All in one PC security protector - you just need one program to keepyour pc safe

Unknown wrote:
BTW----Why haven't you changed your ID to "Snake Oil Peddler"?

Again you lie.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you have
let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs and
other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And if you
have any real world experience you know that and you also know that
"repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups I
frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS you can
reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you can NOT.
Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and, on
top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing in
that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having caused
the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you actually had
something to back up your ridiculous claims there for a moment, til I
saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any way
to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing but
create problems either right away or when least expected. Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend
the use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another
snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying
to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type,
not your perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would
indeed recommend the user of a registry cleaner in some
circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy
products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague references
to things like "snake oil" and others you can not and do not
ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true! Woof!
Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back
them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a
post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

There you go again!
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one and
posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore it. So,
your words are completely without merit. Again and again you ignore
then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you have
let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs and
other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And if you
have any real world experience you know that and you also know that
"repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups I
frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS you can
reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you can NOT.
Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and, on
top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing in
that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having caused
the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you actually had
something to back up your ridiculous claims there for a moment, til I
saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any way
to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing but
create problems either right away or when least expected. Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend
the use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another
snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying
to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type,
not your perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would
indeed recommend the user of a registry cleaner in some
circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy
products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague references
to things like "snake oil" and others you can not and do not
ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true! Woof!
Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back them
up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a
post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

There you go again!
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one and
posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore it. So,
your words are completely without merit. Again and again you ignore
then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you have
let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs and
other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And if you
have any real world experience you know that and you also know that
"repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups I
frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS you can
reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you can NOT.
Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and, on
top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing in
that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having caused
the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you actually had
something to back up your ridiculous claims there for a moment, til I
saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any way
to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing but
create problems either right away or when least expected. Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend
the use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another
snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying
to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type,
not your perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would
indeed recommend the user of a registry cleaner in some
circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy
products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague references
to things like "snake oil" and others you can not and do not
ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true! Woof!
Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back them
up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a
post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And
many, like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an habitual
liar and troll hoping to exert some power over someone so you won't feel
so inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as you contin ue to
demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise you have nothing at
all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you
have let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs
and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And
if you have any real world experience you know that and you also
know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups
I frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS
you can reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you
can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and,
on top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing
in that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having
caused the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you
actually had something to back up your ridiculous claims there for
a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer
was
trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I
suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true!
Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back
them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even
make a post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And
many, like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an habitual
liar and troll hoping to exert some power over someone so you won't feel
so inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as you contin ue to
demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise you have nothing at
all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you
have let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs
and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And
if you have any real world experience you know that and you also
know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups
I frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS
you can reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you
can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and,
on top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing
in that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having
caused the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you
actually had something to back up your ridiculous claims there for
a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer
was
trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I
suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true!
Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back
them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even
make a post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

Originally Posted by Twayne[_2_]

Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually recommend
that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend the
use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another snake oil
peddler, you'd not know that, would you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying to
hype?

Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type, not your
perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would indeed recommend the
user of a registry cleaner in some circumstances.

He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy products and spamming.
You love your little, meaningless and vague references to things like
"snake oil" and others you can not and do not ever back up with any
verifiable evicence. I suspect you love yourself too; I noticed the
other day, searching my archives, that it was you who told me I should
believe something and not try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said
it was true! Woof!

Millions of people in a very large installed base know better than you
and have actual experience in addition to back them up while you have
nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a post
that actually answers someone's questions or makes intelligent
statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You should, though. It's MY
air you're breathing.

Thanks guys.. I really need to keep protection with my computer. This mis important to me because this is a gift from my mom. And it means a lot to me.

That is precisely what you say each and every time. You choose to ignore
proof and continue peddling your registry cleaner
BS. Go stand in a corner and grow up. (Even if your 75 years old).
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And many,
like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an habitual liar and
troll hoping to exert some power over someone so you won't feel so
inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as you contin ue to
demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise you have nothing at
all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you
have let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs
and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And
if you have any real world experience you know that and you also
know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups
I frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS
you can reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you
can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and,
on top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing
in that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having
caused the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you
actually had something to back up your ridiculous claims there for
a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was
trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I suspect
you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true!
Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back
them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even
make a post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

That is precisely what you say each and every time. You choose to ignore
proof and continue peddling your registry cleaner
BS. Go stand in a corner and grow up. (Even if your 75 years old).
"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And many,
like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an habitual liar and
troll hoping to exert some power over someone so you won't feel so
inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as you contin ue to
demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise you have nothing at
all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that I
visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is "was"
your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and now you
can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information backing
up the claims of yours and the other ignorant misinformationists
here who blindly and closed mindedly continue to spew tripe that
millions of users around the world experience with a positive
outcome all the time. You my fine feathered acquaintance, are the
ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption that
occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a single
one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are you now
trying to add the misinformation that only a registry cleaner can
corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to say that you
are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more ignorant than you
have let on so far, which is no small accomplishment IMO.

This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems caused
by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad installs
and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to boot. And
if you have any real world experience you know that and you also
know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a fruitless effort.
You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of the
related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I am going
to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it with a
reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you have not done
that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever done it anywhere
else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day goes
by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many newsgroups
I frequent, and I could care less about your experiences UNLESS
you can reference what you're claiming, and I strongly suspect you
can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly that
issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is being
used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says: quote
Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in this article
if your computer has an OEM-installed operating system. /quote!?!
my Gosh: What have you been doing to these people? Is this just
another example of the ignorance being touted by the
misinformationists? Fortunately I think most people can read and,
on top of the quote, there is NO, nada, zip, nothing, not a thing
in that article that has anything to do with a cleaner having
caused the corruption. OK, so thanks; I thought maybe you
actually had something to back up your ridiculous claims there for
a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd say
"nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic, really.
There are at last three better KBs you could have referenced but
you either chose not to or don't have a hint what they are and that
was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up any
more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as they do
also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was
trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I suspect
you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and not
try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was true!
Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed base know
better than you and have actual experience in addition to back
them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even
make a post that actually answers someone's questions or makes
intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You
should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

Unknown wrote:
That is precisely what you say each and every time. You choose to
ignore proof and continue peddling your registry cleaner
BS. Go stand in a corner and grow up. (Even if your 75 years old).

No, see, that's what you get from being such a liar; confused and
misinformed. You on the other hand are a closed minded, ignorant of
reality, egotistical narcissist.


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And
many, like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an
habitual liar and troll hoping to exert some power over someone so
you won't feel so inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as
you contin ue to demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise
you have nothing at all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that
I visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is
"was" your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and
now you can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information
backing up the claims of yours and the other ignorant
misinformationists here who blindly and closed mindedly continue
to spew tripe that millions of users around the world experience
with a positive outcome all the time. You my fine feathered
acquaintance, are the ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption
that occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a
single one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are
you now trying to add the misinformation that only a registry
cleaner can corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to
say that you are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more
ignorant than you have let on so far, which is no small
accomplishment IMO.
This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems
caused by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad
installs and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to
boot. And if you have any real world experience you know that
and you also know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a
fruitless effort. You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major
issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of
the related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I
am going to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it
with a reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you
have not done that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever
done it anywhere else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day
goes by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more
Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many
newsgroups I frequent, and I could care less about your
experiences UNLESS you can reference what you're claiming, and I
strongly suspect you can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm
afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly
that issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is
being used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says:
quote Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in
this article if your computer has an OEM-installed operating
system. /quote!?! my Gosh: What have you been doing to these
people? Is this just another example of the ignorance being
touted by the misinformationists? Fortunately I think most
people can read and, on top of the quote, there is NO, nada,
zip, nothing, not a thing in that article that has anything to
do with a cleaner having caused the corruption. OK, so thanks;
I thought maybe you actually had something to back up your
ridiculous claims there
for a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd
say "nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic,
really. There are at last three better KBs you could have
referenced but you either chose not to or don't have a hint what
they are and that was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up
any more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as
they do also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer
was trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I
suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and
not try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was
true! Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed
base know better than you and have actual experience in
addition to back them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might
even make a post that actually answers someone's questions
or makes intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my
breath. You should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

Unknown wrote:
That is precisely what you say each and every time. You choose to
ignore proof and continue peddling your registry cleaner
BS. Go stand in a corner and grow up. (Even if your 75 years old).

No, see, that's what you get from being such a liar; confused and
misinformed. You on the other hand are a closed minded, ignorant of
reality, egotistical narcissist.


"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There you go again!

Yup. It's like that when I encounter liars; I call them on it. And
many, like you, don't like it. In fact, i suspect you are an
habitual liar and troll hoping to exert some power over someone so
you won't feel so inferior. Inferior is as inferior does though. as
you contin ue to demonstrate so well. Prove your position; otherwise
you have nothing at all to stand on.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Unknown wrote:
There has been several posted. And, I might add, I also copied one
and posted it for you to see AGAIN and you still choose to ignore
it. So, your words are completely without merit. Again and again
you ignore then ask 'where is it'?
Why don't you find some new words to indicate your cement mind? We
have heard the same 'excuses' over and over and over.

You lie because I would have noticed same.

"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

You are wrong and on top of that ignorant. There was so many
different proofs that were given and yet you ignore them.

Well not a single one has ever been posted to ANY newsgroup that
I visit/ed. If there is so much "proof", where is it? Or is
"was" your safety factor? Meaning they magically disappeard and
now you can't find anything?
Not a single person has as yet to provide any information
backing up the claims of yours and the other ignorant
misinformationists here who blindly and closed mindedly continue
to spew tripe that millions of users around the world experience
with a positive outcome all the time. You my fine feathered
acquaintance, are the ignorant one. There is
even a MS KB about how to start a system if the registry is
corrupt.

ROFLMAO!!
OK. And what does that prove? I have had registry corruption
that occurred on my own machines and those of clients, but not a
single one has ever been attributed to a registry cleaner. Are
you now trying to add the misinformation that only a registry
cleaner can corrupt a registry? Becuase if you are, I'm going to
say that you are just plain stupid, stoopid, and even more
ignorant than you have let on so far, which is no small
accomplishment IMO.
This KB has been successfully used by people that used Registry
Cleaners and could not start up Windows after.

Put me in touch with one or two. Reference a few threads on the
subject. Do something, anything, to back up your claims on the
damage caused by registry cleaners.
Actually, I'd say that the number of non-bootable problems
caused by registry cleaners is far less than the number of bad
installs and other issues that cause a machine to be unable to
boot. And if you have any real world experience you know that
and you also know that "repair" anything with a "cleaner" is a
fruitless effort. You are way out in left field, I'm afraid.


I have answered and posted answers after someone posts that when
they finished using their registry cleaner they have major
issues

No, not in years, you haven't, and not on this group or any of
the related groups here. Is you decide to day you did, then I
am going to call you an outright liar unless you can prove it
with a reference to the posts, because I know for a fact you
have not done that here and I very seriously doubt you have ever
done it anywhere else.

I am in 47 newsgroups on this MS server alone and not one day
goes by when this issue does not come up. Get out a bit more
Twayne

My ego isn't so huge that I have to brag about how many
newsgroups I frequent, and I could care less about your
experiences UNLESS you can reference what you're claiming, and I
strongly suspect you can NOT. Your ego could use a trimming, I'm
afraid.

I am sure you have seen this posted for posters with exactly
that issue
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;en-us;q307545

Uhh, talk about irrelevence!!
Well, let's see: I think the majority of posters with that exact
issue are going to have OEM operating systems ... and that is
being used as a FIX? Even though it clearly and early on says:
quote Warning Do not use the procedure that is described in
this article if your computer has an OEM-installed operating
system. /quote!?! my Gosh: What have you been doing to these
people? Is this just another example of the ignorance being
touted by the misinformationists? Fortunately I think most
people can read and, on top of the quote, there is NO, nada,
zip, nothing, not a thing in that article that has anything to
do with a cleaner having caused the corruption. OK, so thanks;
I thought maybe you actually had something to back up your
ridiculous claims there
for a moment, til I saw the page. You
see, I'm already familiar with it. And it's not relevant in any
way to your claims.
Just another attempt at redirection and hoping to confuse with
facts. Thinking people won't allow you to do that to them. I'd
say "nice try" but it's not even that; it's rather pathetic,
really. There are at last three better KBs you could have
referenced but you either chose not to or don't have a hint what
they are and that was all you could find.

I appreciate the opportunity to display how wrong you are; thanks
much. Twayne





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Peter Foldes wrote:
Twayne

All types of Registry Cleaners are snake oil. They do nothing
but create problems either right away or when least expected.
Period

No, that's wrong. Period. You can't back that statement up
any more than your ignorant leaders can. And you know it, as
they do also. How's that arm up your butt feel?





"Twayne" wrote in message
...
Bruce Chambers wrote:
Jackie lee wrote:
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually
recommend that you install a registry cleaner as well.


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would
recommend the use of such snake oil products. But then, as
just another snake oil peddler, you'd not know that, would
you?


You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read
that? And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer
was trying to hype? Many "true experts" in the dictionary
definition type, not your perverted, closed minded personal
dictionary, would indeed recommend the user of a registry
cleaner in some circumstances. He's not peddling snake oil,
he's peddling spammy products and
spamming. You love your little, meaningless and vague
references to things like "snake oil" and others you can not
and do not ever back up with any verifiable evicence. I
suspect you love
yourself too; I noticed the other day, searching my archives,
that it was you who told me I should believe something and
not try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had said it was
true! Woof! Millions of people in a very large installed
base know better than you and have actual experience in
addition to back them up while
you have nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you
up. Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might
even make a post that actually answers someone's questions
or makes intelligent statements, but I'm not holding my
breath. You should, though. It's MY air you're breathing.

triton wrote:
'Twayne[_2_ Wrote:
;3264533']Bruce Chambers wrote:-
Jackie lee wrote:-
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually recommend
that you install a registry cleaner as well.-


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend the
use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another snake oil
peddler, you'd not know that, would you?-

Bruce continues to rewrite the dictionary and now uses such phrases as
"true expert", which he defiens, and other oddities he makes up in
order to pick at reality. It lives in its own world and if it weren't
for love of self would never have known love at all. He claims to have
so much but in reality shows himself to have almost nothing. Pathetic
really, but still nothing to like.




You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying to
hype?

Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type, not your
perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would indeed recommend
the
user of a registry cleaner in some circumstances.

He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy products and
spamming.
You love your little, meaningless and vague references to things like
"snake oil" and others you can not and do not ever back up with any
verifiable evicence. I suspect you love yourself too; I noticed the
other day, searching my archives, that it was you who told me I
should

believe something and not try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had
said
it was true! Woof!

Millions of people in a very large installed base know better than
you

and have actual experience in addition to back them up while you have
nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a
post

that actually answers someone's questions or makes intelligent
statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You should, though. It's
MY
air you're breathing.

Thanks guys.. I really need to keep protection with my computer. This
mis important to me because this is a gift from my mom. And it means a
lot to me.

triton wrote:
'Twayne[_2_ Wrote:
;3264533']Bruce Chambers wrote:-
Jackie lee wrote:-
.... Additionally, to
clean registry and privacy, many computer expert usually recommend
that you install a registry cleaner as well.-


Sorry, spammer. That's a lie. *NO* true expert would recommend the
use of such snake oil products. But then, as just another snake oil
peddler, you'd not know that, would you?-

Bruce continues to rewrite the dictionary and now uses such phrases as
"true expert", which he defiens, and other oddities he makes up in
order to pick at reality. It lives in its own world and if it weren't
for love of self would never have known love at all. He claims to have
so much but in reality shows himself to have almost nothing. Pathetic
really, but still nothing to like.




You actually think a spammer will be checking back to read that?

And you have no problem with anything ELSE the spammer was trying to
hype?

Many "true experts" in the dictionary definition type, not your
perverted, closed minded personal dictionary, would indeed recommend
the
user of a registry cleaner in some circumstances.

He's not peddling snake oil, he's peddling spammy products and
spamming.
You love your little, meaningless and vague references to things like
"snake oil" and others you can not and do not ever back up with any
verifiable evicence. I suspect you love yourself too; I noticed the
other day, searching my archives, that it was you who told me I
should

believe something and not try to verify it elsewhere becaue YOU had
said
it was true! Woof!

Millions of people in a very large installed base know better than
you

and have actual experience in addition to back them up while you have
nothing but your closed minded ignorance to back you up.

Thanks again for this opportunity. Someday you might even make a
post

that actually answers someone's questions or makes intelligent
statements, but I'm not holding my breath. You should, though. It's
MY
air you're breathing.

Thanks guys.. I really need to keep protection with my computer. This
mis important to me because this is a gift from my mom. And it means a
lot to me.