![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other
computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Yousuf Khan |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yousuf Khan" wrote in message ... I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Since it is some files and not others, I'd check security permissions on the files themselves. If that's not it, it might be helpful to know what files are and are not accessible. -- Zaphod Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, ya know? - Gag Halfrunt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/08/2011 07:46, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Yousuf Khan What is often a simple quick fix for this is to unshare the folder and then share it again. HTH -- Rob |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/08/2011 8:23 AM, Rob wrote:
On 26/08/2011 07:46, Yousuf Khan wrote: I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Yousuf Khan What is often a simple quick fix for this is to unshare the folder and then share it again. HTH Okay, just tried that, and it did work -- somewhat. The files that were previously giving trouble are no longer giving trouble, but new files that are put into this directory seem to give the trouble still. This particular directory is a very dynamic directory, it's used mainly to hold recently downloaded files and share them out to other computers in the house. I'm finding that newer files give the issue. Am I supposed to unshare the folder everytime there's a new file downloaded, and reshare it? There's no other Windows 7 computers in the house to test this out on, apart from the main desktop. When I attempt to mount this computer's own filesystem as a network share, it works fine, but that's obvious. I don't know if it's working fine because it's sharing to Windows 7 or if it's running fine because the network share is actually a local filesystem. I can only test remotely to an XP computer. Yousuf Khan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yousuf Khan wrote in
: On 26/08/2011 8:23 AM, Rob wrote: On 26/08/2011 07:46, Yousuf Khan wrote: I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Yousuf Khan What is often a simple quick fix for this is to unshare the folder and then share it again. HTH Okay, just tried that, and it did work -- somewhat. The files that were previously giving trouble are no longer giving trouble, but new files that are put into this directory seem to give the trouble still. This particular directory is a very dynamic directory, it's used mainly to hold recently downloaded files and share them out to other computers in the house. I'm finding that newer files give the issue. Am I supposed to unshare the folder everytime there's a new file downloaded, and reshare it? There's no other Windows 7 computers in the house to test this out on, apart from the main desktop. When I attempt to mount this computer's own filesystem as a network share, it works fine, but that's obvious. I don't know if it's working fine because it's sharing to Windows 7 or if it's running fine because the network share is actually a local filesystem. I can only test remotely to an XP computer. Yousuf Khan You say that you are moving files into this shared folder. When files are _moved_ within the same disk volume, the files retain their original file protections. So if you move a file that was created in an area where only you have permissions to it into a shared folder, it will retain permissions for only you to access it. The simple solution is to "copy" a file into the shared folder instead of "moving" it (drag it with the right mouse button instead of the left button). When copying the file, the copy will be assigned the permissions of the containing folder which is probably what you desire. The following applies to XP but likely is the same for Windows 7. "How permissions are handled when you copy and move files and folders" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310316 HTH, JW |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/08/2011 1:53 AM, John Wunderlich wrote:
You say that you are moving files into this shared folder. When files are _moved_ within the same disk volume, the files retain their original file protections. So if you move a file that was created in an area where only you have permissions to it into a shared folder, it will retain permissions for only you to access it. Not really, files are coming into this directory after being downloaded from the Internet, but they didn't actually exist anywhere else within this computer before they came to this directory. However, when I started having these problems, in order to test out the problem, I did begin to copy in files into this folder from elsewhere, both from remote locations and locally. However, the problem was already present even before any new files were copied or moved in. The simple solution is to "copy" a file into the shared folder instead of "moving" it (drag it with the right mouse button instead of the left button). When copying the file, the copy will be assigned the permissions of the containing folder which is probably what you desire. None of the files had any unusual permissions beforehand, and neither did this directory. Certainly nothing that would prevent them from even being read. So whether it was copied in or moved in, should be irrelevant as everything should be readable at the very least. And the fact that there are some files in this directory that are readable is a sign of this. Yousuf Khan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yousuf Khan" wrote in message ... On 27/08/2011 1:53 AM, John Wunderlich wrote: You say that you are moving files into this shared folder. When files are _moved_ within the same disk volume, the files retain their original file protections. So if you move a file that was created in an area where only you have permissions to it into a shared folder, it will retain permissions for only you to access it. Not really, files are coming into this directory after being downloaded from the Internet, but they didn't actually exist anywhere else within this computer before they came to this directory. However, when I started having these problems, in order to test out the problem, I did begin to copy in files into this folder from elsewhere, both from remote locations and locally. However, the problem was already present even before any new files were copied or moved in. The simple solution is to "copy" a file into the shared folder instead of "moving" it (drag it with the right mouse button instead of the left button). When copying the file, the copy will be assigned the permissions of the containing folder which is probably what you desire. None of the files had any unusual permissions beforehand, and neither did this directory. Certainly nothing that would prevent them from even being read. So whether it was copied in or moved in, should be irrelevant as everything should be readable at the very least. And the fact that there are some files in this directory that are readable is a sign of this. Yousuf Khan I agree with JW's suggestion. I was having similar problems accessing files on my XP share from Win7 (didn't matter what type- pictures, zip files, executables, whatever), and found that if I downloaded my files to a temporary location and then copied them to my XP share, I could access them from Win7 with no problem. But if I downloaded them directly to the XP share, or moved them to the XP share, some files would produce error messages when trying to work with them from Win7. I still have the Send To powertoy installed on my XP machine, so that makes it very simple and easy to copy the files I want to share. Once I'm sure they're accessible from Win7, I delete them from the temporary location. I agree with your last paragraph- I didn't see any unusual properties in these files, but the simple act of copying instead of moving made them readily accessible to both machines. Things that make you go huh. . . Just my 2 cents worth :-) -- SC Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/08/2011 1:53 AM, John Wunderlich wrote:
The following applies to XP but likely is the same for Windows 7. "How permissions are handled when you copy and move files and folders" http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310316 Okay, looking through the permissions, I'm finding that the files that were having trouble being read were the ones that didn't have the "Everyone" user group in the list of users. The folder itself has "Everyone" on its list of allowed access. I would've thought that since the folder itself had "Everyone" on its access list, that everything inside this folder would inherit this user group too. So I did try the "copy" vs. "move" thing, and it does look like when using "copy" all of the destination folder's permissions are honored, but when moving, it isn't. Now is there a bulk (command-line) way to fix the permissions on these files? Yousuf Khan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Aug 2011, Yousuf Khan wrote in
alt.windows7.general: Now is there a bulk (command-line) way to fix the permissions on these files? The CACLS utility is designed for that: C:\CACLS /? Displays or modifies access control lists (ACLs) of files CACLS filename [/T] [/E] [/C] [/G user ![]() [/P user ![]() filename Displays ACLs. /T Changes ACLs of specified files in the current directory and all subdirectories. /E Edit ACL instead of replacing it. /C Continue on access denied errors. /G user ![]() Perm can be: R Read W Write C Change (write) F Full control /R user Revoke specified user's access rights (only valid with /E). /P user ![]() Perm can be: N None R Read W Write C Change (write) F Full control /D user Deny specified user access. Wildcards can be used to specify more that one file in a command. You can specify more than one user in a command. Abbreviations: CI - Container Inherit. The ACE will be inherited by directories. OI - Object Inherit. The ACE will be inherited by files. IO - Inherit Only. The ACE does not apply to the current file/directory. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/08/2011 6:51 PM, Nil wrote:
On 27 Aug 2011, Yousuf wrote in alt.windows7.general: Now is there a bulk (command-line) way to fix the permissions on these files? The CACLS utility is designed for that: C:\CACLS /? Displays or modifies access control lists (ACLs) of files Yeah thanks, I found that out too after I posted it. Looks like in XP it's CACLS, while in Windows 7 it's ICACLS. Yousuf Khan |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/08/2011 2:46 AM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I have a Windows 7 desktop that's sharing several folders out to other computers, mainly running XP. That's pretty typical, and I'm not having any problem setting this up, it's already setup and working fine. However, recently I added a new folder share from the Windows 7 computer. What I'm finding is that some of the files in the folder are accessible, and some are not. It's unusual because typically I see either that the whole folder is accessible, or it is not, not just some things inside it. I'd say half are accessible, and half are not. When trying to access some files, I get the message: "file not accessible". Yet, I can see all of these files when viewing the directory listing in Explorer. What could be causing this? Yousuf Khan Okay, so now that I've discovered files weren't inheriting the "Everyone" user group from the directory, I started explicitly adding this user group to each of the new files. But of course this is inconvenient. I started looking for a way to allow the new files to inherit these access rights from the parent directory. It's not easy, it's buried down deep in Advanced Permissions. So this link might help out: Changing Permissions in Windows 7 - Neowin Forums http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/88...-in-windows-7/ Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|