If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big Memory drain in new Toshiba laptop
I have a brand new Toshiba Satellite A85-S107. 40 gig harddrive. 1.4
GHz processor. 256 megs ram. A system check using MSinfo32 indicates that I only have 16 megs of available physical memory and only about half of the 512 mb virtual memory available. The shared video card takes the RAM down to 191 megs. Even when I disable every single file under Startup (msconfig) it only raises the available memory to about 26 mb. So, with virtually nothing running I have about a 75 percent memory load. Can this possibly all be attributed to Windows XP? I realize there are other processes running in the background but I am not sure how and what to do about them. And virtualy all of them seems to be windows files. Should I just add another 256 mb of ram and not worry about it? Comments and suggests would be apprecaited. Thanks, Ken |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
512MB of RAM is ideal for running Windows XP.
Actually, your video adapter is robbing your available memory as it is shared. Visit www.crucial.com for information on the correct RAM required for upgrading. -- Carey Frisch Microsoft MVP Windows XP - Shell/User Microsoft Newsgroups Get Windows XP Service Pack 2 with Advanced Security Technologies: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu...xp/choose.mspx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Kenster" wrote: | I have a brand new Toshiba Satellite A85-S107. 40 gig harddrive. 1.4 | GHz processor. 256 megs ram. | A system check using MSinfo32 indicates that I only have 16 megs of | available physical memory and only about half of the 512 mb virtual | memory available. The shared video card takes the RAM down to 191 | megs. Even when I disable every single file under Startup (msconfig) | it only raises the available memory to about 26 mb. So, with virtually | nothing running I have about a 75 percent memory load. Can this | possibly all be attributed to Windows XP? | I realize there are other processes running in the background but I am | not sure how and what to do about them. And virtualy all of them seems | to be windows files. Should I just add another 256 mb of ram and not | worry about it? | Comments and suggests would be apprecaited. | Thanks, | Ken |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Kenster" wrote:
I have a brand new Toshiba Satellite A85-S107. 40 gig harddrive. 1.4 GHz processor. 256 megs ram. A system check using MSinfo32 indicates that I only have 16 megs of available physical memory and only about half of the 512 mb virtual memory available. The shared video card takes the RAM down to 191 megs. Even when I disable every single file under Startup (msconfig) it only raises the available memory to about 26 mb. So, with virtually nothing running I have about a 75 percent memory load. Can this possibly all be attributed to Windows XP? I realize there are other processes running in the background but I am not sure how and what to do about them. And virtualy all of them seems to be windows files. Should I just add another 256 mb of ram and not worry about it? Comments and suggests would be apprecaited. Thanks, Ken Windows will always attempt to find some use, anything whatever that might potentially be of some benefit rather than just leaving the RAM sitting there idly going to rot. "Available physical memory" should perhaps be renamed "Useless physical memory" because that is what it actually represents - memory for which Windows has so far been unable to find any use for. Adding more memory can noticeably improve performance only if the added memory results in reduced usage of the virtual memory paging file. Therefore if the paging file is not currently being used to any significant extent then adding more memory will not provide a significant improvement. Unfortunately there is no ready way of determing actual paging file usage provided with Windows XP - it does not have an equivalent to the 'Memory Manager - Swap File In Use" reporting provided by the System Monitor utility in Windows 95/98/Me. There is a free utility that you can download and run which will provide this information for you. It was written by MVP Bill James and you can get if from http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm or from http://billsway.com/notes_public/WinXP_Tweaks/ If that utility shows actual page file usage of 50 mb or more on a regular basis then that is indicative of fairly significant paging file activity. Adding more RAM will reduce or even eliminate entirely this activity thereby improving performance. This apples regardless of how much or how little RAM is currently installed in the computer, at least up to the 4 gb RAM maximum for Windows XP. Hope this explains the situation. Good luck Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada -- Microsoft MVP On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca In memory of a dear friend Alex Nichol MVP http://aumha.org/alex.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does XP reset the size of my virtual memory? | Ratboy Ken | General XP issues or comments | 31 | May 3rd 05 04:19 PM |
XP memory detection problem at 4 GB | Eddie | Hardware and Windows XP | 6 | August 27th 04 03:39 AM |
XP memory detection problem at 4 GB | Eddie | Hardware and Windows XP | 5 | July 23rd 04 02:53 AM |
XP memory detection problem at 4 GB | Eddie | Hardware and Windows XP | 5 | July 23rd 04 01:30 AM |
XP memory detection problem at 4 GB | Eddie | Hardware and Windows XP | 7 | July 23rd 04 12:49 AM |