Gigabit Ethernet, a.k.a. 10/100/1000BT chip. It is the fastest of commodity consumer NIC types and supports MDI/MDIX automatic cable type detection. ******* My motherboard has an ASM104x USB3 chip on it. Set the OS selector here to Windows 7 and there should be a ~5MB download. But the driver is from the year 2013 and is version V1.16.12.0. https://www.asus.com/Motherboards/P9...Desk_Download/ Certainly other driver sources claim to be more modern than that, but the commenters claim their USB3 won't connect. I would be pretty happy myself, if the port actually worked. http://www.station-drivers.com/index...d=2724&lang=en ******* You seem to have an IP address. That's a good sign. Actually, the Gbe connection does not have an IP address. Just check the ptreviously sent Plugable8.jpg image, Connection 2 on top. The Wireless connection at the bottom has both I and Gateway address. Now, can you "ping" from one wired machine to another wired machine. *** from 192.168.1.1 , I could do ****** ping 192.168.1.2 *** and from 192.168.1.2 , I could do ****** ping 192.168.1.1 You can test from either of the two machines, towards the other, and see if there is a response. The ping does not eork even on the same machines between wired and wireless connections and same across the two machines (fom/to the GbE connection.) And you can also go to Command Prompt and run the ipconfig command on the ASIX machine and get the rest of the details. See if there is a gateway and so on. C:\WINDOWS\system32ipconfig Windows IP Configuration Ethernet adapter Ethernet: ** Connection-specific DNS Suffix* . : ** Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : ** IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.102 ** Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 ** Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.2.1 The relevant section is already on that Plugable8.jpg. What else do you need? If your DNS wasn't working, you should still be able to open a web browser and enter * http://156.151.59.35 and it should be the same as doing * http://www.sun.com***************** # The Sun/Oracle web site Actually, without Internet connection I can't even get local IP page up in my Chrome browser. It's kind'a counterintuitive to me why that should be so. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/25/2018 8:58 PM, Bob_S wrote:
"cameo"Â* wrote in message news On 2/25/2018 12:22 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , cameo writes: On 2/23/2018 11:45 PM, Mike S wrote: [] I didn't try that but the fact that the router port yo which I connected it would not light up suggested to me hardware problem. This was not a big surprise to me because this particular Pavilion model's system board had some problem before wher I had to reflow the solder on its graphics chip a couple times. Eventually I had to replace the system board with a new one with a more recent version of GPU. [] I contacted HP's customer support which was surprisingly accommodating despite the out-of-warranty situation but even they could not help. At that point I decided I had enough of trying to make thet RJ45 port working again and try the USB3 method. [] Since you've had the system board out already, you'll know: is the ethernet socket directly connected to the main board, or - as in a lot of laptops - is it (maybe along with a couple of USB ports) on a small board, that is connected to the main board by a cable? If the latter, it might be worth replacing the small board - and/or checking the connections of the cable connecting the two boards. Luckily I still have pictures of the noteboook disassembly at various stages, so I don't have to rely on my memory. Unfortunately the RJ45 socket is soldered right to the motherboard, no a separate small board. This is the HP Pavilion tx1000 model, more specifically tx1410us. It's a real small notebook but I can run a full 1920 pix HD external monitor from it while the notebook cover is closed and tucked away. Except the obvious quality control issues, it's a really good design where you can access not just the battery but the hard drive and memory slot really easily for any upgrade. I wish I could say the same thing about my newer Lenovo laptop. Just to add my two cents worth.Â* I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers.Â* If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear.Â* If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. I did not have much faith in this method, but I tried it anyway. Imagine my surprise when it worked on the first try. Unfortunately only that one time. As I was ready to finish that setup, I may have inadvertently changed something that blew that wired connection and I could not repeat your method successfully again. Go, figure ... The diagnose tap could not fix it either. I am gona give this a rest for a while and later I'll try to uninstall the GbE driver and try to install the one that came with the adapter on a mini CD. Maybe that older version could mash better with this old USB3 card even though the vendor urges people to use the latest drivers from their web site. Thanks for the help. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
cameo wrote:
You seem to have an IP address. That's a good sign. Actually, the Gbe connection does not have an IP address. Just check the ptreviously sent Plugable8.jpg image, Connection 2 on top. The Wireless connection at the bottom has both I and Gateway address. OK, I see 169.254.228.49 which is in the 169.254.x.x range of APIPA. That means for some reason, the ASIX adapter cannot reach DHCP on the router. Are you sure the router is configured properly for this ? The ping does not eork even on the same machines between wired and wireless connections and same across the two machines (fom/to the GbE connection.) You could manually assign addresses in the same subnet, but above the range used by DHCP. If the DHCP was 192.168.1.199 with subnet mask 255.255.255.0, you could try assigning the APIPA victim 192.168.1.225 or so. Somewhere above where ever the last DHCP address in the pool is set. The DHCP on my router has a start address and number_of_addresses field, and the DHCP values are dealt from that pool. Not that pinging is a priority at the moment, with statically assigned addresses. But I suppose it could be used to prove the router wired interfaces actually work. The relevant section is already on that Plugable8.jpg. What else do you need? Actually, without Internet connection I can't even get local IP page up in my Chrome browser. It's kind'a counterintuitive to me why that should be so. Is the Wifi still up at this point in time ? If the Ethernet is down, the Wifi should have picked up the traffic. Even if the interfaces are prioritized, a NIC that can't carry traffic isn't going to be able to share the load. There's got to be some other weirdness in how you've wired your network boxes. The situation is just a single router, a bunch of computers, and one WAN connection feeding the router ? The Windows 7 networking picture hints at the simple nature of the setup. I thought there was some other option in Windows 7, to make a slightly larger picture which could include more networked devices in the picture. Example here. (This capability was discontinued in later OSes.) https://www.petri.com/create-network-map-windows-7 Paul |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/26/2018 6:19 PM, Paul wrote:
cameo wrote: You seem to have an IP address. That's a good sign. Actually, the Gbe connection does not have an IP address. Just check the ptreviously sent Plugable8.jpg image, Connection 2 on top. The Wireless connection at the bottom has both I and Gateway address. OK, I see 169.254.228.49 which is in the 169.254.x.x range of APIPA. That means for some reason, the ASIX adapter cannot reach DHCP on the router. Are you sure the router is configured properly for this ? The ping does not eork even on the same machines between wired and wireless connections and same across the two machines (fom/to the GbE connection.) You could manually assign addresses in the same subnet, but above the range used by DHCP. If the DHCP was 192.168.1.199 with subnet mask 255.255.255.0, you could try assigning the APIPA victim 192.168.1.225 or so. Somewhere above where ever the last DHCP address in the pool is set. The DHCP on my router has a start address and number_of_addresses field, and the DHCP values are dealt from that pool. Not that pinging is a priority at the moment, with statically assigned addresses. But I suppose it could be used to prove the router wired interfaces actually work. The relevant section is already on that Plugable8.jpg. What else do you need? Actually, without Internet connection I can't even get local IP page up in my Chrome browser. It's kind'a counterintuitive to me why that should be so. Is the Wifi still up at this point in time ? If the Ethernet is down, the Wifi should have picked up the traffic. Even if the interfaces are prioritized, a NIC that can't carry traffic isn't going to be able to share the load. There's got to be some other weirdness in how you've wired your network boxes. The situation is just a single router, a bunch of computers, and one WAN connection feeding the router ? The Windows 7 networking picture hints at the simple nature of the setup. I thought there was some other option in Windows 7, to make a slightly larger picture which could include more networked devices in the picture. Example here. (This capability was discontinued in later OSes.) https://www.petri.com/create-network-map-windows-7 ** Paul Paul I have had cases where it seemed like the first connection established was used as the default connection by the computer, so if I connected to wifi and then ethernet, in that order, the laptop used the wifi connection, the ethernet connection would not carry any traffic. If I disabled the wifi, the ethernet would become the default connection and all of the traffic would flow over it. Do you know if that's how it works? |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
Mike S wrote:
I have had cases where it seemed like the first connection established was used as the default connection by the computer, so if I connected to wifi and then ethernet, in that order, the laptop used the wifi connection, the ethernet connection would not carry any traffic. If I disabled the wifi, the ethernet would become the default connection and all of the traffic would flow over it. Do you know if that's how it works? There's a means of adjusting that, here. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows I think you can also juggle bandwidth on multiple wired connections that way too. My networking setup is a little too simple to test that :-) The router doesn't have Wifi for a start. Paul |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/26/2018 7:47 PM, Paul wrote:
Mike S wrote: I have had cases where it seemed like the first connection established was used as the default connection by the computer, so if I connected to wifi and then ethernet, in that order, the laptop used the wifi connection, the ethernet connection would not carry any traffic. If I disabled the wifi, the ethernet would become the default connection and all of the traffic would flow over it. Do you know if that's how it works? There's a means of adjusting that, here. http://www.thewindowsclub.com/change...iority-windows I think you can also juggle bandwidth on multiple wired connections that way too. My networking setup is a little too simple to test that :-) The router doesn't have Wifi for a start. ** Paul "Under the Adapters and Bindings tab, you will see the list of connection and their order in which they are accessed by Network Connections and other related Windows services." Nice, thanks! |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
snip Just to add my two cents worth. I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers. If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear. If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. I did not have much faith in this method, but I tried it anyway. Imagine my surprise when it worked on the first try. Unfortunately only that one time. As I was ready to finish that setup, I may have inadvertently changed something that blew that wired connection and I could not repeat your method successfully again. Go, figure ... The diagnose tap could not fix it either. I am gona give this a rest for a while and later I'll try to uninstall the GbE driver and try to install the one that came with the adapter on a mini CD. Maybe that older version could mash better with this old USB3 card even though the vendor urges people to use the latest drivers from their web site. Thanks for the help. If it worked once, it will most certainly work again. Been down that road many times. Make sure the driver is installed and just use DHCP (assuming your router is set to dish out the address) and go thru the procedure again. I have two legacy laptops at a client (Asus and Dell) that will not connect if both are enabled. You could try updating the chipset drivers and see if that helps but I never have found out why nor a good fix other than Disabling one or the other and then the one Enabled will work. Bob S. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 27/02/2018 01:11, cameo wrote:
On 2/25/2018 8:58 PM, Bob_S wrote: Just to add my two cents worth.Â* I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers.Â* If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear.Â* If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. I did not have much faith in this method, but I tried it anyway. Imagine my surprise when it worked on the first try. Unfortunately only that one time. As I was ready to finish that setup, I may have inadvertently changed something that blew that wired connection and I could not repeat your method successfully again. Go, figure ... The diagnose tap could not fix it either. I am gona give this a rest for a while and later I'll try to uninstall the GbE driver and try to install the one that came with the adapter on a mini CD. Maybe that older version could mash better with this old USB3 card even though the vendor urges people to use the latest drivers from their web site. If the above works then you might be able to avoid the need for it by going into ... Control Panel Network and Sharing Center Change adaptor settings Advanced Advanced Settings Adaptors and Bindings .... and ensuring the cabled connection is set to be given higher priority than the WiFi connection. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/28/2018 5:48 AM, Java Jive wrote:
On 27/02/2018 01:11, cameo wrote: On 2/25/2018 8:58 PM, Bob_S wrote: Just to add my two cents worth.Â* I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers.Â* If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear.Â* If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. I did not have much faith in this method, but I tried it anyway. Imagine my surprise when it worked on the first try. Unfortunately only that one time. As I was ready to finish that setup, I may have inadvertently changed something that blew that wired connection and I could not repeat your method successfully again. Go, figure ... The diagnose tap could not fix it either. I am gona give this a rest for a while and later I'll try to uninstall the GbE driver and try to install the one that came with the adapter on a mini CD. Maybe that older version could mash better with this old USB3 card even though the vendor urges people to use the latest drivers from their web site. If the above works then you might be able to avoid the need for it by going into ... Â*Â*Â*Â*Control Panel Â*Â*Â*Â*Network and Sharing Center Â*Â*Â*Â*Change adaptor settings Â*Â*Â*Â*Advanced Â*Â*Â*Â*Advanced Settings Â*Â*Â*Â*Adaptors and Bindings ... and ensuring the cabled connection is set to be given higher priority than the WiFi connection. Done, but no change in status. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Substitute for dead RJ45 Ethernet connection
On 2/27/2018 10:59 PM, Bob_S wrote:
snip Just to add my two cents worth.Â* I know you have tried a number of things but try this: Note - Make sure cable is connected to router 1. In the Network Properties, select Change Adapter Settings 2. Right-click on the Wifi connection and select Disable 3. Do the same on the wired connection, then right-click again to Enable. 4. Give it a moment and double-click on the wired connection and look at the Details. Assuming you have the DHCP setting on auto (no manual entries for TCP/IP4) you will see an assigned address by your router, the gateway address (your router) and the DNS servers.Â* If not go back to the General tab and click on diagnose. I have seen a number of laptops that will not connect when the WiFi connection is Enabled - especially on older gear.Â* If it connects up with the WiFi Disabled, that’s' how you'll have to run it and when you want WiFi, unplug from the router and Enable the WiFi connection and it should connect right up. I did not have much faith in this method, but I tried it anyway. Imagine my surprise when it worked on the first try. Unfortunately only that one time. As I was ready to finish that setup, I may have inadvertently changed something that blew that wired connection and I could not repeat your method successfully again. Go, figure ... The diagnose tap could not fix it either. I am gona give this a rest for a while and later I'll try to uninstall the GbE driver and try to install the one that came with the adapter on a mini CD. Maybe that older version could mash better with this old USB3 card even though the vendor urges people to use the latest drivers from their web site. Thanks for the help. If it worked once, it will most certainly work again. That's my hope, too. Been down that road many times.Â* Make sure the driver is installed and just use DHCP (assuming your router is set to dish out the address) and go thru the procedure again. Yes, the router is set to use DHCP within a certain range of IP addresses. But because I use several IP cameras as well, I had to reserve some stable IPs for them so I could use port forwarding to them from outside calls. Personally I don't see the rational of why I could also not uses reserved IP for this GbE adapter. In any case I've tried to use both reserved and unreserved IPs for it without any difference in results. BTW this router's (D-Link DIR-825) DHCP allocates new IPs starting from the highest available one in the pool that I set to 100 to 200 and continues to lower available numbers, skipping the ones that are reserved for given MAC IDs. I have two legacy laptops at a client (Asus and Dell) that will not connect if both are enabled.Â* You could try updating the chipset drivers and see if that helps but I never have found out why nor a good fix other than Disabling one or the other and then the one Enabled will work. I tried now the drivers that came on the enclosed CD, but still no luck there. So I went back to the newest drivers on the ASIX web site. I'd like to see some newer drivers for that Gmyle ExpressCard/34 but I could not find any. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|