A Windows XP help forum. PCbanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PCbanter forum » Microsoft Windows 7 » Windows 7 Forum
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Windows Experience Index



 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 7th 09, 09:28 AM posted to alt.windows7.general
mac[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Windows Experience Index

I have a new PC I just built that is being rated "unfairly" by Windows 7:
Here are the details:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 945 - rated 7.3
Memory: 4 GIG DDR3 RAM - rated 7.5
Graphics (Desktop Performance for Aero) - rated 4.2
Gaming Graphics: ( NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT 1 MB Memory)- 6.2
Primary Hard Disk: (1 TB Seagate SATA) - rated 5.9 (cleaned and
defragmented)
The motherboard is Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P

I don't understand how the Graphics for Aero is is so much lower that the
Graphics for gaming? Also, how a SATA hard drive be rated so low? Any
thoughts about any tweaking I can do to improve some of these ratings?

Thanks, Mac


Ads
  #2  
Old November 7th 09, 05:07 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default Windows Experience Index



"mac" wrote in message
...
I have a new PC I just built that is being rated "unfairly" by Windows 7:
Here are the details:
Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 945 - rated 7.3
Memory: 4 GIG DDR3 RAM - rated 7.5
Graphics (Desktop Performance for Aero) - rated 4.2
Gaming Graphics: ( NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT 1 MB Memory)- 6.2
Primary Hard Disk: (1 TB Seagate SATA) - rated 5.9 (cleaned and
defragmented)
The motherboard is Gigabyte GA-MA770T-UD3P

I don't understand how the Graphics for Aero is is so much lower that the
Graphics for gaming? Also, how a SATA hard drive be rated so low? Any
thoughts about any tweaking I can do to improve some of these ratings?

Thanks, Mac



Is the 9500 an on-board video card? If so, that may be why the rating is so
low. My notebook with an ATI Mobility Radeon HD2600 PCI-e has an Aero rating
of 5.6 and Gaming of 6.2. My SATAII drive is 5.8, not much different than
yours. Have you installed the latest and greatest video drivers?

SC Tom


  #3  
Old November 7th 09, 07:33 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
mac[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Windows Experience Index

I do have the latest NVidia graphic drivers. How come the Aero Rating is
more difficult than the Graphics Gaming ratio? I would have thought it be
the other way around?

mac

  #4  
Old November 7th 09, 07:46 PM posted to alt.windows7.general
SC Tom[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,089
Default Windows Experience Index



"mac" wrote in message
...
I do have the latest NVidia graphic drivers. How come the Aero Rating is
more difficult than the Graphics Gaming ratio? I would have thought it be
the other way around?

mac


I don't have an answer for that. Vista was the same way. I kinda ignore
those anyhow- I can run heavy-duty games like BioShock and Painkiller I and
II on my notebook with no problems and my desktop looks fine, so what's the
big deal? As long as your PC performs to your expectations, that's all that
counts, IMHAWO.

SC Tom

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off






All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PCbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.