Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge

On Tue, 14 May 2019 17:05:37 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/14/19 3:49 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 04:23:42 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/14/19 3:58 AM, default wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 11:52:18 +0200 (CEST), "Trumped"
wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kav...-with-liberal-
justices-against-apple-dealing-blow-to-tech-giant-in-app-store-
challenge

If consumer's have rights, that is "liberal?" Maybe this is a matter
of monopoly pricing?


Keep in mind that liberal and conservative are improper terms
to describe the courts. The proper terms are "Constructionists"
and "Activists".

A Constructionist is trying to follow the law and the "intent" of
the people as expressed by congress. They can have any political
opinion or affiliation. Kavanaugh is a Constructionist.

An Activist does what every he wants. Activists commonly ram down the
throats of the people what they can not achieve politically. The
Ninth circuit is an example of this. Their political affiliations
are typically Left Wing loonie fruits (Regressives).

And the article has no clue as to the proper labels for
these guys. So a poor article.

As is your definitions.



So, it is okay if Activists ram down everyone's throats
what they can't get in the political arena? Okay
with you?

It isn't okay with me from the far right either.

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

Screw the law and the will of the people as expressed
by Congress and ram down the throats your own political
beliefs and you are an Activist. And a totalitarianist too.

You're really FOS.

What happens if what gets rammed down your throat when it
is not politics that you agree with?

Stupid question.

On 5/14/19 6:35 PM, wrote:
Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

In article , wrote:

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

On 5/14/19 6:35 PM, wrote:
So, it is okay if Activists ram down everyone's throats
what they can't get in the political arena? Okay
with you?

It isn't okay with me from the far right either.

There is hope for the Republic!

All political sides should agree with the two of us.
Those that do not are asking for a lot of future
tyranny to achieve a short term political gain

On Tue, 14 May 2019 18:54:47 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/14/19 6:35 PM, wrote:
Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.


1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

LOL. That doesn't mean he isn't a constructionist.

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

The swamp is what he's brought to Washington and he doesn't follow the
law. He's the most crooked POTUS in history and anyone who would want
him to have a second term is blind to truth.

That would be you. Oh, I was a Republican until 2016.

On Tue, 14 May 2019 22:00:41 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , wrote:

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

T is a brick wall....like Arlen Holder.

On 5/14/19 7:13 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 18:54:47 -0700, T wrote:

On 5/14/19 6:35 PM, wrote:
Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.


1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

LOL. That doesn't mean he isn't a constructionist.

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

The swamp is what he's brought to Washington and he doesn't follow the
law. He's the most crooked POTUS in history and anyone who would want
him to have a second term is blind to truth.

Absolutely true.

That would be you. Oh, I was a Republican until 2016.

I am non-partisan... an independent.



--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 5/14/2019 8:13 PM, T wrote:
On 5/14/19 6:35 PM, wrote:
So, it is okay if Activists ram down everyone's throats
what they can't get in the political arena?Â*Â* Okay
with you?

It isn't okay with me from the far right either.

There is hope for the Republic!

All political sides should agree with the two of us.
Those that do not are asking for a lot of future
tyranny to achieve a short term political gain

Well, as Bill Clinton once said, "The americans will get used to communism."

In article
nospam wrote:

In article , wrote:

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com

On 5/14/19 7:18 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2019 22:00:41 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , wrote:

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

T is a brick wall....like Arlen Holder.


Thank you!

On 5/14/19 8:25 PM, Anonymous wrote:
In article
nospam wrote:

In article , wrote:

Follow the law and the will of the people and you are
a constructionist.

Then Trump isn't a constructionist.

1) Trump is not a judge. His label is political not judicial

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com


First he needs to actually break some laws. ****ing you
off politically is what we sent him there to do.

Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign
against him.

T wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law.

Of course he does. He tells the truth, too.

Some of the time, anyway.

--
"Oh, look: a claim from chrisv that there's only 500 supercomputers
in the world." - lying asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

Posting from Germany? I doubt your last statement. But I do agree with you
about Mr. Holder.

In article , wrote:

2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible

no he doesn't.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l
ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump
Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks
like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for
obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel
Robert Mueller's report.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t
rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president
About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction
if he wasn't president.

#Trump4Prison

http://NeedToImpeach.com

First he needs to actually break some laws.

he has, and ****loads of them.

here's mo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump
An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the
previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and
his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal
courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S.
presidential candidate.

https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet
He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law.

****ing you
off politically is what we sent him there to do.

you chose the wrong person.

Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign
against him.

plenty of people are doing exactly that.

wrote:
Posting from Germany? I doubt your last statement. But I do agree with you
about Mr. Holder.

Since when does the USENET server a person uses,
reflect what country the USENET client is sitting in ?

You would need to crack the X-trace
to get an IP address for the client side.

X-Trace: individual.net lRiJ8tA7bQLwldCvBJSrZQ9DjPKl0F5G6JC/Xc4sASD/iBDDO9

The only server still leaking IP these days, is Google Groups.
If you see a message from groups.google.com, then chances
are the IP address there, indicates what country the sender is in.
Just about everyone else is protected by an encrypted
trace string. While some of those have been cracked in
the past by various means (auxiliary correlation), the above
string should be reasonably impervious to third-party examination.
Such strings are output, so if an administrator needs to close
an account due to abuse, there is tracking info. The info is
not intended for the wider community to act on directly.

At least two of the free USENET servers are located in COLO
buildings in Germany. This does not mean the several thousand
users on those machines, also live in Germany. Many of those
people are North Americans who no longer have a server
available to them in North America. The servers were all
shut down in North America thanks to
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. The refugees
from that, had to go elsewhere, like Europe.

https://www.tomsguide.com/us/AT-T-Us...news-4055.html

Paul