If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. -- insert funny tagline here |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
David in Devon
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:45:35 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 19/02/2019 21:11, Shadow wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:45 +0000, David in Devon wrote: On 19/02/2019 11:51, Shadow asked:- How is this on topic on the cross-group you posted to ? OT up. []'s The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group. So respect his moderation. Most certainly not. It's a private server. he's the moderator for a reason, whether you like or agree with that or not. If you cannot respect that, feel free to discontinue abusing the server. People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never command my respect. Isn't that what you demand of others? To respect and do as you want them to do, or you'll blackmail and slime them on usenet and elsewhere. Going so far as to create a totally bogus blog, and/or facebook page. Really David, you're beyond what qualifies for a normal pathetic sorry piece of ****. It's just as well that your kid died so long ago, if you were my parent, I'd be more than slightly ashamed of you. There's nothing okay about what you do and have been doing for years to people you don't know, David. Stalking isn't okay. Sliming people isn't okay. Posting their copyrighted material to usenet, isn't okay. Threatening to file fake dmca notices and counter notices, isn't okay. There's 'something of the dark' about him too. I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well established track record of stalking, sliming, and copyright infringing those you elect to have a problem with. I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the TBI concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your bull**** didn't I? From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory, infact. That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And, I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite similiar, except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine typically does not. -- The female gangbang world record is owned by a woman named Houston who had intercourse with 620 men in one day! A video was made of this historic event. As it took about 10 hours (with a few very brief breaks) to do it, the average time of intercourse was less than 58 seconds. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in discussion, one on one, on his home turf. You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP! -- David B. Devon, UK |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote:
[....] I wouldn't know. What I do know is that you, unlike him, have a well established track record of stalking, *sliming*, and copyright infringing those you elect to have a problem with. I've been very busy with work and meeting up with a friend in the *TBI* concerning you. I told you awhile ago, I'd had about enough of your bull**** didn't I? From the TBI's point of view, you're stalking me and in clear violation of state and federal laws here. If the first call doesn't get the expected result, followup calls going higher up the food chain will. I have little doubt that a phone call from a law enforcement agency that outranks our state and local police will carry more weight with your local officers than the same call from a local (for me) police dept would. I'm going to test the theory, infact. That's my best bet for dealing with you, legally, in real life. And, I'm going to. Btw, our countries copyright laws are quite *similiar*, except that your country uses local police to arrest offenders, mine typically does not. What on earth are you smoking, Dustin? What is the TBI? -- David B. Devon, UK |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 2019-02-19 16:59, nospam wrote:
In article , David in Devon wrote: The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group. So respect his moderation. Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him too. so that's why you were booted out of the navy. No. He was booted out of the Navy for being a drunk incompetent. Given the history of the Navy and the number of drunks and incompetents and even drunk incompetents that the Navy has tolerated over the last 300 years, he must have been truly spectacular. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 2019-02-20 03:34, Diesel wrote:
David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. Quite correct. You cannot just appoint yourself to be a moderator on one of those services. Someone must grant you proper access, and that someone must themselves be someone who has proper access. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. It is, as always, a lie on his part. He has a problem with Winston because Winston did his duty (something David Brooks knows nothing about) and enforced moderation. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-02-19 16:59, nospam wrote: In article , David in Devon wrote: The self-appointed 'moderator' of some public access newsgroups on the private server reads and posts in the Windows10 group. So respect his moderation. Most certainly not. People who appoint themselves to a position of power will never command my respect. There's 'something of the dark' about him too. so that's why you were booted out of the navy. No. He was booted out of the Navy for being a drunk incompetent. Given the history of the Navy and the number of drunks and incompetents and even drunk incompetents that the Navy has tolerated over the last 300 years, he must have been truly spectacular. Considering that receiving a "tot of rum" was part of being in the navy, it goes with the territory. You don't need to be sober to fire a 21" naval gun. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rum_ration "The rum ration (also called tot) was a daily amount of rum given to sailors on Royal Navy ships. It was abolished in 1970 after concerns that regular intakes of alcohol would lead to unsteady hands when working machinery." But they did manage to run their ships, unsteady hands and all, for hundreds of years. Maybe the ships had more sensitive steering or something on the 1970 ships. Or the gears weren't as rugged on the machines. ******* In the Canadian Navy, the beer vending machine was removed, after some staff "abused it" :-) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/briti...hips-1.2871521 "Dec 12, 2014 Canadian sailors will no longer be able to drink aboard ships, unless the vessel is tied up or an exception has been made for a special occasion such as Christmas or a barbecue." When you're at war, every day is a "barbecue"... for someone. I'm beginning to see a theme here. It's not going to be as much fun swabbing that deck, if you're sober. Now that marijuana is legal in Canada, we'll have a bunch of stoner hippies driving our remaining ships. Dammit. https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadi...licy-1.4084015 "Members of the Armed Forces will not be allowed to consume cannabis during a shift or domestic exercise. They will not be allowed to bring cannabis on any aircraft or vessel and are not permitted to bring cannabis with them internationally. As far as day-to-day tasks, military members cannot consume cannabis up to eight hours before performing any duty, up to 24 hours before handling a loaded weapon or driving a vehicle, and up to 28 days before joining the crew of an aircraft or submarine." After 28 days, those hippy hands are going to be pretty steady. I bet the staff are going to be pretty grumpy. "All ahead sober" "Ay, sir" Paul |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
David in Devon
Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote: David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in discussion, one on one, on his home turf. I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person. You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP! I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times to hack his server for your benefit. I'll provide him your full contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer, or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you explain that? -- Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
Panthera Tigris Altaica
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 15:06:11 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 2019-02-20 03:34, Diesel wrote: David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. Quite correct. You cannot just appoint yourself to be a moderator on one of those services. Someone must grant you proper access, and that someone must themselves be someone who has proper access. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. It is, as always, a lie on his part. He has a problem with Winston because Winston did his duty (something David Brooks knows nothing about) and enforced moderation. I know. Winston and the server he runs is one of the targets David Brooks tried to hire me to not only hack, but, obtain data from said target as well. That's two seperate felonies, right off the bat. And that so called 'Christian' so called, 'good guy', tried to publish a google street map view of my house as blackmail when I declined to break federal laws on his behalf. Yet, somehow, I'm the bad guy. Pfft.. right. And pigs fly at great ****ing altitudes, too. -- Poetry is an echo, asking a shadow to dance. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256 Diesel wrote: [...] And pigs fly at great ****ing altitudes, too. Only when they have a helicopter. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlxxPr sACgkQjhHd8xJ5 ooGOXQf9ExCkNHYOICsyt3WJ46xDR7UzrUvBmEHWrGvv6aUZVx 28mKeSZv2YBFSO D6BZxYam+aKTf8nMkwm1BZbqXyfs3WUWNg7CcFDeQnZH9DoQsY 6ptRzGdA4CWNI5 OG/xEbu8pZrfMVhOk9Kevk/2pxKtKFNiK0+ZVEP+lqj4dUga9uXKUqf6k1EUZTWH 7wbs5dw0yUwSMFeZMs+ExqrWXIgqb7F5mwtKZe9+HKZmA60H/ODSGCTa1tOKN7au cqvOR8SKEiYgOuBeXGgG/vupPWGuenuf0ki/koODLzqWa6cGyb6qqwzto9ffKIjm Ao1i9wINXHZ1olfWLIeLPmP1+IJqhg== =f32b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- |_|O|_| |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ...
David in Devon Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote: David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in discussion, one on one, on his home turf. I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person. Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware, HAVE a site for you to explore. You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP! I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times to hack his server for your benefit. Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack. I'll provide him your full contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer, or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G How can you a hack a server which does not exist? Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you explain that? You're making things up again! Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old http://www.phillipmjones.net/ -- David B. Devon, UK |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On 23/02/2019 15:31, David in Devon wrote:
On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ... David in Devon Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:59:12 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 20/02/2019 08:34, Diesel wrote: David in Devon Tue, 19 Feb 2019 22:45:51 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: That is what 'Winston' has done. He's bad news. The only way that can happen is if Winston has control of the server, or the server admin appointed him those duties. As far as your claim of him being bad news, It's likely a lie on your part. As is most things you write. The only way you will EVER know for sure is if you engage him in discussion, one on one, on his home turf. I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person. Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware, HAVE a site for you to explore. You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP! I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times to hack his server for your benefit. Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack. I'll provide him your full contact details too, in the event he wants to discuss your solicitation to commit criminal offenses against him with a lawyer, or, a phone call to your local police. Maybe he'd like to see your recent usenet posts, challenging me to hax0r him. G How can you a hack a server which does not exist? Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you explain that? You're making things up again! Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old http://www.phillipmjones.net/ Here's an interesting turn up for the book! https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/...1-be014e8a8810 The post made by C.Winston Natoli is *NOW* showing up as having been made by "A. User" . *WOW* That is confirming EXACTLY what I was talking about in the thread - posts on the Answers forums *ARE* being 'manipulated'! -- David B. Devon, UK |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon
wrote: CUT_DENIALS You're making things up again! Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you to ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his STALKING TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and BANNED him. Is that what you meant, "commander" ? Since Diesel is a "good guy" he refused, of course. Even after he was threatened and blackmailed. And became a STALKING TARGET himself. Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof. I and the "commander" say TIA Read all about the "commander" he https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php He's the pride of many "sailor boys" []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 Nineteen Eighty-Four was a work of FICTION !!!! - Orwell |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
David in Devon
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel - *under the influence of drugs* again ... Drugs? That's just yet another lie on your part. You've done better in the past, David. I'm disappointed with you. I can take an educated guess based on my own experiences with you that you're most likely lying about him. I didn't explore his site when you demanded I do so via email, what makes you think I'll do so now? Especially since you no longer have the benefit of the doubt with me, nor do I consider you a neutral person. Winston, better known as C.Winston Natali doesn't, as far as I'm aware, HAVE a site for you to explore. Either you've really lost some brain cells hitting that bottle and forgot what you told me via email (and asked of me), or, you're seeking my help via a phishing attempt since directly asking me (again) won't work. You know you aren't getting any favors with the recent **** you've pulled. Or, you should know that. You won't do that. Winston would run rings around you - *HE* is an MVP! I might take you up on the offer and reach out to Winston, to share the email exchange between you and I where you asked me several times to hack his server for your benefit. Winston doesn't *HAVE* a server for you to hack. See above. You think you're so ****ing slick don't you, David? Forget your recent Winston posts? You think you'll con me into confirming one or more things you asked in them do you? I'll take the risk and stick to what I wrote without providing any specific details (I already have actually) that might help you do what I think you're upto. Do you not understand what solicitation to commit a crime is? In my country, malicious hacking (what you tried to hire me for) along with data theft are felonies. You tried to get me to do both for your benefit to NOT ONE, BUT TWO SEPERATE TARGETS, David. How do you explain that? You're making things up again! Are you denying (after having admitted in usenet many times during various discussions; how else would I know you didn't intend to make good on payment for services rendered had I done it? Because you told me, on usenet! [g]) that you've attempted to hire me to hack into sites for you, David? Best you stop smoking that marijuana well before you post on Usenet David, what do you hope to gain by consistently writing lies about another person? MID: On 23/02/2019 04:16, Diesel wrote: Nah, you just lie Nope! -- David B. Devon, UK ** end paste Not only do you lie freely with ease, you lie about the dumbest things possible too! Ask this chap about Winston - he knows him of old Any particular reason someone else should do this? You're the one who seems to have an issue with Winston, going back years (I checked our email correspondence to be sure about a few things while writing this reply) so you and you alone should be the one to deal with it. Nobody else needs to get involved. You got yourself into the mess with Winston, you can get yourself out of it. I don't know why you keep forgetting about the things you've written about me and the things you've done repeatedly with copies of some of my items you lifted from my website... But you must, because you continue to write garbage about me (you did it again in the post I'm writing this reply for) and in the same ****ing post no less, ask me to do something... A As if we have no problems and no issues of any sort between us that need to be resolved in a manner both parties find acceptable. Have you really (all fun and games aside, serious time now) drank so much during your life that you actually do have, measureable, permanent brain damage in one or more regions? The black legion effect, if i'm not mistaken. You are of the right age... David, Your friends in all actuality (I've told you this before, so it's no surprise to you now, unless you've forgotten for the aforementioned reasons) emailed me due to a real concern for you. Your behaviour continues to be off irl. And I know you haven't completely stopped drinking, just yet, too. So quit bsing the good doc Shadow on that. You've cut down, considerably, you aren't drinking daily, but you are most certainly still having a nip now and then. You were partially telling the truth about the date you quit. You did quit, for the next three days in a row afterwards. So, the date is only right for a period of three days. Any sentence that contains that date followed up by didn't touch it since is a lie from just past the date. A bold faced, ****ing lie. And a stupid one too! Nobody really gives a **** about the drinking, David! it's just ANOTHER EXAMPLE of you lying, and, it's not even an important one. I've left some details out, I don't want to toss any source(s) under a bus; I can just imagine how obnoxious you'd be towards them in real life if you ever found out they provided me information on you, and not the other way around as you'd originally intended and planned for! You *are a ****ing prick*, btw, for having tried that. I knew you've tried to sick people online on me for your revenge, but, I wasn't aware you'd been soliciting people you knew locally in real life to help get your sorry ass out of my frying pan, too. I just wanted to give you enough so you can confirm (I don't expect you to do that on usenet. G just you knowing I'm giving your balls a gentle squeeze is enough satisfaction for me... for now) that I updated my information on you recently. In other words, comms link between your friend(s) remains open for business. Matter of fact, it's really nobodies business but your own at the end of the day what you do/don't do in your own personal life. The only time that it's not, is when whatever it is you're doing causes interference in anothers and they have a problem with it. You're a ****ing coward, David. You picked a fight with the wrong person. Rather than accept the righteous 0wnage you received, and move on, you opt to try and solicit help from others under the guise of you being a harmless soul who was picked on by a mean old Hacker. You lie to them, outright, lie to them about the entire thing for their sympathy and what you hope, is their help. I'm not the only one you've tried this **** with either. I'm one of several, infact. You tried (and failed miserably) to solicit my help to deal with some people and servers you had an issue with; an issue you no doubt (based on what I know of you) caused yourself! And you've tried to solicit others help in forcing me to either do your bidding, and/or be 'hung out to dry' as you so eloquently put it to Savageduck when you tried to recruit him. I suspect you won't turn on him as you've done others so quickly if at all is because you're aware of the fact he actually is a retired Police officer, and can easily acquire full contact details of yourself and police dept simply by reviewing old posts, or asking. People like you so much, anyone who knows your details will happily share them on a moments notice with anyone who wants it. I have no sympathy for this, because you've tried to do the same exact thing to me for the past decade or so now without any concern or thought about potential outcomes for myself and others who may reside with me. You don't consider personal safety and seem to think your idea of privacy (none) applies to all. Instead, you knowingly and willingly, try placing myself and others in potential harms way with address after address you think is mine, phone numbers when possible, family members names, etc. You spare no nothing and no-one. You are not a good guy, you are not some unfortunate lost soul who's picked on by a Hacker and needs another to run to his rescue. You're an evil ****ing manipulative sociopath who gets off on stalking people and if at all possible, using them to stalk others and/or further abuse other individuals/companies/servers you feel have wronged you in some way shape or form. It's all about you and how you feel, **** everything and everyone else. That's exactly how you are, David! You, being the coward you are - feel it necessary to try and recruit others to help you out. You just neglect to mention that it's not a case of someone picking on poor harmless David. It's a case of David taking a swing at someone, getting put on his ass for his trouble, and having to ask another person to stand in his place and take another swing for him, since he missed the first time AND got decked for his effort. Since you got your ass put on the ground with a quickness for your trouble, you somehow think it's unjust and you need to get even for it. Sorry ass, cowardly, piece of ****. Not only did you start the problem you have with me, you couldn't handle the response, and you can't finish the problem yourself. All you can do is continue getting your arse kicked. Can we say, dumb ass ****ing coward? Yes, yes we can. -- Cats must toss their poop out of the litter box and play hockey with it. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]On User2User (news.myplugbox.com)
Shadow
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:06:00 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 15:31:52 +0000, David in Devon wrote: CUT_DENIALS You're making things up again! Diesel, I think he's asking you for PROOF that he asked you to ILLEGALLY HACK into a PRIVATE server that CHOSE one of his STALKING TARGETS as a MODERATOR. The moderator did his job, and BANNED him. Is that what you meant, "commander" ? No, he didn't. He's had these discussions via email and in public on another newsgroup with me (and various others, some of which are RIP), multiple times, some years ago. He knows I can pull those MIDs, share links, etc. But that isn't what he wants me to prove. G He isn't sure at this point what Winstons role is, and is actually on a phishing expedition to find out. You're not privvy to the full background (if you took the large amount of time required to read the emails I've shared you would be) concerning David and Winston so you didn't see this for what it is, and had you been able to provide him useful information, would have done so, without even giving it a second thought. Be more careful next time. I don't call David a slimeball and snake just because I find the names amusing. He really is a slippery ****er sometimes. Diesel, try to keep it short. Just the proof. I and the "commander" say TIA I'll shorten it up as follows, then. You got duped into asking me to help David, without realizing what he was asking for help with. David is on a phishing expedition. Be more careful next time. G Read all about the "commander" he https://web.archive.org/web/20190221143021/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php He's the pride of many "sailor boys" []'s ROFL -- We already have enough youth -- how about a fountain of 'smart'? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|