![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big Bertha Thing burster
Cosmic Ray Series Possible Real World System Constructs http://www.bigberthathing.com/gammaray.html 16K Web Page Astrophysics net ring access site Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.seti Gamma Ray Bursters v1.0 01 feb 2000 Greg Goebel public domain Contents List:- 1.THE DISCOVERY OF GRBS 2.PINPOINTING A GRB 3.CAUGHT IN THE ACT 4.COMMENTS, SOURCES, & REVISION HISTORY Big Bertha Thing publication The statistics for Big Bertha Thing postings published on sci.astro are as follows:- 20 No. 50K primary postings (out of 26) 2 No. 600K ditto (out of 4) 12 No. off-topic postings (out of 200) 4 No. 50K secondary postings (out of 26) 20 No. 4K ditto (out of 26) 20 No. 2K ditto (out of 26) 24 No. astronomical postings (out of 2000) There was almost zero response to the above, which were spread over 28 days, at the rate of two days per week. Book-burners deleted the archive of Net Access Policy postings prior to 2nd November 1998. Bertha saved those, with the exception of replies and published 12. The above were also posted to the Onenet conference Astronomy & Space. Here days 18, 19, 20, were minimal keep-off-the-grass days and on days 27 and 28 they broke ranks. The on-topic filibuster of sound-bite journalism ended, at 42 days old. (The beginning of the end of spam.) Thank you, Tony Lance ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tony Lance Date: Jan 25 2007, 2:17*pm Subject: Big Bertha Thing tactics To: sci.chem +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 February 1998 18:22:42 OUSA Astronomy Item From: * Frank Hollis Subject: * * * *Re(2): Big Bertha Thing positron To: * * OUSA Astronomy Caroline Walcot,oufcnt2.open.ac.uk writes: I don't see what pics of a positron particle (??) have to do with a conference on Astronomy, which is basically stargazing and astrophysics and mainly optics. Surely all this Big Bertha stuff should be diverted to a physics conference such as S271? cheers Caroline Or even better, the conference that was specifically set up for exactly this material, moderated by Spammer in Chief - Tony Lance. * * * * * * * * Frank |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|