If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
USENET Posting styles (was Making a copy of a DVD)
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:33:45 -0500, "Robert Sudbury" noEMAILforYOU wrote:
Despite your apparent lack of conversation skills, I still scrolled through to the bottom of your reply to read your one-line insult. I respect your choice to bottom post, but I suggest you try to articulate yourself in a less demeaning manner. As for your argument pro or con, I see none. "Erik Vastmasd" wrote in message ... I caught a glimpse of "Robert Sudbury" noEMAILforYOU on Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:02:48 -0500, writing in alt.windows7.general: To compare a posting style to the unsafe operation of a motor vehicle is ludicrious. The implied consequences are incomparable. Using a posting style of one's choice doesn't place your health or life at risk. Back in the days I used to reply mid-post, or in-line. This made it look more like a live conversation. It was an editing nightmare and if it wasn't formatted properly or your recipient's reader sucked, the reader often missed information. If the conversation required more than a single reply from each person involved however... icky acky ooo, what a mess, and I loved it. Thought it was the cat's meow. As flame wars ebbed and flowed, I decided to give bottom posting a swing. Sure it's great to have a complete conversation, chronologically sorted top to bottom, but if the conversation was long, or the reply just as long, or the topic too complex to edit down to a smaller quoted chunk, it could be just as annoying to scroll through the entire message, and hope you find the start of the reply without having to scroll back. Then what happened if you edited out a chunk that was later deemed important? This lasted about a week. I hated bottom posting ... then I switched to top posting. Top posting is where I'm at, and will stay at. Chances are, when you opened this letter, you recognized that the reply was `right here' ... three seconds and you found your goal. Life is good. 8) As for all those lovely arguments against Top-Posting that quote ancient RFCs or netiquette. The internet and usenet were created by ... you guessed it, Engineers. When left to their own devices, Engineers tend to design things for reasons other than business and personal 'use'. Engineers like big thick manuals. Bottom posting is like a big thick manual. A b c d e f g h... neat, orderly. When you're an Engineer or a Scientist, you need to know a b c d e in the order of a b c d e. That works... sure, but what happens when you're a consumer, a user, a business? Do you care? Long are gone the days when the usenet was used solely by academia. Top-posting is immediate. Top posting is personal. Top-posting is for the masses. Blogs = top post Twitter logs = top post News sites = top post When was the last time you visited an information site that listed oldest conversations first? A forum site probably ... but what else? Anything? The point being, top posting offers you the shortest route, through the least amount of effort, to the latest topics or information. I will try to sum up my opinions for the reason for top posting in few useful, daily life arguments. 1. Same concept goes for good paper filing systems. You file new to the front ... where's the front of an email? top. 2. If you're vision-impaired, using a large font reader or you're listening to your news reader, following a conversation thread, that is say, 20 replies deep, how fast will you dump that thread, important or otherwise if you must wade through all that replied, quoted text, over and over, message after message to reach the simple responses all the way down at the bottom? 3. If you're reading a `Thread' you probably already read it from the OP. That's the purpose of the Thread title ... which BTW is at the top of the thread message ... 8) As one reads through a thread, how much more time is wasted scrolling or paging down through quoted text just to reach a reply several paragraphs long that you then must scroll page-up through to find the actual beginning of the reply? Or worse, to an AOL'esque single line or monosyllabic response? 3. In this age of not just immediate gratification, but of the immediacy of information, anything but top posting, wastes time. We all know what time is ... money. My time is valuable, your time is valuable. Learn to structure your thoughts quickly. Put it to print. Get it out there and move on. 4. How many of your parents, or grandparents still can't grasp the concept of scrolling down or how to pull the scroll bar down to see the other 50 lines of your message beyond the mere 15 they can see after blowing their screen res up to 800x600? You may have heard "The medium is the message. ... The content is the audience". For USENET, the medium is instantaneous, and so too should be the message... this is the very essence of Top-posting. Having said all this, in the end, posting style is all about personal choice. It's up to the author to decide what is the best method for getting their message across. No one can say it's right or wrong, just of differing opinion, or merits. Unlike a private company, on USENET there is no policy, and no one & no way to enforce it (unless it's a moderated ng of course). It's a public forum for all dogs on the internet to have their chance to be praised, flamed or ignored, regardless. If you want popularity, go to Facebook or look in a mirror. USENET is not a private conversation, it's a publc dissemination of information, discussions and the occasional obligatory flame-war. "Stan Brown" wrote in message .net... On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:29:10 -0500, "Robert Sudbury" wrote: Top-posting, in-line posting or bottom-posting is entirely up to the individual. Nonsense. You might as well say which side of the road to drive on is a personal decision. Sure, you *can* decide to do it differently from others, but it will make a big mess if you do, and it will also make you unpopular. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com Shikata ga nai... __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6913 (20120224) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com Dick Head. __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6913 (20120224) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com You quoted all that just to say.... nothing. -- Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|