If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
In message , Ken Blake
writes: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:08:04 +0100, Gordonbp wrote: On 05/10/12 21:46, choro wrote: Win 3.11 was the network capable version, wasn't it?-- choro ***** Windows for Workgroups IIRC..... That's not correct. See my earlier messages in this thread. There was a Windows for Workgroups 3.11 *and* a Windows 3.11. IIRR there was a minor bug in the OS, which showed up embarrassingly if you used Calculator to work out 3.11-3.1 (calc must have called the relevant faulty routines). Whether this was the Workgroup version, or 3.11 or 3.1, I can't remember. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Do ministers do more than lay people? |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:00:55 -0700, Ken Blake
wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. If that's the case, you've been extremely lucky. A backup from one computer will normally not run on a different one, and a clean installation is required. He probably used the Acronis Plus Pack, an add-on for True Image. One of its features is that it allows you to restore an image to dissimilar hardware, which can obviously be very handy at times. -- Char Jackson |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
In message , Char Jackson
writes: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:14:07 +0100, Gordonbp wrote: On 06/10/12 08:40, Steve Hayes wrote: but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. Eh? You're not SERIOUS are you? The last time (about a month ago) I did a fresh install of Window 7 it took all of about four hours - INCLUDING all updates and re-instatement of all data and MS Office 2010. If it really does take you that long then you're doing something really wrong... Four hours sounds about right. If there are a lot of apps and/or a lot of customizations, six hours isn't too unreasonable. _If_ you're so organised that, whenever you tweak a setting in _anything_, you make a note of it. Many (I suspect most) of us do not, so getting _all_ our software back how we like it takes ages - because we don't _know_ how to get it how we like it; in some cases, it can be ages before we even know something _isn't_ how we want it. (But if you now say "that didn't matter then", you're wrong.) -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Do ministers do more than lay people? |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
In message , Char Jackson
writes: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. As others have said, if a fresh install (OS, apps, tweaks) takes more than about 4-6 hours, you're probably jumping into it unprepared. You're not being fair: such "preparation time" must be added. [] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf Do ministers do more than lay people? |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On 06/10/2012 11:26, Bob Henson wrote:
On 06/10/2012 10:07 AM, choro wrote: No idea what the prices are in the UK these days, but when I built my desktop just over a year ago I had to pay £110 (US$180.00) for W7Pro. And that was the OEM version. Heaven knows how much the full retail version would have been. It just doesn't make sense when one can buy a brand new laptop with W7 preinstalled for £250.-- choro ***** PS. I know life's not fair but this is ridiculous! This place Has Windows 7 for $60 (£37.19 UK) https://completesoftwarecenter.com/windows7.php It says Home Premium, but when I came to download, it was Windows 7 Pro - as shown in the little gold disk on the page. It came without SP1, and needed to download more updates (several years worth) than you can shake a stick at - but it was cheap, and legal. Thanks a million. At these prices I can start thinking seriously about updating my Vista laptop to Windows 7. Never liked that damned Vista. I used to run Linux on the laptop, but I was in hospital for a while early in the year, and my son brought me a dongle so I could stay in touch - of course, the software would only run under Windows! I did get it to work under Linux later, but it took forever to set up. Anyway, to get it working in hospital, we put the preview version of Windows 8 on the laptop as a dual boot - the only one we could get a) free and b) quickly. It was so bad that I wanted to get rid a.s.a.p., and it ran out of date next year anyway - which is why I did a bit of searching round, and found this company. There may be others even cheaper, but I'd be a tad suspicious if they were. I did get fed up waiting (it's an old, slow laptop) for all the updates to download, but at that price it would be churlish to complain too much :-) At my age, Windows 7 will probably be my last version, unless Windows 8 is such a disaster that Microsoft have to bring out a Windows 9 quickly - even then, I'm unlikely to change, Windows 7 is by far the best version yet. To be honest, it took me around 6 months after I had built my W7 desktop to switch over from WXP to W7. I wasn't too happy about the new way of organizing things on W7 which is why it took me so long. Anyway, to cut a long story short, in the end my XP machine got so slow that I decided to give W7 a try. Another reason was of course when the PSU on my old XP desktop gave up the ghost. In the meantime I decided to use my new W7 machine which was connected through my KVM and by the time I had managed to buy and install a new PSU on my old machine, I had got used to the ways of W7. Now of course I'll never go back to Windows XP except when I am using my WXP laptop which I still *have* to if I need to do anything with my old scanner. Can't get a W7 compatible driver for my old scanner and I am not going to buy another scanner now since I use it very, very rarely. My Vista laptop in the meantime is luxuriating in indolence and torpidity. It was an impulse buy and turned out to be a white elephant as far as I am concerned. But if I can change the OS to W7 for £37 it might be worth the effort. What has been your experience with Linux OSs and the associated software, BTW? -- choro ***** |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On 06/10/2012 4:29 PM, choro wrote: On 06/10/2012 11:26, Bob Henson wrote: On 06/10/2012 10:07 AM, choro wrote: No idea what the prices are in the UK these days, but when I built my desktop just over a year ago I had to pay £110 (US$180.00) for W7Pro. And that was the OEM version. Heaven knows how much the full retail version would have been. It just doesn't make sense when one can buy a brand new laptop with W7 preinstalled for £250.-- choro ***** PS. I know life's not fair but this is ridiculous! This place Has Windows 7 for $60 (£37.19 UK) https://completesoftwarecenter.com/windows7.php It says Home Premium, but when I came to download, it was Windows 7 Pro - as shown in the little gold disk on the page. It came without SP1, and needed to download more updates (several years worth) than you can shake a stick at - but it was cheap, and legal. Thanks a million. At these prices I can start thinking seriously about updating my Vista laptop to Windows 7. Never liked that damned Vista. I used to run Linux on the laptop, but I was in hospital for a while early in the year, and my son brought me a dongle so I could stay in touch - of course, the software would only run under Windows! I did get it to work under Linux later, but it took forever to set up. Anyway, to get it working in hospital, we put the preview version of Windows 8 on the laptop as a dual boot - the only one we could get a) free and b) quickly. It was so bad that I wanted to get rid a.s.a.p., and it ran out of date next year anyway - which is why I did a bit of searching round, and found this company. There may be others even cheaper, but I'd be a tad suspicious if they were. I did get fed up waiting (it's an old, slow laptop) for all the updates to download, but at that price it would be churlish to complain too much :-) At my age, Windows 7 will probably be my last version, unless Windows 8 is such a disaster that Microsoft have to bring out a Windows 9 quickly - even then, I'm unlikely to change, Windows 7 is by far the best version yet. To be honest, it took me around 6 months after I had built my W7 desktop to switch over from WXP to W7. I wasn't too happy about the new way of organizing things on W7 which is why it took me so long. Anyway, to cut a long story short, in the end my XP machine got so slow that I decided to give W7 a try. Another reason was of course when the PSU on my old XP desktop gave up the ghost. In the meantime I decided to use my new W7 machine which was connected through my KVM and by the time I had managed to buy and install a new PSU on my old machine, I had got used to the ways of W7. Now of course I'll never go back to Windows XP except when I am using my WXP laptop which I still *have* to if I need to do anything with my old scanner. Can't get a W7 compatible driver for my old scanner and I am not going to buy another scanner now since I use it very, very rarely. My Vista laptop in the meantime is luxuriating in indolence and torpidity. It was an impulse buy and turned out to be a white elephant as far as I am concerned. But if I can change the OS to W7 for £37 it might be worth the effort. What has been your experience with Linux OSs and the associated software, BTW? I used several distros on the old laptop, but mainly Linux Mint 9 through to 13, Debian Stable and Unbuntu. They all ran just fine - but Mint 9 ran much, much faster than Windows (any versions) on the old laptop. By the time it reached v.13 it was still faster than Windows, but much slower than v.9. The Ubuntu distros were the same - they slowed down dramatically as more and more trendy, modern, unnecessary features were added to make them appeal to the youngsters. Debian stayed much the same, but will go the same way. Incidentally, my old scanner wouldn't work with Windows 7 either - but ran fine under Linux. If all you want to do is office work, web browsing and e-mail, I'd recommend Linux Mint. If you want to play modern games, or do video editing - forget it. It's a pig to find drivers for anything made originally for Windows - like my phone dongle, or external WiFi aerials. It's like the Mac - nothing is compatible, and the software doesn't exist for it. So summarising, excellent O/S within it's limits - but very limited. I've more or less given it up now. -- Bob Tetbury, Gloucestershire, UK Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On 06/10/2012 16:07, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. As others have said, if a fresh install (OS, apps, tweaks) takes more than about 4-6 hours, you're probably jumping into it unprepared. Likewise, if installing or updating drivers takes a few hours by itself, something is definitely out of whack. Having said that, it's also true that some people just work slower than others. But still, a MONTH? Clearly an exaggeration. NO! Not really. It takes time to remember and install all the little programs and freeware that one had on the old setup. The whole process can take a few weeks but of course this does NOT mean that one is tied down to doing this and nothing else. You do it in dribs and drabs. But the beauty of a fresh installation is that you can apply the experience you've gained with your old setup to setting up the new computer to just how you like it. And if you enjoy doing this sort of thing then it is no chore. If you don't, just sit back and let all the software install normally and forget about configuring things to just how you like them. I for example like to sort my user files not on C but on D drive and when I click My Documents I like to see just folders and no files there. Everything is classified and in the relevant sub-folder. Neat and systematic. The thing to do when installing a new system from scratch is to think and plan everything beforehand and then get on with it. -- choro ***** |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On 06/10/2012 16:08, Char Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:11:16 +0100, choro wrote: On 06/10/2012 08:45, Steve Hayes wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 22:29:58 -0400, "...winston" wrote: South Africa Windows 7 Full Versions http://www.kalahari.com/electronics/software/5717.aspx I can get a full version anywhere. It's the upgrade from Vista that is hard to find. Microsoft Store Windows 7 Full and Upgrade 35 languages http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/...oryID.44066700 Tried accessing web page but got this... "We're sorry. The site you are attempting to access is restricted in your region." Sh*t! Use a proxy based in the country of your choice. Good advice! Thnx.-- choro ***** |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On 06/10/2012 13:26, ...winston wrote:
Choose the version, click 'Shop this edition' - the prices and option for full or upgrade (if available in your area) should show up. Note: You'll have to test it (since I'm in the US) and find out if geographical limits are involved. Also not sure if payment methods are restricted to credit cards for a given geographical area. This old dog is learning new tricks every day. What would I do without you lot out there?-- choro ***** |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
Ken Blake wrote:
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:14:07 +0100, Gordonbp wrote: On 06/10/12 08:40, Steve Hayes wrote: but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. Eh? You're not SERIOUS are you? The last time (about a month ago) I did a fresh install of Window 7 it took all of about four hours - INCLUDING all updates and re-instatement of all data and MS Office 2010. If it really does take you that long then you're doing something really wrong... Well, "months (if not years)" has to be an overstatement as far as I'm concerned, but for me, it's much longer than four hours. I've done clean reinstallation of Windows only once, and it took me two days. I had a lot more software to install than just Microsoft Office, and I had many programs with custom configurations to set, etc. Okay, maybe that is an overstatement for a reinstall. I've never done a reinstall. I'm just going by my original transition from Windows 2000 to Windows 7. -- Crash Today is the first day of the rest of your life, and there's not a damned thing you can do about it. |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , Ed Cryer writes: [] So many PC users are going to give Win8 the brush-off that MS will Probably more than is fair; there seem to be an awful lot of people out there who have decided 8 is bad without really giving it a chance: they took one look at the default interface, cried "I don't like 'phones", and never gave it a second look. (Rather like someone I know on UMRA who will never touch a certain variety of apple [fruit, not computer!] because of a single example he tried on a railway station in the 1960s or '80s.) [I have no axe to grind here - I'm happy with XP, and only moved to it from '98lite because of the latter's poor USB support - though XP _is_ more stable, I admit. If you're wondering why I take this 7 'group, it was initially because I was setting up a new machine for a friend a year or two ago, and I've stayed because I like the people here.] probably have to keep supporting Win7 for decades. They have no obligation to beyond what they've stated (and possibly not even that). "XP rules ok" had its day, but Win7 users will start the revolution at the suggestion of an end to support. With about as much success (-:. One slight problem looms for me. What about those buying new OEM PCs? They'll have Win8 on them. And so many new PCs are sold every day in the western world. Will those people learn to appreciate Win8? Or will It isn't that they'll "learn to appreciate it", it's that they won't know anything else, until they have to work with dinosaurs like us who are using the older OSs; their reaction will be "what a strange way to do things". You like the OS you first use a lot. they strip them down with things like Classic Shell? Ed If they're older users familiar with older OSs, yes - or some of them will; some will learn to use (if not love) 8, and whatever comes next. But new users who haven't really used PCs much before (especially if they _have_ used 'phones or whatever 8 is supposed to resemble) will just learn it the way we did '9x/XP/7. You'd be more convincing if you could list some advantages of moving from 7 to 8 (other than, that is, it's MS' latest). I can easily supply a list of DISadvantages. Ed |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
In message , Ed Cryer
writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , Ed Cryer writes: [] So many PC users are going to give Win8 the brush-off that MS will Probably more than is fair; there seem to be an awful lot of people out there who have decided 8 is bad without really giving it a chance: they took one look at the default interface, cried "I don't like 'phones", and never gave it a second look. (Rather like someone I know on UMRA who will never touch a certain variety of apple [fruit, not computer!] because of a single example he tried on a railway station in the 1960s or '80s.) [I have no axe to grind here - I'm happy with XP, and only moved to it from '98lite because of the latter's poor USB support - though XP _is_ more stable, I admit. If you're wondering why I take this 7 'group, it was initially because I was setting up a new machine for a friend a year or two ago, and I've stayed because I like the people here.] probably have to keep supporting Win7 for decades. They have no obligation to beyond what they've stated (and possibly not even that). "XP rules ok" had its day, but Win7 users will start the revolution at the suggestion of an end to support. With about as much success (-:. One slight problem looms for me. What about those buying new OEM PCs? They'll have Win8 on them. And so many new PCs are sold every day in the western world. Will those people learn to appreciate Win8? Or will It isn't that they'll "learn to appreciate it", it's that they won't know anything else, until they have to work with dinosaurs like us who are using the older OSs; their reaction will be "what a strange way to do things". You like the OS you first use a lot. they strip them down with things like Classic Shell? Ed If they're older users familiar with older OSs, yes - or some of them will; some will learn to use (if not love) 8, and whatever comes next. But new users who haven't really used PCs much before (especially if they _have_ used 'phones or whatever 8 is supposed to resemble) will just learn it the way we did '9x/XP/7. You'd be more convincing if you could list some advantages of moving from 7 to 8 (other than, that is, it's MS' latest). Me, convincing? Me, who is happy with XP and was sad to leave 98lite? I can easily supply a list of DISadvantages. It would probably contribute something useful if you do. (They won't mean anything to _me_ if they're 7-specific, but they will to most people here, I think!) Ed -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum." Translation: "Garbage in, garbage out." |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:19:12 -0500, Char Jackson
wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 07:00:55 -0700, Ken Blake wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. If that's the case, you've been extremely lucky. A backup from one computer will normally not run on a different one, and a clean installation is required. He probably used the Acronis Plus Pack, an add-on for True Image. One of its features is that it allows you to restore an image to dissimilar hardware, which can obviously be very handy at times. Ah, OK. Thanks, I didn't know about the Plus Pack. Yes, that sounds very handy. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:26:02 +0100, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
wrote: In message , Char Jackson writes: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. As others have said, if a fresh install (OS, apps, tweaks) takes more than about 4-6 hours, you're probably jumping into it unprepared. You're not being fair: such "preparation time" must be added. [] When you decide to paint your house and someone later asks you how long it took, do you add the amount of time it took you to decide on a color and visit the paint store to buy paint and brushes? I don't. My point is that you can usually take all the time that you want to prepare for a task, but you certainly wouldn't include that planning time when you report on how long the task took to complete. -- Char Jackson |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
How many of you are ready to run out and upgrade to Windows 8?
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:43:45 +0100, choro wrote:
On 06/10/2012 16:07, Char Jackson wrote: On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:40:51 +0200, Steve Hayes wrote: But when I needed to replace my desktop computer, I bought a new one without an operating system and restored my Acronis backups. It took me a few hours to update drivers, etc, but not the months (if not years) that a fresh instal would require. As others have said, if a fresh install (OS, apps, tweaks) takes more than about 4-6 hours, you're probably jumping into it unprepared. Likewise, if installing or updating drivers takes a few hours by itself, something is definitely out of whack. Having said that, it's also true that some people just work slower than others. But still, a MONTH? Clearly an exaggeration. NO! Not really. It takes time to remember and install all the little programs and freeware that one had on the old setup. The whole process can take a few weeks but of course this does NOT mean that one is tied down to doing this and nothing else. You do it in dribs and drabs. But the beauty of a fresh installation is that you can apply the experience you've gained with your old setup to setting up the new computer to just how you like it. To be clear, I'm not doubting that it takes some people days or weeks or, who knows, even months or years. I'm just saying it takes *me* about 4-6 hours and I don't think I work especially quickly at it. I certainly don't hurry. If someone asked me to spend a full day on this task, I don't know what I would do with the second half of the day. Watch TV, I suppose. The thing to do when installing a new system from scratch is to think and plan everything beforehand and then get on with it. -- Exactly. My High School shop teacher used to say, "Plan your work, then work your plan." Good advice. -- Char Jackson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|