If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 2019-11-17 18:32, David wrote:
Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. Are you really deluded enough to think that someone would risk a reputation which took _decades_ to build just to get you ejected from ASC? In particular, that they would do anything at all when it is clear that all that would be necessary would be to just let you be yourself, and you'd be gone soon enough? You're _that_ delusional? Really? |
Ads |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 18/11/2019 20:49, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-17 18:32, David wrote: Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. Are you really deluded enough to think that someone would risk a reputation which took _decades_ to build just to get you ejected from ASC? In particular, that they would do anything at all when it is clear that all that would be necessary would be to just let you be yourself, and you'd be gone soon enough? You're _that_ delusional? Really? I don't believe that I've had any interaction with Wolffan on the ASC forums. But I cannot be sure of that can I? He denies that the Wolffan persona on ASC is him. There's no way for me to know. Odd coincidence though. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote:
On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:10:49 +0000, David ! wrote:
On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? Your stalking has become somewhat less subtle over the years. You're losing your edge. -- Have you been approached by David Brooks (DB, ~DB~, and 50+ other nyms)? To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber stalking, it's highly recommended that you visit he https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php https://web.archive.org/web/20191103112509/https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
*BD BANNED* on the ASC forums
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:10:49 +0000, David ! wrote:
How many points have YOU accumulated He said he wasn't interested in accumulating points. But that was when you asked YESTERDAY. You probably forgot. --------------- BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to hide". I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request, rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!": http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php 60 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes! Google "David Brooks Devon" []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote:
On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- https://blog.vanillaforums.com/commu...brand-advocacy Long before the advent of modern inbound marketing, word-of-mouth was an important factor in determining what brands people would spend their money on. Now, as technology continues to develop, recommendations still remain the centrepiece in most buying decisions in both B2B and B2C, though it now takes place virtually, on the web.The rise of user-generated content and its role in shaping purchase decisions has made traditional marketing methods almost obsolete. Nowadays, people are less interested in being advertised to, and instead, prefer to receive unbiased recommendations. Moreover, people are willing to share their own experiences, whether it be positive or negative, to help guide the decisions of others. In other words, if someone loves a particular product, they’ll likely spread the good word with or without an incentive to do so. As a result, online social communities have become a driving force behind purchasing decisions in both the B2C and B2B sectors. Successful marketing strategies are no longer in the hands of the brands behind them – they’re now in the hands of users; and so, its important that you keep up with and support this trend! Your primary focus should therefore be on empowering your customers with the right tools (*ahhmmm* such as a branded community) to become brand advocates for your organization. Online communities to help encourage brand advocacy since they support ongoing dialogue (engagement), real-time feedback and even incorporate a bit of fun in the form of gamification or viral memes. There are many different ways to inspire brand advocacy, but in this article, we’ll take a closer look at the role of online communities in creating and empowering brand advocates. Laying the Foundations for a Successful Online Community The first step in building a brand advocacy campaign is knowing who is likely to become a brand ambassador — the right candidate to recommend your brand, products and services to others. To give the simplest explanation, it’s anyone who is satisfied enough with the value you offer to spread the word. Behind every brand advocacy program is, of course, a solid product or service. Just think about how popular Apple products are; it’s not so much because of the advertising, but because they have one of the biggest brand advocacy communities of any consumer product in the world. In other words, people don’t buy the latest iPhone because they’ve seen a billboard by the side of the road or even a banner on a website; they buy it because it’s an industry standard with an immense following. ================================================== ================ This morning, another senior member of the *Apple* support staff emphasised to me, once again, that the ASC forum is *NOT* an Apple site and is *NOT* run by Apple. With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 2019-11-18 18:59, David wrote:
On 18/11/2019 20:49, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: On 2019-11-17 18:32, David wrote: Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. Are you really deluded enough to think that someone would risk a reputation which took _decades_ to build just to get you ejected from ASC? In particular, that they would do anything at all when it is clear that all that would be necessary would be to just let you be yourself, and you'd be gone soon enough? You're _that_ delusional? Really? I don't believe that I've had any interaction with Wolffan on the ASC forums. Irrelevant. You seem to be under the impression that he is doing something you can get stopped. He's been there, according to posts here and elsewhere, well over 20 years, using the same accounts. If Apple cared they would have done something about it more than two decades ago. They are quite unlikely to do anything to someone who has been a considerably more valued than you contributor to their fora just because you are annoyed with him. But I cannot be sure of that can I? And this is the nub of your problem. You lack information you think, incorrectly, that you are entitled to. Your giant overinflated ego is again highly visible. He denies that the Wolffan persona on ASC is him. As he pointed out, there are many who use wolffan or something close. I know of at least four. He uses akwolffan in large part because he is on another site I go to where there is a flwolffan and a lawolffan. It's a bloody common nym. There's no way for me to know. Odd coincidence though. And it is simply none of your business. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 2019-11-20 09:58, David wrote:
On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote: On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- https://blog.vanillaforums.com/commu...brand-advocacy Long before the advent of modern inbound marketing, word-of-mouth was an important factor inÂ* determining what brands people would spend their money on. Now, as technology continues to develop, recommendations still remain the centrepiece in most buying decisions in both B2B and B2C, though it now takes place virtually, on the web.The rise of user-generated content and its role in shaping purchase decisions has made traditional marketing methods almost obsolete. Nowadays, people are less interested in being advertised to, and instead, prefer to receive unbiased recommendations. Moreover, people are willing to share their own experiences, whether it be positive or negative, to help guide the decisions of others. In other words, if someone loves a particular product, they’ll likely spread the good word with or without an incentive to do so. As a result, online social communities have become a driving force behind purchasing decisions in both the B2C and B2B sectors. Successful marketing strategies are no longer in the hands of the brands behind them – they’re now in the hands of users; and so, its important that you keep up with and support this trend! Your primary focus should therefore be on empowering your customers with the right tools (*ahhmmm* such as a branded community) to become brand advocates for your organization. Online communities to help encourage brand advocacy since they support ongoing dialogue (engagement), real-time feedback and even incorporate a bit of fun in the form of gamification or viral memes. There are many different ways to inspire brand advocacy, but in this article, we’ll take a closer look at the role of online communities in creating and empowering brand advocates. Laying the Foundations for a Successful Online Community The first step in building a brand advocacy campaign is knowing who is likely to become a brand ambassador — the right candidate to recommend your brand, products and services to others. To give the simplest explanation, it’s anyone who is satisfied enough with the value you offer to spread the word. Behind every brand advocacy program is, of course, a solid product or service. Just think about how popular Apple products are; it’s not so much because of the advertising, but because they have one of the biggest brand advocacy communities of any consumer product in the world. In other words, people don’t buy the latest iPhone because they’ve seen a billboard by the side of the road or even a banner on a website; they buy it because it’s an industry standard with an immense following. ================================================== ================ This morning, another senior member of the *Apple* support staff emphasised to me, once again, that the ASC forum is *NOT* an Apple site and is *NOT* run by Apple. With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" I don't believe you. I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) Unlike him, you'll just get banned again, only faster this time. You will be nymshifting to avoid a ban. Once detected, and you will be detected, there will be moderators looking for you especially once I forward this post to them, you will be instantly banned. And every new nym you come up with will be banned as soon as it is detected. Virtually the only way for you to avoid detection would be if you behaved yourself, and did not attempt to troll about EtreCheck, ClamXAV, or any of your stalking targets. As soon as you started your normal trolling, you would out yourself and would be checked out and banned. Wolffan is not posting criminal libel. You are. Wolffan has been posting for over 20 years without being banned. You can't stay on a site without being banned. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 20/11/2019 18:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote:
On 2019-11-20 09:58, David wrote: On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote: On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- https://blog.vanillaforums.com/commu...brand-advocacy Long before the advent of modern inbound marketing, word-of-mouth was an important factor inÂ* determining what brands people would spend their money on. Now, as technology continues to develop, recommendations still remain the centrepiece in most buying decisions in both B2B and B2C, though it now takes place virtually, on the web.The rise of user-generated content and its role in shaping purchase decisions has made traditional marketing methods almost obsolete. Nowadays, people are less interested in being advertised to, and instead, prefer to receive unbiased recommendations. Moreover, people are willing to share their own experiences, whether it be positive or negative, to help guide the decisions of others. In other words, if someone loves a particular product, they’ll likely spread the good word with or without an incentive to do so. As a result, online social communities have become a driving force behind purchasing decisions in both the B2C and B2B sectors. Successful marketing strategies are no longer in the hands of the brands behind them – they’re now in the hands of users; and so, its important that you keep up with and support this trend! Your primary focus should therefore be on empowering your customers with the right tools (*ahhmmm* such as a branded community) to become brand advocates for your organization. Online communities to help encourage brand advocacy since they support ongoing dialogue (engagement), real-time feedback and even incorporate a bit of fun in the form of gamification or viral memes. There are many different ways to inspire brand advocacy, but in this article, we’ll take a closer look at the role of online communities in creating and empowering brand advocates. Laying the Foundations for a Successful Online Community The first step in building a brand advocacy campaign is knowing who is likely to become a brand ambassador — the right candidate to recommend your brand, products and services to others. To give the simplest explanation, it’s anyone who is satisfied enough with the value you offer to spread the word. Behind every brand advocacy program is, of course, a solid product or service. Just think about how popular Apple products are; it’s not so much because of the advertising, but because they have one of the biggest brand advocacy communities of any consumer product in the world. In other words, people don’t buy the latest iPhone because they’ve seen a billboard by the side of the road or even a banner on a website; they buy it because it’s an industry standard with an immense following. ================================================== ================ This morning, another senior member of the *Apple* support staff emphasised to me, once again, that the ASC forum is *NOT* an Apple site and is *NOT* run by Apple. With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" I don't believe you. I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) Unlike him, you'll just get banned again, only faster this time. You will be nymshifting to avoid a ban. Once detected, and you will be detected, there will be moderators looking for you especially once I forward this post to them, you will be instantly banned. And every new nym you come up with will be banned as soon as it is detected. Virtually the only way for you to avoid detection would be if you behaved yourself, and did not attempt to troll about EtreCheck, ClamXAV, or any of your stalking targets. As soon as you started your normal trolling, you would out yourself and would be checked out and banned. Wolffan is not posting criminal libel. You are. Wolffan has been posting for over 20 years without being banned. You can't stay on a site without being banned. Perhaps he's not concerned about the bad guy, huh? Maybe he (Wolffan) *IS* one - maybe! Did you notice that JD (Etresoft) is looking for a job? Look carefully:- https://postimg.cc/F1NnxVTM |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 2019-11-20 14:39, David wrote:
On 20/11/2019 18:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: On 2019-11-20 09:58, David wrote: On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote: On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- https://blog.vanillaforums.com/commu...brand-advocacy Long before the advent of modern inbound marketing, word-of-mouth was an important factor inÂ* determining what brands people would spend their money on. Now, as technology continues to develop, recommendations still remain the centrepiece in most buying decisions in both B2B and B2C, though it now takes place virtually, on the web.The rise of user-generated content and its role in shaping purchase decisions has made traditional marketing methods almost obsolete. Nowadays, people are less interested in being advertised to, and instead, prefer to receive unbiased recommendations. Moreover, people are willing to share their own experiences, whether it be positive or negative, to help guide the decisions of others. In other words, if someone loves a particular product, they’ll likely spread the good word with or without an incentive to do so. As a result, online social communities have become a driving force behind purchasing decisions in both the B2C and B2B sectors. Successful marketing strategies are no longer in the hands of the brands behind them – they’re now in the hands of users; and so, its important that you keep up with and support this trend! Your primary focus should therefore be on empowering your customers with the right tools (*ahhmmm* such as a branded community) to become brand advocates for your organization. Online communities to help encourage brand advocacy since they support ongoing dialogue (engagement), real-time feedback and even incorporate a bit of fun in the form of gamification or viral memes. There are many different ways to inspire brand advocacy, but in this article, we’ll take a closer look at the role of online communities in creating and empowering brand advocates. Laying the Foundations for a Successful Online Community The first step in building a brand advocacy campaign is knowing who is likely to become a brand ambassador — the right candidate to recommend your brand, products and services to others. To give the simplest explanation, it’s anyone who is satisfied enough with the value you offer to spread the word. Behind every brand advocacy program is, of course, a solid product or service. Just think about how popular Apple products are; it’s not so much because of the advertising, but because they have one of the biggest brand advocacy communities of any consumer product in the world. In other words, people don’t buy the latest iPhone because they’ve seen a billboard by the side of the road or even a banner on a website; they buy it because it’s an industry standard with an immense following. ================================================== ================ This morning, another senior member of the *Apple* support staff emphasised to me, once again, that the ASC forum is *NOT* an Apple site and is *NOT* run by Apple. With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" I don't believe you. I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) Unlike him, you'll just get banned again, only faster this time. You will be nymshifting to avoid a ban. Once detected, and you will be detected, there will be moderators looking for you especially once I forward this post to them, you will be instantly banned. And every new nym you come up with will be banned as soon as it is detected. Virtually the only way for you to avoid detection would be if you behaved yourself, and did not attempt to troll about EtreCheck, ClamXAV, or any of your stalking targets. As soon as you started your normal trolling, you would out yourself and would be checked out and banned. Wolffan is not posting criminal libel. You are. Wolffan has been posting for over 20 years without being banned. You can't stay on a site without being banned. Perhaps he's not concerned about the bad guy, You are the bad guy. huh? Maybe he (Wolffan) *IS* one - maybe! More libel without anything even resembling any evidence. Keep digging. Did you notice that JD (Etresoft) is looking for a job? Look carefully:- https://postimg.cc/F1NnxVTM Irrelevant. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 20 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ): On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote: On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- Why would I do anything whatsoever for a lying, trolling, stalking, slandering, subhuman, paedophile, alcoholic, arsenugget? With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" do that little thing. You’ll get rebanned. I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) You’re an idiot. There is a considerable difference between having had multiple accounts for decades without once having been warned much less banned and creating a fraudulent account to evade a ban. I will be bringing your stated intent to avoid your permaban to the attention of the mods. They’ll be looking for you. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 20 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ): On 20/11/2019 18:02, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: On 2019-11-20 09:58, David wrote: On 20/11/2019 12:23, Wolffan wrote: On 19 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): On 17/11/2019 23:43, Wolffan wrote: On 17 Nov 2019, David wrote (in article ): Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. You’re an idiot. I’ve had multiple IDs for decades; I also haven’t logged in to some of them for years... until today, when I did just to see if they still work. They do. Apple will know which IDs logged in, and when, and where they logged into, and what they did. It would be trivial for them to see that I was, umm, ‘gaming the system’. And just as trivial to see that, unlike you, I have not done anything of the sort. And _they_ know which IDs are mine, so they can track it. How many points have YOU accumulated under *each one* of your illegal Apple IDs, Wolffan? 1 they’re not illegal, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT THEM 2 a lot more than 250, none of which were obtained by voting for myself, because I don’t care about points and even if I did, if I tried, as Apple KNOWS ALL ABOUT MY ACCOUNTS doing that would be a really good way to lose those accounts. Only a complete idiot would even think of trying that... oh. wait. You _are_ a complete idiot. Carry on. Wolffan, please do everyone a favour. Please bring this article to the attention of the 'staff' at the Apple Support Communities forums:- https://blog.vanillaforums.com/commu...es-inspire-bra nd-advocacy Long before the advent of modern inbound marketing, word-of-mouth was an important factor in determining what brands people would spend their money on. Now, as technology continues to develop, recommendations still remain the centrepiece in most buying decisions in both B2B and B2C, though it now takes place virtually, on the web.The rise of user-generated content and its role in shaping purchase decisions has made traditional marketing methods almost obsolete. Nowadays, people are less interested in being advertised to, and instead, prefer to receive unbiased recommendations. Moreover, people are willing to share their own experiences, whether it be positive or negative, to help guide the decisions of others. In other words, if someone loves a particular product, they’ll likely spread the good word with or without an incentive to do so. As a result, online social communities have become a driving force behind purchasing decisions in both the B2C and B2B sectors. Successful marketing strategies are no longer in the hands of the brands behind them – they’re now in the hands of users; and so, its important that you keep up with and support this trend! Your primary focus should therefore be on empowering your customers with the right tools (*ahhmmm* such as a branded community) to become brand advocates for your organization. Online communities to help encourage brand advocacy since they support ongoing dialogue (engagement), real-time feedback and even incorporate a bit of fun in the form of gamification or viral memes. There are many different ways to inspire brand advocacy, but in this article, we’ll take a closer look at the role of online communities in creating and empowering brand advocates. Laying the Foundations for a Successful Online Community The first step in building a brand advocacy campaign is knowing who is likely to become a brand ambassador — the right candidate to recommend your brand, products and services to others. To give the simplest explanation, it’s anyone who is satisfied enough with the value you offer to spread the word. Behind every brand advocacy program is, of course, a solid product or service. Just think about how popular Apple products are; it’s not so much because of the advertising, but because they have one of the biggest brand advocacy communities of any consumer product in the world. In other words, people don’t buy the latest iPhone because they’ve seen a billboard by the side of the road or even a banner on a website; they buy it because it’s an industry standard with an immense following. ================================================== ================ This morning, another senior member of the *Apple* support staff emphasised to me, once again, that the ASC forum is *NOT* an Apple site and is *NOT* run by Apple. With regard to me being 'banned' he suggested ...... "Just reinvent yourself using another 'nym if you REALLY want to read and post there!" I don't believe you. I'd prefer not to have to do that, but I suppose I /could/ behave just like Wolffan, eh?!! ;-) Unlike him, you'll just get banned again, only faster this time. You will be nymshifting to avoid a ban. Once detected, and you will be detected, there will be moderators looking for you especially once I forward this post to them, you will be instantly banned. And every new nym you come up with will be banned as soon as it is detected. Virtually the only way for you to avoid detection would be if you behaved yourself, and did not attempt to troll about EtreCheck, ClamXAV, or any of your stalking targets. As soon as you started your normal trolling, you would out yourself and would be checked out and banned. Wolffan is not posting criminal libel. You are. Wolffan has been posting for over 20 years without being banned. You can't stay on a site without being banned. Perhaps he's not concerned about the bad guy, huh? Maybe he (Wolffan) *IS* one - maybe! And you can’t post one sentance without showing that you’re a lying slandering subhuman arsenugget. Did you notice that JD (Etresoft) is looking for a job? Look carefully:- stalking again. not a surprise. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 18 Nov 2019, David wrote
(in article ): On 18/11/2019 20:49, Panthera Tigris Altaica wrote: On 2019-11-17 18:32, David wrote: Char Jackson asked:- "How ironic that you would only become a self-proclaimed ASC rules expert AFTER you got yourself banned. Why weren't you able to read and understand the rules before it impacted you?" = It was important to me to prove - to myself if nothing more - that there *ARE* folk on the ASC who are not 'moderating' in a fair and honest manner. It was also necessary for me to gain evidence that folk - like Wolffan, for instance - post under a number of different pseudonyms, contrary to to the rule which I have quoted. Are you really deluded enough to think that someone would risk a reputation which took _decades_ to build just to get you ejected from ASC? In particular, that they would do anything at all when it is clear that all that would be necessary would be to just let you be yourself, and you'd be gone soon enough? You're _that_ delusional? Really? I don't believe that I've had any interaction with Wolffan on the ASC forums. You’re an idiot. You’re completely ****ing clueless. You want to ‘gather evidence’ when you have no ****ing idea which accounts I use or which forums I go to. Hint for the hopeless: as I have multiple machines and each has multiple browsers, I go to different forums using specific browsers from specific machines. I don’t ‘game the system’ because I don’t access forums used by other accounts, so I _can’t_ mess with their precious points. Apple knows this. Any ‘interaction’ you may/may not have had with any of my accounts on ASC would depend on whether or not you blundered into a forum I was active on. As you’re clueless, always were and always will be you will never know. But I cannot be sure of that can I? He denies that the Wolffan persona on ASC is him. Because it’s not. You’re free to attempt to harass him... Oh. Wait. You _can’t_, you’re banned for being an arsenugget. There's no way for me to know. and it burns you. Odd coincidence though. Nah. ‘Wolffan’ is a damn common nym. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 21/11/2019 13:37, Wolffan wrote:
I will be bringing your stated intent to avoid your permaban to the attention of the mods. How on earth could a cheapskate like you manage to do that?!!! Do you know them personally? What are their names?!!! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Starting out on the ASC forums
On 21/11/2019 13:49, Wolffan wrote:
‘Wolffan’ is a damn common nym. Hence "Cheapskate" - 'common as muck' as they say! :-P |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|