|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#61
May 5th 18, 07:58 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware
|
|||
|
|||
Wireless charging mouse pad
On 4/5/2018 5:36 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2018 23:44:51 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang" wrote: The world CAN survive without mobile phones among civilians. Trust me!  It can do without all kinds of motor vehicles too. Especially sport cars! We still need tools to transport food, water clothes and fuel... those basic human rights stuffs. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa 
|
| Ads |
|
#62
May 5th 18, 08:40 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware,alt.conspiracy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do we need so many mobile phones?
On Sat, 5 May 2018 14:57:00 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: On 4/5/2018 1:27 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: No, we can go back without losing a dime. You should notice that all these mobile phones are only being used for mobile entertainment. Don't be addicted to mobile gadgets. I think we really don't need that many mobile phones which are basically toys now. We could reduce the number without affecting economy and health. Why do we need so many battery-powered toys? For GLOBAL pollution? Oh well...  I am not those super duper scientists. And I don't manage nor control those toy factories. You can buy toy walkie talkies with two way video link.
|
|
#63
May 5th 18, 09:27 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wireless charging mouse pad
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
The world CAN survive without mobile phones among civilians. Trust me! I imagine large numbers of people have been *saved* by mobile phones. Without a portable communication device they would have died after getting into serious trouble. Old-fashion fixed line phones can still be useful. What? Even half-way up a mountain? A landline is of no use if you're stuck on a precipice with a broken leg...
|
|
#64
May 5th 18, 09:29 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wireless charging mouse pad
In article , Chris
wrote: The world CAN survive without mobile phones among civilians. Trust me! I imagine large numbers of people have been *saved* by mobile phones. Without a portable communication device they would have died after getting into serious trouble. Old-fashion fixed line phones can still be useful. What? Even half-way up a mountain? A landline is of no use if you're stuck on a precipice with a broken leg... you could use the cord to pull yourself to safety...
|
|
#65
May 5th 18, 11:16 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware,alt.conspiracy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do we need so many mobile phones?
On 5/5/2018 3:40 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote:
Don't be addicted to mobile gadgets. I think we really don't need that many mobile phones which are basically toys now. We could reduce the number without affecting economy and health. You can buy toy walkie talkies with two way video link. How about a more intelligent and smart mobile network based NOT on ground stations but something like the Bit-Torrent protocol.... -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa
|
|
#66
May 5th 18, 11:17 AM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wireless charging mouse pad
On 5/5/2018 4:29 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Chris wrote: you could use the cord to pull yourself to safety... Excellent response! The wire can indeed be a safety measure. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa
|
|
#67
May 5th 18, 05:12 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware,alt.conspiracy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do we need so many mobile phones?
On Sat, 5 May 2018 18:16:49 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: On 5/5/2018 3:40 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote: Don't be addicted to mobile gadgets. I think we really don't need that many mobile phones which are basically toys now. We could reduce the number without affecting economy and health. You can buy toy walkie talkies with two way video link. How about a more intelligent and smart mobile network based NOT on ground stations but something like the Bit-Torrent protocol.... That would not work.
|
|
#68
May 5th 18, 10:30 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.comp.freeware,alt.conspiracy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do we need so many mobile phones?
On Sat, 5 May 2018 18:16:49 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: On 5/5/2018 3:40 PM, Lucifer Morningstar wrote: Don't be addicted to mobile gadgets. I think we really don't need that many mobile phones which are basically toys now. We could reduce the number without affecting economy and health. You can buy toy walkie talkies with two way video link. How about a more intelligent and smart mobile network based NOT on ground stations but something like the Bit-Torrent protocol.... You can rn whatever you want over the top of the radio and backhaul system. But if the mobile network cannot locate your device and figure out which cell you are in, then there isnt going to much traffic arriving... -- Stephen
|
|
#69
September 6th 18, 04:59 PM
posted to alt.comp.os.windows-10
|
|||
|
|||
|
[OT]
On Fri, 4 May 2018 01:30:04 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: On 4/5/2018 1:17 AM, Wolf K wrote: It should, because the outgoing EM radiation from the phone itself is stronger than the incoming EM radiation from that antenna. Fact is, I'm more at risk from background (nuclear) radiation here. We sit on "basement rock", so our background radiation is about twice the average. By contrast, we used to live on the Prairies, where background radiation is about half the average. There's no danger to anyone's health. The observation that there were concentration of some cancers near some power pylons (for example) proves that power pylons are not implicated in the cause9s). If there wy were, there would be fairly uniform distribution of cancer cases all along the line. That is, the number of cancers would be proportional to the local population within, say, a 500m radius of each pylon. That's never been observed. The fact that you don't know this indicates that you need a course in statistics and probability. And you have the reason, the motive and the intention to just don't care about others' health. That assumption is an insult. No. Because you possibly don't have the power to save everyone' health. It's normal to just save yourself first. Calm down... calm down! Not necessarily. There are a lot of variables and no one takes the time to try to eliminate them. For instance, we have one researcher that claims he's seen T cells affected by strong AC magnetic fields. Now that may make the T cells less effective at preventing cancers. Then to get cancer you still need either a genetic pre-disposition, and/or stressor that is known to cause cancer. The radiation may not cause cancer but may still interfere with one's ability to fight it naturally. Then too there are other things that aren't researched well enough. What if, for instance, the presence of ferrous metal structural elements or nearby metal (fencing etc) can result in "hot spots" and a person that spends lots of time in a hot spot can have an increased risk. I'm not making a case for tin foil hats or saying that some forms of electromagnetic radiation (not just cell phones) are harmful - just that we don't approach it with the idea of finding out if there are casual links, but we have a hellovalot politics and money involved that probably color how any "research" into the issue is carried out. The FCC tests for EM radiation? How much heating nearby antennas can cause in a gelatin sample. Making the world safe from melted jell-o, isn't the same as understanding what happens on a cellular level in an animal or plant.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Linear Mode
