Why Linux Will Bury Windows.

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:45:26 +0000, linuxsux wrote:

You don't seem to be too intelligent. Are you mentally retarded?

He said, while staring into the mirror, in one of his more lucid moments.

--
RonB
Registered Linux User #498581
CentOS 5.5 or VectorLinux Deluxe 6.0

"chrisv" wrote in message
...
df wrote:

Linux users in 2010:

*plonk*

*plonk* - is that the sound you made when your filthy anal whore mother ****
you out into the toilet?

if that dirty bitch bothered flushing the world would be spared of a
worthless turd like you.

On 2010-10-26 13:10:03 -0600, Alias said:

On 10/26/2010 08:18 PM, df wrote:
In ,
wrote:

LinuxMan Unger wrote:
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are a thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes Windows. It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the desktop as
more people discover Linux.
Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance. You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Unger

The majority are just too ****ing stupid to appreciate Linux. Look how
they vote.

They're so stupid to choose the operating system that just works out of
the box over the one that requires hours of configuration. Those morons.

Out of the box? Even if preinstalled, no sir. Lotsa crapware to
uninstall, updates to get, programs to install, reboot, reboot, reboot.
Back it all up cause they give you no Win 7 disc., etc., etc. If you
compare installing Windows to Linux, Linux is MUCH quicker, user
friendly and far easier hands down.

Notice you don't cite any of the alleged crapware that must be
uninstalled, and you lie about requiring at least three reboots.
Second, OEMs give you a restoration disc, so that's another lie. Linux
can't even copy a file without the poor IO scheduler slowing down your
system. It's the least user-friendly operating system you could put on
your machine, unless you think vi is an example of an awesome interface.

df wrote:
Alias said:
df wrote:
They're so stupid to choose the operating system that just works out of
the box over the one that requires hours of configuration. Those morons.

Out of the box? Even if preinstalled, no sir. Lotsa crapware to
uninstall, updates to get, programs to install, reboot, reboot, reboot.
Back it all up cause they give you no Win 7 disc., etc., etc. If you
compare installing Windows to Linux, Linux is MUCH quicker, user
friendly and far easier hands down.

Notice you don't cite any of the alleged crapware that must be
uninstalled,

Norton trial stuff comes to mind. Nero extras also are on my immediate
uninstall list.

and you lie about requiring at least three reboots.
Second, OEMs give you a restoration disc, so that's another lie.

A restore partition is becoming more common. The last laptop and netbook
machines come with Windows and did not include a restore disk.

Linux can't even copy a file without the poor IO scheduler slowing down
your system.

Bull****. In this workstation, I have scheduled hourly backups of the entire
system, and I only notice the backups are being made because of the HDD
noise.

It's the least user-friendly operating system you could put
on your machine, unless you think vi is an example of an awesome
interface.

What an nonsense statement!

Regards.

On 10/26/2010 11:20 PM, df wrote:
On 2010-10-26 13:10:03 -0600, Alias said:

On 10/26/2010 08:18 PM, df wrote:
In ,
wrote:

LinuxMan Unger wrote:
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are
a thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given
hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes
Windows. It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the
desktop as
more people discover Linux.
Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't
because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office
with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as
they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance. You might be surprised at how good it has become in the
last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you
like
technical things.

Unger

The majority are just too ****ing stupid to appreciate Linux. Look how
they vote.

They're so stupid to choose the operating system that just works out of
the box over the one that requires hours of configuration. Those morons.

Out of the box? Even if preinstalled, no sir. Lotsa crapware to
uninstall, updates to get, programs to install, reboot, reboot,
reboot. Back it all up cause they give you no Win 7 disc., etc., etc.
If you compare installing Windows to Linux, Linux is MUCH quicker,
user friendly and far easier hands down.

Notice you don't cite any of the alleged crapware that must be
uninstalled,

Where have you been, under a rock?

and you lie about requiring at least three reboots.

At least, if not more.

Second,
OEMs give you a restoration disc, so that's another lie.

It's been that long since you've bought a computer?

Linux can't
even copy a file without the poor IO scheduler slowing down your system.

It's faster than XP, Vista or Win 7.

It's the least user-friendly operating system you could put on your
machine, unless you think vi is an example of an awesome interface.


You obviously have never installed a recent distro of Ubuntu or Mint.
--
Alias

"Alias" wrote in message
...
On 10/26/2010 05:56 PM, Peter Foldes wrote:
Alias

I have to agree with your and your description of WLM 2011. MS really
screwed up with this version of WLM. The issues with it is a continues
and non stopping errors of comedical proportions

I took a look at it and even put in an email account for testing of templates. MS
really got it wrong with that POS.

--
Alias

Yes they did

--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

Blah, blah, blah! We've been hearing the same crap to almost 20 years. Maybe
in another 20 years you will have an argument; MAYBE... The only real threat
to Microsoft is MAC and I can only assume if Google puts out a real OS for
the desktop, they may make some type of run. Who knows...

Microsoft did it right early on with it's advertising, ease of acquiring
their operating Systems, ease of install, and how they rooted themselves
into so many different manufactures... (Dell, HP, gateway, micron, etc..) I
was a big fan of OS/2, and when Windows95 came out, it completely killed
most OS's that were out there at the time...

I just adapted to Microsoft, and enjoy the ease of use, rather than spend
hours or days just to get the sound to work or get the right video drivers
in Linux... It's just not worth my time. I paid 100 dollars for windows 7
pro (32/64bit). For 100 bucks, I loaded my system and everything just worked
pretty much out of the box within 2 hours. I think I downloaded drivers for
my sound card, video card and printer, that's it!
I do download the latest version of Linux from time to time, whether it be
RedHat, UBOOBOO, mint, etc.... and try it out. I'll admit after 20 years
it's gotten a little better, but come on, 20 years and we're still having to
use cryptic command lines, still having trouble with sound or video or
network drivers or performance issues?


"LinuxMan Unger" wrote in message
...
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are a
thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes Windows. It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the desktop as
more people discover Linux.
Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't
because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance. You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Unger

"LinuxMan Unger" wrote in message
...
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are a
thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

Will all our software run on Linux or would we have to BUY all new software?


It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes Windows. It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the desktop as
more people discover Linux.

Discover it how? Changing over would void people's warranties on their PCs.

Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't
because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance.

On whose PC?

You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Just curious, are you paid to shill here?


Unger

On 10/27/2010 07:44 AM, Valorie *~ wrote:

"LinuxMan Unger" wrote in message
...
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are a
thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

Will all our software run on Linux or would we have to BUY all new
software?

Software for Linux is free. To which software do you refer, Windows Live
Mail 2011?



It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes Windows.
It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the desktop as
more people discover Linux.

Discover it how? Changing over would void people's warranties on their PCs.

Not if you take the hard drive out that has Windows on it, put in a new
one and install Linux. Or you can make an image of your hard drive and
restore it if you ever need warranty work.


Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't
because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance.

On whose PC?

Your, who else's?


You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Just curious, are you paid to shill here?


Unger


He's like the rest of us, spreading the word about a good thing.

--
Alias

On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:27 -0700, Frank wrote:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11)
Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Hypocrite.
--
Oh, bugger!

On 10/27/2010 12:48 AM, Parko wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:06:27 -0700, Frank wrote:

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11)
Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Hypocrite.

Yes. porko, you are a ****ing bigot and a hypocrite.
Nice combo, asshole!

On 10/27/2010 12:44 AM, Alias wrote:
On 10/27/2010 07:44 AM, Valorie *~ wrote:

"LinuxMan Unger" wrote in message
...
1. Linux is free as in freedom. Windows costs money.
2. Linux encourages community development. Windows assumes you are a
thief.
3. Linux supports more hardware than Windows.
4. Linux runs on more hardware platforms than Windows.
5. Linux runs better, faster and smoother than Windows on given
hardware.
6. I have the source code to Linux applications.
7. I can compile my own kernel.
8. Linux takes less time to install.
9. Linux is easier to update.
10 Linux has much better security.

Will all our software run on Linux or would we have to BUY all new
software?

Software for Linux is free. To which software do you refer, Windows Live
Mail 2011?



It's only a matter of time before Linux ultimately overtakes Windows.
It's
happening with servers now and soon that will migrate to the desktop as
more people discover Linux.

Discover it how? Changing over would void people's warranties on their
PCs.

Not if you take the hard drive out that has Windows on it, put in a new
one and install Linux. Or you can make an image of your hard drive and
restore it if you ever need warranty work.


Microsoft is trying like crazy to make Linux go away but they can't
because
Linux is not a single company. They have been attacking Open Office with
their FUD and all that has happened is that it backfired on them as they
got exposed rather quickly.

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance.

On whose PC?

Your, who else's?


You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Just curious, are you paid to shill here?


Unger


He's like the rest of us, spreading the word about a good thing.

hehehe...so you've been identified (again!) as a lying linturd spamming
troll!
Oops!

In article
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

LinuxMan Unger pulled this Usenet face plant:

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance. You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Leave your trolling in the Linux groups where they feel right at home,
moron and stop cross posting.

*PLONK*

pulled this Usenet face plant:

In article
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

LinuxMan Unger pulled this Usenet face plant:

For those who have never tried Linux I would suggest giving it a fair
chance. You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Leave your trolling in the Linux groups where they feel right at home,
moron and stop cross posting.

*PLONK*

Jeez, call one guy a "reverse troll", and another guy calls ya "troll"
yourself. Weird. Maybe someone@online is trolling me?

--
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Sam and Janet.
Sam and Janet who?
Sam and Janet Evening...

On 10/26/2010 11:44 PM, Valorie *~ wrote:

Snip


You might be surprised at how good it has become in the last few
years. Ubuntu would be a good choice as is Debian or Gentoo if you like
technical things.

Just curious, are you paid to shill here?

A bit late, but couldn't resist.. A Linux paid shill? You are kidding,
right? ROFLMAO It's more like MS paid shills and astroturfers all over
the place, particularly where Linux is concerned. (Running scared) Just
take a look in the COLA group to get a good idea of the extent of MS
paid shills, astroturfers and FUD spreaders. ..But not nearly limited to
there, MS shills are EVERYWHERE, and now including Youtube.
Look deep into the lawsuits MS has had to fight, (And LOST), and you
will find plenty of eye-opening documents detailing their dirty
practices. It's no secret to anyone savvy or anyone willing to take the
time for research, but MS Zealots, Shills, Astroturfers, and MS
professional FUD spreaders will vehemently deny actual court documents
printed in plain black and white. Those documents include internal MS
documents outlining their dirty agendas and practices, by the way. I
have read them myself.

G'day