If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Snit: Q - Can you run DOS apps?
Snit
Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:55:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: * Assuming he did not use his cell phone, which he can no more prove than I am willing to share my ID/PW, whatever service he used has a sign up process where they verified a phone number and that is what is shared. Incorrect. The service I used does not have a sign up process. I do not have a login for the service, I've never had a login for the service. The service hasn't so much as asked me what my favorite color is, let alone anything else. I *CAN* make a plausible scenario in which I use my VoIP, hide my CID, call Snit, tell him my/that number I hid which he writes on a scrap of paper, then subsequently shows up on his VoIP provider's logs also because those logs unhide my hidden CID; the same number on the scrap that is in the voip provider's logs. Agreed. That's not what happened here, and you ****ing well know it. Don't think for a second that you actually snowed mike with this bull**** story of yours. He's ignoring me concerning this intentionally. He's got an issue with me, same as David Brooks does. He's going to continue giving you the benefit of the doubt, in public, knowing you're full of ****, for that reason, not for you. Just so you know, snit. To help Diesel, and others, troubleshoot this I have offered to allow folks to SET UP A TIME and then call me I strongly advise, for what should be obvious by now, that nobody takes you up on this so called offer. I called you back in May, you began sharing what you were told not to share towards the end of August. I don't expect you to stop, and you can't undo what you've already done. It would be foolish, quite foolish indeed for anyone to call you for any reason. Based on how you've done a single phone call, interacting with you via a video call would also be a very bad idea. That would provide your stalking arse even more data to manipulate for future lies you'll write on the person to use to try to shut them up if they catch you lying about them and dare ask for you to apologize. They need only look at me and see how that works out. You don't do well with accountability. You try to force people to back away from holding you accountable by threatening to dox them, then following through with it; but you suck at that too so the result is limited exposure and little harm. The intention is much worse, though. You just lack the ability. Well, short of paying of for it. Even with Diesel's threats and other nonsense this offer is open to him -- he is welcome to call AT A PREARRANGED TIME with whatever device he wants. I'm going to have to pass on this. I've seen what you do with information you acquire, even if it's voluntary, and sadly, it's not a pretty sight. What's worse, I'm not even one of the first ten? people you've pulled this **** on; anyone who challenges you that you can't wear down with your nauseating repetition you resort to threatening to take things outside of usenet; and then you follow up, thinking you're free and clear to do so. You're a ****ing idiot, but you're a dangerous ****ing idiot and should be handled accordingly. -- The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as Michael Glasser (Snit) view below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html https://www.imgpaste.net/image/9tI2X - https://ibb.co/NTCVpvN - https://gofile.io/d/kE7vxh The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as David Brooks (BoaterDave) view below: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Snit: Q - Can you run DOS apps?
Gremlin wrote:
Snit Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:55:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: * Assuming he did not use his cell phone, which he can no more prove than I am willing to share my ID/PW, whatever service he used has a sign up process where they verified a phone number and that is what is shared. Incorrect. The service I used does not have a sign up process. I do not have a login for the service, I've never had a login for the service. You snipped where I noted it was speculation AND you jumped to the idea of a sign in process — showing again you don’t really understand what is being discussed. What is not speculation is the fact the number shows in my provider’s records, as does Johnson City, and you not only provided me written permission to share that but you have been posting all sorts of information about me. Some of it even correct. Some not. .... Even with Diesel's threats and other nonsense this offer is open to him -- he is welcome to call AT A PREARRANGED TIME with whatever device he wants. I'm going to have to pass on this. Given your increased doxxing and your inability to understand the tech that is fine. Offer rescinded for you. I am still happy to help others. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Snit: Q - Can you run DOS apps?
Snit
Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:11:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Gremlin wrote: Snit Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:55:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: * Assuming he did not use his cell phone, which he can no more prove than I am willing to share my ID/PW, whatever service he used has a sign up process where they verified a phone number and that is what is shared. Incorrect. The service I used does not have a sign up process. I do not have a login for the service, I've never had a login for the service. You snipped where I noted it was speculation AND you jumped to the idea of a sign in process â€" showing again you don’t really understand what is being discussed. I didn't jump to anything, illiterate toadie. You suggested the service I used has a signup service and they verified a phone number and that is what was shared. Which is entirely, and completely, ****ing wrong. You're seriously embarrased that I put a spotlight on your child like reading comprehension level aren't you? You keep trying to project it onto me, and stepping all over your own dick as you did here during the process. You weak little ****ant. This is already turning into something along the lines of shooting fish in a barrel. Normally, I'd feel sorry for someone in your position, but you really do invite it, you beg for it. So, I can't. What is not speculation is the fact the number shows in my provider's records We've already agreed and otherwise established that your logs are very special, just like you. And they, like you, can pretend to be anything you want them to be. Just as you pretend to have a masters degree in IS. Yet, for some reason, no such worthy accreditation is coming back on you yet. Nothing beyond high school, and you weren't exactly an honor roll student, now was ya! you have been posting all sorts of information about me. Duh! What did you think I was going to do, stupid? Just let you continue with your bull**** and stalking? I don't think so. Some of it even correct. Some not. ROFL. As of this point, I'm going with whats coming up on you in the databases. Your word alone isn't worth the bytes spent to display it on my screen. Even with Diesel's threats and other nonsense this offer is open to him -- he is welcome to call AT A PREARRANGED TIME with whatever device he wants. I'm going to have to pass on this. Given your increased doxxing That hasn't begun yet. and your inability to understand the tech that is fine. That's another statement that you cannot support. You're good for those. Offer rescinded for you. I am still happy to help others. I don't recognize any authority from you. Therefore, I don't acknowledge any rescindment. Oops. See how that works? -- The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as Michael Glasser (Snit) view below: https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html https://www.imgpaste.net/image/9tI2X - https://ibb.co/NTCVpvN - https://gofile.io/d/kE7vxh The cyber stalker, liar, and troll known as David Brooks (BoaterDave) view below: https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Snit: Q - Can you run DOS apps?
Gremlin wrote:
Snit Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:11:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Gremlin wrote: Snit Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:55:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: * Assuming he did not use his cell phone, which he can no more prove than I am willing to share my ID/PW, whatever service he used has a sign up process where they verified a phone number and that is what is shared. Incorrect. The service I used does not have a sign up process. I do not have a login for the service, I've never had a login for the service. You snipped where I noted it was speculation AND you jumped to the idea of a sign in process â€" showing again you don’t really understand what is being discussed. I didn't jump to anything, illiterate toadie. You suggested the service I used has a signup service and they verified a phone number and that is what was shared. Which is entirely, and completely, ****ing wrong. Ah, you don’t get the difference between a sign UP process and a sign IN process. Thanks for clarifying where you got confused. .... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Snit: Q - Can you run DOS apps?
On 2020-09-06, Snit wrote:
Gremlin wrote: Snit Sun, 06 Sep 2020 01:11:15 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: Gremlin wrote: Snit Sat, 05 Sep 2020 18:55:23 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: * Assuming he did not use his cell phone, which he can no more prove than I am willing to share my ID/PW, whatever service he used has a sign up process where they verified a phone number and that is what is shared. Incorrect. The service I used does not have a sign up process. I do not have a login for the service, I've never had a login for the service. You snipped where I noted it was speculation AND you jumped to the idea of a sign in process â€" showing again you don’t really understand what is being discussed. I didn't jump to anything, illiterate toadie. You suggested the service I used has a signup service and they verified a phone number and that is what was shared. Which is entirely, and completely, ****ing wrong. Ah, you don’t get the difference between a sign UP process and a sign IN process. Thanks for clarifying where you got confused. You're arguing that he 'signs IN' and supplies the number in question *every* single time? How would that happen without an initial "sign UP process"? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|