Microsoft end of support dates

Snit
Wed, 02 Sep 2020 02:28:32 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Sep 1, 2020 at 2:30:15 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

Snit
Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:50:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Another source
claims it's a centurylink owned line. I already explained why
this happens. So, I see no reason to repeat myself.

This is perhaps your biggest lie to date. Damn, you repeat
yourself non-stop.

What *specifically* are you claiming I've lied about there? Be
specific.

Did you really not follow that simple comment?

Umm.. Nope, I guess I didn't.

Diesel:
-----
So, I see no reason to repeat myself.
-----

Quoting the last sentence I wrote, out of context is hardly what'd I
call a failure on my part to understand what you claimed was my
biggest lie to date. I was writing about centurylink when you
replied, and you quoted what I wrote about Centurylink. I, as I
think most anyone else would, took what you meant by the biggest lie
as that I had lied about something I wrote that you quoted
concerning Centurylink...

Infact, according to you now, you were actually responding to the
very last sentence I wrote, but, opted to make your reply ambiguous
when you said I was lying. Why not just quote the material you take
issue with, specifically, and respond to that? Why be snarky in
every single reply you write where I ask for clarification?

Why do you wish to be so confrontational with me? Don't you think
you're in enough **** with me as it is?

Maybe you just think you do it for no reason at all? LOL!

These games you're playing snit...I should tell you, I'm not much of
a gamer, (unless you count retro games). So... on the rare occasion
when I play a game, such as , gta5, I use the cheat codes to load up
on piles of ammo so I can have some fun and blow off a little steam.
I don't actually play the game as it's creators I think? intended.
I'm not going to play games with you, either, Snit.

We're both adults here. It's time you act like one.


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
https://ibb.co/CBgLWpf
Ayep...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Snit
Wed, 02 Sep 2020 02:29:06 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On Sep 1, 2020 at 2:30:15 PM MST, "Gremlin"
wrote:

So we have two claims of yours:

1) You insist the number in my providers phone records does
not exist. You have speculation but have no direct access to
the phone records. I have direct access. I know. You
speculate.

I *know* you faked the evidence, snit. I'm not speculating.

You SPECULATE I did.

To speculate is to make certain assumptions based on lack of
foreknowledge and then see which if any are true. That's not the
case here. I know how the technology I used to contact you actually
works. So I'm not speculating on how the backup burner cells number
found it's way into your incoming call logs and/or caller ID.

It really doesn't take much brain power for most to understand that
a voIP system without a login couldn't have possibly provided you a
backup burner cell phones number. Or any other number that could be
routed to the individual/or company that contacted you. No login,
means no details. It's just not logical. The two devices know
nothing about each other.

Therefore, your statement is not, and cannot be true. Any evidence
you provide that's supposed to show otherwise is not real. It's been
doctored, or created from nothingness, outright. That's the only
logical conclusion one can reach when ALL of the information is
available, as it is here. There's no escaping logic, no denying
logic.

But I did not.

Logic a child can understand says otherwise.

Can you understand the difference?

What do you expect to gain by talking down to me? Do you really
think that arrogant attitude is going to get you in a good place
with me, at any point in time?


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
https://ibb.co/CBgLWpf
Ayep...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

On Sep 5, 2020 at 4:37:36 AM MST, "Gremlin" wrote:

pothead Tue,
01 Sep 2020 22:48:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-09-01, Gremlin wrote:
Snit
Tue, 01 Sep 2020 15:50:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Another source
claims it's a centurylink owned line. I already explained why
this happens. So, I see no reason to repeat myself.

This is perhaps your biggest lie to date. Damn, you repeat
yourself non-stop.

What *specifically* are you claiming I've lied about there? Be
specific.

IMHO you are approaching this in the wrong way.
Anyone can fake call logs, videos, screen shots, PDF files and so
forth and as you have discovered this isn't snit's first rodeo at
faking data.

I know about the former, recently learned about the latter.

And let's be honest there is no way of knowing one number from
another or one person's claim from another. At least not by
looking at the raw data, ie:the numbers, cities, etc.

It depends on the raw data and what you're looking for. I'll concede
that your statement is mostly correct for a lay person, though.

What you need to do is take the FILE, the video, screenshot, pdf
file etc and have it forensically analyzed for trickery.

Yes, I'm aware of this, and I've already taken such liberty with
:the material he's offered to share, thus far.

Only an expert can insert something that wasn't in the original
and not leave some type of tracks. And that includes blurred
files.

Umm.

I disagree with you on this assumption - I've seen some impressive
trickery done by non experts, using the right software. And I know
of two cases where had it not been for the umm, bad guys admitting
it, nobody was going to prove they diddled the video. This is a
digital world now, and digital photo/video editing software packages
have gotten very advanced throughout the years. Short of the digital
photograph being digitally signed in some manner, and/or the video
itself, there's no way to identify all cases of digital video
forgery, no. Sadly, the answer is no. The hardware and software, and
algorithms in use now due to faster processors and more advanced
understanding of various types of math makes what wasn't possible,
not even so much as ten years ago, quite possible, and infact,
demonstratably done, now. And it's not going to get better as time
marches on.

Now, the only way you're going catch fakery is if the person who
shot the video didn't really try to hide anything or ****ed up if
they did, or the video is so unbelievable as to make you doubt it.

If they did, and they used the right packages, you probably aren't
going to know for sure what's real and what isn't in the video
itself. Now, if you see an alien land in dudes back yard, you
may/may not trust the video, but the damn data itself isn't going to
tell you the guy didn't insert that space ship during post
production, if it's done right.

I already told you the way the video was made. Even showed you a video on it:

https://youtu.be/xNvMu5fwUxQ

Nothing but a direct screen recording.

What you are not getting is that your speculation does not make the
information in my phone logs, that you directly gave me permission to share,
go away.

Even with all your lying and attacking and threatening, though, I *still* am
protecting you from yourself, as if you were a small child.

The three letter groups do it all the time.

Yes, but, they outsource that work most of the time to uhh, people
like me. It's possible a peer would find something I missed, but,
I'm not hopeful. They still do some inhouse work mind you, but, they
aren't using inhouse only tools vs outsource only tools. It's not
quite like that...

This was not some quick video production. This took a little time to
do properly. Now, I don't have original source sample videos of this
particular material to cross reference against either; it's possible
I could find something I'd missed if I did. Such as pixelation
present that I'm mistaking as should be there, for shouldn't.
Youtubes transcoding isn't helpful for this either. rofl.

I've already said I can't prove what I accused him of and that
hasn't changed. I'll review the videos he's shared again later, as
time allows, but I expect the results are going to be the same from
a forensic analysis approach. Again.

You cannot prove your speculation because your speculation is wrong. Period.

I will not share my ID/PW for people to verify the records directly, but I am
happy to provide the information you gave me written permission to share so
others can verify the lies of yours tied to public information. Depending on
the service they use they will find something similar to this:

https://gofile.io/d/IDouHx

I do not approve of ANYONE using the number to harass you in ANY way but only
to verify that you lied when you made accusations tied to your claims about
connections with Johnson City.

YyRp
-----
They are relevant to the fact YOU INSERTED the phone
number I provided you verbally into a bogus call log video
you've taken the time to create. When I use the cell I
provided you the number for to make outbound calls, It
*ALWAYS* reports Kingsport, TN. Not one single time has it
ever, nor would it have any reason to report Johnson City.
It doesn't pick cities at random, it doesn't go by my
present location, either. That's actually fixed, as is the
number assigned to the phone.
-----

3WTC373bt67J31gn
-----
You didn't even score the right city, Snit. And, the
correct city is common, public knowledge with the regulars
here. The moment you unblocked 'Johnson City' in your
videos, you were busted.
-----

oj8b
-----
David, every single Address you've posted that's supposed
to be mine has been Kingsport. Not Johnson City. Don't you
think you should tell snit that was a ****up on his part
by now?
-----


-----
His response to that was to file a report with the
kingsport,tn police. Well hell, why not the johnson city
ones? That's where he claimed the call said it originated
from.
-----

Your written permission to share info from my logs:

Gremlin :
-----
You have my permission to post your caller ID logs, snit.
-----

That is how I would approach this.

I did. I'm glad to see we think alike in some aspects, though.

Grab these files before snit all of a sudden loses them and ask
around for people who can help you.

I've already acquired the ones youtube allows me to get. One is
private as of the last time I tried. I have passed them around to my
peers, those who didn't already have copies, and they are also
analyzing the files. No one is hopeful of finding enough material to
prove he faked it and be able to show the time stamps of where the
faking begins/ends - which is what we were wanting to be able to do
with the analysis.

Your speculation is wrong. Period.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.