If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#301
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Mark Twain wrote:
A couple of questions if I may, while were waiting for the HD etc. I have updates turned off on both the 8500 and the 780 and both are Windows 7 Professional OS's but on the 780 there's a red circle with a white X over the Action Center icon whereas on the 8500 there's nothing. The other question I have is that lately I've noticed that when on Yahoo; if I click a story it seems to lag or stop altogether where I can't even scroll down but only on Yahoo or sometimes MSN. Are they overloading the browser because I don't have any problems with any other webpage? I noticed also that if you click on anything anymore it triggers other stories ads, and who knows what ? Now they even put them in on the email page. Robert Check your Task Manager display. It could be, that the browser is simply using up all the resources it can get its hands on. I've noticed this behavior on CNN advertising platform. (That piece of crap on the right hand side, that slides up and down when you scroll.) On my 32 bit OS, using a 32 bit browser, the browser burns up 1.8GB of RAM, and then seizes up (because in this case, it's out of address space to be able to ask for more RAM). While it is possible to get a 64 bit version of Firefox, I don't recommend doing that, at this time. Instead, study the problem first, to see whether this is even something you can fix from the user end. http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ win32/ win64/ I don't know if Adobe Flash is available for a 64 bit Windows browser or not. So changing to a 64 bit browser, may require some work. It's not necessarily a drop-in replacement, and at the moment, I would not expect "better behavior". It would be a stop-gap measure. If you had Google Chrome loaded up, you could retest the web page with that, and see if the obnoxious behavior is handled better by the rendering engine in the browser. That may be the only temporary fix, until these web idiot designers ruin the user experience, once again. HTH, Paul |
Ads |
#302
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
I really don't know what I'm looking for?
http://i67.tinypic.com/2j4wxlc.jpg http://i64.tinypic.com/14t3pxz.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/2qsc4md.jpg http://i66.tinypic.com/6fuvx2.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/ruqqom.jpg http://i64.tinypic.com/s4z6v8.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/2hxm1xt.jpg What about refreshing FF ? Robert |
#303
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
What was that program that created
an arc? To test the CPU? would that be of any value? Robert |
#304
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
I thought I was using the 64 bit version
in both the 8500 and 780 computers? Robert |
#305
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
On 30/05/2016 03:08, Mark Twain wrote:
I thought I was using the 64 bit version in both the 8500 and 780 computers? Robert No you didn't. You are an intelligent person. Windows XP 64 bit were very common in those days and the very first thing they asked the store person was "does it run 64bit XP?" The answer was always YES. Nowadays, it is hard to get a 64 bit machine because everything is 32 bit! They are short changing customers!! Can you not ask for a refund? -- /*This post contains rich text (HTML). if you don't like it then you can kill-filter the poster without crying about it like a small baby so that you don't see this poster's posts ever again.*/ /*This message is best read in Mozilla Thunderbird as it uses 21st century technology.*/ |
#306
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Excuse me, yes I did
|
#307
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Mark Twain wrote:
I really don't know what I'm looking for? http://i67.tinypic.com/2j4wxlc.jpg http://i64.tinypic.com/14t3pxz.jpg Need to click "Show Processes for all users" Then click memory column, to sort on most memory. http://i68.tinypic.com/2qsc4md.jpg http://i66.tinypic.com/6fuvx2.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/ruqqom.jpg 1.56GB used ( 1GB for OS, 560MB programs ?) http://i64.tinypic.com/s4z6v8.jpg http://i68.tinypic.com/2hxm1xt.jpg What about refreshing FF ? Robert Since this is Windows 7, I can kinda guesstimate that the browser is not in trouble at the moment. If I assume the OS is fully expanded, it uses around 1GB. The browser, while not shown in your pictures, would be using 560MB or so. Task Manager has a stupid button "Show Processes for all users" That should be the default. I don't know why we have to go through the extra step every time. But that's life. Even if Task Manager would remember I clicked that from one usage of the thing to another, I might be happy with the design. But, you have to click it every time you visit there. ******* First, make sure your menu bar is turned on. Right-Click on the blue area near the top of the browser window. Check the menu presented for "Menu Bar". Select that and it should become ticked. The words "File"..."Help" should appear. For example, now the word "Tools" should be up there. http://s33.postimg.org/xex6z2x4f/FFmenu.gif To clear cache: Tools : Options : Privacy Clear your recent history http://s33.postimg.org/tjghanqr3/FFcache.gif If you want to Refresh the browser, that may remove extensions. I did this to my test browser, and Plugins like Silverlight are still there. Help : Troubleshooting Information Refresh Firefox (button on page) http://s33.postimg.org/cdyvpfcq7/FFrefresh.gif The current version of Firefox (just updated mine for the purposes of taking some pictures) is 46.0.1 . But knowing Yahoo News, I don't think this is going to help. We'll see. On the 780, the Intel graphics in the Q45 may not be the fastest for the purposes of "hardware acceleration". Both the browser and the Adobe Flash plugin can use hardware acceleration. On the 8500, you have an Nvidia video card, which is modern enough to have some shaders to use for the purpose. (Modern Intel processors also have a slightly better GPU, but that's not going to help in this case. Both of your processors don't have a GPU inside the CPU package. Even my test machine, is like your 8500, in not having a GPU inside the CPU. So for hardware acceleration on the Test Machine, I have a $50 HD6450. You would want something more modern than that, as it is now out-of-support.) Example of today's rubbish video cards. $30 This one would fit in a short x16 slot. I ruled out a number of other cheap cards, as they had no fan, and my experience with fanless cards, is some are a bit unstable when "flat-out". And even some of the cheap cards with fans, they have no housing to control airflow (making the fan useless). http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814487221 I no longer have good data to compare video cards, so I'm operating blind here. The gpureview.com web site no longer updates their table. While I don't believe the performance issue is hardware related, it's about all that is practical to upgrade on the 780. Paul |
#308
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Mark Twain wrote:
I thought I was using the 64 bit version in both the 8500 and 780 computers? Robert I don't know if it indicates somewhere on the browser or not. Mozilla initially introduced a 64 bit browser compile some time back. But I don't know if the plugins were ready for it at the time. And then, Mozilla withdrew their 64 bit browser, and just distributed the 32 bit one for a few more years. But the 64 bit version has made a comeback. In part, because Google Chrome is in the process of switching entirely to 64 bit browsers. So Mozilla now ships a 64 bit version (again). A 64 bit OS (what you've got on both machines), can run a 32 bit browser or a 64 bit browser. Other than being able to gobble down more memory when it wants to, I don't see the point of a 64 bit browser. As far as I know, every Firefox browser I have installed here, is the 32 bit version. (And that's likely to be what the download page offers a user automatically, is the 32 bit one.) I've not even tested any 64 bit ones. If you wanted the 64 bit one, you'd browse the releases server for a copy. And the browser also isn't likely to be all that happy to upgrade on the fly from a 32 bit to a 64 bit version (since a different Program Files folder gets used). I don't know if their installer is "graceful" or not, when making such a transition. http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/fire...1/win64/en-US/ And while your Task Manager pictures weren't conclusive, just the total RAM usage of 1.56GB in the picture (1GB for OS maybe), suggests Firefox hadn't gone crazy. I'm not sure what problem we're fixing yet :-) Paul |
#309
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Good Guy wrote:
On 30/05/2016 03:08, Mark Twain wrote: I thought I was using the 64 bit version in both the 8500 and 780 computers? Robert No you didn't. You are an intelligent person. Windows XP 64 bit were very common in those days and the very first thing they asked the store person was "does it run 64bit XP?" The answer was always YES. Nowadays, it is hard to get a 64 bit machine because everything is 32 bit! They are short changing customers!! Can you not ask for a refund? The 8200 was a 32 bit machine. It used RAMBUS RAM, to give some idea of the vintage (an older P4 processor). It came with a copy of WinXP x32 on it. The 780 and 8500 have 64 bit CPUs and both have 64 bit OSes. And both can run either 32 bit or 64 bit programs. He doesn't need a refund. ******* I only know of one person running WinXP SP2 x64 in this group, and I don't think he's all that happy with it. I wouldn't recommend that software to anyone - the reviews on Newegg for that software purchase, said all that needed saying about it. HTH, Paul |
#310
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
I'd didn't know the history of 32bit/64 bit OS's
I just assumed that 32bit was for older computers and 64 bit was for newer computers. So can I/ should I covert both computer to 32 bit? Not really a problem;I was just saying that on the 780 there's a red circle with a white X over the Action Center logo. Yet both computers have Windows Updated turned off but the 8500 has no red circle. When I open the Action Center on the 780 it's just the Windows Update in red. Robert |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
I checked for updates and there were none.
the scans have picked up nothing, As far as I can tell it all looks good except for the red circle over the Action Center flag. Robert |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
|
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Are you suggesting we upgrade the video
card in the 780? If so, I don't have a problem with it. You suggest this (as good as any other)? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814487221 Robert |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
I guess I don't need to 'convert'
The 8200 lasted 16 years with upgrades and was still working when boxed and has a spare bootable 320 GB HD. Still using the beautiful monitor that came with it for the 780 which was an excellent choice. Robert |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Dell 8200 HD problems:
Problem resolved,.....
It was there all along and I didn't see it. I had Windows Update turned off but I didn't turn off the Action Center Window Update messages. So after I turned the messages off the red circle with white X disappeared. Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|