homework/computer?

In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Roger wrote:
Smith wrote:
Simple answer is the Internet is the media. The result of the
hardware and software.
You're wrong too.
Media are the storage used to store and deliver information or
data. Singular is medium, as a diskette, CD, DVD, HD and so on.

By definition the Internet "stores" unless you can provide a cite
to assert your interpretation that I am wrong. Something stored
on the Internet may indeed outlast all other methods.

You're wrong, the "Internet" as designed, does not store anything.
The internet provides redundant paths between points.

By your interpretation memory does not store data because it needs
to be work in conjunction with the rest of the circuit.

You have no argument. Get over it.

LOL, you might want to look up what the "Internet" actually is. The
"Internet" was around long before WWW was created and long before MS
even thought about it.


So what Fool. TV has been around for a long time and way before the
term "multi-media" has been used in it's current context. The
Internet is media just as much as TV is. Get a clue.

Which proves my POINT - The physical Television IS NOT MEDIA, the
Programming, from multiple locations is MEDIA.

The Internet is NOT media, it's a path to media, the same as a
Television or broadcast is not MEDIA, the content is MEDIA.

Get a clue yourself.

You continue to be a fool. You insist on proving my point with every post.
Good luck with that.

I see, you're one of those types that resorts to personal attacks when
you've lost your position and are not human enough to admit you made a
mistake.

I have "the internet" connected to my home network - but it seems that I
can't store anything on the "Internet", only on media servers connected
to the Internet - maybe you'll understand now.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Roger wrote:
Smith wrote:
Simple answer is the Internet is the media. The result of the
hardware and software.
You're wrong too.
Media are the storage used to store and deliver information or
data. Singular is medium, as a diskette, CD, DVD, HD and so
on.

By definition the Internet "stores" unless you can provide a
cite to assert your interpretation that I am wrong. Something
stored on the Internet may indeed outlast all other methods.

You're wrong, the "Internet" as designed, does not store
anything. The internet provides redundant paths between points.

By your interpretation memory does not store data because it
needs to be work in conjunction with the rest of the circuit.

You have no argument. Get over it.

LOL, you might want to look up what the "Internet" actually is.
The "Internet" was around long before WWW was created and long
before MS even thought about it.


So what Fool. TV has been around for a long time and way before
the term "multi-media" has been used in it's current context. The
Internet is media just as much as TV is. Get a clue.

Which proves my POINT - The physical Television IS NOT MEDIA, the
Programming, from multiple locations is MEDIA.

The Internet is NOT media, it's a path to media, the same as a
Television or broadcast is not MEDIA, the content is MEDIA.

Get a clue yourself.

You continue to be a fool. You insist on proving my point with
every post. Good luck with that.

I see, you're one of those types that resorts to personal attacks when
you've lost your position and are not human enough to admit you made a
mistake.

I have "the internet" connected to my home network - but it seems
that I can't store anything on the "Internet", only on media servers
connected to the Internet - maybe you'll understand now.

"The Internet IS multimedia"

http://insidedigitalmedia.com/intern...rinting-press/

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/1...d-not-so-much/


http://query.nytimes.com/search/tech...=nyt&x=12&y=14

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&bt nG=Search


If this does nothing to give a troll like you an education then you are
simply just to ignorant and will remain so.

Deal with it.

In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Roger wrote:
Smith wrote:
Simple answer is the Internet is the media. The result of the
hardware and software.
You're wrong too.
Media are the storage used to store and deliver information or
data. Singular is medium, as a diskette, CD, DVD, HD and so
on.

By definition the Internet "stores" unless you can provide a
cite to assert your interpretation that I am wrong. Something
stored on the Internet may indeed outlast all other methods.

You're wrong, the "Internet" as designed, does not store
anything. The internet provides redundant paths between points.

By your interpretation memory does not store data because it
needs to be work in conjunction with the rest of the circuit.

You have no argument. Get over it.

LOL, you might want to look up what the "Internet" actually is.
The "Internet" was around long before WWW was created and long
before MS even thought about it.


So what Fool. TV has been around for a long time and way before
the term "multi-media" has been used in it's current context. The
Internet is media just as much as TV is. Get a clue.

Which proves my POINT - The physical Television IS NOT MEDIA, the
Programming, from multiple locations is MEDIA.

The Internet is NOT media, it's a path to media, the same as a
Television or broadcast is not MEDIA, the content is MEDIA.

Get a clue yourself.

You continue to be a fool. You insist on proving my point with
every post. Good luck with that.

I see, you're one of those types that resorts to personal attacks when
you've lost your position and are not human enough to admit you made a
mistake.

I have "the internet" connected to my home network - but it seems
that I can't store anything on the "Internet", only on media servers
connected to the Internet - maybe you'll understand now.

"The Internet IS multimedia"

http://insidedigitalmedia.com/intern...rinting-press/

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/1...d-not-so-much/


http://query.nytimes.com/search/tech...=nyt&x=12&y=14

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&bt nG=Search


If this does nothing to give a troll like you an education then you are
simply just to ignorant and will remain so.

Deal with it.

You seem to be mistaking what you've read for "Internet" and not seeing
that the "Media" is the servers that contain the "Media".

The "Internet" is not the media, it's the connective parts that allow
you to reach the "Media".

Your own links prove the point - take away the "Servers" that contain
the media and you have nothing to view/read, but the "Internet" would
still exist as it has for decades.

People like you make the same mistake of thinking a TV "IS MULTIMEDIA",
but it's not, it's capable of showing multiple types of media, just like
the internet.

Grasp this one son, if you turned off all the servers that host media,
the "Internet" would still exist, still route traffic, still be
redundant, but you would not have any media to view.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Roger wrote:
Smith wrote:
Simple answer is the Internet is the media. The result of
the hardware and software.
You're wrong too.
Media are the storage used to store and deliver information
or data. Singular is medium, as a diskette, CD, DVD, HD and
so on.

By definition the Internet "stores" unless you can provide a
cite to assert your interpretation that I am wrong. Something
stored on the Internet may indeed outlast all other methods.

You're wrong, the "Internet" as designed, does not store
anything. The internet provides redundant paths between
points.

By your interpretation memory does not store data because it
needs to be work in conjunction with the rest of the circuit.

You have no argument. Get over it.

LOL, you might want to look up what the "Internet" actually is.
The "Internet" was around long before WWW was created and long
before MS even thought about it.


So what Fool. TV has been around for a long time and way before
the term "multi-media" has been used in it's current context. The
Internet is media just as much as TV is. Get a clue.

Which proves my POINT - The physical Television IS NOT MEDIA, the
Programming, from multiple locations is MEDIA.

The Internet is NOT media, it's a path to media, the same as a
Television or broadcast is not MEDIA, the content is MEDIA.

Get a clue yourself.

You continue to be a fool. You insist on proving my point with
every post. Good luck with that.

I see, you're one of those types that resorts to personal attacks
when you've lost your position and are not human enough to admit
you made a mistake.

I have "the internet" connected to my home network - but it seems
that I can't store anything on the "Internet", only on media servers
connected to the Internet - maybe you'll understand now.

"The Internet IS multimedia"

http://insidedigitalmedia.com/intern...rinting-press/

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/1...d-not-so-much/


http://query.nytimes.com/search/tech...=nyt&x=12&y=14

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&bt nG=Search


If this does nothing to give a troll like you an education then you
are simply just to ignorant and will remain so.

Deal with it.

You seem to be mistaking what you've read for "Internet" and not
seeing that the "Media" is the servers that contain the "Media".

The "Internet" is not the media, it's the connective parts that allow
you to reach the "Media".

Your own links prove the point - take away the "Servers" that contain
the media and you have nothing to view/read, but the "Internet" would
still exist as it has for decades.

People like you make the same mistake of thinking a TV "IS
MULTIMEDIA", but it's not, it's capable of showing multiple types of
media, just like the internet.

Grasp this one son, if you turned off all the servers that host media,
the "Internet" would still exist, still route traffic, still be
redundant, but you would not have any media to view.

I don't know who you think you really are with your lame comment using the
term "son" but you are totally clueless even while being proven totally
wrong. If somehow you think you might be some older and more informed
individual you are continuing to show how lame and foolish you can be and
perfectly willing to make an ass out of yourself. I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim while all you do is bury your head
further up your ass. Your "opinion" means nothing to anyone. Now if you care
to Google and show where you might even have something I will be waiting.
Otherwise you will remain an ignorant buffoon.

In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the MEDIA
is the content on the servers, and those servers are CONNECTED TO THE
INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal network,
not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would still be serving
MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it is
the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT. The
internet itself does not have content, it provides access to content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the MEDIA
is the content on the servers, and those servers are CONNECTED TO THE
INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal network,
not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would still be
serving MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it
is the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT. The
internet itself does not have content, it provides access to content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say it is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and so on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain. You sure
are a stupid one.

In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the MEDIA
is the content on the servers, and those servers are CONNECTED TO THE
INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal network,
not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would still be
serving MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it
is the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT. The
internet itself does not have content, it provides access to content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say it is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and so on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain. You sure
are a stupid one.

My Television (TV) is not media, it is a display device that permits me
to view/hear MEDIA broadcast.

My Internet connection provides access TO MEDIA sitting on SERVERS that
contain the MEDIA.

My internet connection, like my television, contains no media, but it is
a device that permits access to MEDIA.

Do you understand now?

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Smith;1458325 Wrote:


Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say
it is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and so
on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain. You
sure
are a stupid one.

Calm down friend..
Don`t so angry..we can clear of this




--
liciney

"Leythos" wrote in message
om...
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the MEDIA
is the content on the servers, and those servers are CONNECTED TO THE
INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal network,
not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would still be
serving MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it
is the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT. The
internet itself does not have content, it provides access to content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say it
is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and so
on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain. You
sure
are a stupid one.

My Television (TV) is not media, it is a display device that permits me
to view/hear MEDIA broadcast.

My Internet connection provides access TO MEDIA sitting on SERVERS that
contain the MEDIA.

My internet connection, like my television, contains no media, but it is
a device that permits access to MEDIA.

Do you understand now?


Media from a macro perspective is a big giant thing...print, broadcast,
internet, etc. Generally the non-tech viewpoint. OTOH if you deal with OSI
layers, this giant 'inter-network' is a just pile of cables, routers, and
servers moving data around.

-John

In article , johno@!NOOSPAM!
heathkit.com says...

"Leythos" wrote in message
om...
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the MEDIA
is the content on the servers, and those servers are CONNECTED TO THE
INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal network,
not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would still be
serving MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it
is the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT. The
internet itself does not have content, it provides access to content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say it
is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and so
on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain. You
sure
are a stupid one.

My Television (TV) is not media, it is a display device that permits me
to view/hear MEDIA broadcast.

My Internet connection provides access TO MEDIA sitting on SERVERS that
contain the MEDIA.

My internet connection, like my television, contains no media, but it is
a device that permits access to MEDIA.

Do you understand now?


Media from a macro perspective is a big giant thing...print, broadcast,
internet, etc. Generally the non-tech viewpoint. OTOH if you deal with OSI
layers, this giant 'inter-network' is a just pile of cables, routers, and
servers moving data around.

If my News Paper is media, and it is, then the Internet is the same as
the news paper delivery person - a path for the media to reach me, but
not the media itself.

Any person that is versed in computers, network, and then programming or
actually creating media knows that the "Internet" is just the
path/connection to the media available on servers/devices.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

liciney wrote:
Smith;1458325 Wrote:


Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to say
it is
untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are media and
so on.
The Internet is also media no mater how lame you choose to remain.
You sure
are a stupid one.

Calm down friend..
Don`t so angry..we can clear of this

I don't think anyone is angry. I simply call them like I see them.

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
I have posted several
cites of many more that prove my claim

Actually, your posted links prove you are WRONG - they prove the
MEDIA is the content on the servers, and those servers are
CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET, they are NOT THE INTERNET.

So, those servers could provide the same MEDIA to a internal
network, not even connected to the Internet, and yet they would
still be serving MEDIA from those servers.

So, again, the Internet is a network that connects devices/nodes, it
is the devices/nodes that provide access to MEDIA, called CONTENT.
The internet itself does not have content, it provides access to
content.

Your links prove my statements - try a comprehension class.

Comprehend this moron.

You have nothing. If someone works for the media will you try to
say it is untrue? Get a clue fool. TV is the media, newspapers are
media and so on. The Internet is also media no mater how lame you
choose to remain. You sure are a stupid one.

My Television (TV) is not media, it is a display device that permits
me to view/hear MEDIA broadcast.

My Internet connection provides access TO MEDIA sitting on SERVERS
that contain the MEDIA.

My internet connection, like my television, contains no media, but it
is a device that permits access to MEDIA.

Do you understand now?

Go here moron and read a definition of media and post back and ague that
you are still correct. Boy you will always remain to be one stupuid young
fool.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media

Mass media is a term used to denote a section of the media specifically
envisioned and designed to reach a very large audience such as the
population of a nation state. It was coined in the 1920s with the advent of
nationwide radio networks, mass-circulation newspapers and magazines,
although mass media (like books and manuscripts) were present centuries
before the term became common. The term public media has a similar meaning:
it is the sum of the public mass distributors of news and entertainment
across media such as newspapers, television, radio, broadcasting, which may
require union membership in some large markets such as Newspaper Guild,
AFTRA, & text publishers. The concept of mass media is complicated in some
internet media as now individuals have a means of potential exposure on a
scale comparable to what was previously restricted to select group of mass
media producers. These internet media may include:

a.. Television
b.. Personal web pages
c.. Message boards
d.. Podcasts
e.. Blogs
f.. Video hosting services

In article ,
says...
Mass media is a term used to denote a section of the media specifically
envisioned and designed to reach a very large audience such as the
population of a nation state.


There you go, the INTERNET doesn't have any content, it's the servers
that are on the "Internet".

Definition: Internet: a computer network consisting of a worldwide
network of computer networks that use the TCP/IP network protocols to
facilitate data transmission ...

The internet is the transport of MEDIA, but the internet is NOT MEDIA.

Try this - remove all servers from connection to the internet, what
media do you have then?

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)

Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
Mass media is a term used to denote a section of the media
specifically envisioned and designed to reach a very large audience
such as the population of a nation state.


There you go, the INTERNET doesn't have any content, it's the servers
that are on the "Internet".

Definition: Internet: a computer network consisting of a worldwide
network of computer networks that use the TCP/IP network protocols to
facilitate data transmission ...

The internet is the transport of MEDIA, but the internet is NOT MEDIA.

Try this - remove all servers from connection to the internet, what
media do you have then?

You are a total moron. The Internet is media no matter how stupid you
choose to remain. What does this mean?

"These Internet media may include:"

a.. Television
b.. Personal web pages
c.. Message boards
d.. Podcasts
e.. Blogs
f.. Video hosting services

It shows you what a stooge you actually are Moe. If you take away
everything in the list above you will have no Internet.

You must enjoy making an ass out of yourself over and over. Good luck with
that fool.

In article ,
says...


Leythos wrote:
In article ,
says...
Mass media is a term used to denote a section of the media
specifically envisioned and designed to reach a very large audience
such as the population of a nation state.


There you go, the INTERNET doesn't have any content, it's the servers
that are on the "Internet".

Definition: Internet: a computer network consisting of a worldwide
network of computer networks that use the TCP/IP network protocols to
facilitate data transmission ...

The internet is the transport of MEDIA, but the internet is NOT MEDIA.

Try this - remove all servers from connection to the internet, what
media do you have then?

You are a total moron. The Internet is media no matter how stupid you
choose to remain.

Your ignorance is astounding.

What does this mean?

"These Internet media may include:"

a.. Television
b.. Personal web pages
c.. Message boards
d.. Podcasts
e.. Blogs
f.. Video hosting services

And well it may, but it is media hosted on SERVERS, not on the
"Internet". The internet is the method to get to the MEDIA hosted on
Servers.

Without the servers hosting the MEDIA there none of that media would
exist, but the Internet would still be there.


It shows you what a stooge you actually are Moe. If you take away
everything in the list above you will have no Internet.

Wrong, just like in my office or home, the Internet is a network and
will still be a network without MEDIA/Servers/Content. If I have 2000
network ports in my office, and no servers, nothing providing any of the
things you list above, I still have a network, and it's still an
Intranet, just a smaller scale version of the internet.

You must enjoy making an ass out of yourself over and over. Good luck with
that fool.

Try and lean something from people that were around in the early days of
the Internet, those of us that were around before ANY of those things
you listed above were available on it.

There were no blogs, no web sites, not streaming media, no Podcasts, no
video, not even pictures in the early days.

The MEDIA was not confuse with the NETWORK because almost everyone that
used the Internet at the time had some technical background and
understood the difference between a NETWORK and MEDIA, something you
should learn.

--
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
(remove 999 for proper email address)