If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Disaster recovery options - complex ??
During the NT4 days a sugested method for full disaster recovey was to
install a dual boot NT4 system on the same hard drive. One system being the main working system ( I'll call this NT4[1]) and the other being a minimum install ( I'll call this NT4[2]) for purely backup purposes. Then boot from NT4[2] and do a tape backup of all but the NT4[2] folder - keep this safe for disaster recovery and always boot to NT4[1] for normal use and boot to NT4[2] if recovery is needed. The main system 'files in use' problem would not occur during backup of NT4[1] because that OS would not be active at the time of the backup when booted to NT4[2]. This arrangement would not appear to contravene licencing agreements as NT is only installed on one PC and plainly only one installation can be used at any one time - I know there are some slight risks in this strategy for disaster recovery but these are acceptable. I used this method previously - luckily not in a real recovery situation but the proc was proven. Having recently bought XP and after visiting the various XP newsgroups over a period of time I am convinced that a disaster recovery procedure (full recovery not just the OS) will be needed sometime in the (not too distant) future and I need to have a procedure in place to cope. Perhaps this is a comonly held view of users of the OS and if so could be a reflection of its percieved reliability. Now I have XP installed ( and activated ) but of course I can't install the OS again on the same PC and the same HDD for a dual boot ( to do the above) because of the activation process, or certainly not in within a short time of initial activation and I need a full recovery procedure documented ASAP. I am using XP Home for this example so what is the best disaster recovery option. When I installed XP I formatted to NTFS which, from what I read, is incompatible with the earlier NT4 NTFS so a dual boot with NT4 as the backup system is not an option unless I wipe and reinstall making the NT4 NTFS the first install. Then I would need to reactivate XP, and this within a month of its initial activation and only due to OS doubts learned since install. What would be the best disaster recovery (FULL RECOVERY not just OS) procedure to implement. I'm not in the market to go XP Pro purely for the ability to overcome any reliabilty shortcommings there may (or may not) be in Home, I'd go back to reliable NT4WS or Linux first and put XP down as a 'learning experience'. NT4WS didnt raise these doubts. Come on Nicolas get your head round this. Any suggestions from anyone welcome and thanks in advance. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Disaster recovery options - complex ??
ASR Automated System Restore 1. Use Backup to Restore Files and Folders on Your Computer in Windows = XP http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q309340 2. An Error Message Is Displayed When You Attempt to Use the Automated = System Recovery Wizard = http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q302700 3. Cannot Restore Backups That You Create in Windows 95, Windows 98, = or Windows Me with the Windows XP Ntbackup Tool = http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;Q305381 4. Use Backup to Back Up Files and Folders on Your Computer in = Windows XP = http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q308422 --=20 Just my 2=A2 worth Jeff _____in response to_____ "-0-" wrote in message = ... | During the NT4 days a sugested method for full disaster recovey was to | install a | dual boot NT4 system on the same hard drive. One system being the main | working system ( I'll call this NT4[1]) and the other being a minimum | install ( I'll call this NT4[2]) for purely backup purposes. Then boot = from | NT4[2] and do a tape backup of all but the NT4[2] folder - keep this = safe | for disaster recovery and always boot to NT4[1] for normal use and = boot to | NT4[2] if recovery is needed. The main system 'files in use' problem = would | not occur during backup of NT4[1] because that OS would not be active = at the | time of the backup when booted to NT4[2]. This arrangement would not = appear | to contravene licencing agreements as NT is only installed on one PC = and | plainly only one installation can be used at any one time - I know = there are | some slight risks in this strategy for disaster recovery but these are | acceptable. I used this method previously - luckily not in a real = recovery | situation but the proc was proven. | Having recently bought XP and after visiting the various XP newsgroups = over | a period of time I am convinced that a disaster recovery procedure = (full | recovery not just the OS) will be | needed sometime in the (not too distant) future and I need to have a | procedure in place to cope. Perhaps this is a comonly held view of = users of | the OS and if so could be a reflection of its percieved reliability. | Now I have XP installed ( and activated ) but of course I can't = install the | OS again on the same PC and the same HDD for a dual boot ( to do the = above) | because of the activation process, or certainly not in within a short = time | of initial activation and I need a full recovery procedure documented = ASAP. | I am using XP Home for this example so what is the best disaster = recovery | option. When I installed XP I formatted to NTFS which, from what I = read, is | incompatible with the earlier NT4 NTFS so a dual boot with NT4 as the = backup | system is not an option unless I wipe and reinstall making the NT4 = NTFS the | first install. Then I would need to reactivate XP, and this within a = month | of its | initial activation and only due to OS doubts learned since install. |=20 | What would be the best disaster recovery (FULL RECOVERY not just OS) | procedure to implement. I'm not in the | market to go XP Pro purely for the ability to overcome any reliabilty | shortcommings there may (or may not) be in Home, I'd go back to = reliable | NT4WS | or Linux first and put XP down as a 'learning experience'. NT4WS didnt = raise | these doubts. |=20 | Come on Nicolas get your head round this. |=20 | Any suggestions from anyone welcome and thanks in advance. |=20 |=20 |=20 |=20 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 4/10/2003 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Disaster recovery options - complex ??
Hi Jeff,
That was a very quick reply. I realise that this is available in Pro but in Home ASR has doubts about reliability from what I recall reading XP newsgroups. Will check though and welcome other contributions. thanks - Colin -- Looking to sell or buy a home in the North West - visit my website - www.homes-fs.co.uk/ "mrtee" hingelickeratnew.rr.com wrote in message ... ASR Automated System Restore 1. Use Backup to Restore Files and Folders on Your Computer in Windows XP http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q309340 2. An Error Message Is Displayed When You Attempt to Use the Automated System Recovery Wizard http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q302700 3. Cannot Restore Backups That You Create in Windows 95, Windows 98, or Windows Me with the Windows XP Ntbackup Tool http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;Q305381 4. Use Backup to Back Up Files and Folders on Your Computer in Windows XP http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q308422 -- Just my 2¢ worth Jeff _____in response to_____ "-0-" wrote in message ... | During the NT4 days a sugested method for full disaster recovey was to | install a | dual boot NT4 system on the same hard drive. One system being the main | working system ( I'll call this NT4[1]) and the other being a minimum | install ( I'll call this NT4[2]) for purely backup purposes. Then boot from | NT4[2] and do a tape backup of all but the NT4[2] folder - keep this safe | for disaster recovery and always boot to NT4[1] for normal use and boot to | NT4[2] if recovery is needed. The main system 'files in use' problem would | not occur during backup of NT4[1] because that OS would not be active at the | time of the backup when booted to NT4[2]. This arrangement would not appear | to contravene licencing agreements as NT is only installed on one PC and | plainly only one installation can be used at any one time - I know there are | some slight risks in this strategy for disaster recovery but these are | acceptable. I used this method previously - luckily not in a real recovery | situation but the proc was proven. | Having recently bought XP and after visiting the various XP newsgroups over | a period of time I am convinced that a disaster recovery procedure (full | recovery not just the OS) will be | needed sometime in the (not too distant) future and I need to have a | procedure in place to cope. Perhaps this is a comonly held view of users of | the OS and if so could be a reflection of its percieved reliability. | Now I have XP installed ( and activated ) but of course I can't install the | OS again on the same PC and the same HDD for a dual boot ( to do the above) | because of the activation process, or certainly not in within a short time | of initial activation and I need a full recovery procedure documented ASAP. | I am using XP Home for this example so what is the best disaster recovery | option. When I installed XP I formatted to NTFS which, from what I read, is | incompatible with the earlier NT4 NTFS so a dual boot with NT4 as the backup | system is not an option unless I wipe and reinstall making the NT4 NTFS the | first install. Then I would need to reactivate XP, and this within a month | of its | initial activation and only due to OS doubts learned since install. | | What would be the best disaster recovery (FULL RECOVERY not just OS) | procedure to implement. I'm not in the | market to go XP Pro purely for the ability to overcome any reliabilty | shortcommings there may (or may not) be in Home, I'd go back to reliable | NT4WS | or Linux first and put XP down as a 'learning experience'. NT4WS didnt raise | these doubts. | | Come on Nicolas get your head round this. | | Any suggestions from anyone welcome and thanks in advance. | | | | --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 4/10/2003 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Disaster recovery options - complex ??
There is information in the list that applies to XP home.
--=20 Just my 2=A2 worth Jeff _____in response to_____ "-0-" wrote in message = ... | Hi Jeff, | That was a very quick reply. |=20 | I realise that this is available in Pro but in Home ASR has = doubts | about reliability from what I recall reading XP newsgroups. Will = check | though and welcome other contributions. |=20 | thanks - Colin |=20 | -- | Looking to sell or buy a home in the North West - visit my website - | www.homes-fs.co.uk/ | --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 4/10/2003 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|