A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Problem with Users folder



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old May 5th 17, 06:11 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
VanguardLH[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,881
Default Problem with Users folder - WTF is going on?

Nil wrote:

jbm wrote:

Tonight, I have just run about a hundred FLAC files successfully,
transferred the resulting wav file to the Cloud drive, and went into
the AppData\Temp folder to delete the rubbish. Except there's no
rubbish in there!!!!!!! Work that one out. Now, where did I put my
Windows XP installation disks?


I don't see any problem here. What are you complaining about?


That the cockroach disappeared when he turned on the light. He had a
problem. He tried to investigate. It disappeared. The sucker wasted
his time. When it goes dark (he isn't watching), the cockroach could
come back.
Ads
  #32  
Old May 5th 17, 02:18 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Rene Lamontagne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,549
Default Problem with Users folder - thank you all

On 5/4/2017 10:29 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017 23:27:53 +0100, jbm wrote:

On 04/05/2017 14:18, Paul wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-05-03 18:17, jbm wrote:
[...]
Secondly, I am a bit ****ed off with HP for installing such a small
drive as their main C:\ drive.
[...]

Well, they were trying to meet a price point....


These are the specs on the HP Pavilion 550-103na Desktop PC.

Hard drive: 2 TB HDD & 128 GB SSD

I don't think that's a particular egregious setup.

If having C: on an SSD is cramping your style,
you can always move the contents of the 128GB SSD
into the 2TB HDD, resize the C: partition, done.

The 128GB SSD is likely to have the recovery partition
and the like, while the 2TB hard drive should have
hardly any valuable OEM info at all on it.

So you should be able to whip up a 1800GB C:
partition, if you want one. I think I could
do that in one shot, with Macrium Reflect Free.

http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp

By placing C: on the hard drive, it won't run as
fast, but it will "suit your lifestyle" better
(if you want to "store it all" on C: ). It can be
fixed.

Paul



On delivery, the 2TB D:\ drive was empty apart from its label
DATADRIVE1. Just one partition and no stored folders or files.

The 128GB drive contained the OS (Win10) on C:\, a SYSTEM drive Z:\, and
an unspecified RECOVERY drive; i.e. 3 separate partitions.

Transferring the OS C:\ drive onto the 2TB drive sounds like a good
idea. I'll have to look into that. What are the major pitfalls? There
have got to be some!!! The big question is how the hell do you create a
new C:\ drive when one already exists???


One way that's frequently recommended around here, which I agree with,
is to use Macrium Reflect Free to clone C: to D:. Do the cloning
operation, then shut down. Disconnect the SSD and boot from the 2TB
drive. Shut down, reconnect the SSD, boot from the 2TB drive, format the
SSD and use it for whatever you like. Disk performance will take a hit
by going from SSD to spinning drive, but before too long you'll stop
noticing it.

God. I loved Windows XP!


The OS doesn't matter in this case.


Using a spinning drive as your windows drive when you have a perfectly
good SSD to run it on is a real dumb Idea!
Furthermore 128 GB is plenty big enough for windows IF you don't put any
other crap on it.
I have 3 machines running Windows 10 on 128 GB SSDs and in all cases
Windows uses 27 to 32GB, lean and mean. JUST INSTALL ALL your other
stuff and data on the large spinning drive.

Rene
  #33  
Old May 5th 17, 03:07 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Mr. Man-wai Chang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,941
Default Problem with Users folder

On 3/5/2017 6:27 AM, jbm wrote:
... user folder in C:\Users\Xxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp. (Xxxxx is my
name.) This particular folder was hidden which didn't help matters.
....
What I have just found in the Users folder are 396 .wav and .flac files
totalling 58GB. No wonder I am running out of room on a 117GB drive. If
....


How could you not know that you downloaded a 58GB file? Someone tampered
with your computers?

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa
  #34  
Old May 7th 17, 04:10 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Char Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,449
Default Problem with Users folder

On Fri, 5 May 2017 22:07:54 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote:

On 3/5/2017 6:27 AM, jbm wrote:
... user folder in C:\Users\Xxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp. (Xxxxx is my
name.) This particular folder was hidden which didn't help matters.
....
What I have just found in the Users folder are 396 .wav and .flac files
totalling 58GB. No wonder I am running out of room on a 117GB drive. If
....


How could you not know that you downloaded a 58GB file? Someone tampered
with your computers?


This is probably obvious to most, but "396 .wav and .flac files
totalling 58GB" is not "a 58GB file".

  #35  
Old May 7th 17, 04:20 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Char Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,449
Default Problem with Users folder - thank you all

On Fri, 5 May 2017 08:18:22 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/4/2017 10:29 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017 23:27:53 +0100, jbm wrote:

On 04/05/2017 14:18, Paul wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-05-03 18:17, jbm wrote:
[...]
Secondly, I am a bit ****ed off with HP for installing such a small
drive as their main C:\ drive.
[...]

Well, they were trying to meet a price point....


These are the specs on the HP Pavilion 550-103na Desktop PC.

Hard drive: 2 TB HDD & 128 GB SSD

I don't think that's a particular egregious setup.

If having C: on an SSD is cramping your style,
you can always move the contents of the 128GB SSD
into the 2TB HDD, resize the C: partition, done.

The 128GB SSD is likely to have the recovery partition
and the like, while the 2TB hard drive should have
hardly any valuable OEM info at all on it.

So you should be able to whip up a 1800GB C:
partition, if you want one. I think I could
do that in one shot, with Macrium Reflect Free.

http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp

By placing C: on the hard drive, it won't run as
fast, but it will "suit your lifestyle" better
(if you want to "store it all" on C: ). It can be
fixed.

Paul


On delivery, the 2TB D:\ drive was empty apart from its label
DATADRIVE1. Just one partition and no stored folders or files.

The 128GB drive contained the OS (Win10) on C:\, a SYSTEM drive Z:\, and
an unspecified RECOVERY drive; i.e. 3 separate partitions.

Transferring the OS C:\ drive onto the 2TB drive sounds like a good
idea. I'll have to look into that. What are the major pitfalls? There
have got to be some!!! The big question is how the hell do you create a
new C:\ drive when one already exists???


One way that's frequently recommended around here, which I agree with,
is to use Macrium Reflect Free to clone C: to D:. Do the cloning
operation, then shut down. Disconnect the SSD and boot from the 2TB
drive. Shut down, reconnect the SSD, boot from the 2TB drive, format the
SSD and use it for whatever you like. Disk performance will take a hit
by going from SSD to spinning drive, but before too long you'll stop
noticing it.

God. I loved Windows XP!


The OS doesn't matter in this case.


Using a spinning drive as your windows drive when you have a perfectly
good SSD to run it on is a real dumb Idea!


I totally agree, but the OP is apparently in a tight spot. For his
system drive, does he use a drive that's very fast and way too small, or
does he use a drive that's slow and probably way bigger than it needs to
be? Neither are good choices, IMHO.

Furthermore 128 GB is plenty big enough for windows IF you don't put any
other crap on it.
I have 3 machines running Windows 10 on 128 GB SSDs and in all cases
Windows uses 27 to 32GB, lean and mean. JUST INSTALL ALL your other
stuff and data on the large spinning drive.


Again, I agree, but your use of the word "IF" is a deal breaker for me,
and possibly for the OP. I know I'm not willing to jump through those
hoops, so IMHO the minimum size for a Windows system drive is 512GB. My
use case might not apply to anyone else, however.

  #36  
Old May 7th 17, 04:45 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Rene Lamontagne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,549
Default Problem with Users folder - thank you all

On 5/7/2017 10:20 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2017 08:18:22 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/4/2017 10:29 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017 23:27:53 +0100, jbm wrote:

On 04/05/2017 14:18, Paul wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-05-03 18:17, jbm wrote:
[...]
Secondly, I am a bit ****ed off with HP for installing such a small
drive as their main C:\ drive.
[...]

Well, they were trying to meet a price point....


These are the specs on the HP Pavilion 550-103na Desktop PC.

Hard drive: 2 TB HDD & 128 GB SSD

I don't think that's a particular egregious setup.

If having C: on an SSD is cramping your style,
you can always move the contents of the 128GB SSD
into the 2TB HDD, resize the C: partition, done.

The 128GB SSD is likely to have the recovery partition
and the like, while the 2TB hard drive should have
hardly any valuable OEM info at all on it.

So you should be able to whip up a 1800GB C:
partition, if you want one. I think I could
do that in one shot, with Macrium Reflect Free.

http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp

By placing C: on the hard drive, it won't run as
fast, but it will "suit your lifestyle" better
(if you want to "store it all" on C: ). It can be
fixed.

Paul


On delivery, the 2TB D:\ drive was empty apart from its label
DATADRIVE1. Just one partition and no stored folders or files.

The 128GB drive contained the OS (Win10) on C:\, a SYSTEM drive Z:\, and
an unspecified RECOVERY drive; i.e. 3 separate partitions.

Transferring the OS C:\ drive onto the 2TB drive sounds like a good
idea. I'll have to look into that. What are the major pitfalls? There
have got to be some!!! The big question is how the hell do you create a
new C:\ drive when one already exists???

One way that's frequently recommended around here, which I agree with,
is to use Macrium Reflect Free to clone C: to D:. Do the cloning
operation, then shut down. Disconnect the SSD and boot from the 2TB
drive. Shut down, reconnect the SSD, boot from the 2TB drive, format the
SSD and use it for whatever you like. Disk performance will take a hit
by going from SSD to spinning drive, but before too long you'll stop
noticing it.

God. I loved Windows XP!

The OS doesn't matter in this case.


Using a spinning drive as your windows drive when you have a perfectly
good SSD to run it on is a real dumb Idea!


I totally agree, but the OP is apparently in a tight spot. For his
system drive, does he use a drive that's very fast and way too small, or
does he use a drive that's slow and probably way bigger than it needs to
be? Neither are good choices, IMHO.

Furthermore 128 GB is plenty big enough for windows IF you don't put any
other crap on it.
I have 3 machines running Windows 10 on 128 GB SSDs and in all cases
Windows uses 27 to 32GB, lean and mean. JUST INSTALL ALL your other
stuff and data on the large spinning drive.


Again, I agree, but your use of the word "IF" is a deal breaker for me,
and possibly for the OP. I know I'm not willing to jump through those
hoops, so IMHO the minimum size for a Windows system drive is 512GB. My
use case might not apply to anyone else, however.


If changing a few drive letters is too much of a hardship for you thats
OK by me.

Rene

  #37  
Old May 8th 17, 03:36 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Char Jackson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,449
Default Problem with Users folder - thank you all

On Sun, 7 May 2017 10:45:06 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/7/2017 10:20 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2017 08:18:22 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/4/2017 10:29 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017 23:27:53 +0100, jbm wrote:

On 04/05/2017 14:18, Paul wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-05-03 18:17, jbm wrote:
[...]
Secondly, I am a bit ****ed off with HP for installing such a small
drive as their main C:\ drive.
[...]

Well, they were trying to meet a price point....


These are the specs on the HP Pavilion 550-103na Desktop PC.

Hard drive: 2 TB HDD & 128 GB SSD

I don't think that's a particular egregious setup.

If having C: on an SSD is cramping your style,
you can always move the contents of the 128GB SSD
into the 2TB HDD, resize the C: partition, done.

The 128GB SSD is likely to have the recovery partition
and the like, while the 2TB hard drive should have
hardly any valuable OEM info at all on it.

So you should be able to whip up a 1800GB C:
partition, if you want one. I think I could
do that in one shot, with Macrium Reflect Free.

http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp

By placing C: on the hard drive, it won't run as
fast, but it will "suit your lifestyle" better
(if you want to "store it all" on C: ). It can be
fixed.

Paul


On delivery, the 2TB D:\ drive was empty apart from its label
DATADRIVE1. Just one partition and no stored folders or files.

The 128GB drive contained the OS (Win10) on C:\, a SYSTEM drive Z:\, and
an unspecified RECOVERY drive; i.e. 3 separate partitions.

Transferring the OS C:\ drive onto the 2TB drive sounds like a good
idea. I'll have to look into that. What are the major pitfalls? There
have got to be some!!! The big question is how the hell do you create a
new C:\ drive when one already exists???

One way that's frequently recommended around here, which I agree with,
is to use Macrium Reflect Free to clone C: to D:. Do the cloning
operation, then shut down. Disconnect the SSD and boot from the 2TB
drive. Shut down, reconnect the SSD, boot from the 2TB drive, format the
SSD and use it for whatever you like. Disk performance will take a hit
by going from SSD to spinning drive, but before too long you'll stop
noticing it.

God. I loved Windows XP!

The OS doesn't matter in this case.


Using a spinning drive as your windows drive when you have a perfectly
good SSD to run it on is a real dumb Idea!


I totally agree, but the OP is apparently in a tight spot. For his
system drive, does he use a drive that's very fast and way too small, or
does he use a drive that's slow and probably way bigger than it needs to
be? Neither are good choices, IMHO.

Furthermore 128 GB is plenty big enough for windows IF you don't put any
other crap on it.
I have 3 machines running Windows 10 on 128 GB SSDs and in all cases
Windows uses 27 to 32GB, lean and mean. JUST INSTALL ALL your other
stuff and data on the large spinning drive.


Again, I agree, but your use of the word "IF" is a deal breaker for me,
and possibly for the OP. I know I'm not willing to jump through those
hoops, so IMHO the minimum size for a Windows system drive is 512GB. My
use case might not apply to anyone else, however.


If changing a few drive letters is too much of a hardship for you thats
OK by me.


If you think that's all it takes that's OK by me. ;-)

  #38  
Old May 8th 17, 04:08 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
Rene Lamontagne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,549
Default Problem with Users folder - thank you all

On 5/8/2017 9:36 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2017 10:45:06 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/7/2017 10:20 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2017 08:18:22 -0500, Rene Lamontagne
wrote:

On 5/4/2017 10:29 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 4 May 2017 23:27:53 +0100, jbm wrote:

On 04/05/2017 14:18, Paul wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-05-03 18:17, jbm wrote:
[...]
Secondly, I am a bit ****ed off with HP for installing such a small
drive as their main C:\ drive.
[...]

Well, they were trying to meet a price point....


These are the specs on the HP Pavilion 550-103na Desktop PC.

Hard drive: 2 TB HDD & 128 GB SSD

I don't think that's a particular egregious setup.

If having C: on an SSD is cramping your style,
you can always move the contents of the 128GB SSD
into the 2TB HDD, resize the C: partition, done.

The 128GB SSD is likely to have the recovery partition
and the like, while the 2TB hard drive should have
hardly any valuable OEM info at all on it.

So you should be able to whip up a 1800GB C:
partition, if you want one. I think I could
do that in one shot, with Macrium Reflect Free.

http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp

By placing C: on the hard drive, it won't run as
fast, but it will "suit your lifestyle" better
(if you want to "store it all" on C: ). It can be
fixed.

Paul


On delivery, the 2TB D:\ drive was empty apart from its label
DATADRIVE1. Just one partition and no stored folders or files.

The 128GB drive contained the OS (Win10) on C:\, a SYSTEM drive Z:\, and
an unspecified RECOVERY drive; i.e. 3 separate partitions.

Transferring the OS C:\ drive onto the 2TB drive sounds like a good
idea. I'll have to look into that. What are the major pitfalls? There
have got to be some!!! The big question is how the hell do you create a
new C:\ drive when one already exists???

One way that's frequently recommended around here, which I agree with,
is to use Macrium Reflect Free to clone C: to D:. Do the cloning
operation, then shut down. Disconnect the SSD and boot from the 2TB
drive. Shut down, reconnect the SSD, boot from the 2TB drive, format the
SSD and use it for whatever you like. Disk performance will take a hit
by going from SSD to spinning drive, but before too long you'll stop
noticing it.

God. I loved Windows XP!

The OS doesn't matter in this case.


Using a spinning drive as your windows drive when you have a perfectly
good SSD to run it on is a real dumb Idea!

I totally agree, but the OP is apparently in a tight spot. For his
system drive, does he use a drive that's very fast and way too small, or
does he use a drive that's slow and probably way bigger than it needs to
be? Neither are good choices, IMHO.

Furthermore 128 GB is plenty big enough for windows IF you don't put any
other crap on it.
I have 3 machines running Windows 10 on 128 GB SSDs and in all cases
Windows uses 27 to 32GB, lean and mean. JUST INSTALL ALL your other
stuff and data on the large spinning drive.

Again, I agree, but your use of the word "IF" is a deal breaker for me,
and possibly for the OP. I know I'm not willing to jump through those
hoops, so IMHO the minimum size for a Windows system drive is 512GB. My
use case might not apply to anyone else, however.


If changing a few drive letters is too much of a hardship for you thats
OK by me.


If you think that's all it takes that's OK by me. ;-)



Touche.

Rene

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.