If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On 2/19/17 12:57 AM, David B. wrote:
On 19/02/2017 04:53, Mike Easter wrote: I've had online newsgroup conversations with those who have weak connectivity at home and travel to the nearest library for broadband. That sounds like something for President Trump to fix to help "Make America great again"! ;-) It is. As well as all the politician's before him. The government used to do things like this, many of them done during the depression to create some job. Such as all the dams that were built that make an attempt to control flooding (although the Oroville dam is having problems, but I don't know the construction date there) and the Rural Electrification Program which brought electricity to just about everywhere. IMO, it's what the federal government is legally bound to do. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.11.6 Firefox 51.0.1 (64 bit) Thunderbird 45.7.1 "My brain is like lightning, a quick flash and it's gone!" |
Ads |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On 19/02/2017 7:02 AM, philo wrote:
Correct, but any of the current browsers require SSE2 I would have needed an older version of the browser. I tried an AMD Athlon and Sempron and the machine was just too slow. Any P-4 should still be good Per another reply, try older versions of Firefox... Your hardware is no longer supported https://support.mozilla.org/t5/Insta...ted/ta-p/39389 If your computer has a processor older than Pentium 4, Firefox version 53 and above is no longer supported. Like many programs, newer versions of Firefox require a processor that supports Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (SSE2) for better performance. We recommend a computer with a Pentium 4 or newer processor that supports SSE2 to use the latest version of Firefox, which has more features, stability and security. Firefox Extended Support Release (ESR) will continue to work with older processors but will not receive updates beyond ESR version 52. Firefox ESR version 59, scheduled for release in March 2018, will no longer be supported. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
Ken Springer wrote:
Mike Easter wrote: For connectivity, I jumped more or less directly from Atari ST with dialup modem for BBS to a built Win95 and RoadRunner cable connectivity, so I've had broadband 'forever'. I've owned numerous pieces of Atari equipment. Loved them. Still have a working Hades060 clone and a couple other pieces. Remember the 10 MB floppy unit from Supra? I went from one Atari ST 1040 w/ B&W monitor to 3 of them, 2 networked by their midi ports in an office setting, and then on to the mega ST using the Supra hdd. I never had any STE, Falcon, TT, or low res color monitors and I never played any Atari games. It was all productivity, utilities, and telecom. I don't know what 10 MB floppy means. I just know the little Supra hard drives, mine was 20 meg. Most of the time I used the Atari, everything was running in ram, either 1 meg or 4 megs, the floppy storage wasn't actually used much except for saving some doc. The main reason for needing the supra hdd was a database program called Zoomracks (and II) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoomracks Zoomracks was text based instead of GEM and I found it very powerful. -- Mike Easter |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On 02/18/2017 08:40 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
snip Hi, philo, This thread has been an interesting read, from my perspective. I not only learn quite a bit, but I also learn tidbits about those who take the time to post. This thread is one of those where I learn about the posters. And please, no one should take what I write from this point as any kind of personal attack on any individual. Just observations about their computing environment. Not a single person mentioned anything about older computers being equipped with a modem. LOL And that is still a needed piece of hardware in many areas. There are places where that's their only option. Even satellite companies can't see their location. That just leaves dial-up. And even that can be rather strange. The big name local phone company tells a friend they cannot offer dial up service to him. (I'm not sure he understood what they were telling him, though.) Yet, he's been connecting via AOL dial-up service for years. LOL that was another giveaway that the machine I had been working on was old...it had a modem in it! After cleaning up his old XP system, and turning off automatic updates which was slowing the system to a super crawl, it's a snappy little system. Most importantly, he knows how to use it. His sister just gave him a Windows 10 laptop. And the Windows 10 UI has him baffled. Plus, he obviously cannot connect to the internet. So, for the moment, he has to drive 15 miles to the library to use it on the internet. We have not investigate the external dial up modem possibility. If one exists, and you can't connect to it wirelessly, it would limit the portability of a laptop. He's also on a fixed income, and it's unlikely the cost of satellite service, if available, would be an option. Older systems can be donated to social agencies as well, where they can be redone and given to families and seniors that in today's world need to have computers. If you don't want to deal with XP being unsupported, there's always Linux, of which I get more and more questions about using. But that's for another thread. As to Linux, I have been using it since the year 2000 or so and have set up several Linux machines for an organization where I had been doing volunteer work. No one had any trouble using them, but if given a choice most people do not want to use Linux so I never try to force it upon them. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
David B. wrote:
Mike Easter wrote: I've had online newsgroup conversations with those who have weak connectivity at home and travel to the nearest library for broadband. That sounds like something for President Trump to fix to help "Make America great again"! ;-) It isn't up to the president. It is up to those who would develop tech, such as the various 'atmosat' approaches, Loon balloon, Aquila solar drone (made in UK), tropopause or stratospheric Stratobus. So far, the tech has a long way to go; it seems the developers can't really decide whether to stay out of the winds by lingering in the tropopause or to go higher and try to go up and down to catch the opposing currents to stay in place or float around the world. -- Mike Easter |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
philo wrote:
if given a choice most people do not want to use Linux so I never try to force it upon them. If given a 'choice' (for some metric of choice), most of those same people would choose to still be using XP. The choice would need to include an XP with the capabilities of using a modern browser. It is sometimes strange to consider how people's 'choice' is guided/dictated. -- Mike Easter |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
Mike Easter wrote:
It is up to those who would develop tech, such as the various 'atmosat' approaches, Loon balloon, Aquila solar drone (made in UK), tropopause or stratospheric Stratobus. So far, the tech has a long way to go; it seems the developers can't really decide whether to stay out of the winds by lingering in the tropopause or to go higher and try to go up and down to catch the opposing currents to stay in place or float around the world. For a glance at the 'ups and downs' of advanced altitude comm tech, one need look no further than the financial fluctuations of the satellite radio story prior to the current Sirius XM and the even more devastating fluctuation of the Iridium debacle, which is currently back in business big-time launching more sats. -- Mike Easter |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 08:08:23 -0800
Mike Easter wrote: From: Mike Easter Subject: No sense in reviving old computers Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 08:08:23 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 Newsgroups: alt.windows7.general Mike Easter wrote: Nothing that matters,his big head requires him to post to himself for attention. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Video resolutions (Was: No sense in reviving old computers)
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:46:55 -0500, Wolf K
wrote: Fact is, those of us who see the bands are in the minority. Most people do not see an image, they see the objects that interest them. That's why they keep taking pictures of Aunt Emily with a light pole growing out of the top of her head. The same phenomenon accounts for people failing to see stop signs, etc. Not to mention failing to see a gorilla walking through a scene. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On 2/19/17 9:52 AM, Wolf K wrote:
On 2017-02-19 10:54, Mike Easter wrote: philo wrote: if given a choice most people do not want to use Linux so I never try to force it upon them. If given a 'choice' (for some metric of choice), most of those same people would choose to still be using XP. The choice would need to include an XP with the capabilities of using a modern browser. It is sometimes strange to consider how people's 'choice' is guided/dictated. All choices are constrained. The trick is to see the constraints. All of us have trouble doing that, since having any kind of choice makes us feel we can choose anything we want. But you obviously can't choose what's not available. Exactly. With Windows and Macs, you have one choice, the current operating system, and previous systems still on the shelves. I think there are two issues with new Windows and Mac systems for many users. The actual complexity of the system, and the complexity of the UI in accessing the system. I've been helping 3 seniors who are totally confused with the W10 interface, yet all 3 have used XP systems. Only 1 of the 3 is actually going through what looks to be a very good beginner's book on using Windows 10. On a side note, I'm working slowing on some small help documents for folks in that position, which benefits me in learning W10, as well as a particular page layout program. My interest in Linux came from an effort to find some way to a) prolong the life of the hardware when nothing was wrong with it, and b) find a simpler UI/system that was easier to learn for people who were definitely not computer literate. That led me to Linux Mint with the Cinnamon desktop. Which, when I've shown it to people, there's been an overall positive response. We even set up a system at work for people to see, and when the customer has been thinking about a different computer, the response has also been generally positive. Elementary Linux looks simple, but I've not had the time to play with it. Etc. the psychology of choice is "poorly understood", as they say, but the research shows quite clearly that most of the time choice is just another illusion. "Marketing" is all about creating that illusion to the seller's advantage. Have a good day, -- Ken Mac OS X 10.11.6 Firefox 51.0.1 (64 bit) Thunderbird 45.7.1 "My brain is like lightning, a quick flash and it's gone!" |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
Ken Springer wrote:
Only 1 of the 3 is actually going through what looks to be a very good beginner's book on using Windows 10. What book is that? -- Mike Easter |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
No sense in reviving old computers
On 2/19/17 12:15 PM, Mike Easter wrote:
Ken Springer wrote: Only 1 of the 3 is actually going through what looks to be a very good beginner's book on using Windows 10. What book is that? Beginner's Guide to Windows 10, updated to 2017. It's part of "BDM's Desktop Series". I didn't find it on Amazon or Barnes and Noble. They bought it at a Sam's Club. -- Ken Mac OS X 10.11.6 Firefox 51.0.1 (64 bit) Thunderbird 45.7.1 "My brain is like lightning, a quick flash and it's gone!" |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Video resolutions (Was: No sense in reviving old computers)
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Video resolutions (Was: No sense in reviving old computers)
In message , Wolf K
writes: On 2017-02-18 19:54, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: [...] It seems obvious to me that there must be some angle below which the density of rods and cones in the eye becomes the limiting factor. [...] Nope, it's your brain. People see what they pay attention to. If the [] No, it's not. I'm perfectly aware of all the psychological arguments concerning optical matters, and most of them have some validity; however, I can see no way in which putting more pixels in a display than the eye can resolve can truly make any difference. I'll turn it back on you: _knowing_ that the display is HD (or at least 720) might make you _think_ it looks better (-:. In much the same way that wifi manufacturers succeed in selling ever-faster wifi, despite the fact that in most cases the external link is the (main!) limiting factor. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf (Incidentally, it was made in Spain so shouldn't it be a "paella western"?) - Barry Norman [on "A Fistful of Dollars"], RT 2014/10/4-10 |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Video resolutions (Was: No sense in reviving old computers)
In message , Wolf K
writes: [] No, it's not. I'm perfectly aware of all the psychological arguments concerning optical matters, and most of them have some validity; They're not arguments: they're demonstrated effects. Eerie: we see only what the brain computes. The computation includes the illusion of sharply focused detail. Notwithstanding, though, I see no way increasing resolution beyond what the eye can resolve making any difference, psychological effects (and I never said they weren't real) or no psychological effects. [] The only way to resolve this is to test it. In any case, I was referring to banding, which is an effect of the a mismatch between image and display resolution (and colour range). Ah, that's a completely different matter; I totally agree, not running your display at its native resolution (where it has one, which all but CRTs do) loses out big time. I'll turn it back on you: _knowing_ that the display is HD (or at least 720) might make you _think_ it looks better (-:. I'm sure this has an effect. Context affects all our senses. (Context is the reason for the unseen gorilla). So set up a test. I CBA, but I'd be very surprised if confirmation bias wasn't found (-:! [] Resolution isn't the whole story. Display size and viewing distance "Display size and viewing distance" takes us back to what I said several posts ago: angle subtended at the pupil. [] I'd say that when your eye cannot physically resolve the dots, the Yup, that's what I've been saying too (-: [roughly] image looks sharper. Halftone printing relies on this effect: standard newspaper screen was 300 (lines/inch) before digital printing. Magazine halftones had finer screen, sometimes up to 600. That looked needle sharp compared to a newspaper. I can remember when newspaper halftoning was a _lot_ coarser than good-quality magazine printing, by a factor of a lot more than 2:1. Bottom line: there are lots of unanswered questions. Indeed! Have a good day, You too. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf (Incidentally, it was made in Spain so shouldn't it be a "paella western"?) - Barry Norman [on "A Fistful of Dollars"], RT 2014/10/4-10 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|