A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Windows 10 » Windows 10 Help Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 22nd 20, 09:24 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off. Despite him stating many times, nobody can quote any lies
written by him. I just did, right he

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Here's another one ROFL!:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159159190100

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Please note.
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 22:05:53 -0700
Message-ID:
References:



On 5/7/20 9:36 PM, Diesel wrote:
.....
Now you go and find some old source code you don't understand and ask
for Snits advice concerning it? The idiot didn't even realize what
you were asking about and provided you no answer.


Ah, more trolling of me by you. So more reminding you of your past
nonsense.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Diesel F08TPFtT157gyFB5:
-----
Snit, if you're running the bot you have an easy way out
that won't cost you any respect, face, or anything else.
Just stop. That's it. Simple right?
-----

The last time the bot had posted was more than three hours before.

Diesel made it clear he could find the IP of the person running the bot.
And he made it clear it would be easy for him to make a Sandman-like
time table of posting, but showing Carroll and the bot and myself.

Was he lying when he said that? Maybe. But I do not think so. And if he
was merely lying he would not have access to the program itself, which
he makes VERY clear he did.

Diesel and Carroll were trolling together. The bot goes silent. Diesel
then says if the bot is just turned off he will let it slide. Does that
sound like Diesel to you? And he also say this:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously **** poor
example of writing software.
-----

Diesel made it clear he had access not just to the output of the bot but
to the code itself. When called out on this he clarified it was merely
the compiled code he had:


-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're
given looks nothing like the original source code, but it
still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----

So how did Diesel get a copy of the program, compiled or not? My guess:
he will NEVER say.

*** end copy

I've repeatedly asked you to backup the statements you wrote
concerning my involvement with the floodbot. Not one single time
have you even so much as attempted to do so. Questions again:

I want to see the post(s) where I "made it quite clear" that I had
access to more than just the posts the bots been making (the output -
atleast what's available to an end user; admin may provide more
information). I want to see the post(s) where I was "called out", and
finally, I want to see the post(s) where I clarified I had the
"compiled code".

Those are three, seperate and distinct lies in a very short
paragraph. What you quoted me out of context! doesn't even come
close to supporting your accusation. And, it IS an accusation. And
then we have the issue of the question you asked at the end. That
question makes the assumption that what you wrote previous to it is
factual - The question is intended to give credence to what's
written previous to it, to give it credibility. To assist in your
effort to mislead. Which is incidently, a form of manipulation,
Snit.

--
NUMBER CRUNCHING: Jumping on a Computer.
Ads
  #2  
Old August 22nd 20, 10:47 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.


If you could understand what you read you would have known I have been very
clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he pointed to. When you
cried about me doing research for him or whatever I thought you meant
something, you know, of any interest of value. You just were playing victim.

But notice how many times you have lied about me editing a video to add your
phone number that IS ALREADY THERE and, even worse for your idiotic claims, I
HAVE NOT SHOWN.

And even though you gave me permission to show it, I have not because I am
treating you like a child and protecting you from yourself.

https://ibb.co/fpJry4K
https://youtu.be/xRvaRLlb3b8
https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

You directly gave me permission to show the number in my call log (which out
of your ignorance and failure to understand what you read you called a "caller
ID log"). I am protecting you from your own ignorance about the phone tech you
use, and your poor troubleshooting skills, by NOT posting the number YOU said
I could.

Your response is to throw tantrums lasting tens or even hundreds of thousands
of words and cry about my "attitude" as I protect you from yourself, and even
as you make threats.

Hint: you can write a million words and it will not make the number in my call
log go away (though time will, it only is saved for six months). Your ignorant
speculation cannot change reality.

Can you understand that?

This is NOT a rhetorical question -- you truly act like if you just write
enough words, and throw a big enough tantrum, that somehow the phone number
direct from my phone company records will disappear.

Remember: I already taught you how you can test your claims -- recreate the
situation: work out a time with me to call me again from another burner
number. Wait a day to see if it shows up in the logs. If you find a DIFFERENT
way maybe it will not, but if you do it the same way it almost surely will.

Simple troubleshooting -- but beyond your skills.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


  #3  
Old August 22nd 20, 10:36 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.


If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.


What's to misunderstand by this?

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a mistake here?
Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit?


You just were playing victim.


Catching you lying on me, again, is not my playing victim. It's
holding you accountable, and you might as well get used to the idea.

But


Nothing. You *lied* again, and this time, there's nothing for you to
use to even try confusing people. An apology is in order, snit. You
owe me an apology for lying about me here. I want that apology for
the direct lie you claim I made that I did NOT make. Your own words,
directly accusing me of something which was NOT true.

Now, you have to admit you ****ed up, and apologize. It's the right
thing to do. You can no longer claim 'unquotable lies'; because I
quoted you, straight up, lying about me, and I backed up my claim by
sharing Davids and yours discussion doing exactly what I wrote about
him asking you to do, and you doing for him, just as I wrote. There
was no direct lie on my part, at any point in time.

[diversion of your lies snipped]

Can you understand that?


Can you understand that I caught you in a direct lie this time that
you can't even try passing off as a misunderstanding?

You owe me an apology.

Remember: I already taught you how you can test your claims --
recreate the situation: work out a time with me to call me again
from another burner number. Wait a day to see if it shows up in
the logs. If you find a DIFFERENT way maybe it will not, but if
you do it the same way it almost surely will.


I didn't call you from a burner the first time, as I've taken a
great amount of time to explain to your quite stupid ass,
previously. What part of voIP isn't clear to you? the vo or IP?

Simple troubleshooting -- but beyond your skills.


You're projecting your own shortcomings onto me, yet again. It's
amusing, considering how easy it is for me to prove that's the case
here. A recent Joel inability to burn an audio cd so he hoses the os
is a fine example of that. I can find the post where I asked
technical support questions, as any professional would. I cannot
find a single post where you so much as tried. I can find the post
where I asked if yuo agreed with joels repair methodology; to hose
the system and reload another os. you said that was a good idea. It
wasn't, because if the issue comes up again, joel has no idea how it
happened and no idea how to fix it, aside from OS reloading. That's
not something a professional technician does as their first option
for such a situation. I can find hundreds of posts, more likely
thousands though were i'm involved in very technical discussions and
offering useful assistance, ranging from an actual virus infection
to non malicious software and hardware troubleshooting issues, snit.

Anytime you want to setup a troubleshooting contest, lemme know;
We'll do it stupid easy, with the basics of the basic **** here.

We'll setup a circuit simulator with a known ****ing problem and see
which of the first, if both even do, find it and correct the issue.
I bet you fail miserably. Any takers?

--
He's dead Jim. Grab his tricorder. I'll get his wallet.
  #4  
Old August 22nd 20, 11:08 PM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.


If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.


What's to misunderstand by this?

.....

You really fail to understand everything you read. Remember, I already
acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web searches to see if your number was
there -- AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone in any
group you are spamming that you called me.

Please TRY to understand what you read... and TRY to understand at least the
basics of your phone system and how to troubleshoot / test it. PLEASE!

You are not the victim you think you are.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


  #5  
Old August 23rd 20, 05:32 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 22:08:19 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying
his arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I
have been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the
site he pointed to.


What's to misunderstand by this?


You really fail to understand everything you read.


I don't see how I could have possibly misunderstood what you wrote, he

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is. So,
how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit? When you
can't back your statements up, and in this case, you can't - it's
probably best not to try and stick with your totally bull**** claim.
Instead, you should be doing the right thing, manning up, and
apologizing for writing what you did about me - Nothing you've
published so far about me has been true.


What you've been running away from in the last two replies you've
provided in this thread. You clearly went out of your way to lie
about me, again, and now, you're backpeddling about what you did,
again. I really don't see how you think you can convince anyone that
you didn't lie on me, yet again, just because you can.


Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G Just keep denying
things took place as the timeline and myself are clearly showing
they did. Even Google's view of this thread backs me up and calls
you out for the liar you are regarding this entire conversation.
It's all right here in this very thread. You denying David asking
you to do something for him, twice.

You trying to blame your lie on a bogus reading comprehension issue
you want so much for me to be diagnosed with; so that we have
something in common; that's how desperate you are to be accepted by
those with far more knowledge than yourself. You really are, that
pathetic. Especially in this case, lying your arse off as you're
continuing to duck and dodge around the apology you owe me.

Anything to avoid admission of your mistakes. The delays you've
provided say a ****load about you and those who are responsible for
raising you. They did a **** poor job of things, clearly, a ****
poor job of things.


Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit? It's a rhetorical question,
simplesnit. I have a very good idea how dishonest you actually are
now. Willing to lie about the smallest of things doesn't bestow
much trust in you. And despite your claims to the contrary, you did
infact LIE on me again when you claimed I wrote a direct lie about
what David and yourself have been doing. I didn't.

You flat out, straight up, lied your ass off here. As you're more
than willing to lie about this, what else would you lie about with
ease? Oh yes, a phone log. You'd go so far to complete the lie that
you'd dr the evidence to support it. It's really No different than
what you're doing with your replies in this thread.

Remember, I already acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web
searches to see if your number was there


So, there's no question about then, you knew you were lying as you wrote this:

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

You straight up knew for a fact prior to you having writing that
reply that it was a lie; and you went and wrote it anyway. Why do
you make the decision to intentionally be as dishonest as you are?


AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.


You made it perfectly clear to him you had an alternate way of
reaching me. And I suspect you knew David likes to read between the
lines, so you left him a large line to follow.

Ahh, so when you wrote this:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

You were fully aware of the fact you were lying the entire time,
that I didn't write a direct lie as you claimed, nor did I write an
indirect lie. I didn't lie at all, by your own admission; you did
and you're trying to avoid taking responsibility for what you wrote,
yet again.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone
in any group you are spamming that you called me.


Snit, I already explained what you did, by accident that one
particular case. You chose to ignore what I told you, but that
doesn't make what I told you about this go away or cease to exist.
It simply means, as with other things, you chose to ignore it and
play stupid. Only, the more I interact with you, the less likely I
find it to be that you're playing.

Please TRY to understand what you read...


I understand what I read just fine. There's no way in which for me to have misunderstood this:

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

At no time was it ever a direct, or indirect for that matter lie
from me. He did infact do such things, and you just recently
admitted to knowing about it before you wrote the post accusing me
of lying about it. There's no reading issue here, no
misunderstanding. What happened is quite simple, you lied your ass
off (again) about me, with NOTHING to support what you claim
happened.

But there is evidence which supports what I said you and David have
done: As well as your own admission that He'd already asked for your
help by the time you got around to writing the lie you did again
about me. What's funny is that you actually think you can get away
with it.

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

I wrote that David asked you to check that number against phonebook
urls, and he clearly did. And, you attempted to do as he requested.
So there was no direct or even so much as an indirect lie by me, as
you claimed above. So, you lied on me (again) and you owe me an
apology for the lie you wrote there, Snit.

Here's David doing what you claimed I directly lied about:

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

Well, Snit, an apology is clearly in order. When do you expect
you'll be able to swallow enough pride down to admit you made a
mistake here? Or, will you try to weasel around it as you've
continued doing with the bot accusation you made against me?

Just how dishonest are you, snit?

You are not the victim you think you are.


I'm not claiming to be any such thing. Continued attempts to avoid
and project have been noted though.


--
Useless Invention: Blinker Fluid.
  #6  
Old August 23rd 20, 05:36 AM posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns
Snit[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,027
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

On Aug 22, 2020 at 3:08:19 PM MST, "Snit"
wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 2:36:00 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

Snit
Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:47:52 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Aug 22, 2020 at 1:24:32 AM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Just a tiny, easily found example of snit being quoted, lying his
arse off.

If you could understand what you read you would have known I have
been very clear David asked me to check the numbers on the site he
pointed to.


What's to misunderstand by this?

....

You really fail to understand everything you read. Remember, I already
acknowledged he pointed me to a couple web searches to see if your number was
there -- AFTER YOU TOLD HIM I HAD YOUR NUMBER.

Remember, I did not even mention that, nor even tell him or anyone in any
group you are spamming that you called me.

Please TRY to understand what you read... and TRY to understand at least the
basics of your phone system and how to troubleshoot / test it. PLEASE!

You are not the victim you think you are.



I was planning on doing you the favor of responding to anything dealing with
TECH you responded with and ignoring the rest. You know, helping you to learn
how to focus on important things and not your victim mentality.

But you ONLY focused on your victim mentality. NOTHING else.

I sincerely feel bad for you. Seriously, read the above and this time try to
understand it. When you do, maybe, you will be able too move forward in your
life.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.


  #7  
Old August 23rd 20, 10:17 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
David_B[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 162
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

On 23/08/2020 05:32, Gremlin wrote:
Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is. So,
how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit?


What you completely failed to understand is that Snit wasn't doing
ANYTHING for *me*.

I don't NEED anything, Dustin. My fiend in the States tracked you down
in real life and sent me full details of your address in Kingsport. I've
shown it to Snit, but not published it 'in the clear' so to speak.

I was trying to help Snit locate purported business premises for which
he has a telephone number - given to him by you.

I suspect Snit is now thinking that you are a complete and utter fraud.

*You run away from the truth*, Dustin J. Cook!

Man up, for once in your miserable life.
  #8  
Old August 23rd 20, 12:28 PM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Shadow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,638
Default [OT]Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:17:16 +0100, David_B
wrote:

What you completely failed to understand is that Snit wasn't doing
ANYTHING for *me*.


He's been relieving that nasty itch you have in your backside,
a sequela of a "war wound" you suffered in the Dear Captain's cabin
during your unwelcome stay in the Royal Navy.
So, just *ANOTHER LIE*.

I don't NEED anything, Dustin. My fiend in the States tracked you down
in real life


At last! The truth!!! That you STALK and that you use FIENDS
to help you STALK.
We all know. Maybe you forgot we know. Carry on drinking and
you will eventually forget that psychopath in the mirror is you.

The OT groups left in. I have no idea why you added them.
Trying to wreck more groups?

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

67 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
  #9  
Old August 24th 20, 02:41 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

David_B
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 09:17:16 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 23/08/2020 05:32, Gremlin wrote:
Snit, isn't that exactly what David asked you to do for him? And
isn't that what you've been doing for him? Why yes, yes it is.
So, how and in what possible way was I lying about this, Snit?


What you completely failed to understand is that Snit wasn't doing
ANYTHING for *me*.


That's even worse, then, David. I felt sorry for him previously.

I don't NEED anything, Dustin. My fiend in the States tracked you
down in real life and sent me full details of your address in
Kingsport. I've shown it to Snit, but not published it 'in the
clear' so to speak.


If that's the case, why did snit use the wrong city?

I was trying to help Snit locate purported business premises for
which he has a telephone number - given to him by you.


I see. You were trying to get snit to do for you what you have failed
to do to me for the past few years when you thought it a wise move to
try and dox me for refusing to help you break into servers you didn't
own.

I suspect Snit is now thinking that you are a complete and utter
fraud.


I don't care what Snit or you thinks. I've read quite a bit about
snit, he's a net kook like yourself and had I known that months ago,
he'd already be featured like you in various .nfo releases.

*You run away from the truth*, Dustin J. Cook!


I've never done so, despite many years of you lieing on me and trying
to dox me and those I care about. All because you couldn't con me
into breaking into servers you didn't own. You're a piece of ****,
and nothing is ever going to improve that for you.





--
Love as it exists in society is merely the mingling of two fantasies
and the contact of two skins.
  #10  
Old August 24th 20, 05:50 AM posted to alt.computer.workshop,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,talk.politics.guns,alt.comp.os.windows-10
GReMLiN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Snits "unquotable lies" Here's two :)

Snit
Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:54:53 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Absolutely! Diesel AKA Gremlin called me â€" and I never even
mentioned it.


Not directly. You made it quite clear that we interacted outside of
usenet - which told David I called you. Due to previous history
David and I have that you weren't aware of at the time.

He brought it up.


I simply confirmed at that point what you alluded to, I didn't see
any point in not doing so. Lest I be accused of lying about it, later on.


I noted the fact his number showed in my phone logs.


Actually, you noted nothing of the sort; which is why you asked me
for a number to call me back at. This all took place in May, and
until I became very direct, quoting your lies back to you and
demanding apologies for you having written them, did this even come
up. I suspect and you've since confirmed this is an effort by you to
try and get me to backoff or otherwise silence me about what I've
written and continue to write about you, and your dishonest ways.

I won't be silenced by you, Snit. I'm going to continue taking you
to task for the lies you like to write, and now since you've
publically admitted to trying to stalk me - You think making threats
if I do anything about it is going to work out for you. You clearly
aren't thinking this thru, so, to amuse the others reading here, I'm
going to explain to simplesnit how this works, then laugh as I ask
him about how the fbi threat is supposed to help him.

So, here we go, simplesnit:

HHI doesn't create torrents. HHI doesn't distribute torrents. HHI
provides the 'rips' in batches to a distribution chain. From there,
the distribution system takes over, eventually providing our
material where the public, like you for example, gets access. We
don't deal with the public at any point along the way.

From there, couriers (completely unaffiliated with us) distribute it
down to places where joe q public can access it. Piratebay, is one
such place. At some point, the materials wind up on places like
piratebay, and various other p2p technologies and associated sites.

HHI has *nothing* to do with any aspect of that. We do NOT
distribute anything to joe public. While your greets will certainly
be in our .nfos, due to the large amount of information we're going
to share, it'll actually include a seperate .zip file with
instructions in the .nfo to review it to protect themselves from
netkooks, like yourself.

At no point along the way will you be able to prove that I
personally created any files, put your information inside any files,
or sent said release anywhere. The FBI threat you made is a
pointless one, there's nothing here to show them (even if they
confiscated my equipment tonight snit) that I was in any way involved
with the torrent release that includes a greets for you.

And you should know, said release isn't just going to be found on
piratebay; the couriers will distribute it to all available outlets.
There's really nothing you can do from a legal standpoint. this
usenet post won't work as proof, and you won't be able to directly
(or even indirectly) link me to anything HHI has already released or
will release in the future.

The group hasn't been a pain in the RIAAs ass for sixteen years
because we're stupid ****s who don't know what we're doing. We do,
and we've demonstrated that for sixteen years now. And, due to the
fact you want to play netkook stalker with me, you'll be the second
person in HHIs entire history who got his **** dropped world wide
inside official group scene releases. The second person in sixteen
years, Snit. Take a bow.

I asked what interest you had in my business; you answered my
question for me today by trying to libel me and my business; and had
I provided you information beyond that of a disposable, you would
have attempted to use it to dox me, and/or locate my business as you
already demonstrated doing, for the purposes of doxing via
intimidation. You picked the wrong person to play those types of
games with, Snit. And you are going to learn that, the hard way.


You did ask if that number showed on a couple pages


Yes, he did, and you tried to locate it for him, too. And, you
claimed when I mentioned this that it was 'a direct lie' that David
asked you no such thing: (You still owe me an apology for this, Snit)

Message-ID:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=159808110300

From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Ha! Ads be gone!
Date: 18 Aug 2020 17:06:20 GMT
Organization: Sourthern Nevada Institute of Technology
Message-ID:
References: op.0oxuv7shwdg98l@glass 3WTC373bt67J31gn YyRp

On Aug 18, 2020 at 8:49:01 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:
David has asked you to check it against phone book urls he shared
with you.


This is a direct lie from you. He did no such thing.

*** end copy

From: David_B
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 07:19:33 UTC
Organization: blocknews - www.blocknews.net
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:19:32 +0100
On 12/08/2020 08:00, Snit wrote:

I am well aware that those who seek to attack do so out of their own
weaknesses and insecurities. Even with those I disagree with, say Gremlin and
Carroll, I try to note good things about them... and am sincere when I do so.
And even when I am not nice in responding to trolling I am honest, and I try
to not sink to their level.


Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 07:38:13 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores


Not there.

Message-ID:
From: David_B
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:52:23 UTC
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:52:23 +0100

On 12/08/2020 08:38, Snit wrote:
On Aug 12, 2020 at 12:19:32 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:
Perhaps you can match the number you have with the businesses you can
read about here?

https://www.yellowpages.com/johnson-...omputer-stores

Not there.


OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


Message-ID:
From: Snit
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: WOW! Snit was really hitting the gluebag this weekend !!
Date: 12 Aug 2020 17:44:03 GMT
Message-ID:
References:

On Aug 12, 2020 at 5:19:49 AM MST, "David_B"
wrote:

OK. Thanks for looking.

Please try he- https://www.yellowpages.com/kingspor...omputer-stores


121 results! Sorry there are so many to check.


Not a big deal -- just five pages. Did a search for the last four digits... no
matches.

*** end share

So much for those unquotable lies, Snit. G

And now, you can add netkook, stalker to your resume.

(something I mistakenly suggested otherwise at one point)
but you never asked me to check business licenses, search for the
number, search for the name of the business or anything else
relevant.


What legitimate reason, other than attempting to stalk and dox me were you looking for said information?

But by all signs his claim of having a business is a lie. No
reason to think he does.


I do have a legitimate PC repair business, with partners as I've
described previously. If it wasn't for the fact i'd have to disclose
the valid information in order to file a lawsuit against you for
libel - as our company lawyer advises I should do at this time, I'm
still not willing to do so yet. Maybe if you continue, I'll take hs
advice, disclose what you'll eventually find anyway, and ensure you
pay me a large check for a long period of time for the damage you
tried to cause. Did you know I don't even have to prove damages with
a civil suit, dumbass?

How many times have you already been taken to court and lost, snit?
Oh, don't bother answering, I already know; and i'll share a url
soon enough that'll show the world what sort of legal **** you've
been in for years now. You have a hell of a record, snit, and it's
all about to become very public. Good luck with your threats of the
fbi, that should be real interesting. David has made good on that
threat several times now, all to no avail. I'm pretty sure they have
him on a list; you know the kind - netkook; humor him and get rid of
him.

And for those who don't know, hpavc stands for
h=hacking
p=phreaking (as well as piracy)
a=anarchy
v=virus
c=carding (information theft, data theft, pillage and plunder your finances, unf unf)

Myself and my peers have been in that scene since we were barely
double digit age, back when Sneakernet had real meaning, back when
getting your friends boards an 800 number scored you major bragging
rights and a ****load of street cred. You are out of your league
here, snit, and you're about to learn that the hard way.

Your efforts to lie on me, I can deal with; I just call you out on
them. Your new efforts to actually stalk me via my business though,
I can deal with that too, but it requires going outside of usenet to
do so properly. You should have just stuck with your lies and not
gone this route; but you have, and now, it's my turn to show you how
you go and do this properly, for the proper ****ing effect.

Before you respond, ask yourself, about David; he's been doxed and
doxed and doxed, he's tried and tried and tried to get something
done about it, only to have more of his information dox'd as a
result. He's been my bitch for years now. Just what do you think you
can do that he hasn't already tried that will have a different
outcome for you, Snit? Go ahead, think on that. Davids been trying
for years. I'm going to predict that there's nothing you can do,
and when you see what happens when I share a url with you, you'll
complain and whine like David has, but at the end of the day, you'll
have gotten yourself dox'd really good, with no recourse.



--
Always remember to pillage *before* you burn.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.