If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird
even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote:
On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
cameo wrote:
On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. If this was happening to me, I'd be using a copy of Wireshark, to capture what packets Thunderbird is emitting when it starts. It *could* be trying to reach the mozilla web site and get the source code for the teaser window for when it starts. But it could just as easily be going to some unexpected site, in which case you'd want to make sure the profile didn't contain compromised information. If you don't like Wireshark, a less effective tracing tool would be TCPView. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sys...nloads/tcpview Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
On 9/25/2018 9:17 PM, cameo wrote:
In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." Chrome is malware. Those are "tracking" cookies. They tell Google the sites you visit so they can place certain ads (depending on your types of interest. And one cannot remove all of Chrome once it has been installed (except possible via "safe mode" which I haven't tried). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
On 9/25/2018 10:17 PM, Paul wrote:
cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. If this was happening to me, I'd be using a copy of Wireshark, to capture what packets Thunderbird is emitting when it starts. It *could* be trying to reach the mozilla web site and get the source code for the teaser window for when it starts. But it could just as easily be going to some unexpected site, in which case you'd want to make sure the profile didn't contain compromised information. If you don't like Wireshark, a less effective tracing tool would be TCPView. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sys...nloads/tcpview ** Paul I'm afraid your solution suggestion is over my head. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
cameo wrote:
On 9/25/2018 10:17 PM, Paul wrote: cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. If this was happening to me, I'd be using a copy of Wireshark, to capture what packets Thunderbird is emitting when it starts. It *could* be trying to reach the mozilla web site and get the source code for the teaser window for when it starts. But it could just as easily be going to some unexpected site, in which case you'd want to make sure the profile didn't contain compromised information. If you don't like Wireshark, a less effective tracing tool would be TCPView. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sys...nloads/tcpview Paul I'm afraid your solution suggestion is over my head. THunderbird is a web browser. The main windows is drawn based on some XML file. When THunderbird starts, it can put Mozilla advertising in the lower-right pane. THis requires contacting a known address on the Mozilla site, and picking up version specific advertising material. Download TCPView and start it. It shows connections opening and closing. Now, double click the Thunderbird icon to start Thunderbird. Glance over at the TCPView window. Did a new connection open ? Is the connection to Mozilla or to some other web server ? When the web server is contacted, all the normal things happen. If they craft poorly designed web code, it could be that the Mozilla advertising page is trying to track access by setting a cookie on the client. Note that cookies are seldom implemented as actual (old-fashioned) cookie storage any more. The web page attempts to use DOM storage instead, and the browser has all sorts of cracks and crevasses to store identify information. When a diagnostic message says "I cannot store a cookie", that's not really what it means. It means "your DOM storage is not working for me, or I am unable to abuse your browser the way I expected", rather than a puny cookie being denied. I always leave cookie storage *wide open* and I still see that stupid message. I get a chuckle out of this, that the message complains about cookies, yet my cookie storage is there is they want it. But they don't use it, because I would only erase the cookie at my next convenience :-) You can fix this problem one of two ways: 1) Discover that the web communication is illegitimate and track down how that is happening. 2) Discover the communication is normal (such as the advertising page picked up at startup), then make sure that the browser policies are open enough to cause the error/warning message to go away. The usage of TCPView or the usage of Wireshark, are to try to provide some information about what Thunderbird is trying to contact. Even some third-party firewalls could help you, and perhaps you are more familiar with using such outgoing firewalls for discovery or research purposes. (I.e. Zonealarm could tell you that Thunderbird is trying to contact "some" site.) Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Paul wrote on 26/09/2018 3:17 PM:
cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? -- Daniel |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Daniel60 wrote:
Paul wrote on 26/09/2018 3:17 PM: cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? A suite works, because the "source sharing" is kinda hidden. Once you "part out" Thunderbird as a separate source tree, your knickers are exposed. If you're using the engine from the browser, somehow you have to link to that. And since the browser portion may need "tweaks" to meet project objectives, that means eating the whole source tree. For better or worse. For example, if the browser portion invaded privacy, maybe you'd have to turn off parts of it. The source tree is *way* too big, to do any sort of analysis. Even running a debugger (WinDBG with IDE integration), I tried that once with Firefox and it was hopeless. After two hours of single stepping stuff, I got no-where fast. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...la_Thunderbird Thunderbird Version (Gecko Version) Based on Firefox version number ------------------- --------------- ------------------------------- ... Thunderbird 52 52.0 52.9.1 [ XUL ? ] Thunderbird 60 60 60 [ "new method" ] The Thunderbird .mozconfig file had a build option to just build the browser portion. As a means of proving the pouring of the source tarball, into the Tbird source tree, didn't break anything. I build these programs occasionally. I've built Thunderbird, Firefox, and Chromium from source. Some of these efforts take a couple days of solid effort, and 5GB+ worth of download. The build recipes aren't completely honest and above board (you download a tarball, but can't use it, and have to clone an HG tree instead, filled with 50% more third party files like Rust and friends). If you do want to try your hand at building, use an x64 OS and own a big machine (even if the executable is x86). A machine with 3GB of RAM isn't nearly enough now. Even a 16GB machine is too tight during the linking phase (the linking phase can be done as one giant obj loading exercise, and basically every object compiled, gets linked at the same time. Memory usage during that step, shoots through the roof, and is the "rate limiting step"). I generally split my machine, put the source tree in a 32GB RAMDisk, and leave the other 32GB for the OS and tools to use. That usually works OK. The developers who work on projects like this, use 20-core computers. And probably as much RAM as you can stuff into such machines. My machine isn't that big :-) You won't find any developers there running a Core2 Duo and 3GB of RAM. That ship sailed years ago. Paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Daniel60 wrote:
Paul wrote on 26/09/2018 3:17 PM: cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? Paul's comment "Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser." is (IMO) not quite correct. Thunderbird contains an HTML renderer, which can also render remote content / webpages, but that's not the same thing as a web-browser. Thunderbird and Firefox share a large part of the HTML renderer code, but Thunderbird is still only an e-mail (and NetNews) client and Firefox is still only a web-browser. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
In message , Paul
writes: [] Thunderbird Version (Gecko Version) Based on Firefox version number ------------------- --------------- ------------------------------- ... Thunderbird 52 52.0 52.9.1 [ XUL ? ] Thunderbird 60 60 60 [ "new method" ] Thanks, interesting - so basically TB is more or less the same version as F. [] The developers who work on projects like this, use 20-core computers. And probably as much RAM as you can stuff into such machines. My machine isn't that big :-) You won't find any developers there running a Core2 Duo and 3GB of RAM. That ship sailed years ago. Paul Sadly, they use their turn-it-on-and-the-lights-dim machines not just for compiling, but also for testing. So they have no (OK, little) idea how their code actually _runs_ on lesser machines. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf All I ask is to _prove_ that money can't make me happy. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Wolf K wrote on 27/09/2018 11:05 PM:
On 2018-09-27 06:36, Daniel60 wrote: Paul wrote on 26/09/2018 3:17 PM: [...] Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? Function (email client) and architecture (method of displaying content) are two different things. Keep in mind that a mail server is just a server that stores mail. "Web pages" are just different content, is all. If someone were to send me a web-page, rather than a link to the web-page, sure, TB would display the content of the e-mail, which would appear as a web-page ... with-in the e-mail program!! Is that what you mean by "remote content", Wolf?? NB that Tbird can display "remote content" if you permit that. That's web pages. Web pages usually include or link to trackers these days. Tbird's option protects you from tracking, if that's what you wish. I suspect that OP's Tbird is set to d/l remote content without first requesting permission. Check Tools - Options - Privacy - Mail content - "Allow remote content..." and change as* desired. Best, -- Daniel |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Paul wrote on 28/09/2018 4:47 AM:
Daniel60 wrote: Snip Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? A suite works, because the "source sharing" is kinda hidden. Once you "part out" Thunderbird as a separate source tree, your knickers are exposed. If you're using the engine from the browser, somehow you have to link to that. And since the browser portion may need "tweaks" to meet project objectives, that means eating the whole source tree. For better or worse. For example, if the browser portion invaded privacy, maybe you'd have to turn off parts of it. The source tree is *way* too big, to do any sort of analysis. Even running a debugger (WinDBG with IDE integration), I tried that once with Firefox and it was hopeless. After two hours of single stepping stuff, I got no-where fast. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...la_Thunderbird Thunderbird Version** (Gecko Version)** Based on Firefox version number -------------------** ---------------** ------------------------------- * ... * Thunderbird 52*********** 52.0********* 52.9.1*** [ XUL ? ] * Thunderbird 60*********** 60*********** 60******* [ "new method" ] The Thunderbird .mozconfig file had a build option to just build the browser portion. As a means of proving the pouring of the source tarball, into the Tbird source tree, didn't break anything. I build these programs occasionally. I've built Thunderbird, Firefox, and Chromium from source. Some of these efforts take a couple days of solid effort, and 5GB+ worth of download. The build recipes aren't completely honest and above board (you download a tarball, but can't use it, and have to clone an HG tree instead, filled with 50% more third party files like Rust and friends). If you do want to try your hand at building, use an x64 OS and own a big machine (even if the executable is x86). A machine with 3GB of RAM isn't nearly enough now. Even a 16GB machine is too tight during the linking phase (the linking phase can be done as one giant obj loading exercise, and basically every object compiled, gets linked at the same time. Memory usage during that step, shoots through the roof, and is the "rate limiting step"). I generally split my machine, put the source tree in a 32GB RAMDisk, and leave the other 32GB for the OS and tools to use. That usually works OK. The developers who work on projects like this, use 20-core computers. And probably as much RAM as you can stuff into such machines. My machine isn't that big :-) You won't find any developers there running a Core2 Duo and 3GB of RAM. That ship sailed years ago. ** Paul Thanks for this explanation, Paul, but I think building this would be well beyond my capabilities ... and not to mention the capability of my 4GB RAM, HP laptop!! -- Daniel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
Frank Slootweg wrote on 28/09/2018 5:22 AM:
Daniel60 wrote: Paul wrote on 26/09/2018 3:17 PM: cameo wrote: On 9/25/2018 7:24 PM, Wolf K wrote: On 2018-09-25 22:17, cameo wrote: In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." I assume you've clicked on a link in Thunderbird. If so, the message merely means that the page you wanted to see won't open until you enable cookies. Nope. I did not click on a link, but now I wonder if I should also enable 3rd party cookies. Somewhere I read that those should not be enabled. Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser. 90% of the files in the source tarball, are source files for a browser. There's a copy of Firefox in the Thunderbird source. Really, Paul??I understood Thunderbird was the e-mail program that grew out of the Mozilla Suite. Sure, Thunderbird contains much of the (Gecko) coding required to Compose and/or display received e-mails that may contain HTML ... but, at it's roots, Thunderbird is still an e-mail agent!! Isn't it?? Paul's comment "Thunderbird is, at heart, a web browser." is (IMO) not quite correct. Thunderbird contains an HTML renderer, which can also render remote content / webpages, but that's not the same thing as a web-browser. Thunderbird and Firefox share a large part of the HTML renderer code, but Thunderbird is still only an e-mail (and NetNews) client and Firefox is still only a web-browser. My sentiments as well, Frank. ;-) -- Daniel |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What is this about?
On 9/25/2018 9:17 PM, cameo wrote:
In the last few days I've been getting this error message in Thunderbird even though I have bot change any setting in it, just like I have not changed my Chrome's cookie settings. Very annoying. "You've reached this page because we have detected that cookies are disabled in your browser. The page you attempted to load cannot display properly if cookies are disabled. Please enable cookies and retry the operation or go back in your browser." Sure! Amazon places "tracking cookies" on your machine. They keep a record of the sites you frequently visit so they can insert certain ads (based on your habits) on the page. Chrome is malware! (And, I'll wager you cannot completely remove it from ypur computer. I know--I've been through this. I've tried every un-install I can find and have been unable to remove them all. Trying to delete one group, I get the message that it takes "administrator approval" to delete --- and I am the only user and administrator for my machine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|