If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have Fat32. Is
that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If so how do I convert? Thanks |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Yes. Defragging FAT32 takes a lot longer to do. The speed difference is
astounding once you compare the two. To convert: Just go to the Command Prompt and execute the command: C:\ CONVERT C: /fs:ntfs Where C: is a name of the drive you want to convert. After machine re-boot conversion process will start and you'll have your FAT32 converted to NTFS without of data loss. You may want to read this article first: http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q307881 -- ~john aka: jopa Curtis wrote: I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If so how do I convert? Thanks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
"Curtis" wrote:
I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If so how do I convert? Thanks NTFS is much better for XP, especially on larger hard drives (did you mention defrag time -- the answer to your question is yes). There should be a conversion utility as part of system tools. Also, here is a Microsoft article that explains the procedure. http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q307881 Not only will you get better performance, fewer disk errors, and shorter defrags, but NTFS also has lots of cool security/privacy features that FAT32 does not have. Ken |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Curtis wrote:
I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If so how do I convert? Thanks You should convert, for several reasons. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Ken Gardner wrote:
NTFS is much better for XP, especially on larger hard drives (did you mention defrag time -- the answer to your question is yes). There should be a conversion utility as part of system tools. Also, here is a Microsoft article that explains the procedure. http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q307881 Not only will you get better performance, fewer disk errors, and shorter defrags, but NTFS also has lots of cool security/privacy features that FAT32 does not have. The one problem I have noticed with NTFS is how frameted the drives do get, and quicker than fat 32. That is the one main problem with NTFS. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
"AD" wrote:
The one problem I have noticed with NTFS is how fragmented the drives do get, and quicker than fat 32. That is the one main problem with NTFS. Does it? I don't know, at least not as a general rule. However, if NTFS does get fragmented more often, the reason is because it uses 4kb file cluster sizes instead of the larger cluster sizes that FAT32 uses. To make a long story short, this essentially means that NTFS wastes less space on the hard drive than FAT32, which in turn means that a defragmented (or, in some cases, even a slightly fragmented) NTFS drive will be faster and more efficient than a defragmented FAT32 drive. The bigger the hard drive, the greater the advantages of NTFS over FAT32. Also, a NTFS drive defragments much faster. An NTFS drive is lot less prone to disk errors, and does a much better job of recovering from such errors. And a NTFS drive gives you security and privacy features that are unavailable on FAT32 drives. Really, there is no good reason to use FAT32 unless you need it to boot a second operating system that requires it, or -- to get hypertechnical -- you save lots of large files on a small hard drive (but who the heck does THAT nowadays??). Ken |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
jopa66 wrote:
Yes. Defragging FAT32 takes a lot longer to do. The speed difference is astounding once you compare the two. To convert: Just go to the Command Prompt and execute the command: C:\ CONVERT C: /fs:ntfs Where C: is a name of the drive you want to convert. After machine re-boot conversion process will start and you'll have your FAT32 converted to NTFS without of data loss. You may want to read this article first: http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q307881 Can the conversion be reversed? I have a few drives I would like to be able to place into HDD drawers in Win98 machines temporarily. J. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Jimmy wrote:
jopa66 wrote: Yes. Defragging FAT32 takes a lot longer to do. The speed difference is astounding once you compare the two. To convert: Just go to the Command Prompt and execute the command: C:\ CONVERT C: /fs:ntfs Where C: is a name of the drive you want to convert. After machine re-boot conversion process will start and you'll have your FAT32 converted to NTFS without of data loss. You may want to read this article first: http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;Q307881 Can the conversion be reversed? I have a few drives I would like to be able to place into HDD drawers in Win98 machines temporarily. J. Nope. Not with native Windows. I've read there was 3rd party stuff that can. Steve |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Steve N. wrote:
Nope. Not with native Windows. I've read there was 3rd party stuff that can. Partition magic can reverse it. That is what I had to do to get my system running ME. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Ken Gardner wrote:
The one problem I have noticed with NTFS is how fragmented the drives do get, and quicker than fat 32. That is the one main problem with NTFS. Does it? I don't know, at least not as a general rule. However, if NTFS does get fragmented more often, the reason is because it uses 4kb file cluster sizes instead of the larger cluster sizes that FAT32 uses. To make a long story short, this essentially means that NTFS wastes less space on the hard drive than FAT32, which in turn means that a defragmented (or, in some cases, even a slightly fragmented) NTFS drive will be faster and more efficient than a defragmented FAT32 drive. The bigger the hard drive, the greater the advantages of NTFS over FAT32. Also, a NTFS drive defragments much faster. An NTFS drive is lot less prone to disk errors, and does a much better job of recovering from such errors. And a NTFS drive gives you security and privacy features that are unavailable on FAT32 drives. I really do find that my drives get fragmented a lot with NTFS, I know the contents of my video drive do change a lot, but it never got in the same mess with FAT32. as for the length of time it takes to defrag a drive, that is not an issue with me, as I leaves the computer on over night and get the computer to defrag when I am asleep. Security or privacy is also only an issue if your computer is multi user. Really, there is no good reason to use FAT32 unless you need it to boot a second operating system that requires it, or -- to get hypertechnical -- you but there is, even when I was running XP, my USB drive was formated with FAT32, as it meant I could move it between computers that had any windows OS on. All my data drives are also FAT32, due to the fact that if anything went wrong with this computer, I could still take the drive to mates place and get data of them. FAT32 has it advantages, because if the drive do have a problem, you got more chance of rescuing the files. save lots of large files on a small hard drive (but who the heck does THAT nowadays??). Some might I suppose. My zip drive is FAT32. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
André Gulliksen wrote:
Curtis wrote: I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If so how do I convert? Thanks You should convert, for several reasons. It is no good saying you should convert for several reasons and then not state those reasons. so what are those reasons? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Curtis wrote:
| I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have | Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If | so how do I convert? Thanks I had a second harddrive formatted to FAT32 and when I tried to defrag it in XP I received a message from XP that it would not work correctly. So I weighed some isssues and reformatted the drive to NTFS. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
How do i make a NTFS boot disk ? I know i would want one and a few copies just incase i would need them ? On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 18:48:04 -0500, "BBUNNY" wrote: Curtis wrote: | I have XP home, while defraging (takes forever) I see that I have | Fat32. Is that why it takes so long and should I convert to NTFS. If | so how do I convert? Thanks I had a second harddrive formatted to FAT32 and when I tried to defrag it in XP I received a message from XP that it would not work correctly. So I weighed some isssues and reformatted the drive to NTFS. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
AD wrote:
It is no good saying you should convert for several reasons and then not state those reasons. Well, IMNSHO the topic is a no brainer. FAT32 or NTFS? In most scenarios, there are multiple reasons for NTFS, and rarely any at all for FAT32. That's why I didn't bother going into details. so what are those reasons? From the top of my head: - Added security through file permissions - Less risk of loss and corruption of data - Smaller cluster size, causing less data overhead and lower performance impact from fragmentation - Native compression support - Native encryption support - Better long file name support - Support for larger files and larger number of files As for pro-FAT32 I can only think of one single legitimate reason, and that is if you need to be able to write to the disk from operating systems not based on NT. Personally I have one single (relatively small) FAT32 partition to interchange data between Windows XP and FreeBSD. All other Windows partitions are NTFS. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Fat32 vs NTFS ?
Paul M wrote:
How do i make a NTFS boot disk ? I know i would want one and a few copies just incase i would need them ? What do you mean "NTFS boot disk"? Normally I would say that whenever you install XP onto an XP partition with a bootloader loading that partition, there's your NTFS boot disk. If you mean you want to be able to boot from removable media and retrieve files from an NTFS formatted disk I know at least two options: 1) Knoppix (http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html). Linux based live-CD. Full desktop environment, CD burner, network support, NTFS read support, the works. No assembly required, just download and roast. 2) BartPE (http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/). Builds a boot CD which basically boots a stripped down Windows XP, with a few useful tools thrown in. NTFS read/write support. The actual building of this CD may be daunting for a beginner, though. But if you're serious it's worth checking out. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAT32 and NTFS on 2 hard drives? | Shaun B | Windows XP Help and Support | 20 | February 15th 05 02:58 AM |
OK to have FAT32 boot drive with NTFS second HD? | Ken Blake | General XP issues or comments | 3 | January 9th 05 06:44 PM |
Cloning NTFS & FAT32 | SeaSpeeder | Networking and the Internet with Windows XP | 2 | November 29th 04 10:42 PM |
hard drive space calculation between NTFS and FAT32 | namsilat | General XP issues or comments | 6 | October 11th 04 05:09 PM |
ntfs or fat32, which is better gor my unusual | Patrick Pierson | General XP issues or comments | 4 | August 22nd 04 05:55 PM |