If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:57:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 12:13 AM, Diesel wrote: David_B Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:06:08 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] I *TRUST* Snit. :-D Do you also trust FromTheRafters and Apd? Even if you don't trust Carroll, FromTherRafters agreed with something he wrote concerning Snit that may be of interest to you: Honest and good people can disagree -- another concept you fail to understand. I don't fail to understand that. But, this isn't an issue of any disagreemets. It's an issue of you writing a bull**** story about me and being unable to support it in any way shape or form. When you asked for an explanation concerning what I wrote, that you lifted out of context ever so carefully or so you thought to try and support your unfounded accusations towards me. I've asked you multiple times to provide MID(s) to the post(s) you claimed called me out crickets I've asked you multiple times to provide the MID(s) to the post(s) you claim were my being forced to clarify that I actually had the bot in compiled form, as well crickets again. As one can see by following the links I've recently shared, everyone agrees with me that you made an accusation towards me. And you provided nothing in which to support it. You *lied* You can claim you disagree with what we all wrote concerning your question about what I meant with what I wrote all you want. It's *highly unlikely* that four of us are in error and you are correct. I know damn well what I meant, and obviously, so did everyone else in that conversation; except for you. When you were told what I meant by myself, Apd, Ftr, Carroll, and some others I don't even know, you "disagreed" with everyone and stuck to your bull**** story about me. Where the **** do you even get off thinking you can tell me you know more about something I wrote than I did? I wrote it, I know damn well what I meant by it. You, clearly, did not! It is amazing how often you demonstrate significant comprehension deficits. What's amazing is that you didn't even start trying to attack me like this until I brought your obvious reading comprehension problems to light. In other words, ****ant, you're projecting your shortcomings and other problems onto me as a diversion tactic; You're still trying to weasel your way out of that apology while being able to maintain the totally bull**** claim that nobody can prove you're a liar; that nobody provides proof of unfounded accusations you like to make towards people. Well, I have: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. -- Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to get along without it. |
Ads |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
David_B
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:52:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: Well David? That's FOUR people, five if you include me who all agree that snit accused me of something I didn't do, or have anything to do with. Carroll went a step further, and, you don't see Ftr or Apd disagreeing with him in the thread. Ftr lets you know, on no uncertain terms his opinion of the matter. Apd has also done so; I shared two! posts from him where he agrees, Snit accused me of things I didn't do. No misunderstanding on my part, three seperate and distinct lies on snits part. And, despite Snits requests to have what I wrote explained to him, IT ALREADY HAS BEEN, and Apd even references that point. Snit continues to "DISAGREE" with all of us concerning what I meant by what he cherry picked out of context to try and support his accusation concerning my involvement with the bot. He's a liar, David, and he owes me an apology. Let it go, Dustin. Why should I do that, David? It's not like I asked him to go and write such a story about me. At the time he went and did that, I had him filtered. I actually had to not only release the filter, but elect to reload articles to reset the already read marks; that's when I noticed his first post making the claim. It's actually part of a longer post where he thinks I was trying to troll him because of something I wrote (which was truthful) about him to another person. I didn't even know prior to doing all of that, that the post even existed, or that it's been duplicated several times in different replies from Snit that were directed to me, questioning, disagreeing, whatever with something I wrote to someone that wasn't Snit. It's not worth your time and energy. I don't spend that much time on it. I'm only using a small amount of free time, or when I'm taking a break from soldering to rest my eyeballs. (I don't always solder under a scope) - or when I'm taking a break to backup and punt when I'm troubleshooting an issue. See, unlike Joel, I can't afford to be wiping and reloading over simple issues like a failure to be able to burn, oh, say, an audio cd. I'm paid to actually fix the issue without spending hours reloading everything from scratch. fixing the issue properly also allows for technote taking; describing the symptoms and the working fix - whatever caused his issue has probably happened to others before so the chances of me running into it aren't zero. So fix it once the usual way, next time will be much faster because you have the technotes you got from the first time around. That is, if you actually are a *REAL* *PRO*, such as myself. Snit is open and honest. I've already proven that your statement is false. But, thanks for trying! You are not. shrug I've also proven that statement is false, but again, I do thank you for trying. You've failed though. -- Yorkshire man takes his cat to the vet. Yorkshireman: "Ayup, lad, I need to talk to thee about me cat." Vet: "Is it a tom?" Yorkshireman: "Nay, I've browt it wi' us." |
#288
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:52:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 12:13 AM, Diesel wrote: Snit Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:52:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] Again with your crossposting trolling and your failure to understand what has been explained to you at least 14 times. I didn't fail to understand anything. Remember when you used to deny being arrogant and immature? But here you are showing off how both are true, and doing so in one short sentence. Quite a feat for you! By writing the truth, and nothing more than that, I'm being arrogant and immature? Why don't you just grow some balls about yourself, get some bass in that girly voice of yours as a result, and apologize for the lies you wrote about me? Then, we can move on. I'm sure you'll go off half cocked again down the road and concoct another bull**** story to peddle. I'm looking forward to your creative writing skills - that is, if you actually do have any. Just what is so hard about fessing up to telling a porkie on me anyway Snit? We're all adults here, it's not that big of a deal. Are you worried that if you do admit you lied and apologize, your detractors will use it against you in the future? They're already using what you did against you, just like I am. It's worse this way for you though, because everybody already knows you not only lied, but that you've been trying to play a game of diversion to draw attention away from what you wrote. You'd take less damage by coming clean in the long run, Snit. Again, your detractors can already use what's been posted between us against you; it shows that you are a liar, and not the little white lie kind. As it stands now though, they can also show that when caught, you'll try anything to weasel around it. That's worse for you than just being caught on record as an admitted liar. Atleast YOU opted to admit it, and it wasn't necessary for others to prove you are, as you waste time and energy denying the truth about you. I know this isn't the first time someone you talked **** about called you out for it. What annoys me though is how weak your diversion efforts actually are. Is this seriously the best you've got? It's no wonder you have a snitlist and fan pages like David Brooks. People need to be warned about your kinds of people (that is, you and David Brooks aka BoaterDave one of the worlds worst internet stalkers and pests), for their own safety. -- The real world is only a special case. |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
David_B
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:02:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: David_B [....] I'm 100% confident that Snit is not/was not responsible for the 'flood' posts. I'm inclined to agree with you there, David. I still don't think either of them are actually behind it. I think it's most likely one (but could be more) individual who knows them both (likely a regular of cola or something they both know each other from) and is taking advantage of their animosity towards each other for free entertainment. Not only is the bot code itself lame as **** all, the individual who's so proud of it obviously is such a loser, his/her only chance of entertainment is usenet trolling. And, it's not even that good, being as it's so easy to filter out. Apd and myself disagree somewhat on the automation aspects of the bot. I'm not convinced it's automated in any real way based on some tests i've been doing. You didn't really think my replies to yourself and Snit was only intended for you did ya? and, I'm not spamming anywhere; thanks. Please learn to use the proper terminology if you're going to accuse me of something. I've been xposting for several reasons. One is part of an ongoing analysis test and the other is to ensure the groups I'm familiar with all get to know your new best friend, before he's able to cause much of a ruckus there. I have far more confidence in what Apd has to say on the matter. :-D Apd agrees with me concerning what Snit wrote about me. What is your confidence in that? Or, is your confidence dependent on whether or not he agrees with me, specifically? Do be honest, David. You never know who might be reading this. G -- Eschew obfuscation. |
#290
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Snit
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:56:01 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 12:13 AM, Diesel wrote: Snit Thu, 23 Jul 2020 21:12:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/23/20 3:31 AM, Diesel wrote: Snit Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:30:31 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] I've been very busy, otherwise I would have responded to your latest bull**** sooner. You claim to be very busy. Maybe that explains why you do not take the time to even try to understand what you read. But it does not explain how you find the time to focus on your tantrum over any valuable content. Interesting perspective on your priorities. Board level diagnosis and repair isn't a ten minute thing, usually. And, when soldering/desoldering/rework is necessary, that's not a super quick process either, not if you want to do it right the first time around. I've finally got the backlog done, and I'm waiting on the last laptop to finish a long burn in run, to ensure no lockup issues here before I return it to it's owner and observe it in it's native environment later this morning. I had to replace a diode and logic level mosfet on it's board as well as the fan/heatsink cooling assembly. Notice below your response shows NO understanding of what you read. It is quite telling of your reading comprehension issues. It's not below anymore, I put it back where it belongs. Your efforts to cause confusion by screwing around with message flow hasn't gone unnoticed, troll. I responded to your wiseass remark about my claiming to be very busy by telling you what I've been doing. Your response is completely out of line, and totally bull**** to boot. You made a statement in a snarky manner (there was no reason at all for you to even write that "You claim to be very busy." - you were inferring that I was lying. Don't you think you've been busted lying enough already, Snit? I clarified, simple as that. Sorry if you didn't expect the response, but, some of us actually do real work for our incomes. And, i'm one of those people. Perhaps some day I will teach you how to find posts by message ID. Then you will be able to prove to yourself they do exist. But you need to be a bit kinder to me for me to do that favor for you. Umm. I've been sharing howardknight shortcut links for various people to make it easier to lookup a post when I provide the MID. In the event they don't know how to use their client, or howardknight. I also know how to query servers directly using nothing more than a telnet client; I don't have to use a GUI based one. or even a 'client' at all. So, enough with your bull**** offers to teach me, Snit. You would be the student , make no mistake. Snit, you give an all new meaning to the expression, digging yourself a hole. I mean, you really go all in. -- Any system that depends on reliability is unreliable. |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote:
David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:02:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: David_B [....] I'm 100% confident that Snit is not/was not responsible for the 'flood' posts. I'm inclined to agree with you there, David. I still don't think either of them are actually behind it. I think it's most likely one (but could be more) individual who knows them both (likely a regular of cola or something they both know each other from) and is taking advantage of their animosity towards each other for free entertainment. Not only is the bot code itself lame as **** all, the individual who's so proud of it obviously is such a loser, his/her only chance of entertainment is usenet trolling. And, it's not even that good, being as it's so easy to filter out. Apd and myself disagree somewhat on the automation aspects of the bot. I'm not convinced it's automated in any real way based on some tests i've been doing. You didn't really think my replies to yourself and Snit was only intended for you did ya? and, I'm not spamming anywhere; thanks. Please learn to use the proper terminology if you're going to accuse me of something. I've been xposting for several reasons. One is part of an ongoing analysis test and the other is to ensure the groups I'm familiar with all get to know your new best friend, before he's able to cause much of a ruckus there. I have far more confidence in what Apd has to say on the matter. :-D Apd agrees with me concerning what Snit wrote about me. What is your confidence in that? Or, is your confidence dependent on whether or not he agrees with me, specifically? Do be honest, David. You never know who might be reading this. G The truth is that, as far as I'm aware, Apd has always been truthful. I've had no cause to doubt what he says, but confess that I would like to have a better understanding of the 'real-life him. |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote:
David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:52:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: Well David? That's FOUR people, five if you include me who all agree that snit accused me of something I didn't do, or have anything to do with. Carroll went a step further, and, you don't see Ftr or Apd disagreeing with him in the thread. Ftr lets you know, on no uncertain terms his opinion of the matter. Apd has also done so; I shared two! posts from him where he agrees, Snit accused me of things I didn't do. No misunderstanding on my part, three seperate and distinct lies on snits part. And, despite Snits requests to have what I wrote explained to him, IT ALREADY HAS BEEN, and Apd even references that point. Snit continues to "DISAGREE" with all of us concerning what I meant by what he cherry picked out of context to try and support his accusation concerning my involvement with the bot. He's a liar, David, and he owes me an apology. Let it go, Dustin. Why should I do that, David? It's not like I asked him to go and write such a story about me. At the time he went and did that, I had him filtered. I actually had to not only release the filter, but elect to reload articles to reset the already read marks; that's when I noticed his first post making the claim. It's actually part of a longer post where he thinks I was trying to troll him because of something I wrote (which was truthful) about him to another person. I didn't even know prior to doing all of that, that the post even existed, or that it's been duplicated several times in different replies from Snit that were directed to me, questioning, disagreeing, whatever with something I wrote to someone that wasn't Snit. Snit has been heaven-sent to help expose you for the bad deeds you have done - and for which you are not truly sorry. It's not worth your time and energy. I don't spend that much time on it. I'm only using a small amount of free time, or when I'm taking a break from soldering to rest my eyeballs. (I don't always solder under a scope) - or when I'm taking a break to backup and punt when I'm troubleshooting an issue. See, unlike Joel, I can't afford to be wiping and reloading over simple issues like a failure to be able to burn, oh, say, an audio cd. I'm paid to actually fix the issue without spending hours reloading everything from scratch. fixing the issue properly also allows for technote taking; describing the symptoms and the working fix - whatever caused his issue has probably happened to others before so the chances of me running into it aren't zero. So fix it once the usual way, next time will be much faster because you have the technotes you got from the first time around. That is, if you actually are a *REAL* *PRO*, such as myself. A *REAL* *PRO* has a business address published on-line and, nowadays, invariably has a website and Facebook page too. Snit is open and honest. I've already proven that your statement is false. But, thanks for trying! You are not. shrug I've also proven that statement is false, but again, I do thank you for trying. You've failed though. Nope. Everyone reading your words *KNOWS* that you operate in the shadows and live in fear of repercussions for your past bad deeds. |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
David_B
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:10:39 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:52:46 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: [snip] Why should I do that, David? It's not like I asked him to go and write such a story about me. At the time he went and did that, I had him filtered. I actually had to not only release the filter, but elect to reload articles to reset the already read marks; that's when I noticed his first post making the claim. It's actually part of a longer post where he thinks I was trying to troll him because of something I wrote (which was truthful) about him to another person. I didn't even know prior to doing all of that, that the post even existed, or that it's been duplicated several times in different replies from Snit that were directed to me, questioning, disagreeing, whatever with something I wrote to someone that wasn't Snit. Snit has been heaven-sent to help expose you for the bad deeds you have done - and for which you are not truly sorry. Snit is a confirmed, and well known, liar David. And I can tell that you've been hitting the bottle again, because your story has flip flopped back around to me being a bad guy and you teaching me a lesson. You are beyond pathetic, David. A *REAL* *PRO* has a business address published on-line and, nowadays, invariably has a website and Facebook page too. I'm not about to give you anything to help you continue your stalking and besmirching efforts against me, asshat. No professional would. And besides, that would actually meet the definition of spamming, no question about it. You and snit would do well to learn WTF the words you use to accuse people actually mean. Snit needs to learn what called out means, as well as clarified. And you both need to learn what honesty means; and work your asses off to emulate the concept - we all know it won't be an easy task for either of you. You've pickled your brain with excessive alcohol consumption over time, and Snit has spent too much time taking the lids off prescription bottles - you've both done a considerable amount of lifelong damage to that gray matter. Nope. Everyone reading your words *KNOWS* that you operate in the shadows and live in fear of repercussions for your past bad deeds. Actually, heh, so far, everyone important is already on record providing their opinion concerning Snit over some things he took the time to write about me. He's not fooling anybody. Apd called him out, Ftr has called him out, along with myself and Carroll. And we all know that you'll turn a blind eye to anyone who gives someone you don't like a hard time, for any reason. It's how you roll. Yes, you're that impotent that you need to find new suckers (fresh meat) to help your sliming campaigns against myself, clamxav author, various site admins, and mvps. Yet, there's nothing wrong with you, it's all us. You and Snit have more in common with each other than either of you are willing to admit. But your admission isn't necessary. Snit like you has shown us all that they are an untrustworthy, liar. And that's not likely to change anytime soon. -- All good writing is swimming under water and holding your breath. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
David_B
Fri, 24 Jul 2020 18:54:36 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:02:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: David_B [....] I'm 100% confident that Snit is not/was not responsible for the 'flood' posts. I'm inclined to agree with you there, David. I still don't think either of them are actually behind it. I think it's most likely one (but could be more) individual who knows them both (likely a regular of cola or something they both know each other from) and is taking advantage of their animosity towards each other for free entertainment. Not only is the bot code itself lame as **** all, the individual who's so proud of it obviously is such a loser, his/her only chance of entertainment is usenet trolling. And, it's not even that good, being as it's so easy to filter out. Apd and myself disagree somewhat on the automation aspects of the bot. I'm not convinced it's automated in any real way based on some tests i've been doing. You didn't really think my replies to yourself and Snit was only intended for you did ya? and, I'm not spamming anywhere; thanks. Please learn to use the proper terminology if you're going to accuse me of something. I've been xposting for several reasons. One is part of an ongoing analysis test and the other is to ensure the groups I'm familiar with all get to know your new best friend, before he's able to cause much of a ruckus there. I have far more confidence in what Apd has to say on the matter. :-D Apd agrees with me concerning what Snit wrote about me. What is your confidence in that? Or, is your confidence dependent on whether or not he agrees with me, specifically? Do be honest, David. You never know who might be reading this. G The truth is that, as far as I'm aware, Apd has always been truthful. Good. I'm glad we have that established, and on the record. G Now, as I told you, Apd along with Ftr have both stated that Snit told a lie on me, and that he's been telling a series of them as he continues to attack me. Since you've just admitted that Apd has always been truthful with you, how do you explain his difference of opinion concerning SNit vs yours? On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 2:06:57 PM UTC-6, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: When did I 'snip and run' with you? Last week. MID: You quoted one line: "Whatever the difference you still do the same things". What I meant by "do" is "accuse each other of" And I explained that I don't merely accuse. In large part, I do what you just said to Snit in a previous post, I'll confront his BS (unsupported) allegations. If you've been reading, you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel right now. Yup. And here's some more, so that there's no possible 'confusion' with what Apd has written, David: "Snit" wrote: On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: [...] you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel right now. Yup. Diesel is playing a very immature game. He insists he meant some code other than the code to Carroll's Usenet flood bot. OK. Maybe I missed the context -- but if so then what code did he mean. He never says. That shoots down his own argument. He was speaking about code in general, not any particular piece of software. He said as much. [...] So if I ever directly said Diesel *WAS* helping Carroll I rescind that. You should perhaps reply to a post of his with that. [...] We all make mistakes. I simply cannot see why it matters so much to Diesel. None of us like to be accused of doing what we are not. I've got a lot more where that came from. Snit tried to dismiss it as babbling previously; he clearly didn't bother to check any of the post message contents. unless he was writing about his own posts and rightfully calling them 'babbling"? Snit did accuse me of something I didn't do - he lied about me, David. There was no misunderstanding. It was a lie, told by snit he http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. The section of my reply that he lifted out of context was explained by myself, Apd, Ftr, etc. Snit didn't like that and claimed to 'disagree' with all of us about what I meant with my own words. As if, as ****ing if. There's no way we all misunderstood what I wrote, David. And I'm not even sure at this point Snit actually did, either. Your friend, much like you when caught lying about other posters, dances around it, tries to play it off. And since when is it an if accusation concerning working with or otherwise helping carroll? Is his short term memory as ****ed up as yours, David? He's accused me of helping carroll multiple times. I've had no cause to doubt what he says, but confess that I would like to have a better understanding of the 'real-life him. Great, since you doubt nothing he's written, explain why you're giving snit a free pass concerning their story they wrote about me. An untrue, story at that, David. Go ahead, explain what your new friend has been doing. -- It would be nice if entropy could be used for something constructive. |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
On 29/07/2020 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
I've had no cause to doubt what he says, but confess that I would like to have a better understanding of the 'real-life him. Great, since you doubt nothing he's written, explain why you're giving snit a free pass concerning their story they wrote about me. An untrue, story at that, David. Go ahead, explain what your new friend has been doing. I've not really been following your discussion, Dustin. There was some misunderstanding I gather. If Snit is the guilty party, just forgive him and move on. You will feel MUCH better! :-D Talk about something of interest? Did you mention elsewhere that you have a replacement cat. How about showing all of us a photograph of it? |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Snit
Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:32:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/29/20 2:04 PM, Gremlin wrote: Snit Fri, 24 Jul 2020 23:48:06 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/24/20 2:07 PM, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote: On 2020-07-24, David_B wrote: On 24/07/2020 13:59, Diesel wrote: David_B Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:02:16 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 24/07/2020 08:13, Diesel wrote: David_B [....] I'm 100% confident that Snit is not/was not responsible for the 'flood' posts. I'm inclined to agree with you there, David. I still don't think either of them are actually behind it. I think it's most likely one (but could be more) individual who knows them both (likely a regular of cola or something they both know each other from) and is taking advantage of their animosity towards each other for free entertainment. Not only is the bot code itself lame as **** all, the individual who's so proud of it obviously is such a loser, his/her only chance of entertainment is usenet trolling. And, it's not even that good, being as it's so easy to filter out. Apd and myself disagree somewhat on the automation aspects of the bot. I'm not convinced it's automated in any real way based on some tests i've been doing. You didn't really think my replies to yourself and Snit was only intended for you did ya? and, I'm not spamming anywhere; thanks. Please learn to use the proper terminology if you're going to accuse me of something. I've been xposting for several reasons. One is part of an ongoing analysis test and the other is to ensure the groups I'm familiar with all get to know your new best friend, before he's able to cause much of a ruckus there. I have far more confidence in what Apd has to say on the matter. :-D Apd agrees with me concerning what Snit wrote about me. What is your confidence in that? Or, is your confidence dependent on whether or not he agrees with me, specifically? Do be honest, David. You never know who might be reading this. G The truth is that, as far as I'm aware, Apd has always been truthful. I've had no cause to doubt what he says, but confess that I would like to have a better understanding of the 'real-life him. Being that you've neglected your lesson on function basics, and being that Snit now seems to have 'manipulated' you into being ashamed to even try to learn anything (that's some 'friend' you have there), I offer: let mystery = [72,111,119,32,99,97,110,32,65,112,100,32,107,110,1 11,119,32,11 6, 104,101,,32,116,114,117,116,104,32,104,101,114,101 ,63] function mysterySolver(array) { return mystery.map(num = String.fromCharCode(num)).join('') } What's going on there? I'll pass - and ask FromTheRafters. I ran it and got "undefined". But what it is doing is getting the ASCII character of each code. Given how ASCII is a standard, notice how Carroll did not have to specify what OS or machine... ASCII will be the same on macOS, Linux, Windows, etc. ASCII is one standard, and this is all besides the point. It was pretty key to the point I was making, and perhaps the one Carroll was. What point were you making, other than to try and take a snide shot at me (Diesel) snit? But, of course, being that you almost surely ARE Carroll you can speak for him. Someone can't read headers for ****, nor can they comprehend the concept of a 'writing style'. Message-ID: Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Diesel Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Microsoft end of support dates Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:13:46 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 190 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:13:46 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="859c4502f6973d481c530b905737cfd2"; logging-data="28833"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194mX2MTYeHbLXT2yawwnKguNhsfgi8B 5I=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Cancel-Lock: sha1xOvqrxATgl1NBD8mSakc32zqvQ= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.computer.workshop:53160 And here's the one from the post you're responding to: Message-ID: XnsAC09AE8992FB5HT1@WQfND4ubf5P1A5ycOs38eyNyCr69n S17N8.45P Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gremlin Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Microsoft end of support dates Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:04:28 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 149 Message-ID: XnsAC09AE8992FB5HT1@WQfND4ubf5P1A5ycOs38eyNyCr69n S17N8.45P References: Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 21:04:28 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="225cef8addc0d47e8a6cd99998159535"; logging-data="2758"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ayxebjO0hSd6qUfymxo9eVh8O04Dz7y8=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mSrNygbLQ+UeaH6NSHL/411Dnj8= Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.computer.workshop:53915 **** What do you suppose is the same about those two headers, Snit? What do you suppose is inside those headers that pretty much is a dead ****ing give away that I, Gremlin, am also known as Diesel, as well as Raid. Take your time, nearly illiterate adult; I know you skimmed the post, because that's the best your reading level allows for. I also know you have to do that because you lack the intelligence to understand what you read in full context. And you demonstrated that yet again with your accusation of my being Carroll and/or a sock of Carrolls. You could have saved yourself the trouble and another false accusation by reviewing the ****ing headers. Now, I have that much more doubt of a poster being a carroll sock just because you claim they are. You just confused me for being one! And this isn't the first time you did it, either. And, again being Carroll, you will try to speak FOR me, and your posts will show your obsession with me. And you will "magically" have knowledge of Carroll's accusations from the past, but then whenever I quote Carroll you will pretend to not know a thing about it and demand Message IDs and then twist just as Carroll does. I'm not Carroll, and outside of here, I don't know Carroll anymore so than I know you. But, what I know about the both of you is that you have websites dedicated to warning people about you, just like David Brooks - and I'd say it's for the same reasons. I've not been able to find sites dedicated to warning others about Carroll. Why might that be? And let's not even bother considering the fact you just accused me (wrongfully!) of being Carroll himself, and/or a ****ing sock of his. It seems to me that anyone who posts something you don't like, or is otherwise not a positive example of you, is a sock; by default. I'm much more inclined at this point to believe you actually do have that many people who despise you for the same reasons as I have formed a strong dislike towards you. I bet it mostly revolves around your consistent need to be a liar. A confirmed, liar, Snit. All predictable. And all explained best by you being yet another Carroll sock. You really do not understand how poorly you hide your tells, Carroll -- but folks like Diesel will PRETEND to not see to further their trolling, and you will use their insecurities to manipulate them. Again, all very predictable. I am Diesel!, you illiterate ****stain on the underwear of life. Learn to read a header, illiterate gob****e. Seriously. Learn to ****ing read AND COMPREHEND what you are reading. It's not a selective thing Snit, it's a life long skill and you don't have a very good understanding of it. See below for a string of your tells... you really just can't deal with the fact I have you set on auto-read. You NEED my attention. How pathetic. A string of my tells? Dude, you went way above and beyond the call of duty to show yourself as an ignoramous asshat who doesn't even have the reading level of a 4th grader in American public schools, in say, detroit. You don't have me set on auto-read you ignorant ****, we don't have matching addresses. And, we're not the same person. It's quite clear to most of us that you're the one here to play games, Snit. See: tell after tell after tell. I wonder who will pretend to not see it? Diesel and Shadow, surely. Others might just have no comment, not wanting to get involved... but do you think they REALLY do not see it? Are people REALLY as stupid as you need them to be, Carroll? What in the **** are you going on about? Snit, dude, listen and listen close, you haven't succesfully snowed anybody here into believing you aren't a lying, ****wit, of a troll. On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 2:06:57 PM UTC-6, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: When did I 'snip and run' with you? Last week. MID: You quoted one line: "Whatever the difference you still do the same things". What I meant by "do" is "accuse each other of" And I explained that I don't merely accuse. In large part, I do what you just said to Snit in a previous post, I'll confront his BS (unsupported) allegations. If you've been reading, you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel right now. Yup. From: FromTheRafters Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Message-ID: Steve Carroll - fretwizzer explained : On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 7:24:55 AM UTC-6, FromTheRafters wrote: Steve Carroll - fretwizzer formulated on Monday : On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 4:21:14 AM UTC-6, Apd wrote: "Snit" wrote: Diesel wrote: Snit wrote: On 6/12/20 3:11 AM, Apd wrote: He was speaking about code in general, not any particular piece of software. He said as much. I have agreed he may have changed topics away from Carroll's Usenet flood bot. He does tend to wander a lot as he posts. You *didn't* understand what Apd wrote, or, you did, and are trying to twist it into something else entirely. Which is it? It is my understanding he said you changed topics away from Carroll's flood bot code to code in general. If he disagrees he can tell me. No I didn't say he changed topics. The talk about code in general was directly related to the topic of the bot code itself. You *really* believe the BS he's slinging at you now? That it was in general doesn't mean it didn't apply to the code in the context of the discussion, Snit is *fully* aware of that fact. He's playing you and I think you know it. For the record, I've know Diesel a long time and while we've had our run-ins and disagreements, Is that your issue here (same one you have with me)? I believe him when he says he has no access to the flood-bot code. That misses the point, the question here is *why* Snit points fingers like he does. Anyone reading can see it's beyond the 'hard sell' stage. What do you get by ignoring the obvious to this extent? That's what I don't understand. You get to converse with people who are 'nice' to you? That they are pathologically lying pieces of sh*t is irrelevant? Even if you'd not made the accusation It's not *just* an accusation (in an endless stream of them), it's unsupported and clearly made for a purpose in a campaign to convince readers that 'Snit is good, Diesel is bad'. There is *no* way you don't know this, so WTF is the story here? The story, as I see it, is that somebody is running a lame spoofer flooder bot or whatever and others are arguing about whose it is. I don't care, it is filtered out. That story doesn't address the fact that Snit is doing what we can all clearly see (even DB sees it, he's only quiet about it because Snit 'supports' his BS). You haven't noticed the lengths that Snit has gone to in order to keep attention focused on the bot? Or his over the top, hard sell that I run it? Or that he's the only person who has tried to seek benefit from it? I see it, but I skip most of the bot related posts because I am not interested in such a lame program. ** end paste See that Snit? can you comprehend what they are agreeing with that was written about you by your detractor? They are agreeing that Carroll was telling the truth about you, atleast in so far as your need to lash out and attack. And, they've all noticed what you've been doing towards me, too. In case you're still confused, Snit, Carroll wrote some negative things about what you've been doing here and specifically towards me. Apd and FTR responded that they are *both* well aware of what you're doing; neither of them disagreed with Carroll at any point when he described your activities as he did in both of those posts I shared here. So, if you're thinking that you snowed them and they are seeing things from your ****ed up point of view; we can all agree, that's not the case. They are aware of your continued efforts to lie and weasel around acknowledging what you wrote or issuing an apology for it. There's no doubt about it, we all agree on that, snit. -- Cats must sit in mom's pants/underwear when she is on the throne. |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Snit
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 01:11:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 7/27/20 5:52 PM, Pimiento Pete wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:04:24 +0000, Simon wrote: David_B wrote in : On 27/07/2020 12:49, Simon wrote: Steve Carroll: ----- I've been booted off by past providers before because people complain about me and all my bull****. I don't want to lose my ISP*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted from. https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os....working.window s /c/kbBnF7Aogf0 HTH :-D Sorry. No bueno. A post with a similar email address as Steve Carroll and written in the third person doesn't constitute a form of legitimate proof of snit's statements. And why are you answering for snit? Can't snit answer directly? Maybe you would like to try again? Snit is behind the various permutations of account. He has been planting "evidence" for years using various similar to Steve Carrolls real account emails. He is also behind the bot which posts as and despite snit claiming it's posted under other email addresses he has yet to provide any evidence of this which means it's just another lie he can add to the 1000's he has posted over the years. Snit is a sicko pathological liar. THOSE have Carroll's tells... the other sock which people asked if it was Carroll did not. Actually, the post david cited is written like your posts, and the |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Simon news:XnsAC074F94E2CE19999@
144.76.35.198 Mon, 27 Jul 2020 11:49:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Snit wrote in : I do not have the list, but this is a quote from him (though he then lied and tried to attribute it to *me*, as being dishonest is just what he does): Steve Carroll: ----- I've been booted off by past providers before because people complain about me and all my bull****. I don't want to lose my ISP *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted from. ----- MID ? Don't expect to see one anytime soon. Snit's pulled this before. -- To live in the hearts we leave behind, is not to die. |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft end of support dates
Simon
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 11:38:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Pimiento Pete wrote in : On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:04:24 +0000, Simon wrote: David_B wrote in : On 27/07/2020 12:49, Simon wrote: Steve Carroll: ----- I've been booted off by past providers before because people complain about me and all my bull****. I don't want to lose my ISP*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted from. https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os....tworking.windo ws /c/kbBnF7Aogf0 HTH :-D Sorry. No bueno. A post with a similar email address as Steve Carroll and written in the third person doesn't constitute a form of legitimate proof of snit's statements. And why are you answering for snit? Can't snit answer directly? Maybe you would like to try again? Snit is behind the various permutations of account. He has been planting "evidence" for years using various similar to Steve Carrolls real account emails. He is also behind the bot which posts as and despite snit claiming it's posted under other email addresses he has yet to provide any evidence of this which means it's just another lie he can add to the 1000's he has posted over the years. Apparently snit has been playing this nym copying game for a long time. It's quite obvious that snit is behind the spam messages posted by some kiddie script he has cobbled together from code fragments he found on the net. Snit is not intelligent enough to design something from scratch, even something as poorly implemented as his bot. That appears to be the case, going by various interactions with him here; some of which I've participated in under the nym Diesel. All snit has to do is answer a few questions, provide an MID to substantiate his claims and he would not only show honesty but would also shut down the various people asking for him to prove his claims. Indeed. I have no problem admitting when/if I'm wrong about something. I've asked for MIDs from him for various things he's written, all to no avail. He won't even provide MIDs to backup the lies he wrote about me he http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100 Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely the compiled code he had: ----- Do you think when you disassemble something that you're provided the original source code that was compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're given looks nothing like the original source code, but it still tells you *everything* about the program. ----- So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess: he will NEVER say. I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output - atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the "compiled code". Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short paragraph. The section he quotes that I wrote has nothing to do with any specific bot, and he was told this, ad nausem when he first asked me about it. He lifted it from a reply I wrote to him, questioning how much he actually knew about programming - because he wrote some erroneous statements on what one needed/didn't need to determine how the algorithm works. The part of the reply he cherry picked was going into more detail concerning that erroneous comment of his, and this was explained when I wrote it. It was also explained *again* by Apd. Snit opted to "disagree" with both of us concerning what I meant with the words I used. If you examine the entire reply, in full context, it becomes quite obvious to anyone who doesn't have a severe reading comprehension issue that I was NOT writing about any specific piece of code, that I did NOT change subjects, etc. As was explained to him, by several other people. When he's told something he doesn't like, he dismisses it as a "disagreement". I know damn well what I meant by what I wrote, and so does anyone who doesn't have a reading comprehension issue. Snit is the only one who is still confused about what I wrote. But he never will and the reason is because he can't prove what never happened. Snit likes to re-write history and whether it's due to the long term effects of the various drug cocktails he has been poisoning his brain with for years or he really does believe people are as stupid as he needs them to be and simply expects people to take his word as truth. That's exactly what he does, in a nutshell. His efforts to snow various individuals here though, have failed. On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 2:06:57 PM UTC-6, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: When did I 'snip and run' with you? Last week. MID: You quoted one line: "Whatever the difference you still do the same things". What I meant by "do" is "accuse each other of" And I explained that I don't merely accuse. In large part, I do what you just said to Snit in a previous post, I'll confront his BS (unsupported) allegations. If you've been reading, you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel right now. Yup. And I have more examples of his failure to con or otherwise snow various individuals here. He's trying his best? to confuse things and ride me, but it's not working as you can clearly see. Based upon the various websites documenting snit's behavior, which BTW show high in Google ratings,that ain't gonna happen. Indeed. And the websites aren't quoting him out of context, or otherwise fabricating stories about him either. MIDs are provided, and from those, entire threads can be pulled for contextual review. Snit really is as various people have gone to great lengths to describe him as being. Snit is a sicko pathological liar. Indeed he is. Personally I don't know how he is able to live with himself. He's obviously a pathetic old man who has watched life pass him by because he spent all of that time trolling the Internet. Oh, to hear Snit tell it, he's spent time 'teaching people. You believe that right? If snit wasn't so dishonest and pathetic this would be hilarious to watch but instead it is so very sad. By the time snit wakes up and realizes he ****ed up his and his family's lives he will have one foot in the grave. The guy is the very definition of pathetic and seems to have no intention towards improving himself. eyeroll He'd much rather waste his time trying to convince others that he knows a hell of a lot more than he actually does. His credibility here is in ruins, as can be plainly seen by reading any number of threads he's involved with here (acw). -- Good ideas are not adopted automatically. They must be driven into practice with courageous impatience. --Admiral Hyman G. Rickover |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
Hate speech reported
David_B
Tue, 28 Jul 2020 12:39:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 28/07/2020 12:38, Simon wrote: Simon may not understand that this item in his header identifies exactly who he is:- Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3418118481dc3a117aaef7ba839a91b4"; logging-data="31154"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3rmDhaYos1fip6x9rBDXBslAPi/wdn54=" It is now a requirement under the law that Ray Banana report all incidents of hate speech to law enforcement officers. Where is the hate speech? I'm more than willing to act as witness to the atrocious behavior of some folk using the ES server. David, I'm pretty sure it's illegal to knowingly file false reports.. And I wouldn't count on Ray banana accepting anything you tell them at face value without checking things thoroughly first. What Simon wrote can all be factually verified as being truthful. Here's an example: On 6/11/20 5:19 PM, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: On Thursday, June 11, 2020 at 2:06:57 PM UTC-6, Apd wrote: "Steve Carroll - fretwizzer" wrote: When did I 'snip and run' with you? Last week. MID: You quoted one line: "Whatever the difference you still do the same things". What I meant by "do" is "accuse each other of" And I explained that I don't merely accuse. In large part, I do what you just said to Snit in a previous post, I'll confront his BS (unsupported) allegations. If you've been reading, you can see he's doing the same thing with Diesel right now. Yup. Carroll as you can see described what Snits doing to Apd. Apd is aware of it and acknowledged it. Would you like to see a post from FTR doing the same thing? Your new friend has failed to snow the others here, David. If anything, they've gone well out of their way to show myself, Apd, FTR, etc, that what's been shared about them is more than likely to be true vs not true. Nobody convinced us of anything, Nobody aside from Snit has tried to run a con game here. How do you explain this David? -- EXPANSION SLOTS: The extra holes in your belt buckle. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|