Is 1903 now OK?

On 7/31/19 11:45 AM, Zaghadka wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 11:19:04 -0500, in alt.comp.os.windows-10, Char
Jackson wrote:

If you're running an earlier version of Windows, pre-10, you're probably
in better shape altogether.

Not if you're running 8.1. I recently acquired a machine that was running
8, and it was like going back to the paleolithic era.

The first thing I thought of when I saw Win 8 running was "I really
DON'T want an iPhone". This junk (all the tiles) doesn't belong on a
real computer. Some things required clicking with the mouse pointer OFF
THE SCREEN, making the thing unusable in some cases.

Win 7, however, might be considered an upgrade.

When 7 came out, I remember it being described as an improved version of
Vista. Once I considered Win 2000 to be the best version, before it
became incompatible with so much. Now 7 is the best version.

I wish they had forked
off of that version. Just about everything about 8 should have been
chucked in the bin, excepting the greatly improved Task Manager.

Yes, although they'd still have to add crap.

--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us/

"God is a divider, not a uniter."