If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
What'sa proper reader for Usenet?
On 02/05/2017 17:01, Wildman wrote:
Linux executables begin with 0x7F followed by the letters 'ELF'. Thanks - I have noticed that! Have you EVER heard anyone else EVER say anything quite like this quote from Dustin? Hmm, I've considered it. But, i have to be honest with you. i don't give a damn about most people; *people to me are like insects*, they *deserve to be treated as cruely as I can possibly treat them*. Do you think he's changed since he said that? -- David B. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]What'sa proper reader for Usenet?
On Fri, 5 May 2017 14:17:10 +0100, "David B."
wrote: On 02/05/2017 17:01, Wildman wrote: Linux executables begin with 0x7F followed by the letters 'ELF'. Thanks - I have noticed that! Have you EVER heard anyone else EVER say anything quite like this quote from Dustin? CUT Is the quote anything about the SUBJECT of Usenet readers, or just another drunken Off Topic attempt to denigrate and STALK ? []'s You've been posting for 10 years. I asked you almost 3 weeks ago for the MSG-ID of ANY posts of yours that attempted to help another fellow Usenet user, without immediately changing into a STALKING thread. "Good guys" help others. Still waiting. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
What'sa proper reader for Usenet?
Char Jackson
Tue, 02 May 2017 23:41:47 GMT in alt.windows7.general, wrote: On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:00:44 +0100, "David B." wrote: On 01/05/2017 11:40, mechanic wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote: I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at the forefront of things if what you say is true. Seriously, I was delighted to find you he- https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/ Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several. No, I am *NOT* sure. I had expected 'OUR' 'Char' to be male. Out of the 17 or so that you found on LinkedIn, did you just pick one at random? If you expected me to be male, why not pick one that is male? I'd expect 'genuine' folk to correct me and provide their correct identity if I'm mistaken. Let's see if this Usenet character DOES do this or continues to be anonymous. If folk are not listed on LinkedIn or Facebook, or will not have a discussion on FaceTime or Skype, they go into my 'shady characters' folder. You've been in my 'shady characters' folder for a long time. The least you can do is to return the favor. So LinkedIn, FB, FT, and Skype get your seal of approval, but everything else does not. That's interesting. I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! :-) Which is it, open and honest, or just like you? You're about as shady and dishonest as a person can get. You should just own that. ROFL, So ****ing true. -- I would like to apologize for not having offended you yet. Please be patient. I will get to you shortly. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
What'sa proper reader for Usenet?
David B. wrote:
On 01/05/2017 11:40, mechanic wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2017 09:02:19 +0100, David B. wrote: I feel fairly sure that I read somewhere you claim that you had been on Usenet - on-line - since 1984. You were pretty much at the forefront of things if what you say is true. Seriously, I was delighted to find you he- https://www.linkedin.com/in/charjackson/ Sure you got the right one? Linkedin lists several. No, I am *NOT* sure. I had expected 'OUR' 'Char' to be male. I'd expect 'genuine' folk to correct me and provide their correct identity if I'm mistaken. Let's see if this Usenet character DOES do this or continues to be anonymous. If folk are not listed on LinkedIn or Facebook, or will not have a discussion on FaceTime or Skype, they go into my 'shady characters' folder. LOL! Well, I guess that tells me what I am, because I'm not listed everywhere. That's OK, I prefer reading to writing, and therefore, don't require a lot of responses. I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! :-) I think I still qualify in that area though. bj |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
What'sa proper reader for Usenet?
On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 08:45:06 -0400, chicagofan
wrote: David B. wrote: I like folk to be open and honest, just like me! I think I still qualify in that area though. I sincerely hope not. Just like him ? http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php He posted 12 "stalks" yesterday in various off topic newsgroups. Let's see how he behaves today. (depends on how much alcohol he has lying around) Note how he changed the thread from "Usenet readers" to asking people to STALK for him. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|