If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law. ****es the swamp off something terrible no he doesn't. https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel Robert Mueller's report. http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction if he wasn't president. #Trump4Prison http://NeedToImpeach.com First he needs to actually break some laws. he has, and ****loads of them. here's mo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate. https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law. ****ing you off politically is what we sent him there to do. you chose the wrong person. Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign against him. plenty of people are doing exactly that. USA Today is fake news. Along with the rest of them. |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 8:46 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote: In article , wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law.Â* ****es the swamp off something terrible no he doesn't. https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump Â*Â*Â* Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks Â*Â*Â* like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for Â*Â*Â* obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel Â*Â*Â* Robert Mueller's report. http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president Â*Â*Â* About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction Â*Â*Â* if he wasn't president. #Trump4Prison http://NeedToImpeach.com First he needs to actually break some laws. he has, and ****loads of them. here's mo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump Â*Â* An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the Â*Â* previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and Â*Â* his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal Â*Â* courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S. Â*Â* presidential candidate. https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet Â*Â* He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law. ****ing you off politically is what we sent him there to do. you chose the wrong person. Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign against him. plenty of people are doing exactly that. USA Today is fake news. Along with the rest of them. Why do you troll so obviously? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 8:46 AM, AnonLinuxUser wrote:
On 5/15/2019 8:39 AM, nospam wrote: In article , wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law.Â* ****es the swamp off something terrible no he doesn't. https://thehill.com/policy/national-...omey-it-sure-l ooks-like-evidence-is-there-to-prosecute-trump Â*Â*Â* Former FBI Director James Comey said Thursday that "it sure looks Â*Â*Â* like" there is enough evidence to prosecute President Trump for Â*Â*Â* obstruction of justice based on details laid out in special counsel Â*Â*Â* Robert Mueller's report. http://www.abajournal.com/news/artic...secutors-say-t rump-would-be-charged-with-obstruction-if-he-werent-president Â*Â*Â* About 800 ex-prosecutors say Trump would be charged with obstruction Â*Â*Â* if he wasn't president. #Trump4Prison http://NeedToImpeach.com First he needs to actually break some laws. he has, and ****loads of them. here's mo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump Â*Â* An analysis by USA Today published in June 2016 found that over the Â*Â* previous three decades, United States president Donald Trump and Â*Â* his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal Â*Â* courts and state court, an unprecedented number for a U.S. Â*Â* presidential candidate. https://www.quora.com/Has-Trump-broken-any-laws-yet Â*Â* He has been sued 4,500 times for breaking the law. ****ing you off politically is what we sent him there to do. you chose the wrong person. Instead of being such a sore loser, go out and campaign against him. plenty of people are doing exactly that. USA Today is fake news. Along with the rest of them. American Pravda has gotten pretty bad. There was a saying in the Soviet Unions that does apply to American Pravda: "There is no Izvestia in Pravda and no Pravda in Izvestia" Izvestia is the "News" and Pravda is the "Truth" |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote:
InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign againstÂ*him. plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that. USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news. AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them. WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously? Definition of a troll: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement or a specific gain. Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote:
On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote: InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign againstÂ*him. plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that. USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news. AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them. WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously? Definition of a troll: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain. Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you. I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
T wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law. Of course he does. He tells the truth, too. Some of the time, anyway. Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking. You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He was right. You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 5:16 PM, Snit wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote: On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote: InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign againstÂ*him. plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that. USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news. AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them. WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously? Definition of a troll: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain. Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you. I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition. My apologies if I misread you. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article
T wrote: On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote: T wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law. Of course he does. He tells the truth, too. Some of the time, anyway. Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking. You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He was right. You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
I T wrote:
On 5/15/19 5:16 PM, Snit wrote: On 5/15/19 5:13 PM, T wrote: On 5/15/19 10:51 AM, Snit wrote: InsteadÂ*ofÂ*beingÂ*suchÂ*aÂ*soreÂ*loser,Â*goÂ*out Â*andÂ*campaign againstÂ*him. plentyÂ*ofÂ*peopleÂ*areÂ*doingÂ*exactlyÂ*that. USAÂ*TodayÂ*isÂ*fakeÂ*news. AlongÂ*withÂ*theÂ*restÂ*ofÂ*them. WhyÂ*doÂ*youÂ*trollÂ*soÂ*obviously? Definition of a troll: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts quarrels Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or upsets people on the Internet to distract and sow discord Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* by posting inflammatory and digressive,[1] extraneous, or Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* tangential discussion,[3] whether for the troll's amusement Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* or a specific gain. Don't call someone a troll because he disagrees with you. I did not. I was noting how his comments fit that definition. My apologies if I misread you. No problem. Text is an easy medium to misunderstand. And that goes both ways. Sorry if I cane across cold. Getting too used to the cesspool here. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
T wrote:
You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. Lie, after lie, after lie. Typical, for a right-winger. -- "Compassionate liar chrisv believes everything the media tells him." - "Slimer", packing two *lies* into one short sentence. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple,deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
In article
chrisv wrote: T wrote: You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. Lie, after lie, after lie. Typical, for a right-winger. -- "Compassionate liar chrisv believes everything the media tells him." - "Slimer", packing two *lies* into one short sentence. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blow to tech giant in App Store challenge
On Wed, 15 May 2019 17:19:06 -0700, T wrote:
On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote: T wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law. Of course he does. He tells the truth, too. Some of the time, anyway. Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking. Trump isn't smart enough to joke. You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. Hardly. Some things are apparent and Trump's racism is overt. And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He was right. You mistake spying with legal, non-hostile surveillance. You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung. You have mental problems. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 11:16 PM, Snit wrote:
My apologies if I misread you. No problem. Text is an easy medium to misunderstand. And that goes both ways. Sorry if I cane across cold. Getting too used to the cesspool here. I worked a place once where I could not use the eMail because no matter how polite I was, I got marched in front of my management and lectured about being "flippant". I got so bad that I had to wait till after hours when they had gone home and leave an answering machine message to the effect that it "shipped". Mind you I could not even say what or my name. Then they had a great laugh about truing to figure out who it was and all was forgiven. (Bunch of ass holes.) That why emotocons are useful, even though they on 12 year old level. :-) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Kavanaugh sides with liberal justices against Apple, deals blowto tech giant in App Store challenge
On 5/15/19 6:59 PM, Anonymous wrote:
In article T wrote: On 5/15/19 4:51 AM, chrisv wrote: T wrote: 2) Trump does follow the law. Of course he does. He tells the truth, too. Some of the time, anyway. Problem here is that the left in the zeal to enforce Gleichschaltung has lost their sense of humor. You can't tell when other people are being sarcastic or are joking. You have also redefined a lie as anything that disagrees with you. And to make things worse, you have redefined terms like Racist to mean anyone who disagrees with you. And a lot of the time he is right. Remember American Pravda making fun of him about his campaign being spied on? He was right. You have also redefined what a crime is. Not something that breaks the law, but something that breaks Gleichschaltung. Anonymous, if you wrote me something, I can't find it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|