If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
G. Winston Natoli
On 17/11/2015 18:12, Paul wrote:
~BD~ wrote: That's true, Paul. Would it help if I put 'OT' at the beginning of a thread? Each of the groups have a charter and a main topic. Using an "OT" tag, is not a license to sporge, crap flood, insert noise, or otherwise make a mess of the group. The definition of "OT" is "slightly off topic but still within the same area as the main charter topic of discussion". That's "slightly" off topic, not "way off" topic. If you make everyone in the group angry enough to wring your neck, that's "way off topic". For example, if my copy of Firefox is not working in Windows 7, people might quite rightly complain that I should take it to the Mozilla support forum. If I put "[OT] Recent Win7 update broke my Firefox", then the topic discussed is Firefox, but the topic isn't that far removed from the OS. There might be a root cause in the OS, the subject may have some overlap between the two groups or forums. If a person were to drop a hundred different chocolate chip cookie recipes into the group, that's not [OT], that's a crap flood. You can find all sorts of articles on Wiki, giving descriptive terms for ways to disrupt USENET. We don't need this kind of disruption. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sporge If you keep it up, you will be nominated for an alt.usenet.kook monthly award. And there is some tough competition, such as the insane university professor (who eventually disappeared from USENET - we assume when this happens, that the person got treatment or there was an intervention - I think his students noticed... :-) ) Genuine kooks receive rewards. Paul That's most interesting. Thanks. :-) Tell me, Paul, why is THIS group not available on the Google Groups? There, there is SOME moderation. Here, there is none! Sadly, I'm not a kook at all! ;-) Just a researcher! |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
G. Winston Natoli
~BD~ wrote:
That's most interesting. Thanks. :-) Tell me, Paul, why is THIS group not available on the Google Groups? There, there is SOME moderation. Here, there is none! Sadly, I'm not a kook at all! ;-) Just a researcher! There is a reason for it. The alt.* hierarchy does not have working control messages. Creating groups takes manual intervention from the server administrator. Control messages were turned off, after people started creating vanity groups. That's where alt.swedish.chef.bork.bork.bork came from. At one time, there might have been a 100,000 garbage groups created. So that stuff was all turned off. At Google, there are no humans... Thus, no way to have a group added. If a comp.* group is added, the signed control message can be received and acted upon automatically. The control message presumably comes from some staff member at the Big-8. But alt.* receives no such service. It's the Ghetto. And as a Ghetto, there is no archiving of newly created groups at Google. Undoubtedly at some level, there is a piece of hardware that does have all the information necessary stored on it. But the software is missing, to make it accessible. Paul |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
G. Winston Natoli
On 17 Nov 2015, ~BD~ wrote in
alt.windows7.general: There's no need to be rude! Yes, there is. You're a well-known net kook and stalker. Your fake cutesy nicey-nice facade is completely ineffective at disguising your obvious and true malignancy. You earn every rudeness you get. You'll note that '...winston' is NOT one of the accredited supporters. No, I won't. I don't care. Maybe you like to ask him why that might be? Why would I do that? It's unimportant and I really don't give a flying ****. As you've noticed, he refuses to communicate with me. He recognizes you as the toxic cancer you are. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
G. Winston Natoli
On 17/11/2015 21:29, Nil wrote:
On 17 Nov 2015, ~BD~ wrote in alt.windows7.general: There's no need to be rude! Yes, there is. You're a well-known net kook and stalker. Your fake cutesy nicey-nice facade is completely ineffective at disguising your obvious and true malignancy. You earn every rudeness you get. You'll note that '...winston' is NOT one of the accredited supporters. No, I won't. I don't care. Maybe you like to ask him why that might be? Why would I do that? It's unimportant and I really don't give a flying ****. As you've noticed, he refuses to communicate with me. He recognizes you as the toxic cancer you are. Thank you for your contribution, dickhead! :-) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|