Second opinion requested! Does anyone else get a warning? (was -

On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff
wrote:

On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote:
On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote:
Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the
first on left hand side.

https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv

Sorry about that! ;-)


Yeah I wondered where the image link was.

Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ?

Nice pic, nice boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the
mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it.

geoff

Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff
wrote:

On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote:
On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote:
Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the
first on left hand side.

https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv

Sorry about that! ;-)


Yeah I wondered where the image link was.

Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ?

Nice pic, niceÂ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the
mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it.

geoff

Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

On 06/06/2020 18:23, John McWilliams wrote:
On 6/6/20Â*Â* PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff
wrote:

On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote:
On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote:
Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the
first on left hand side.

https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv

Sorry about that! ;-)


Yeah I wondered where the image link was.

Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ?

Nice pic, niceÂ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the
mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it.

geoff

Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

Hello John

Will you please clarify? The link I posted https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv is not
malicious - not according to VirusTotal anyway!

https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/7...c9e2/detection

In article , John McWilliams
wrote:


Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

4 options:
- ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons)
- skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort)
- use a proxy to circumvent the block
- whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:23:57 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff
wrote:

On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote:
On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote:
Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the
first on left hand side.

https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv

Sorry about that! ;-)


Yeah I wondered where the image link was.

Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ?

Nice pic, niceÂ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the
mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it.

geoff

Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

See https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ejgecx8uk...nbury.jpg?dl=0

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On 07/06/2020 00:33, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 10:23:57 -0700, John McWilliams
wrote:

On 6/6/20 PDT 5:42 AM, David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 04:18, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:58:14 +1200, geoff
wrote:

On 5/06/2020 4:35 am, David_B wrote:
On 04/06/2020 17:32, David_B wrote:
Here's a piccie of what Banbury was like in 2004 - my boat is the
first on left hand side.

https://ibb.co/XYBwqqv

Sorry about that! ;-)


Yeah I wondered where the image link was.

Presumably you mean the first 'whole' boat on LHS ?

Nice pic, niceÂ* boats. Great sense of depth. I think I would find the
mentioned faux '3D' effect detracting from it.

geoff

Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

See https://www.dropbox.com/s/6ejgecx8uk...nbury.jpg?dl=0

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

Thanks, Eric.

Please will you type out here the full name of the link being shown By
Kaspersky?

If you wish to explore further yourself, simply copy/paste the link into
Virus Total - select 'URL', he-
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/home/upload

Thanks

On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote:
In article , John McWilliams
wrote:


Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

4 options:
- ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons)
- skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort)
- use a proxy to circumvent the block
- whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently

Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer?

David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote:
In article , John McWilliams
wrote:


Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

4 options:
- ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons)
- skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort)
- use a proxy to circumvent the block
- whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently

Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer?

Start working your way through the list ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS

Paul

On 09/06/2020 16:24, Paul wrote:
David_B wrote:
On 06/06/2020 19:05, nospam wrote:
In article , John McWilliams
wrote:


Malicious link is blocked ... Kaspersky

Please post a screenshot, Eric.

Perhaps Kaspersky is mistaken?

Wasn't a problem at all.

4 options:
- ditch kaspersky (best choice, it shouldn't be used for *many* reasons)
- skip it entirely (second best choice, it's not worth the effort)
- use a proxy to circumvent the block
- whitelist the site, either temporarily or permanently

Which AV software do YOU recommend one should use on an Apple computer?

Start working your way through the list ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS

Â*Â* Paul


That's really comprehensive list. Thanks, Paul.

I've already tried many of them! :-)

I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of
the best in the business though:-

https://www.clamxav.com

Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing?

--
David

David_B wrote:
I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of
the best in the business though:-

https://www.clamxav.com

Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing?

wp:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...edit&section=4


To be included in this list, the product must be notable, which means it must have an article written first. Redlinks or entries not linked to an article will be removed.

ClamXAV does not have a wp article. It is (only) mentioned in the
ClamAV wp article.

I don't doubt that if the ClamXAV dev/s would go to the trouble to
create an entry for the wp that was appropriate for acceptance, that
they could also edit the Mac table to include clamxav.

For examples: the tables include two other softwares which are based on
the clamav engine, ClamWin and Immunet (now under Cisco), both of which
have wp articles.

It would be logical for the tables to include clamxav if there /were/ a
wp article which is not at all impossible or even particularly difficult
to achieve.

ClamAV is an AV of 'modest' capabilities.


--
Mike Easter

On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote:


I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list of
the best in the business though:-

https://www.clamxav.com

Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing?


Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be
better-named.

geoff

On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote:
On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote:


I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list
of the best in the business though:-

https://www.clamxav.com

Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing?


Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be
better-named.


That's upside-down thinking for sure, geoff! :-)

Not many folk here like the product either:-

https://www.facebook.com/clamxav/

Less than 400 the last time I looked.

On 09/06/2020 20:55, Mike Easter wrote:
David_B wrote:
I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list
of the best in the business though:-

https://www.clamxav.com

Any thoughts as to why it doesn't feature in the listing?

wp:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php...edit&section=4


To be included in this list, the product must be notable, which means
it must have an article written first. Redlinks or entries not linked
to an article will be removed.

ClamXAV does not have a wp article.Â* It is (only) mentioned in the
ClamAV wp article.

I don't doubt that if the ClamXAV dev/s would go to the trouble to
create an entry for the wp that was appropriate for acceptance, that
they could also edit the Mac table to include clamxav.

For examples: the tables include two other softwares which are based on
the clamav engine, ClamWin and Immunet (now under Cisco), both of which
have wp articles.

It would be logical for the tables to include clamxav if there /were/ a
wp article which is not at all impossible or even particularly difficult
to achieve.

ClamAV is an AV of 'modest' capabilities.


Thank you for your comprehensive reply, Mike.

What response do you think 'someone' would receive if they were to
contact the developer he- https://www.clamxav.com/support/contact-us/
and ask why such a great product has no Wikipedia article about ClamXav
and thus no mention of it here either:-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compar...software#macOS

At the bottom of the web page it says:-

"We respond to every request we receive (*promise*!) and our reply will
either come from or
– so, if you use a spam filter,
please ensure that you’ve allowed emails from these addresses to reach
you. If you haven’t heard from us within 48 hours, give your spam
mailbox a quick check first!"

"David_B" wrote:
On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote:
Sounds like a medicinal vaginal treatment. Possibly could be
better-named.

That's upside-down thinking for sure, geoff! :-)

Lydia, Lydia
Get rid of your chlamydia.
Only an idiot would ever consider ya.

(with apologies to John Cooper Clarke)

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:02:36 +0100, David_B
wrote:

On 10/06/2020 00:16, geoff wrote:
On 10/06/2020 7:39 am, David_B wrote:


I'm puzzled as to why THIS product hasn't found its way onto the list
of the best in the business though:-

Maybe you should advertise it. You've installed it multiple
times on your machines. You even asked people repeatedly to crack it
so you wouldn't have to pay(and they did, and you used the crack). You
must really love it.

(MSG_IDs available on request)

CUT_STALKING

Not many folk here like the product either:-

https://www.facebook.com/STALKING

Less than 400 the last time I looked.

Why did you even bother looking at a non-support site? It says
quite clearly NOT to use the Facekook page for support.
In your own words, please, explain to us why they don't
support users with cracked software.
While you're at it, explain the OT cross posts to Win 10 and
photo groups.
TIA

-------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php

65 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012