|If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
+1! Do not hijack this thread. Post a new post with your problems.
In message , Twayne
+2! However, you won't change this poster: he seems to enjoy pouncing,
and name-calling (I'm sure he'll respond to one of _our_ posts, and call
us silly names too).
Tim Meddick typed:
If someone decides that it's a good idea to reply to a post
from the stone age, I don't believe it requires anyone else
to follow in a cascade of foolishness and loose sight of
[Mind you, that should have been "lose" ... (-:]
They will simply be alone with their solitary response -
and when - eventually - the poster realizes why his
solitary contribution is so eerily alone, he will cringe
inwardly with the rest of us!
(Yup, done it myself.)
It really does benefit no-one to call him by playground
[I guess the name under which he posts ... (-:]
There should be only one unwritten rule in a group that has
no method to enforce any at it's disposal - keep your text
to the thread!
Your body of text has little to do with it's subject .
Cheers, Tim Meddick, Peckham, London. :-)
"Harden Thicke" wrote in message
Hey, you idiot...
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)[email protected]+Sh0!:`)DNAf
?pu gnickab yb naem uoy tahw siht sI