![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not a windows question
Retrieved this webpage eearlier tonight, and again just now, https://ceac.state.gov/genniv/ I think it took longer this time and in the middle of retreption**, the little notes in the bottom left of the Firefox page said something like "transferring to google analytics". What is the purpose of that? Being too literal is an ongoing problem of mine, but my first thought is that google was going to analyse why the page was taking too long to load. **If reception is the noun for receive, shouldn't retreption be the noun for retrieve? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/23/2020 10:44 PM, micky wrote:
Not a windows question Retrieved this webpage eearlier tonight, and again just now, https://ceac.state.gov/genniv/ I think it took longer this time and in the middle of retreption**, the little notes in the bottom left of the Firefox page said something like "transferring to google analytics". What is the purpose of that? Being too literal is an ongoing problem of mine, but my first thought is that google was going to analyse why the page was taking too long to load. Might be for "There has been no activity for 15 minutes. As a security measure, your session will time out in 5 minutes. Click OK to continue." **If reception is the noun for receive, receival shouldn't retreption be the noun for retrieve? retrieval |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
micky,
... said something like "transferring to google analytics". What is the purpose of that? "google analytics" is a server/service which gathers statistics about page hits, and makes them available to the website owner (afaik, for free) Though the consensus is that Google uses them to track a visitors movements over the 'web (alike spypixels, but with some benefit to the website owner, so that he will keep using them). Blocking the "google analytics" domain does not seem to have any adverse effects. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:41:04 +0200,
"R.Wieser" wrote: micky, ... said something like "transferring to google analytics". What is the purpose of that? "google analytics" is a server/service which gathers statistics about page hits, and makes them available to the website owner (afaik, for free) So one statistic might have been tonight, when it took a long time to get some parts of the page? If it had gone quickly, google analytics wouldn't have noticed, been called, kept a record? Though the consensus is that Google uses them to track a visitors movements over the 'web (alike spypixels, but with some benefit to the website owner, so that he will keep using them). Blocking the "google analytics" domain does not seem to have any adverse effects. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
micky,
So one statistic might have been tonight, when it took a long time to get some parts of the page? Not the way you think. Just the fact that you visited that webpage. If it had gone quickly, google analytics wouldn't have noticed, been called, kept a record? Nope. Most likely the only reason that you saw that "transferring to google analytics" message is because the response to your browsers request for that data was a bit slow. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
micky wrote:
In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:41:04 +0200, "R.Wieser" wrote: micky, ... said something like "transferring to google analytics". What is the purpose of that? "google analytics" is a server/service which gathers statistics about page hits, and makes them available to the website owner (afaik, for free) There is a free tier, but you can pay to get more. So one statistic might have been tonight, when it took a long time to get some parts of the page? Google will record a whole swathe of info, but what gets reported is dependent on the what the site owner wants to know. Their reports are very informative and highly detailed. You can set triggers so it's possible the site owner to a notification that site traffic is slow, if they so desire. If it had gone quickly, google analytics wouldn't have noticed, been called, kept a record? Nope. When a website has google analytics enabled every visit is recorded. You only saw it because something was being slow. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Corvid" wrote
| Retrieved this webpage eearlier tonight, and again just now, | https://ceac.state.gov/genniv/ | | I think it took longer this time and in the middle of retreption**, the | little notes in the bottom left of the Firefox page said something like | "transferring to google analytics". | | What is the purpose of that? Being too literal is an ongoing problem | of mine, but my first thought is that google was going to analyse why | the page was taking too long to load. | | Might be for | | "There has been no activity for 15 minutes. As a security measure, your | session will time out in 5 minutes. Click OK to continue." Google Analytics is spyware beacons and script that track page visits. Webmasters who don't know what they're doing -- and don't care about their visitors' privacy -- add it to their pages in order to get free stats for their website. What Google gets -- as with the fonts they give away, the map links, the jquery, and their ad tracking links such as googletagmanager -- is a chance to monitor nearly every visit to nearly every webpage online... There's a reason they're the top advertising company online. They didn't get there by being nice. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"R.Wieser" wrote
| Blocking the "google analytics" domain does not seem to have any adverse | effects. | Not much help, either, unless you also block their other sources, along with other trackers like scorecardresearch. Here's my list of Google blocking. (Note that you need gstatic if you want to be able to deal with most captchas.) I think these are all Google properties, but I'm not positive. 127.0.0.1 *.googlesyndication.com 127.0.0.1 *.googleadservices.com 127.0.0.1 *.googlecommerce.com 127.0.0.1 *.1e100.com 127.0.0.1 *.1e100.net 127.0.0.1 *.doubleclick.net 127.0.0.1 *.doubleclick.com 127.0.0.1 *.googletagservices.com 127.0.0.1 *.googletagmanager.com 127.0.0.1 *.google-analytics.com 127.0.0.1 google-analytics.com 127.0.0.1 fonts.googleapis.com 127.0.0.1 *.2mdn.net 127.0.0.1 googleadapis.l.google.com 127.0.0.1 *.gstatic.com 127.0.0.1 plusone.google.com 127.0.0.1 cse.google.com 127.0.0.1 www.google.com/cse 127.0.0.1 www.youtube-nocookie.com 127.0.0.1 *.appspot.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mayayana,
| Blocking the "google analytics" domain does not seem to have any | adverse effects. Not much help, either, unless you also block their other sources, To be honest, I've got /all/ third-party domains blocked (with selected ones permitted on a site-by-site basis). But yes, just blocking the "google analytics" domain isn't going to help much in the whole scheme of things. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In alt.comp.os.windows-10, on Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:47:53 +0200,
"R.Wieser" wrote: micky, So one statistic might have been tonight, when it took a long time to get some parts of the page? Not the way you think. Just the fact that you visited that webpage. If it had gone quickly, google analytics wouldn't have noticed, been called, kept a record? Nope. Most likely the only reason that you saw that "transferring to google analytics" message is because the response to your browsers request for that data was a bit slow. I see. So that's one advantage to me of a slow response (this once). Thanks, and thanks Chris. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mickey,
Nope. Most likely the only reason that you saw that "transferring to google analytics" message is because the response to your browsers request for that data was a bit slow. I see. So that's one advantage to me of a slow response (this once). :-) Yep, the proverbial "silver line around a dark cloud". Thanks, and thanks Chris. You're welcome. Regards, Rudy Wieser |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|