If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
Dear knowledgeable folks.
My daughter's machine is set up to manage shares via password (not managed via workgroup) and has several SMB shares available. All permissions are set correctly for the shares to be accessed by other computers. Every other computer on the network, when accessed, gives either a password prompt, where password shares are enabled, or immediate anonymous access where it does not require passwords. Her computer, named RAVEN, flat out denies access. Not even a password prompt. It just tells you that you don't have access to that computer, as if it is offline. I've done advanced troubleshooting, like checking secpol.msc, especially the "Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts and shares." Everything in local security is set to the defaults on her system. It used to allow anonymous access to the shares with no password. I checked, and she is on a private network; it doesn't show as public. Same subnet. Same workgroup. I tried reinstalling "Client for MS networks" and "File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks" and rebound them to the adapter. No dice. It is a wireless adapter: Wireless n, running on the 5Ghz spectrum. I haven't tried the 2.4Ghz spectrum. The only other symptom is that the network browser in explorer on her system only shows her computer, RAVEN. It does not show the other computers on the network. If I type in a hard URI "\\STARLING" into the explorer address box, it brings up the shares on the other server, but STARLING does not appear in explorer. STARLING is the master browser. "nbtstat -a STARLING" executed on RAVEN shows the MSBROWSE line. Wireless printers and the access points do show up enumerated, however. All systems are running the latest update of Win 10 Creators edition. I don't know when her system stopped working with networking. It used to work, and then one day it didn't. Any ideas what might fix it? -- Zag No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:58:23 -0500, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Zaghadka
wrote: All systems are running the latest update of Win 10 Creators edition. I don't know when her system stopped working with networking. It used to work, and then one day it didn't. Any ideas what might fix it? One last data point. Although I can tick the radio button for "Turn off password protected sharing," RAVEN will not retain the setting. It always goes back to "on." -- Zag No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:58:23 -0500, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Zaghadka
wrote: All systems are running the latest update of Win 10 Creators edition. I don't know when her system stopped working with networking. It used to work, and then one day it didn't. Any ideas what might fix it? I tried manually changing the two keys in the registry that govern password protected sharing, and the settings were retained on reboot, but the radio button still indicates "turn on password protected sharing" despite the fact that it is turned off in the registry. -- Zag No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:40:47 +1200 "Dave Doe" wrote in
article click Start and just start typing 'network reset'.) I tried this because I've been experiencing wifi issues recently. Typing 'network reset' doesn't bring up anything like a network reset :-( |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
En el artículo , Zaghadka
escribió: Any ideas what might fix it? It sounds as if the browser service is not running. Try this: In an elevated command prompt: net stop browser then net start browser if that then works to browse for remote shares, check out services.msc to see if the Browser service is enabled on startup. I find myself wondering if the recent patch for the WannaCry worm (which disables SMBv1) is in some way responsible for your issues. -- (\_/) (='.'=) "Between two evils, I always pick (")_(") the one I never tried before." - Mae West |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
Jason wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:40:47 +1200 "Dave Doe" wrote in article click Start and just start typing 'network reset'.) I tried this because I've been experiencing wifi issues recently. Typing 'network reset' doesn't bring up anything like a network reset :-( Control.exe Troubleshooting Search "network" That gives "Network Adapter" as a suspect. ******* And lines like this entered in Google, can dig up the usual suspects. netsh int ip reset c:\resetlog.txt Typically the stuff kicking around forums looks like this, and some of the lines from here, can help you find some networking threads. A networking thread with 250 pages though, would be pretty daunting to read from end to end. netsh winsock reset netsh int ip reset netsh int ipv4 reset netsh int ipv6 reset ipconfig /renew ipconfig /flushdns And the netsh thing, is a pretty talented piece of work. My log file is littered with stuff like this (with no notes about why I'd want it particularly). netsh wlan show drivers netsh wlan show profiles netsh wlan delete profile name="WirelessProfileName" If you do a google search with site:tenforums.com and some of those keywords, you might dredge up some more gems. HTH, Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:44:35 -0400, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Paul
wrote: Jason wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:40:47 +1200 "Dave Doe" wrote in article click Start and just start typing 'network reset'.) I tried this because I've been experiencing wifi issues recently. Typing 'network reset' doesn't bring up anything like a network reset :-( Control.exe Troubleshooting Search "network" That gives "Network Adapter" as a suspect. The "Incoming Connections" troubleshooter looked to be the most promising. It had me attempt to access the borked machine in the middle of the troubleshooter. The access attempt failed. Eventually it came back with a "not fixed" "Windows troubleshooter needs more information" error message. It was unable to pinpoint what went wrong, just that the request didn't go through. Since the machine is effectively isolated from LAN traffic, that makes a lot of sense. It also dumped a bunch of .etl logs that I don't know how to access. When I clicked on the link in the troubleshooter, it opened the file locally in IE, but all that appears on the page is a black "X" in the upper left hand corner. Do you know how to read error logs in Windows 10? There is a bunch of diagnostic information included with the troubleshooter. It might be the contents of the .etl file. Should I post it? I had previously stopped SMB 2.0/3.0 on this machine because of a network browsing issue where only SMB 1.0 would see the machines on the network. Microsoft has since fixed that issue, and I turned it back on. I checked. It's on. I did some PowerShell: Get-SmbConnection returns a null reply. Get-SmbServerConfiguration shows SMB 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 active. Get-SmbClientConfiguration shows a bunch of data I don't understand. Get-SmbShareAccess shows that the shares (two of them at least) are set for Everyone, Full access, Allowed. Basically, all the SMB diagnostics are showing that nothing is wrong at all. I'm beginning to wonder if this *is* related to the WannaCry patch. I should open a ticket at the MS forums, but I suspect all they'll tell me to do is do a system refresh, which I am unwilling to do at this time. At this point, I have a workaround. I can always type in the hard URI of the main server in my house to get access to the network servers on the borked machine, even though the server doesn't show up in the browser, and get to the network that way. The machines are in two rooms that are close together, so I can get by with that until it is fixed. WAN (Internet, Wifi, router gateway etc.) works fine. It's just the LANManager/TCP-IP encapsulated NetBEUI stuff that's failing. Her Internet got borked at one point and I had to uninstall/reinstall the Wifi card drivers to resolve the issue. I suspect that's when this all went wrong, but I can't be sure. I've tried unbinding, rebinding MS network client/server and uninstalling/reinstalling MS client/server; it didn't fix it. Sucks. -- Zag No one ever said on their deathbed, 'Gee, I wish I had spent more time alone with my computer.' ~Dan(i) Bunten |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Inexplicable network failure
Zaghadka wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:44:35 -0400, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Paul wrote: Jason wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:40:47 +1200 "Dave Doe" wrote in article click Start and just start typing 'network reset'.) I tried this because I've been experiencing wifi issues recently. Typing 'network reset' doesn't bring up anything like a network reset :-( Control.exe Troubleshooting Search "network" That gives "Network Adapter" as a suspect. The "Incoming Connections" troubleshooter looked to be the most promising. It had me attempt to access the borked machine in the middle of the troubleshooter. The access attempt failed. Eventually it came back with a "not fixed" "Windows troubleshooter needs more information" error message. It was unable to pinpoint what went wrong, just that the request didn't go through. Since the machine is effectively isolated from LAN traffic, that makes a lot of sense. It also dumped a bunch of .etl logs that I don't know how to access. When I clicked on the link in the troubleshooter, it opened the file locally in IE, but all that appears on the page is a black "X" in the upper left hand corner. Do you know how to read error logs in Windows 10? There is a bunch of diagnostic information included with the troubleshooter. It might be the contents of the .etl file. Should I post it? I had previously stopped SMB 2.0/3.0 on this machine because of a network browsing issue where only SMB 1.0 would see the machines on the network. Microsoft has since fixed that issue, and I turned it back on. I checked. It's on. I did some PowerShell: Get-SmbConnection returns a null reply. Get-SmbServerConfiguration shows SMB 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 active. Get-SmbClientConfiguration shows a bunch of data I don't understand. Get-SmbShareAccess shows that the shares (two of them at least) are set for Everyone, Full access, Allowed. Basically, all the SMB diagnostics are showing that nothing is wrong at all. I'm beginning to wonder if this *is* related to the WannaCry patch. I should open a ticket at the MS forums, but I suspect all they'll tell me to do is do a system refresh, which I am unwilling to do at this time. At this point, I have a workaround. I can always type in the hard URI of the main server in my house to get access to the network servers on the borked machine, even though the server doesn't show up in the browser, and get to the network that way. The machines are in two rooms that are close together, so I can get by with that until it is fixed. WAN (Internet, Wifi, router gateway etc.) works fine. It's just the LANManager/TCP-IP encapsulated NetBEUI stuff that's failing. Her Internet got borked at one point and I had to uninstall/reinstall the Wifi card drivers to resolve the issue. I suspect that's when this all went wrong, but I can't be sure. I've tried unbinding, rebinding MS network client/server and uninstalling/reinstalling MS client/server; it didn't fix it. Sucks. Wireshark is the only other tool I could suggest at this point. It shows Network Browser traffic with different color packets. And it has an SMB dissector. But the dissector doesn't break down what the bitfields are. I have a WannaCrypt-patch-related problem here, and that's about as close as I got to fixing it. The client machine is the one with the problem, but it's the serving side that throws up some sort of "needs more info" error, that stops file sharing. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|