If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Office
Libre or Open Office.
And why ? Thank you ! I have a large PDF that I saved to a .DOC file so I can edit it. The PDF contains many images and tables so I am hoping to maintain all of that so as to minimize rewrite. I will be changing paragraph text only. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Office
LibreOffice since it is a fork of OpenOffice and updated. They can edit
PDFs? That's news to me. I just tried it. Wow! Awesome and thanks. In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. And why ? Thank you ! I have a large PDF that I saved to a .DOC file so I can edit it. The PDF contains many images and tables so I am hoping to maintain all of that so as to minimize rewrite. I will be changing paragraph text only. -- Quote of the Week: "Ants never sleep." --Ralph Waldo Emerson, poet Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly. /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit- | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link. \ _ / ( ) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Office
Fremantle wrote:
Libre or Open Office. You want LibreOffice (a supported fork of OpenOffice). OpenOffice, was discontinued by Corel back in 2011 and dumped, er, donated to the Apache Foundation (and why OpenOffice became Apache OpenOffice) to keep available an archived copy of that old software. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Office
VanguardLH wrote:
Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. You want LibreOffice (a supported fork of OpenOffice). OpenOffice, was discontinued by Corel back in 2011 and dumped, er, donated to the Apache Foundation (and why OpenOffice became Apache OpenOffice) to keep available an archived copy of that old software. You mean Oracle, rather than Corel, but otherwise correct. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Office
Carl Kaufmann wrote:
VanguardLH wrote: Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. You want LibreOffice (a supported fork of OpenOffice). OpenOffice, was discontinued by Corel back in 2011 and dumped, er, donated to the Apache Foundation (and why OpenOffice became Apache OpenOffice) to keep available an archived copy of that old software. You mean Oracle, rather than Corel, but otherwise correct. 1986 StarDivision StarOffice 1999 Sun Microsystems buys StarDivision. StarOffice becomes OpenOffice. 2009 Oracle buys Sun. Some forking happens. OpenOffice to Apache OpenOffice. OpenOffice to LibreOffice etc. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...atives.svg.png The diagram there doesn't necessarily have everything in it. ******* And don't expect miracles when editing PDF. A person should always attempt to get source (.doc or .docx) when editing documents, as this gives the most accurate reproduction and ability to edit. Editing a derivative such as a PDF is bound to have cases where an object cannot be edited when you really needed it. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Office
In message , Ant
writes: LibreOffice since it is a fork of OpenOffice and updated. They can edit PDFs? That's news to me. I just tried it. Wow! Awesome and thanks. Interesting to know, but Fremantle didn't say he was going to edit the ..pdf - he said he'd saved it as a .doc file. In microsoft.public.windowsxp.general Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. And why ? Thank you ! I have a large PDF that I saved to a .DOC file so I can edit it. What did you use to save it as a .doc file? The PDF contains many images and tables so I am hoping to maintain all of that so as to minimize rewrite. I will be changing paragraph text only. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Every kid starts out as a natural-born scientist, and then we beat it out of them. A few trickle through the system with their wonder and enthusiasm for science intact. - Carl Sagan (interview w. Psychology Today published '96-1-1) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Office
On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 02:57:12 -0400, Paul wrote:
Carl Kaufmann wrote: VanguardLH wrote: Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. You want LibreOffice (a supported fork of OpenOffice). OpenOffice, was discontinued by Corel back in 2011 and dumped, er, donated to the Apache Foundation (and why OpenOffice became Apache OpenOffice) to keep available an archived copy of that old software. You mean Oracle, rather than Corel, but otherwise correct. 1986 StarDivision StarOffice 1999 Sun Microsystems buys StarDivision. StarOffice becomes OpenOffice. 2009 Oracle buys Sun. Some forking happens. OpenOffice to Apache OpenOffice. OpenOffice to LibreOffice etc. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ns/thumb/f/fb/ StarOffice_major_derivatives.svg/1100px- StarOffice_major_derivatives.svg.png The diagram there doesn't necessarily have everything in it. ******* And don't expect miracles when editing PDF. A person should always attempt to get source (.doc or .docx) when editing documents, as this gives the most accurate reproduction and ability to edit. Editing a derivative such as a PDF is bound to have cases where an object cannot be edited when you really needed it. Paul Well he isn't editing the .pdf which is a good thing for despite claims to the contrary, none of the software that claims to do this only do so in certain cases. I suspect most software that exports to .pdf will read it back, but I haven't tested this. I've had .pdf's that were editable in one or another of the packages to which I have access and in some cases not at all. I've no idea why some do and some don't, maybe depends on how the .pdf was generated. I have used Libre Office, Serif PagePlus in windows and Scribus to name a few. Note, almost all editing programs these days will export to .pdf as does my bank statements. As an exercise, try exporting the same document using one of the many printer drivers available. You will find while they all do the job, file sizes vary widely. For file size, Scribus is the worst, creating a huge 350mb file when PagePlus produces a 50mb file for the same publication. A Scribus forum poster claimed Scribus more accurately rendered the text attributes but I'm not sure. I can print the Scribus file using one of the .pdf print drivers, but since the file size isn't a problem for the local print shops, I leave things as are. The downsize to large files is if you want to email to a group. It would be interesting to know how genuine Adobe products handle this. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Office
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:23:54 -0700, Fremantle
wrote: Libre or Open Office. And why ? Thank you ! You want to know which is better? Here's my recommendation: Don't ask. Ignore everyone's opinion. They are both free. Try them both and decide for yourself which one *you* like better. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Office
"Ken Blake" wrote
| You want to know which is better? Here's my recommendation: | | Don't ask. Ignore everyone's opinion. They are both free. Try them | both and decide for yourself which one *you* like better. Anyone can, of course, try both. But it doesn't mean they don't think for themselves just because they solicit opinions. Also, this is a special case. It's not just brand x vs brand y. As I understand it, most of the OO people went to LO when Oracle bought OO. There seems to be wide agreement that LO has had a lot more work put into it. (Someone else may have a more complete version of the story.) A note for the XP group: LO 6 won't run on XP. 5 is the latest. I don't expect you're missing much. I've been updating for years and see no notable changes. It's obscenely bloated. It's free. It works pretty well. But it doesn't perfectly render docx is there's any layout complexity. All of those things have been true for as long as I can remember. As for OO, they won't let a visitor see the options without javascript enabled. There's only a note that you'll have to go fishing around in the version storage online.... Apparently they've broken their site so that they can use script to guess a visitor's OS. For your convenience. Woe to anyone spoofing that. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Office
"Fremantle" wrote
| Libre or Open Office. | You might find this a useful read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Openof...che_OpenOffice It provides a brief history of the OO/LO political debacle over the years and may give you some idea of the differences. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Office
On 07/28/2018 09:23 PM, Fremantle wrote:
Libre or Open Office. And why ? Thank you ! I have a large PDF that I saved to a .DOC file so I can edit it. The PDF contains many images and tables so I am hoping to maintain all of that so as to minimize rewrite. I will be changing paragraph text only. After trying both of them, I found the Libre did a better job of rendering most documents, pdf & doc. I was using Windows at the time and didn't want what seemed like a bloated Word (MS Office) products. I also tried a 3rd product, don't think it was WPS Office, but it was horrible. Now that I'm on Linux, it's built into the system and updates cleanly so I'm happy and working fine. I just found out too that I could edit PDF's. My MRI/X-RAY lab allows me to download the reports as PDF's but they usually are 1 page with a 2nd almost blank page. I like to delete that last page. And editing printed recipes taking out the ads is a great use too. Here is an interesting chart showing Libre and MS Office. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/...crosoft_Office |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Office
dave61430 wrote:
Well he isn't editing the .pdf which is a good thing for despite claims to the contrary, none of the software that claims to do this only do so in certain cases. I suspect most software that exports to .pdf will read it back, but I haven't tested this. I've had .pdf's that were editable in one or another of the packages to which I have access and in some cases not at all. I've no idea why some do and some don't, maybe depends on how the .pdf was generated. I have used Libre Office, Serif PagePlus in windows and Scribus to name a few. Note, almost all editing programs these days will export to .pdf as does my bank statements. As an exercise, try exporting the same document using one of the many printer drivers available. You will find while they all do the job, file sizes vary widely. For file size, Scribus is the worst, creating a huge 350mb file when PagePlus produces a 50mb file for the same publication. A Scribus forum poster claimed Scribus more accurately rendered the text attributes but I'm not sure. I can print the Scribus file using one of the .pdf print drivers, but since the file size isn't a problem for the local print shops, I leave things as are. The downsize to large files is if you want to email to a group. It would be interesting to know how genuine Adobe products handle this. Fonts can use "subset". Check the PDF information page, to see if full fonts are embedded, versus subset. Subset is used a lot for "legal reasons" to prevent "font theft". A decent PDF editor may refuse to edit text on a page. Why ? A subset font prevents changing any letters. There was a time, when a document would have 2MB of fonts per printed page, and the document would be huge. Images can be stored in the PDF at very high resolution. This becomes obvious when zooming into 3200% and the image is sharp and detailed. But this also wastes a lot of bytes. FrameMaker or FrameBuilder was good for this kind of work. B&W images can have the CCITT FAX 4 compressor applied to them. This is an output option on Acrobat Distiller. That's a good choice for B&W scans to PDF for preservation of old paper documentation. Color images have available compressors too. Reducing resolution of images can save a lot of bytes. In some industries, this is epidemic. Take a router hardware manual as an example. It might have a hundred screen shots of the web interface, absolutely none of which are readable. Why even have a manual if you insist on doing that ? With the right tools, the user is in control of the byte count and the image quality. To see just how efficient PDF can be, find a couple of the Adobe reference manuals. Like PLRM or one of the versions of the PDF standard. You can have a thousand pages of printed material, in a 10MB file. Obviously, they put the effort into that, using the document as a "showpiece" of their craft. Paul |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Office
Mayayana wrote:
LO 6 won't run on XP. 5 is the latest. I don't expect you're missing much. I've been updating for years and see no notable changes. It's obscenely bloated. It's free. In my opinion, it's structured well. They decomposed the problem well. I looked at the mess that represents all the versions of Office that Microsoft ever produced, and they seem to have dealt with that well. However, the "implementation" within individual modules leaves a lot to be desired. It's failed every "quality" test I've tried on it here, and I wasn't even trying to break it. For example, one document I saved for output, the output was "double-printed" in the output file. It was rendered twice. I agree with the "no notable changes" comment. Things change, but it doesn't leave a strong impression of being "fixed". It's kinda like a rotating bug generator. There's more things that can break, than humans can keep up with. What does that tell us ? That the developers are not document specialists and are general programmers ? That there aren't enough PhDs working there ? I don't really know what to make of it all, in terms of constructive criticism. ******* To give an example by analogy from the FOSS world, take Firefox and the Firefox choice of print engine. I don't know what the first print engine was called exactly, but one day the Firefox team decided to switch to Cairo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_3.0 "Because of Cairo's lack of support for Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, and Windows NT (versions 4.0 and below), and because Microsoft ended support for Windows 98 and Windows ME on July 11, 2006, Firefox 3 does not run on those operating systems." It was worse than that. At the time, Cairo wasn't even finished. Some output tasks in Firefox were rendered as bitmaps (slow, inefficient). By gluing in some other FOSS software, a software that wasn't finished, what does that say about your developers ? Probably not skilled in the craft of printing ? But why include an unfinished piece of software ? Wouldn't it have made sense to cut over when the Cairo team said "all Done" ??? That's the kind of feeling I get from LibreOffice some times when it crashes. And the choice of OpenGL inside LibreOffice, it seems they didn't do enough "special casing" in the code, to compensate for the differences ("quirks") in the Windows OpenGL. For one of the design problems in LibreOffice, it took about the fourth version of Win10 before the windows side of the problem was fixed (that's the update where Task Manager gets a GPU pane for GPU usage). And that only works if you have a very modern video card ("bakery fresh driver"). I haven't had a chance to see that feature yet, as my video card is too old. Paul |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Office
Big Al wrote:
On 07/28/2018 09:23 PM, Fremantle wrote: Libre or Open Office. And why ? Thank you ! I have a large PDF that I saved to a .DOC file so I can edit it. The PDF contains many images and tables so I am hoping to maintain all of that so as to minimize rewrite. I will be changing paragraph text only. After trying both of them, I found the Libre did a better job of rendering most documents, pdf & doc. I was using Windows at the time and didn't want what seemed like a bloated Word (MS Office) products. I also tried a 3rd product, don't think it was WPS Office, but it was horrible. Now that I'm on Linux, it's built into the system and updates cleanly so I'm happy and working fine. I just found out too that I could edit PDF's. My MRI/X-RAY lab allows me to download the reports as PDF's but they usually are 1 page with a 2nd almost blank page. I like to delete that last page. And editing printed recipes taking out the ads is a great use too. Here is an interesting chart showing Libre and MS Office. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/...crosoft_Office LO is more likely to work right on the Linux side. I think they're more comfortable making that version. Paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Office
"Paul" wrote
| To give an example by analogy from the FOSS | world, take Firefox and the Firefox choice | of print engine. I don't know what the first print | engine was called exactly, but one day the Firefox team | decided to switch to Cairo. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_3.0 | | "Because of Cairo's lack of support for Windows 95, | Windows 98, Windows ME, and Windows NT (versions 4.0 | and below), and because Microsoft ended support for | Windows 98 and Windows ME on July 11, 2006, Firefox 3 | does not run on those operating systems." | | It was worse than that. At the time, Cairo wasn't | even finished. Some output tasks in Firefox were | rendered as bitmaps (slow, inefficient). By gluing | in some other FOSS software, a software that | wasn't finished, what does that say about | your developers ? Probably not skilled in the | craft of printing ? But why include an unfinished | piece of software ? Wouldn't it have made sense | to cut over when the Cairo team said "all Done" ??? | That's an interesting point. I don't know much about Cairo, but I do know the programming world often falls for irrational fads. (Java, XML, JSON, agile programming, top ten language contests, etc). I suspect part of the attraction to Cairo may also be the ability to cut out a lot of cross-platform work. They want to support Mac, Linux and Windows without having to actually write the native code. I think that's also part of why Java is never entirely gone from LO. Cross-platform is a dream that's never been entirely feasible. | That's the kind of feeling I get from LibreOffice | some times when it crashes. | You must use it a lot more than I do. I mostly just do occasional things like writing up estimates and receipts. Even those are often done with pen and paper. I detest all office products I've tried simply because it's so hard to make them behave. A simple job like laying out 10 business cards for printing becomes an all-day affair. But I haven't found LO any worse than other programs. I've never seen it crash, though it takes a ridiculously long time to get to its feet in the first place. I guess another big problem is the tendency to overproduce. PhotoShop... MS Office... They cater to an audience of people who actually use those programs for a living. So extensive capability is desirable. Couple that with the need to always be adding features in order to sell new product and it ends up getting carried away with complexity. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|