If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 07:19:33 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote:
Please don't. All they do is draw flames and you can't help yourself in responding. Actually, with the current purposefully persistent attempt at troll shaming being somewhat successful, I think we've abated the trolls that still have a shred of decency left, at least for a while. My goal was very clearly approached and my tactics devilishly simple, such that even the lowly trolls Frank Slootweg and Char Jackson can comprehend what will happen each time they troll in a thread I care about. In fact, you'll note, that the incessantly valueless trolls of the likes of Wolf K and nospam have *subsided*, hence your prediction will likely not come to fruition, although this explanation stimulate the trolls (since they're here, after all, for their own amusement, and not to help others). (Did you notice how both Char Jackson & Frank Slootweg, as I recall, were clearly affronted that their "right to bully and troll" is being confronted?) Since the low-intelligence trolls like Nil & Diesel are here only for their own amusement, they don't find much value in a tutorial, which is a rather dry topic, filled with technicalities that they don't comprehend given their exhibited lack of intelligence and inability to contribute meaningfully to any technical discussion. Just watch, for example, to see that I am correct that the trolls Frank Slootweg, Char Jackson, Nil, Diesel, nospam, Sam Hill, Wolf K, can never contribute even one iota of value to any technical tutorial I post. The fewer responses to any thread, in general, the better, since the goal is simply either (a) to ask a technical question which is hard to answer, and/or (b) to provide knowledge so that others benefit. Trolls can do neither - so - if they're shamed away, they will find some other less proactive newsgroup to infest for their personal amusement. Why not create yourself a GitHub.com (or similar) account and store your tutorials as versioned files in a standard repository? They will then be: -in a permanent place, -searchable by others (much better than non-indexed Usenet archives), -always up to date -maintain a history -easy, for those who want, to constructively help you hone your skills. Public Git repositories are great places to build a community around a common need. This is good advice, where reasonable people will always differ on how to provide value without giving up your privacy (e.g., I avoid logins like you might avoid the bubonic plague). But still, the purpose of this thread is to ask for advice from people who actually know the answer to the question, which is, was, and will be: *What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?* |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 02:57:00 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:09:48 -0400, Nil wrote: Anyway, I'm still seeking someone here (not just the nospam-like trolls who just guess at everything) who has been successful getting Google to archive a newsgroup. Nice chit-chattin' witcha! If not bowling, how about lawn darts? You forget there is a strategic and tactical design to all questions. That I do that every time (once in a while I might forget) reminds you chit-chatters that the thread has a question in the title and that's what the thread is intended, stratetically, to answer. It used to be "I only speak facts". That quickly went out the window. Then it became "Nothing I do is by accident". Now that's dead, too. What's next? "My strategy and tactics are simple"? |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google toarchive this ng?
On 06/27/2018 10:32 PM, Paul wrote:
Rene Lamontagne wrote: On 06/27/2018 9:59 PM, Arlen Holder wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:24:20 -0500, Char Jackson wrote: I read somewhere that you were arranging a potluck picnic. Commendable. What is amazing is that worthless chit-chat trolls like you, Char Jackson, consistently prove me right in every post. Jeez, just spent e week in the the hospital with a bad gallbladder problem and when I was relaesed I felt the air was decidedly thinner and harder to breath. So naturally I looked here and sure enough, the arlen holder thing was still suckling upÂ* oxygen like no tomorrow. We need a moderating influence. Do you think you could teach Arlen to bowl ? Â*Â* Paul Naw, He's probably all thumbs and six toed, Ever see a bowling ball with 3 thumb holes And bowling shoes that wide ? :-) Rene |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:59:33 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: Still ... the question in this thread is, was, and always will be: *What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive a ng?* And picnics. Don't forget about the picnics. That would be a great excuse to come up into the Santa Cruz hills and see some of your signs. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:48:12 -0500, Rene Lamontagne wrote:
Naw, He's probably all thumbs and six toed, Ever see a bowling ball with 3 thumb holes And bowling shoes that wide ? :-) Rene Hi Rene Lamontagne, Some day you'll actually act like an adult in a Usenet thread. But, apparently, not today. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:54:41 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
And picnics. Don't forget about the picnics. That would be a great excuse to come up into the Santa Cruz hills and see some of your signs. Notice that the inveterate troll Char Jackson, who hasn't a single iota of technical value to contribute, incessantly plays silly semantic games. Char Jackson plays his silly semantic games because he's affronted that his "right to troll" along with his "right to bully" is being impinged upon. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:46:24 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
What's next? "My strategy and tactics are simple"? It seems you've finally comprehended that I use the simplest of logic on you inveterate worthless trolls, Char Jackson. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:36:08 -0500, Char Jackson wrote:
Like I said before, once you're right a little more often, it'll stop feeling "amazing". You'll sort of get used to it. But not today. Hi Char Jackson, First off, I'm almost always "right" since my belief system is based upon facts. Facts are funny that way - I realize you don't subscribe to facts - but I do, so, I doubt you'll even be able to find a single instance in your entire life where I was factually wrong. It can happen, but it's rare. Facts are funny that way. *What you don't like is that I point out what it is that you do.* You prove that point in almost every one of your bullying posts. However, I left you an easy out. (Yes, I left you that easy out on purpose.) Remember always, I'm a mirror of your intent and tone. a. Act like an adult - and I treat you like an adult. b. Act like a worthless troll - and I treat you as such. It's really very simple - you control the dynamic. Since you seem to thrive on Usenet for your own amusement, and since you rebel against your "right to bully others", I'm sure you'll appreciate that I let you troll all you want in threads that I don't care about. Do you see the perfect freedom I'm offering you, Char Jackson? A. You can still use Usenet for your own personal chit-chat amusement. B. Just avoid any thread that I care about - and you're free to troll. Of course, this deal only words for those trolls who have a shred of decency left, but I actually think there are two things about you, Char Jackson, which are similar to the worth of the likes of nospam and Frank Slootweg: I. Deep inside, you three actually do have a shred of decency left, II. Therefore, you actually *can* contribute value to a technical thread! The value you *can* contribute is probably of a low level, e.g., offering Notepad++ when the topic is VIM, but it's still value to some people who may be ignorant of both (although anyone who uses Notepad++ isn't the same type of person who uses VIM simply because of the difference in powwer and complexity is immense). It's like me telling you how to race and then you offer up a Honda Civic as another "solution" to the problem set - but the attempt at adding value *is* appreciated, so I won't say the facts I'm telling you here in that thread, because I mirror your intent and tone more than your contributed value. In reality, you and the other three musketeers (you, nospam, and Frank Slootweg) should probably stay out of any technical thread I author because you three have proven time and again that none of you can ever possibly offer me any information that I didn't know decades ago). HINT: The trolls who love Notepad++ *always* throw it into *any* vi thread, even if the topic is how to use VI regular expressions, for heaven's sake. Your keyword-based responses are as predictable as the sun rising in the morning for God's sake. By keyword-based responses, I mean that you low-level trolls have pre-recorded responses to everything, based not on the topic, but of keywords about the topic (witness any thread about VPN, even if the thread is how to spell VPN, always results in the lowly trolls saying you can't trust that the NSA isn't running them). It's so easy to predict the behavior of the three trolls (you, Frank, and nospam) who still have a shred of decency, since none of you actually are even the slightest bit technical (so all you *can* do, is troll). It's much harder to predict what the three trolls who have no decency left, such as Nil, Diesel, and GoodGuy are, since they don't care one whit about their lack of value added. While GoodGuy is on the corner of mental illness, it's even worse with the clearly mentally ill such as Snit, Steve Carroll, and Petrucelli (likely all one and the same) as, for them, the *only* solution is the killfile. In summary, Char Jackson, if you act like an adult, I treat you as one. Nonetheless, the question for this thread is, was, and shall be: *What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?* |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google toarchive this ng?
On 06/28/2018 9:04 AM, Arlen Holder wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:48:12 -0500, Rene Lamontagne wrote: Naw, He's probably all thumbs and six toed, Ever see a bowling ball with 3 thumb holes And bowling shoes that wide ? :-) Rene Hi Rene Lamontagne, Some day you'll actually act like an adult in a Usenet thread. But, apparently, not today. No, not today, maybe next year when I'm 85. Rene |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:04:13 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:48:12 -0500, Rene Lamontagne wrote: Naw, He's probably all thumbs and six toed, Ever see a bowling ball with 3 thumb holes And bowling shoes that wide ? :-) Rene Hi Rene Lamontagne, Some day you'll actually act like an adult in a Usenet thread. But, apparently, not today. Is the use of full names one of the symptoms of AS? |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:04:14 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder
wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:54:41 -0500, Char Jackson wrote: And picnics. Don't forget about the picnics. That would be a great excuse to come up into the Santa Cruz hills and see some of your signs. Notice that the inveterate troll Char Jackson, who hasn't a single iota of technical value to contribute, incessantly plays silly semantic games. You're not proud of your signs? You don't want to show them off? Hard to believe. I know you like potluck picnics, though. There was a time when you couldn't stop talking about them. Get the next one scheduled already. My deviled eggs aren't going to last forever. Char Jackson plays his silly semantic games because he's affronted that his "right to troll" along with his "right to bully" is being impinged upon. Affronted? I think you mean amused. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On 27 Jun 2018, Arlen Holder wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: While I knew your chitchat input was worthless toward the end goal, my goal is also to salvage some of the remaining scraps of decency that is left in the non-Snit-like trolls to achieve the end goal. How's that working out for ya? |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
On 28 Jun 2018, Arlen Holder wrote in
alt.comp.os.windows-10: Actually, with the current purposefully persistent attempt at troll shaming being somewhat successful, I think we've abated the trolls that still have a shred of decency left, at least for a while. No. You have no control over that or anything else in Usenet. (Did you notice how both Char Jackson & Frank Slootweg, as I recall, were clearly affronted that their "right to bully and troll" is being confronted?) You are delusional. *What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?* They ignored me. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google toarchive this ng?
On 06/28/2018 11:32 AM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:04:13 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 08:48:12 -0500, Rene Lamontagne wrote: Naw, He's probably all thumbs and six toed, Ever see a bowling ball with 3 thumb holes And bowling shoes that wide ? :-) Rene Hi Rene Lamontagne, Some day you'll actually act like an adult in a Usenet thread. But, apparently, not today. Is the use of full names one of the symptoms of AS? Hi Char, Must be AS but just as a test I will give him my full name, That should make him **** his eyeballs out. Joseph Rene Raymond Edouard Lamontagne Rene |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive this ng?
Char Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:59:33 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote: Still ... the question in this thread is, was, and always will be: *What was your experience when you last tried to get Google to archive a ng?* And picnics. Don't forget about the picnics. That would be a great excuse to come up into the Santa Cruz hills and see some of your signs. And the bowling! As I understand it, Mr. EMAK has volunteered that we use the big round part of his upper body as it's clear that it doesn't contain any valuable material. BTW, his signs? His signs of what? Doesn't he have already enough signs of most anything!? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|