If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
Ant wrote:
notX wrote: On 09/15/2018 02:07 PM, Ant wrote: notX wrote: ... I once saw a documentary that said that corporations are essentially psychopaths (not caring about anything but profit). Makes sense. Which documentary was that? I'd like to see it. "The Corporation", which I found on the internet. It appears to be this: https://www.amazon.com/Corporation-M...he+corporation Ah, nice scores in http://flickmetrix.com/?id=379225. So up to 2003? Darn, there should be a sequel to 2018! http://thecorporation.com/#block-vie...ents_blog-feat says there will be a sequel! -- Quote of the Week: "Still we live meanly, like ants;... like pygmies we fight with cranes;... Our life is frittered away by detail. Simplify... simplify..." --Henry Thoreau Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit- | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link. \ _ / ( ) |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 21:37:26 +0100, ? Good Guy ?
wrote: Windows 10 is here and intelligent people, especially young people, should start using it unless they want to remain idiot like you. Why "should" anyone start using what is in essence a dumb terminal ? Like in the old mainframe days. Win 10 is sooooo "yesterday". Young people might be inexperienced enough to use Win 10, and older people like you might be stupid enough to do the same. But that's hardly a recommendation. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
On 16/09/2018 17:23:30, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , mick writes: [] Yes, your are correct about the time stamp, but I just mark those files to be excluded from future back ups. That is easy enough to do along with other files and folders such as photos, videos and books that will never want to be repeatedly backed up. Sounds like you might benefit from some syncing application for your backups, if you have lots of files you don't want to back up repeatedly (because they haven't changed). I use synctoy to "back up" my D: partition (cycling round two or three backups, though that's not relevant to this discussion); other sync utilities are available. I use Allway Sync -- mick |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
Mayayana wrote:
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote | (Unfortunately, TP stores it with strong encryption, that can't be | turned off.) According to this... https://www.mailxaminer.com/blog/inv...client-emails/ ...it uses Berkeley Mailbox format, or at least can export in that format as a .mbox file. That's also the format that TBird uses, or rather a variation of it. (I wasn't aware of the name or of its being a standard. I just had to figure out what the pattern of storage was in TBird and it turns out to be like BMF. It's not a very sensible format because it allows for ambiguity, but I suppose What ambiguity? the Mozillians have a higher regard for tech "historicity" than for efficiency. Most geeks do. They're a surprisingly conservative bunch.) At any rate, it's a simple format to parse. They use an empty line followed by "From -", which is then followed by 3 lines of superfluous officiality. That pattern separates each email. I say it's poorly designed because "From -" is not a unique string, and empty lines are common in emails. In mbox format, any leading "From " in the body of an email message is escaped with a '', i.e. "From " becomes "From ". This is done because - as you've found - a "From " line signifies the start of the next message. An example from :-) my News/posted mbox file: From the 2006 The Washington Post's Style Invitational [1]: I.e. this is not a *quoted* line, but an *escaped* unquoted line, [...] |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
In message , Mayayana writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote | I really don't like the fact that all my emails are held in a single | monolithic file of a bespoke proprietary format and encryption. For | one thing, if it gets corrupted, it could prove very challenging to | retrieve anything useful from it. For another, if you want to clean | | AFAIK, all - Windows, anyway - do that. (The degree of proprietariness - | and encryption - varying.) I have TBird and OE. Both store in a "flat file" with minimal structure and no encryption. It's still a single file though. Which makes me uneasy (though I'm obviously accepting it since I have no choice). With the 'ImportExport Tools' Extension I mentioned before, TB can Export to individual .eml files with a - machine and human-readable - index.html and it can Export to MBOX format, so you could - periodically - make a safe and non-proprietary - backup. (Though some emails these days are actually sent with Base-64 encoding of the text. Email clients decode that so it's not visible in general usage. It doesn't constitute encryption. I don't know why they do it. Because their coders are too thick to realise they don't need to. I genuinely can't think of any other reason. They only should use Base-64 encoding if the text contains any 8-bit characters. And it's indeed *encoding* (of what can not be sent otherwise), not encryption. [...] |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
In message , Frank Slootweg
writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , Mayayana writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote | I really don't like the fact that all my emails are held in a single | monolithic file of a bespoke proprietary format and encryption. For | one thing, if it gets corrupted, it could prove very challenging to | retrieve anything useful from it. For another, if you want to clean | | AFAIK, all - Windows, anyway - do that. (The degree of proprietariness - | and encryption - varying.) I have TBird and OE. Both store in a "flat file" with minimal structure and no encryption. It's still a single file though. Which makes me uneasy (though I'm obviously accepting it since I have no choice). With the 'ImportExport Tools' Extension I mentioned before, TB can Export to individual .eml files with a - machine and human-readable - index.html and it can Export to MBOX format, so you could - periodically - make a safe and non-proprietary - backup. That's post-processing, though. I don't know of any Windows email client that _uses_ individual files for emails _instead of_ its own internal scheme (as opposed to being able to _generate_ such files afterwards, e. g. with an extension). (Though some emails these days are actually sent with Base-64 encoding of the text. Email clients decode that so it's not visible in general usage. It doesn't constitute encryption. I don't know why they do it. Because their coders are too thick to realise they don't need to. I genuinely can't think of any other reason. They only should use Base-64 encoding if the text contains any 8-bit characters. And it's indeed *encoding* (of what can not be sent otherwise), not encryption. Agreed. Where encoding is required, fine. But only then. (And as you say - though Mayayana did say encoding anyway - it's encoding, not encryption.) [...] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf All humanity is divided into three classes: those who are immovable, those who are movable, and those who move! - Benjamin Franklin |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
Mayayana wrote:
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote [...] [About Thunderbird's mail storage format.] All of that's to say that you should be able to get your email out without much trouble, but I'm not aware of any program that will just export single messages. I can drag them out onto the desktop one at a time, as can also be done with TBird. But I can't save all of them. Elsewhere in this thread, I mentioned Thunderbird's 'ImportExport Tools' Extension, which *can* export single messages (in .eml format, which is basically one-message mbox format). If you export a folder - for example Inbox' - you get a timestamped (Windows) folder (Inbox_20180917-1808) with a subfolder 'messages' and a 'index.html' file. The 'messages' folder contains the messages in .eml format, for example '20180906-Your new F1 hub-2324.eml', where 2324 is probably some index. You can open these files with Thunderbird and they of course will have the real Subject: sans fluff, i.e. 'Your new F1 hub'. You can open the index.html file in your browser, which will show a list of 'Subject', 'From', 'To', 'Date' and 'Attachment'. The messages in the 'Subject' column are highlighted/clickable, but they open the raw/source message. I don't know if that can be changed. Out of curiosity I tried the Export function in OE and it told me that it would only export to Outlook or MS Exchange. Parochial monopoly strikes again. Thunderbird (basic, i.e. without Extension) can Import from Outlook Express and - see above - Thunderbird's 'ImportExport Tools' Extension can export to .eml or mbox (or HTML or Plain text or PDF or ...) format, so Bob's your uncle! FYI, I come from a UNIX and standards background, so I've always checked if I could export my current mail folders from their proprietary format to the only real de jure standard, mbox format. That was possible with Outlook (non-Express) and Outlook Express with third-party software and with Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail (barf!) and now Thunderbird. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
In message , Frank Slootweg writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote: In message , Mayayana writes: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote | I really don't like the fact that all my emails are held in a single | monolithic file of a bespoke proprietary format and encryption. For | one thing, if it gets corrupted, it could prove very challenging to | retrieve anything useful from it. For another, if you want to clean | | AFAIK, all - Windows, anyway - do that. (The degree of proprietariness - | and encryption - varying.) I have TBird and OE. Both store in a "flat file" with minimal structure and no encryption. It's still a single file though. Which makes me uneasy (though I'm obviously accepting it since I have no choice). With the 'ImportExport Tools' Extension I mentioned before, TB can Export to individual .eml files with a - machine and human-readable - index.html and it can Export to MBOX format, so you could - periodically - make a safe and non-proprietary - backup. That's post-processing, though. I don't know of any Windows email client that _uses_ individual files for emails _instead of_ its own internal scheme (as opposed to being able to _generate_ such files afterwards, e. g. with an extension). I was addressing your "Which makes me uneasy ... since I have no choice)." comment. Being able to make backup in a reliable format can take some of the "uneasy" bit away. It also does give you a choice. As to a "Windows email client that _uses_ individual files for emails _instead of_ its own internal scheme", Windows Mail and Windows Live Mail do use individual .eml files, but dependent on your Windows version, WM might not be available and WLM, well let's not talk about WLM. I don't know if there are any other Windows email clients which use individual .eml (or mbox-per-message) files. (As I've described in another response in this thread, I have no such need, because I can always get .eml/mox format if the need arises.) (Though some emails these days are actually sent with Base-64 encoding of the text. Email clients decode that so it's not visible in general usage. It doesn't constitute encryption. I don't know why they do it. Because their coders are too thick to realise they don't need to. I genuinely can't think of any other reason. They only should use Base-64 encoding if the text contains any 8-bit characters. And it's indeed *encoding* (of what can not be sent otherwise), not encryption. Agreed. Where encoding is required, fine. But only then. (And as you say - though Mayayana did say encoding anyway - it's encoding, not encryption.) But Mayayana also said "It doesn't constitute encryption.", because earlier, you were talking about encryption. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
In message , Frank Slootweg
writes: Mayayana wrote: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote [...] [About Thunderbird's mail storage format.] All of that's to say that you should be able to get your email out without much trouble, but I'm not aware of any program that will just export single messages. I can drag them out onto the desktop one at a time, as can also be done with TBird. But I can't save all of them. (I - JPG - _didn't_ write that paragraph, though no matter.) [More at end.] Elsewhere in this thread, I mentioned Thunderbird's 'ImportExport Tools' Extension, which *can* export single messages (in .eml format, which is basically one-message mbox format). If you export a folder - for example Inbox' - you get a timestamped (Windows) folder (Inbox_20180917-1808) with a subfolder 'messages' and a 'index.html' file. The 'messages' folder contains the messages in .eml format, for example '20180906-Your new F1 hub-2324.eml', where 2324 is probably some index. You can open these files with Thunderbird and they of course will have the real Subject: sans fluff, i.e. 'Your new F1 hub'. You can open the index.html file in your browser, which will show a list of 'Subject', 'From', 'To', 'Date' and 'Attachment'. The messages in the 'Subject' column are highlighted/clickable, but they open the raw/source message. I don't know if that can be changed. Out of curiosity I tried the Export function in OE and it told me that it would only export to Outlook or MS Exchange. Parochial monopoly strikes again. Thunderbird (basic, i.e. without Extension) can Import from Outlook Express and - see above - Thunderbird's 'ImportExport Tools' Extension can export to .eml or mbox (or HTML or Plain text or PDF or ...) format, so Bob's your uncle! FYI, I come from a UNIX and standards background, so I've always checked if I could export my current mail folders from their proprietary format to the only real de jure standard, mbox format. That was possible with Outlook (non-Express) and Outlook Express with third-party software and with Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail (barf!) and now Thunderbird. I've not snipped, because all of the above is talking about "getting your mail out", "import"ing, and "export"ing. I am unaware of any Windows mail client that _uses_ individual files for emails, rather than being able to create such files (with or without using extensions). What I mean is this - if there was such a client: If you examined where the emails are stored, in Windows Explorer, you'd see folders - named as they appear inside the client (or at least with a one-to-one correspondence). If, inside the client, you moved an email from one folder to another, then looked again with Windows Explorer, there'd be one more file in one folder and one less in another. I'm sure there are plenty of reasons why such a client would be unwieldy, or have similar disadvantages. I do think, though, that if such an approach had been used from the start (or at least for many years), such problems would have been overcome as clients developed. Wishful thinking now, though, as email client development has almost stopped - certainly nothing as major as that sort of change; the only changes left happening are minor tweaks, and perhaps protocol changes (such as encryption implementations, e. g. for passwords). P. S. - I've just read your post that says WM (and the terrible WLM) _does_ use single files per email (though you call them mbox rather than file). -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Today, I dare say more people know who starred as /The Vicar of Dibley/ than know the name of the vicar of their local parish. - Clive Anderson, Radio Times 15-21 January 2011. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to something after all."
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
In message , Frank Slootweg [...] P. S. - I've just read your post that says WM (and the terrible WLM) _does_ use single files per email (though you call them mbox rather than file). Sorry for the confusion. 'mbox' is a *format*, i.e. like PDF is a format. WM/WLM stores individual messages in .eml files. mbox-format files can store one or multiple messages. Instead of 'mbox [format] files', I might say '.mbox files', but there really is no such thing, because mbox format stems from UNIX, which mainly uses extension-less filenames. .eml format is very similar to one-message-per-file mbox format. The main difference is that the mbox format file should have a "From ..." line as the first line. For example my response you're referring to has From franks Mon Sep 17 20:49:58 2018 as it's first line. N.B. This line should not be quoted by my or your newsreader, i.e. it should NOT say "From franks Mon Sep 17 20:49:58 2018" N.B.2. This is NOT the normal 'From:' (i.e. with colon') header, but an extra *line* (not *header*), which is part of the mbox format, not part of the posted article. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
"Maybe all those people clinging to Windows 7 are on to somethingafter all."
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 21:37:26 +0100, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
On 14/09/2018 00:46, Stan Brown wrote: Fun article You are the same Stupid Stan Brown so whatever crap you post here is not going to make anybody take it seriously. Windows 10 is here and intelligent people, especially young people, should start using it unless they want to remain idiot like you. You've been told to go away many times, do you not read follow up posts. Here's a clue, look at all the times you initiated a thread, then see if anyone bothered to follow up. No, just a bunch of lonely posts, nobody is interested in anything you have to say. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|