Snit lies about helping Stalker David Brooks (again)

Snit
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 16:24:47 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

FromTheRafters wrote:
Shadow formulated on Sunday :
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:
Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up.

They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's
contribution will probably crash their system.
IMHO
[]'s

They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what
they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just
to harass him. This would be an abuse of those 'see something,
say something' reporting systems. Best to cut out the middle-man
and toss them in the trash themselves locally.


Gremlin has shown where he has carried out his threats against
David leading to illegal attacks.

What I actually showed you was *one* of the responses David Brooks
got, two years after the fact, for trying to dox me on usenet the
first time around. David took an address that was supposed to have
been mine, converted it to a gsv link and posted it to all kinds of
places asking if it was my house. He did this because, like you, I
wouldn't comply with a demand he made of me.

In his case, I repeatedly turned down his requests to break into
gear he didn't own or have permission to give me to access at that
level. He wanted me to break federal law and when I refused to do
so, upto and including his offer to pay me to do it, he tried to dox
me as I described above. I repeatedly! asked him why he did that,
too, snit, same as I've done with you about the bot lies you wrote
about me.

And snit, you should know, he promised me a visit from all kinds of
three later agencies if I did what I told him I was going to do if
he didn't cough up a reasonable explanation for what he tried to do.

I laughed at him (I still mock him, openly, as I'm doing now in this
very reply to you), still remind him of it to this day, and still
share all kinds of urls pointing to his very public information. And
on occasion, share the results of some of the other things that were
done for him. Although he continues to deny it, he got a pizza
delivery once. That was no small feat, none of us are british nor
familiar with his local, nor the brit slang. That took days to setup
and perform. Days, snit.

And, he *knows* I was involved in it. He can't prove it. Even though
I've bragged about it, rubbed his nose in it here on usenet, he
can't prove *I* had anything to do with it.

If you'd like, although you already declared anything he says about
me as being immaterial, you could ask him about Eagle and a certain
bank transaction.

In his defense, he has warned you (barely, it's easily dismissed as
sarcasm; it's that weak) It's just enough to cover his ass when
things go down and you ask for his help to deal with me - like his
other former friends did when he assured them, he had their backs,
go ahead, **** with me. He's only now issuing the weak as **** all
warning because I previously called him out for not warning his
other former friends, ahead of time. He's covering his ass, not
really helping you.

You're going to find, as his other friends did, he's going to leave
you on your own, to deal with me (although just upto the point where
you take the first swing, he'll be in your corner, encouraging you
to do it!)

When you kiss the matt though, David isn't going to be anywhere to
be found to help you get back up. You've opted to ignore him and
continue taunting me here on usenet, because you think I'm like
everyone else you've ****ed with along the way. You don't really
believe me, or David concerning who I am, or what I've done, or know
how to do. YOU are making a huge tactical mistake in that line of
thinking.

I can provide some interesting google usenet discussions concerning
two individuals he tried to send after me, and how things went for
them. You might find it useful for your complaint you'll be filing
in the future once you initiate and a response is provided.

You really *don't* comprehend what *IS* going to be done to you once
you publish that number. And I no longer care about the consequences
I know you'll experience even if you don't grasp them, presently. I
do, and I'm okay with it at this point. I know your wife is going to
be very upset with you, and I know you have to live with her; I
don't. That alone puts a huge smile on my face.

Due to some serious meetings of things going on outside of my
control that are super important for HHIs continued safety, my
responses to your ignorance will be delayed, but I will respond to
you as needed.

It's on you whether this goes down or not. Once you start the
process though, I'll introduce you to another online world that runs
in the shadows of the one you've experienced. I'll show you my home.


So far I have not reported him.

Report away, it's not going to help you.



--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

David_B
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:35:33 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 25/08/2020 15:29, Steve Carroll wrote:

My guess: that is a Carroll sock asking me why Carroll socks
follow me wherever Carroll follows me with socks.

Agreed. sigh

You agree with an unsubstantiated "guess" from a known, prolific
liar/troll when it suits you, yet, you'll whine how others are
challenging your "integrity". Care to explain how that works?

I'm not whining. I KNOW that I'm honest and truthful. :-)

ROFL! David, there's *nothing* which supports what you claim. What's
available on you directly disputes it.

I like to believe that I'm in tune with the 'greater consciousness
of mankind' - it helped bring Snit here to help me. Perhaps that's
what helps Snit to be insightful too.



I have no idea who the author was.

Check the headers. And then pull a post you think is from snit in
that newsgroup from the same period of time. Review the headers.
Notice anything in particular, being a full match?

I don't subscribe to that group

Doubtful.


nor subscribe to your allegation that Snit is "sick in the head". He seems just about fine to me
(although he's told me that he's not 100% fit and well)

You're full of ****. You're taking advantage of his decreased mental
abilities. I'm sure you've seen it too, David. We all have. It's
just that, you're abusing it for your own means. And you know that
due to it, he can't tell. You're an asshole.

Said some fool who claims he's sober but can't recognize a sick
piece of Snit when he sees it. As for his "honesty", ask that
sick fool how long he tried to pin that 'content' on "others".

I am NOT a fool and I *AM* 'Sober'.

lie and doubtful.

It wasn't easy

Due to alcoholism. Go ahead, continue denying it.

but I have provided some evidence of the truth of the matter.

Yes, you have. What you provided is that what I wrote about your
drinking problem is all true. You went so far as to not only accuse
me of breaking into your computers to learn about your drinking
problem (I didn't do that), you even went so far as to tell me your
side of events concerning a lost friendship, over your excessive
alochol usage.

And the icing on the cake, dude, you have visible man
tits (that are large enough to be in a bra); which is a known side
effect of excessive drinking; along with some other visual tells,
which can all be seen in the picture of you available he

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Or, the completely uncensored version available on hundreds of HHI
releases which have been propogated millions of times. Probaby into
the billions by now, some are rather old.

You're an abusive, dirty old man, a stalker, who according to
various individuals you served with, actually does have a thing for
guys. How many times did you cheat on trish with one? Obviously not
them in particular, since they took issue with your unwanted
advances towards them.

Evidently, one of us can get quite a bit of dirt on you concerning
your military time. Nice stalking efforts there on your part David,
you went and ****ed off someone else who happens to know people you
served with. What are the chances, you ****ed off a former hacker,
got dox'd and how for it, and even managed to **** off someone who
can learn about you, real personal things, that they can send along
to me, the hacker you already ****ed off...who's already shown you
one thing he can do concerning you... lol.

You can find my testimonial here

That's quite alright, your usenet testimony is much more accurate
and more telling.


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

David_B
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 21:24:30 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 25/08/2020 20:50, Snit wrote:

May I suggest that if Dustin has a message for you, he puts it in
plain English for you to read on his own website?

I don't think Snit would want that, David.

Playing games with Dustin will not be in your best interests,
Snit! IMO

He clearly thinks you're as full of **** as he thinks I am, with
respect to this David. He demonstrates this with his recent posts
and replies. As he continues trying to stalk me via my business and
claim it doesn't exist, that I'm a fraud, etc.

Once, as you know, he tries to dox me with the phone number.. things
will be different for him. As with you, I'm giving him a more than fair chance here.

It's one thing to lie on me, as you've done (for years), and he's
been trying to do, but it's another matter once you attempt to dox
me, isn't it, David. when you make the move to take things outside
of usenet - things change, don't they David...

Did I ever make the first move towards you or your former friends,
David? No, I didn't. Did I follow up and make life a living hell
online and in real life for them nonstop with pressure only mounting
until one nearly died from the experience? Yes, I did, didn't
I...

And, the thing is, I did all of that lone wolf style. I didn't allow
anyone to help me at any point along the way. I continued to refuse
help and even got in trouble for working as a lone wolf when I
shouldn't have. The arse chewing and temporarily disabling of some
of my accounts for a period of time, effectively grounding me from
certain functions, was STILL WORTH IT. lol. I just wish I could have
seen the look on eagles face as his niece's first picture rendered.
Damn, I bet it was something to see. I know he didn't see that
coming. G

David, Let me be very clear about this. When snit publishes the
number I've repeatedly asked him not to publish, I will follow up
with a response very close to what was done with eagle, but there
will be no censoring of information and one last chance given, as
was with eagle.

There will be no cease fire arrangements, no white flag, no truce.
Firing will commence until snit can no longer be found on usenet or
any other social media sites. Period. Full stop, that's whats going
to happen. That will be his only reprieve. He will not be afforded
the opportunity to create a new identity and just leave me be, as
was negotiated with your former friend jenn.

Any attempt to return to usenet, create new youtube channels, etc,
will be met with the same firing sequence as the original snit, and
we'll (I'd still prefer to do this on my own, but I have help this
time, that I do not need for the record, whether I want it or not)
keep upping the ante, as we did with eagle until he submits, and
totally, ****s off. He seems to basically live on usenet, so we're
pretty sure this decision will cause him great distress and much
annoyance. Which is the obvious goal in doing it.

He should realize how serious I am about continuing the firing
sequence going by how many times I repeatedly ask for those
apologies alone. I'm not going to go away, I'm not going to back
off. I won't dox him, unless/until he tries it on me first. But er,
when he does, I'm not the only one who wants a chunk of his arse for
having done it. They are using it as an excuse to nail him to a
cross for the threat of snitching, I don't give two ****s about
that. My interest is in his threats to dox me. That's what I'll be
going after him for, when he does it.

You think the bank trick was impressive? (BIG ****ING GRIN) Just
you wait until you see what happens to snit for an encore. Btw, just
a few more months david, and I'll tell you how it was done. I
already contacted a certain companies I.T dept and told them about
the vulnerability. At this point, I'm giving them the agreed upon
amount of time to fix it before I test it to see if they have.

Michael Glasser aka snit is going to hate life as he knows it
(correction: more so than he already does) as soon as he goes from
trying to intimidate me with his doxing threat, to doing it. I'm
just waiting for him to make good on it, then I'm going to make my
move. It's that simple. It keeps me in good graces with everyone. I
can't very well be seen as the bad guy if im only defending myself.




--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

Snit
Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:30:41 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

Until or unless he carries out his threats likely not. After that
maybe... if he does. Hopefully we never find out.

As I told David, previously, nothing is going to happen to you
unless and until you try to dox me. And that includes my business.
When and if you find it, if you publish any details concerning it,
I'll consider that to be a doxing move on your part, and I will
follow up.

Technically, as of now, with your continued efforts to stalk me, I
am within my rights. But, I'll continue to wait until you provide
absolute justification for it, by actually trying to dox me.


--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

On 2020-08-29, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 23 Aug 2020
15:11:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


You guys thought you had a very special and unique case right? I
told you, we have our own version of your snit here, it's known as
David Brooks.

How they find each other?
Snit isn't exactly the type of person who attracts friends.



--
pothead

On 2020-08-29, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 23 Aug 2020
15:11:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-23, FromTheRafters wrote:
Shadow formulated on Sunday :
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:27:03 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

Shadow was thinking very hard :
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:36:34 -0400, FromTheRafters
wrote:

David_B brought next idea :
On 22/08/2020 07:30, Snit wrote:
[....]
More threats from you Â- and yet I still protect you from
your ignorant claims about tech and your inability to
troubleshoot a simple question.

Remember you gave me permission to share your burner phone
number.

More threats noted. :-(

Should his claim to be 'involved' with *Russian Hackers* be
reported to the US three letter agencies?

If so, which one(s)?

Send all reports directly to the WMS.

Women's Missionary Society?

Waste Management System. Here, we have roadside pick-up.

They probably have too much rubbish to deal with. BD's
contribution will probably crash their system.
IMHO
[]'s

They claim that Gremlin lies, yet they are willing to submit what
they think are lies to the so-called 'three letter agencies' just
to harass him.

It's actually worse than that, first, they incite people, then
they report them. Snit used to make a huge (whining) deal about
'what happens on usenet stays on usenet', except when *he*
(hypocritically) decided otherwise. This is the reason I recommend
people kf me, because I'm going to continue pointing out what he
is as long as he keeps doing it. Prior to 'meeting' DB, I've never
seen anyone else do what Snit does.

You guys thought you had a very special and unique case right? I
told you, we have our own version of your snit here, it's known as
David Brooks.

IMO Snit makes DB look like a schoolboy. Your history is with DB so you
probably see the reverse of what I do. No one wins the game of 'your
troll is worse than my troll

pothead Sat, 29 Aug 2020 16:32:01 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 2020-08-29, Gremlin wrote:
Steve Carroll "Steve
Sun, 23 Aug 2020
15:11:42 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:


You guys thought you had a very special and unique case right? I
told you, we have our own version of your snit here, it's known as
David Brooks.

How they find each other?

David claims to have invited snit here, so you'd have to ask him.

--
All about snit read below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

Holy ****...He's as bad as David Brooks:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php