If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade question
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:28:17 -0600, "R. C. White"
wrote: ?Hi, Gordon. This is where I'm a bit confused. If I can install Windows 7 into the Windows XP partition without disrupting anything else, it is a go situation, but if installing Windows 7 will somehow mess up the other partitions and destroy all my client software files, it is not worth the trouble. Gordon It's not enough to have all an application's files intact and available to the new OS. You must also run the app's Install or Setup program in Win7 so that it can make the proper entries into the NEW operating system's Registry. Until you INSTALL Word. for example, into Win7, that word.exe file is "just another file", like a .doc or .txt file, and Win7 has no idea how to load it and run it. Double-clicking on word.exe will just get you an error message that the app must be installed (or something like that - I haven't tried this specific situation). It's just like trying to run any other app without installing it: some will work, but most require installation. The Windows Easy Transfer (WET) program can smooth the transition considerably. Run it first in WinXP, pointing its output to some storage device that will be accessible to Win7 later. This can be a USB flash drive, an external HDD, or another partition on your main HDD; just be sure that it's some location that will not be reformatted or otherwise erased during the transition. Then, after Win7 is installed and running, run WET again in Win7 to retrieve your data. WET will not actually re-install your applications, but can help you "re-tweak" them. Except for updating the few small startup files (bootmgr instead of NTLDR, for example) in the System Partition, Win7's Setup.exe will not write anything to any partition except the Boot Volume (typically C - which is where it will write the C:\Windows folder tree with all its gigabytes of subfolders and files. It will not disturb your data files on any other partition. (Reformatting the boot volume is highly recommended, but not strictly required. If you choose not to reformat, then your data files and other content outside C:\Windows will remain intact. If it were my system, though, I would backup my files and reformat that partition. Or even delete the partition and re-create it.) RC I'm considering buying a new hard drive to replace the primary drive, then install Windows 7 onto this new drive...then re-install all my client software. If for some reason this fails I could just remove the new hard drive and replace the original one, then use the new hard drive, after clearing everything off of it, as a back-up storage means. Gordon |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade question
"Antares 531" wrote in message
... I have an older computer that is set up with Windows XP Pro SP3 and would like to upgrade it to Windows 7. I've been told that the only way to do this is to do a reformat/clean install. Is this correct? This computer is a home built with a Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L motherboard and an Intel Core 2 Duo CPU 2.66 GHz. Is there any reason Windows 7 would not run on this computer? It has two Western Digital WD5000 AAKS hard drives with about half the space available on each drive. Gordon FWIW... There are some third party programs you can run to effectively upgrade directly from XP to Windows 7. Z-Install is one that comes to mind and it seems to do a pretty good job. Just don't believe all of their claims. I don't know if I would completely trust a program like this though. I can see too many fail points. Just my 2 cents worth. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade question
bettablue wrote:
Path: ...!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "bettablue" Subject: Upgrade question Message-ID: *** The References header shows the post was a reply *** References: *** The CULPRIT on why quoting is phucked up in the reply *** X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3502.922 Antares wrote ... I have an older computer that is set up with Windows XP Pro SP3 and would like to upgrade it to Windows 7. I've been told that the only way to do this is to do a reformat/clean install. Is this correct? snipped the rest of the IMPROPERLY (non-indented) original post FWIW... There are some third party programs you can run to effectively upgrade directly from XP to Windows 7. Z-Install is one that comes to mind and it seems to do a pretty good job. Just don't believe all of their claims. I don't know if I would completely trust a program like this though. I can see too many fail points. Ah, now I realize why I'm seeing so many posts where the respondent isn't quoting (indenting with "" characters) the cited post. I've read over in the WLM group on how the latest release of that email/nntp client no longer indents the quoted content ... not in email and not in news posts, just the vertical bar (from using DIV) in email if composing in HTML format (which is not recommended in Usenet). While the excuse is that Microsoft no longer gives a **** about news[group] support with their abandoning of their own groups (only on their own NNTP server), that doesn't excuse the lack of this feature since it is also needed for non-HTML email replies. Sure seem folks using WLM should be going back to the prior version to get back the quoting indent function or move to a better newsreader (the latter giving them more robust clients even for ones that have been abandoned by their authors almost a decade ago). Not quoting the cited posts violates Usenet netiquette. It sure makes a mess of trying to figure out who said what when multiple WLM users (of the latest version) are involved in the same thread. Looks like I'll have figure out a filter that looks for the WLM version being used for a post/reply, maybe something like (in 40tude Dialog): !setcolor(fg;bg) Header {^X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15} I already colorize lots of different types of posts so I'll have to come up with a scheme that's unique to this test (so I can later look at the properties of a colorized post to then look through my long list of filters to see which one got used). A beta version of v15 had the quoting function. It got lost in the released version. Maybe in v16 it'll come back. If not, I'll have to add more versions to the filter (since I can't do a greater-than operator in regex), like replace "15" with "(1[5-9]|[2-9])" in the above filter. Yeah, there are the long-time arguments that Microsoft's newsreaders suck but they are doable for many users so it sucks worse that Microsoft phucked up the quoting function (by omitting it) in replies. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade question
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:09:23 -0600, VanguardLH wrote:
I already colorize lots of different types of posts so I'll have to come up with a scheme that's unique to this test (so I can later look at the properties of a colorized post to then look through my long list of filters to see which one got used). I suggest stripes :-) Yeah, the WLM quoting (none) drives me a bit more crazy that I might already be. -- Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch) |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Upgrade question
This would be the best practice, IMHO, for upgrading an OS even if an
upgrade install were available to you. The main advantage of this practice is to allow you to identify and solve problems from drivers to application configurations at install time (of course, one should do compatibility study first, but you will never know until try), and if there were problems couldn't be resolved at the time, you could simply put back the old hard drive and continue to work without interruptions. An upgrade install is theoretically faster but if there were problems, one has to do lots of guesswork and usually ended up doing a clean install. There is no way for anyone including MS to test all possible system states, configurations, and scenarios other than limited sets of scenarios, so doing an upgrade install is pretty much a gamble on your luck. For major tasks such as an OS upgrade, it is advised to do things right the first time rather than relying on one's luck. Hope this helps and good luck. "Antares 531" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:28:17 -0600, "R. C. White" wrote: ?Hi, Gordon. This is where I'm a bit confused. If I can install Windows 7 into the Windows XP partition without disrupting anything else, it is a go situation, but if installing Windows 7 will somehow mess up the other partitions and destroy all my client software files, it is not worth the trouble. Gordon It's not enough to have all an application's files intact and available to the new OS. You must also run the app's Install or Setup program in Win7 so that it can make the proper entries into the NEW operating system's Registry. Until you INSTALL Word. for example, into Win7, that word.exe file is "just another file", like a .doc or .txt file, and Win7 has no idea how to load it and run it. Double-clicking on word.exe will just get you an error message that the app must be installed (or something like that - I haven't tried this specific situation). It's just like trying to run any other app without installing it: some will work, but most require installation. The Windows Easy Transfer (WET) program can smooth the transition considerably. Run it first in WinXP, pointing its output to some storage device that will be accessible to Win7 later. This can be a USB flash drive, an external HDD, or another partition on your main HDD; just be sure that it's some location that will not be reformatted or otherwise erased during the transition. Then, after Win7 is installed and running, run WET again in Win7 to retrieve your data. WET will not actually re-install your applications, but can help you "re-tweak" them. Except for updating the few small startup files (bootmgr instead of NTLDR, for example) in the System Partition, Win7's Setup.exe will not write anything to any partition except the Boot Volume (typically C - which is where it will write the C:\Windows folder tree with all its gigabytes of subfolders and files. It will not disturb your data files on any other partition. (Reformatting the boot volume is highly recommended, but not strictly required. If you choose not to reformat, then your data files and other content outside C:\Windows will remain intact. If it were my system, though, I would backup my files and reformat that partition. Or even delete the partition and re-create it.) RC I'm considering buying a new hard drive to replace the primary drive, then install Windows 7 onto this new drive...then re-install all my client software. If for some reason this fails I could just remove the new hard drive and replace the original one, then use the new hard drive, after clearing everything off of it, as a back-up storage means. Gordon |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|