If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
View live or recorded TV.
Location 1 Win 7 Pro with Media Center and Dual TV Tuner to roof antenna. High speed internet up and down. Location 2 Win 7 Pro PC medium speed download internet. what are ways to get 1) Media Center recordings from Location 1 to Location 2 2) Live TV from Location 1 to Location 2 Please consider all possible methods including buying additional software and hardware. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On 8/7/2017 10:04 AM, Oft wrote:
View live or recorded TV. Location 1 Win 7 Pro with Media Center and Dual TV Tuner to roof antenna. High speed internet up and down. Location 2 Win 7 Pro PC medium speed download internet. what are ways to get 1) Media Center recordings from Location 1 to Location 2 2) Live TV from Location 1 to Location 2 Please consider all possible methods including buying additional software and hardware. I use VLC to watch all my .wtv time-shifted files. Shouldn't be any problem with watching a remote file. VLC has the ability to speed up the playback. I watch at 1.7X and skip the commercials. You can watch while it's recording. Not exactly real-time, but can be a short delay. VLC has the ability to stream, but I've never been successful making that work. Media center should be able to play a file while recording. I don't use it because I can't speed it up. Part of your problem is finding your remote PC. You probably don't have a fixed external IP address. You can fix that with FREE DNS and mooo.com. Start with mooo.com for instructions. Not sure your concept of high speed and medium speed internet. ..wtv files are HUGE. IRRC, it takes almost 20Mbps to play one competently without hesitation. Laptops and tablets I've tried tend to bottleneck at the network. Playing .wtv takes most of the CPU. Add network access and encryption and antivirus and firewall to the mix and there just isn't enough CPU to make it all work. ..wtv is very efficient. With a dual-core 2.8GHz PC, I can record 4 channels and play a file simultaneously, but it maxes out the CPU. If you're trying to compress two TV channels to a highly compressed format then decode it back out to the network, It'll take a lot more horsepower. Some external tuners do the compression internally. That can ease the PC task considerably. Handbrake can be used to convert .wtv to something lighter. IIRC, it takes about as long to convert a file as it does to watch it. Somewhere around here I have a HomeRun tuner that records in a format that's much more space-efficient. But, to get that, I'd have to use their recording application. I really like the freedom from motion artifacts that I get with .wtv format. I stick with mediacenter for recording because the program recording scheduler and EPG are very easy to use. Never found anything close (and free) for setting up scheduled recordings. If I needed to watch it over the internet, I might have to reconsider. I picked the programs referenced above because they're all easy to setup and use. I've tried a lot of others that turned out to be a nightmare to setup and use. Linux looks like an alternative, but I've never made any Linux TV recording apps operate conveniently. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
Per Oft:
Please consider all possible methods including buying additional software and hardware. SageTV v9 (the latest open-source version) on the Location 1 PC. SageTV "PlaceShifter" on the Location 2 PC. The slick thing about PlaceShifter is that the Sage server dopes out the bandwidth and adjusts rez accordingly. I have had it work on some pretty pathetic connections. It also does a nice (IMHO) job of presenting lists of the material that can be viewed. -- Pete Cresswell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 13:38:29 -0700, mike wrote:
.wtv is very efficient. With a dual-core 2.8GHz PC, I can record 4 channels and play a file simultaneously, but it maxes out the CPU. If you're trying to compress two TV channels to a highly compressed format then decode it back out to the network, It'll take a lot more horsepower. Some external tuners do the compression internally. That can ease the PC task considerably. Somewhere around here I have a HomeRun tuner that records in a format that's much more space-efficient. But, to get that, I'd have to use their recording application. I really like the freedom from motion artifacts that I get with .wtv format. I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. -- Char Jackson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
Per Char Jackson:
I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. Somewhere, I came away thinking that HD HomeRuns could be viewed over a WAN. -- Pete Cresswell |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:17:33 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)"
wrote: Per Char Jackson: I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. Somewhere, I came away thinking that HD HomeRuns could be viewed over a WAN. In theory, I don't see why it wouldn't work, but I haven't tried it. -- Char Jackson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On 8/7/2017 3:12 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 13:38:29 -0700, mike wrote: .wtv is very efficient. With a dual-core 2.8GHz PC, I can record 4 channels and play a file simultaneously, but it maxes out the CPU. If you're trying to compress two TV channels to a highly compressed format then decode it back out to the network, It'll take a lot more horsepower. Some external tuners do the compression internally. That can ease the PC task considerably. Somewhere around here I have a HomeRun tuner that records in a format that's much more space-efficient. But, to get that, I'd have to use their recording application. I really like the freedom from motion artifacts that I get with .wtv format. I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. Does media center have any way to record in anything but .wtv format? It's not the tuner, but the recording format that is at issue. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On 8/7/2017 9:48 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 19:17:33 -0400, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote: Per Char Jackson: I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. Somewhere, I came away thinking that HD HomeRuns could be viewed over a WAN. In theory, I don't see why it wouldn't work, but I haven't tried it. I have watch shows recorded at home by HDHomeRun from my machine in Tennessee on my laptop while staying at a Bed and Breakfast in Florida. I was using TeamViewer to access a PC at home and it basically ran the TV show with me piggy-backing on it with the Team Viewer program. I'm sure if I set up something using DDNS either on my file server or on a PC at "home" and connect that way eliminating the use of TeamViewer. Either directly to the file server holding the files or through a PC that can access the file server. I just have not taken the time to try. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 20:24:07 -0700, mike wrote:
On 8/7/2017 3:12 PM, Char Jackson wrote: On Mon, 07 Aug 2017 13:38:29 -0700, mike wrote: .wtv is very efficient. With a dual-core 2.8GHz PC, I can record 4 channels and play a file simultaneously, but it maxes out the CPU. If you're trying to compress two TV channels to a highly compressed format then decode it back out to the network, It'll take a lot more horsepower. Some external tuners do the compression internally. That can ease the PC task considerably. Somewhere around here I have a HomeRun tuner that records in a format that's much more space-efficient. But, to get that, I'd have to use their recording application. I really like the freedom from motion artifacts that I get with .wtv format. I have a pair of HDHomeRun tuners that worked very well with Windows Media Center. You should be able to get that to work. Does media center have any way to record in anything but .wtv format? It's not the tuner, but the recording format that is at issue. I don't know the answer to that question. Hopefully, someone else does. As I recall, it was WMC's .wtv recording format that sent me looking for an alternative. I ended up with SageTV, which was excellent. Recordings were in .mpg (as in, mpeg2) format, so a 1 hour HD program would run about 7.5GB. You can eat up some serious disk space that way. -- Char Jackson |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
Per mike:
Does media center have any way to record in anything but .wtv format? It's not the tuner, but the recording format that is at issue. I use SageTV and HDHomeRun OTA tuners. AFIK, Sage does not do any transcoding. Instead, the HDHomeRuns feed it their own .MPG streams that get written directly do disk. As cheap as disk space is getting, I don't worry about file size at all. -- Pete Cresswell |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
On 8/8/2017 7:14 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per mike: Does media center have any way to record in anything but .wtv format? It's not the tuner, but the recording format that is at issue. I use SageTV and HDHomeRun OTA tuners. AFIK, Sage does not do any transcoding. Instead, the HDHomeRuns feed it their own .MPG streams that get written directly do disk. As cheap as disk space is getting, I don't worry about file size at all. Go back to the subject line. File size does matter when you have a thin pipe. When you have a bigger file storing the same video duration, you need a higher data rate to view/move it. Makes a difference for remote viewing. The OP didn't make it clear, but remote viewing often takes place where internet throughput is less than optimum...like a vacation home or cabin in the woods. IIRC, it takes a lot more horsepower to software decode/play a .mpg file than a .wtv file. Depending on your playing device, some don't support .wtv... some may not have the horsepower to software decode high resolution files in other formats. I find the motion artifacts in the HDHomeRun files to be distracting, so mine's in the closet gathering dust. Lots of issues related to remote viewing. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
OT Remote TV Viewing
Oft wrote:
View live or recorded TV. Location 1 Win 7 Pro with Media Center and Dual TV Tuner to roof antenna. High speed internet up and down. Location 2 Win 7 Pro PC medium speed download internet. what are ways to get 1) Media Center recordings from Location 1 to Location 2 2) Live TV from Location 1 to Location 2 Please consider all possible methods including buying additional software and hardware. You can try transcoding some of your existing collection with this. I modified the command a bit, to convert the whole video (two hours worth). Since the command here "implies" stream copying, this should go as fast as the hard drives can go. I used two different partitions here when making up a path, so that two different hard drives could be used while copying. http://www.dirkbertels.net/video/wtv.php (unpack to C:\ffmpeg\bin first...) cd \ cd C:\ffmpeg\bin ffmpeg.exe -i C:\sample.wtv -vcodec copy -acodec copy -target ntsc-dvd D:\sample.mpg Then figure out a way to serve "sample.mpg" to some other media server stuff. Windows Media Player can stream, and I think VLC can stream, amongst others. FFMPEG can be obtained here. Use the release one rather than the nightly, as the nightly seemed to have some broken dependencies the last time I tested it. On other occasions, I've had no trouble with the Zeranoe stuff. https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/builds/ Other programs in the package are ffplay ffplay sample.wtv and ffprobe. ffprobe can dump packets from the video, which you don't need at the moment. Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|