If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:03:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:33:21 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bc9wiqawdg98l@glass Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:27:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: He shared videos with your permission? Huh? typo. rofl. How long have you worked with computers? And you still can't operate a keyboard? Have you seen his keyboard? Truly disgusting. Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly. -- p-0.0-h the cat Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat, Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, ******* hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy, Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav, punk ass dole whore troll, no nothing innumerate religious maniac, lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball. NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery. By Appointment to God Frank-Lin. Signature integrity check md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896 I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky |
Ads |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On 18/11/2019 16:54, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:03:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:33:21 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bc9wiqawdg98l@glass Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:27:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: He shared videos with your permission? Huh? typo. rofl. How long have you worked with computers? And you still can't operate a keyboard? Have you seen his keyboard? Truly disgusting. I snipped this from his video! https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFil...710/857026.jpg It's not REALLY Dustin's keyboard - well, as far as I know it isn't!!! ;-) |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 16:54:39 -0000, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:03:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:33:21 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bc9wiqawdg98l@glass Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:27:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: He shared videos with your permission? Huh? typo. rofl. How long have you worked with computers? And you still can't operate a keyboard? Have you seen his keyboard? Truly disgusting. Maybe he should send it to Manlove Forensics (ROFL!) for analysis: http://www.forensicsciencedatabase.o...nsics-limited/ |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:05:19 -0000, David wrote:
On 18/11/2019 16:54, p-0''0-h the cat (coder) wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:03:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 06:33:21 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bc9wiqawdg98l@glass Sat, 16 Nov 2019 21:27:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: He shared videos with your permission? Huh? typo. rofl. How long have you worked with computers? And you still can't operate a keyboard? Have you seen his keyboard? Truly disgusting. I snipped this from his video! https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFil...710/857026.jpg ROTFPMSL! It's not REALLY Dustin's keyboard - well, as far as I know it isn't!!! ;-) Indeed. His fingers are in good condition in that photo, I doubt he's that healthy. |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
"Commander Kinsey"
newsp.0bghvmmcwdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:12:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You seem a bit more than slightly confused here. My virus writing activities ended long before I ever encountered David Brooks. He did not ask me to write any virus for him and I didn't claim he did. Not that it would have made a difference in this case, he would have still done the same things he did, just a started a little sooner. You need to inform your socks of this, because several people (the likes of Shadow etc) keep accusing David of asking you to write viruses. I have no socks. You're beyond lost... -- "The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire." |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:41:19 -0000, Diesel wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bghvmmcwdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:12:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You seem a bit more than slightly confused here. My virus writing activities ended long before I ever encountered David Brooks. He did not ask me to write any virus for him and I didn't claim he did. Not that it would have made a difference in this case, he would have still done the same things he did, just a started a little sooner. You need to inform your socks of this, because several people (the likes of Shadow etc) keep accusing David of asking you to write viruses. I have no socks. You're beyond lost... You have a few followers in here. |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:58:53 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:41:19 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bghvmmcwdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:12:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You seem a bit more than slightly confused here. My virus writing activities ended long before I ever encountered David Brooks. He did not ask me to write any virus for him and I didn't claim he did. Not that it would have made a difference in this case, he would have still done the same things he did, just a started a little sooner. You need to inform your socks of this, because several people (the likes of Shadow etc) keep accusing David of asking you to write viruses. MSG_ID? I've NEVER said that. I'd be interested to know who did. I have no socks. You're beyond lost... You have a few followers in here. Followers? This is not FaceKook. You must mean "people that respect his work". How many people are there in alt.home.repair that "respect your work"? None? Is that why you nymshifted and even then most people killfile you? Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. --------------- BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to hide". I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request, rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!": http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php 60 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes! Google "David Brooks Devon" []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:11:17 -0000, Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:58:53 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:41:19 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bghvmmcwdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:12:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You seem a bit more than slightly confused here. My virus writing activities ended long before I ever encountered David Brooks. He did not ask me to write any virus for him and I didn't claim he did. Not that it would have made a difference in this case, he would have still done the same things he did, just a started a little sooner. You need to inform your socks of this, because several people (the likes of Shadow etc) keep accusing David of asking you to write viruses. MSG_ID? I've NEVER said that. I'd be interested to know who did. Look up "likes of". And search function broken is it? It's been mentioned many times. Might not have been you, but I can't really tell the difference between Dustin and all his followers. I have no socks. You're beyond lost... You have a few followers in here. Followers? This is not FaceKook. You must mean "people that respect his work". That's what followers means. You'll find the word in a dictionary. How many people are there in alt.home.repair that "respect your work"? I don't need people to do that, I don't have an inflated ego. None? Is that why you nymshifted No, that was because a) I felt like it and b) to avoid people being childish and killfiling me just after getting in the last word. and even then most people killfile you? Because they're stupid and can't handle the things I say. I've been chucked off forums for saying god doesn't exist.... Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. A club of people with an ounce of intelligence? Maybe it's because we're not Americans, where it's well known the world over the average IQ is 2 digits lower. This is what the rest of the world thinks of Americans: https://youtu.be/c7qhVJIPfck --------------- BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to hide". I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request, rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!": http://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php 60 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes! Google "David Brooks Devon" And there you go again, pasting in childish quotations. []'s They're called brackets, you still haven't explained, even after me asking many times, why you keep putting those in there. Is it a nervous twitch? |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:33:02 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. A club of people with an ounce of intelligence? An ounce? You flatter yourself. I'd use "fractions of a grain" to measure your combined intelligence. []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:36 -0000, Shadow wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:33:02 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. A club of people with an ounce of intelligence? An ounce? You flatter yourself. I'd use "fractions of a grain" to measure your combined intelligence. It's an expression, sorry I shouldn't use those with ****wit Americans. []'s {}'s |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
"Commander Kinsey"
newsp.0bg0orn8wdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:59:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:36 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:33:02 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. A club of people with an ounce of intelligence? An ounce? You flatter yourself. I'd use "fractions of a grain" to measure your combined intelligence. It's an expression, sorry I shouldn't use those with ****wit Americans. Another ****ing priceless example of your stupidity. And you don't even understand why. -- You can lead a horticulture but you can't make her think. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
[OT]Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:31:35 -0000, Diesel wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" newsp.0bg0orn8wdg98l@glass Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:59:05 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:38:36 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:33:02 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: Maybe you and BD should form a club. The sex would be a bonus. A club of people with an ounce of intelligence? An ounce? You flatter yourself. I'd use "fractions of a grain" to measure your combined intelligence. It's an expression, sorry I shouldn't use those with ****wit Americans. Another ****ing priceless example of your stupidity. And you don't even understand why. And since you can't explain why, you're equally to blame. |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
Shadow wrote:
There is NO way YOU know where it takes them. Content is generated on the fly, and varies from profiled-user to profiled-user, We know because *we* generate the content on the fly. That is how we give the advertising-funded content to people who show the advertisements, and we do not give the advertising-funded content to people who do not show the advertisements which pay for it. |
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 16:44:15 -0000, CoMmAnDoTrOn wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote: You might not be, but if you think you can do a screengrab, then others could be doing so and looking at things they shouldn't, like bank details and passwords. You know almost nothing about browser security. We can take a screenshot of our own page. Browser "same-origin policy" security will prevent site A from taking a screenshot of a page on site B, unless the page on site B has expressly allowed site A to do so. I am certain that your bank's online banking site has not expressly allowed others to take screenshots. It's taking a risk, what if this security breaks and someone gets loads of bank details?Â* There will probably be a way to fool the browser into thinking your server is the bank's server. If this security breaks, someone would have other much easier ways to read your bank details from your online banking page. Those other ways would have to work before that screenshot could work; that screenshot depends on them. *If* you were honestly worried about this security breaking, there are several things you would *already* be doing to protect yourself. |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Why can't we have an undetectable adblocker?
"CoMmAnDoTrOn" wrote
| There is NO way YOU know where it takes them. Content is | generated on the fly, and varies from profiled-user to profiled-user, | | | We know because *we* generate the content on the fly. That is how | we give the advertising-funded content to people who show the | advertisements, and we do not give the advertising-funded content | to people who do not show the advertisements which pay for it. | Very interesting. You may have the only company online who shows their own ads.... Or maybe you've just never even seen webpage code and you're generating your strident comebacks on the fly? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|